Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sci-flux
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 08:56, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Sci-flux (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Does not appear to be a notable competition. Unsourced, not much in terms of third party coverage that I can find. Enigmamsg 20:23, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, no WP:RS to be found. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:35, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 23:15, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Google News returns no results, while a normal Google search returns no third-party reliable sources. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:00, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.