Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RPGds
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Daniel Bryant 08:20, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable software. I'm unable to find any secondary, reliable sources to verify any of the content in the article, and, as the article has remained tagged {{primarysources}} since November 2006, neither has anyone else. —Cryptic 10:02, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. There is no reason to delete this. You can verify by visiting the website. http://www.rpgds.com/ --Darth Borehd 00:55, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Does "secondary" mean something different to you than it does to everyone else? —Cryptic 01:10, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Quarl (talk) 08:01, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Apart from being completely NN, according to the article it's still in Beta test. EliminatorJR Talk 15:33, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete its a beta test and that is certainly not notable.--Joebengo 18:18, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete until it sheds beta status and actually has some coverage outside of the project. Once the program is mature enough, I guess that won't be a problem at that point, right now it might be... --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 12:11, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This project has been in "beta" for years, now. If I recall correctly, it's essentially a try at a freeware version of RPG Maker 2000. Lack of sources means that this article lacks the required verification needed to remain. Cheers, Lankybugger ○ Yell ○ 20:13, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.