Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oakville Chamber Orchestra
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:07, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Oakville Chamber Orchestra (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Cliff Smith 18:14, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Borderline notability case here; bringing to AfD for further community review. No strong opinion with a slight leaning toward delete on my end. Blurpeace 13:56, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - There is no signicant coverage about this group. Most of the search results for news come from InsideHalton, the website for a local community newspaper. Other results are concert listings. -- Whpq (talk) 13:35, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 16:41, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSpecialUser TSU 15:05, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSpecialUser TSU 03:52, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - the relist I made was a third one and generally not more then two relists are made. The reason for going for a third one was, this AFD lacked participation and maybe a third one would work. Otherwise this is to be deleted and very less likely to be closed as "no consensus". TheSpecialUser TSU 03:54, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Of the three sources provided, the only one that actually links to anything (as far as I could find) was the orchestra's own official site. If independent reliable sources can be found, the article can be re-created later. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:38, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - no significant coverage. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 01:42, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.