Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pop Party

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Pop Girl. Consensus is to return to a redirect to Pop Girl as noted by nom and others (non-admin closure) ES &L 19:10, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pop Party

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced, vague stub. Was previously a redirect to Pop Girl, which is probably a better choice than deletion. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 06:35, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Gong show 16:30, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Gong show 16:30, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Gong show 16:31, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It should not be deleted, it is like deleting Pop Girl. HoshiNoKaabii2000 — Preceding unsigned comment added by HoshiNoKaabii2000 (talk • contribs) 17:06, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Pop Girl without prejudice to being converted back to a full article -- This was once a substantial article, but its content was largely copied from Pop Girl, which is what that article was in fact about. It therefore seems to have been cut back to the present stub. If I understand correctly Pop Party is also a list of music. If the list is set out in the article, and is something that is not already in "Pop Girl", I would change my vote. I think that would meet HoshiNoKaabii2000's concerns. Peterkingiron (talk) 09:14, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

maybe he could show what was in each thingy so it doesnt get deleted Unorginal4 (talk) 13:09, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000^(talk) 22:52, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:24, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep. Quite apart from the fact it has charted (although it's up to more experienced users to tell if this is a notable enough chart or not), I've found a strong overall sales position. There aren't many reviews online though, but I need to note something: there are two separate Pop Party products; the compilation album, and the TV show. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 11:53, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.