Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pietro De Vico
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Heptanitrocubane (talk) 20:03, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
"Withdrawn by nominator
Agreed, but perhaps needs some work.
- Pietro De Vico (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I do not believe the article meets the notability guidelines - it is not adequately referenced. Heptanitrocubane (talk) 19:18, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep "it is not adequately referenced" is not a valid reason for deletion. This actor has appeared in more than 70 films, and per WP:BEFORE, you could easily see the article is linked to an extensive page on the Italian Wiki. Within 10 seconds, I found these pages via Google: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], etc. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 19:32, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep clearly meets WP:NACTOR with significant roles in multiple films. As noted by Lugnuts, not being "adequately referenced" is not a viable reason for deletion. There are plenty of sources available and a more robust Italian Wikipedia article that an interested editor can use to flesh out the article.--Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 19:37, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep - Looks an awful lot like this needs a caffeinated Italian speaker, but probably not deletion, per sources already presented. GMGtalk 19:59, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.