Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Riaz agha
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 18:12, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Riaz agha (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:N » nafSadh did say 20:20, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As per above reasoning. The NICE ref appears to be legit but everything else seems to be self published. Either way non notable. Noformation Talk 20:25, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — Logan Talk Contributions 21:48, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Looking through the ghits on him, anything that at first appears significant is his own work or from entities he is directly involved in. WP:N applies. --Nat Gertler (talk) 21:50, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Approve - A number of references from a broad range of sources have now been added to the article to support the content. --Riaz12 (talk) 22:12, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 18:55, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.