Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prathap Suthan
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 13:45, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Prathap Suthan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I do not see anything her that indicates notability for him as an individual DGG ( talk ) 19:16, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. czar · · 19:27, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. czar · · 19:27, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. czar · · 19:27, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep. I don't know, dude. Some of the sources don't seem reliable and some of them are his own work, but the Financial Express and Economic Times pieces do seem to scrape by WP:Notability (people), don't they? MezzoMezzo (talk) 06:10, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:34, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J04n(talk page) 01:39, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 00:24, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Wikipedia does not need the resumés of advertising executives, nor does it need to trail ads for their brand new enterprises. SpinningSpark 07:33, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.