Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sahir Hashmi Adeeb

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) -- Sam Sailor Talk! 08:45, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sahir Hashmi Adeeb (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

My searches found nothing good at all aside from a few non-helpful blogs so there isn't even anything to suggest minimal improvement. Granted although this is a foreign subject and sources may not be easily accessible but we shouldn't keep an article like this simply because of that and there was enough time for any improvement (author's name and tone suggests a family member started this). Pinging taggers Utcursch and GorgeCustersSabre. SwisterTwister talk 21:45, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 21:47, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 21:47, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 21:47, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —JAaron95 Talk 18:04, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —JAaron95 Talk 14:22, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.