Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Starvision Plus

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 22:42, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Starvision Plus

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:CORP, WP:GNG and also reads like an advertisement. If you cut all the advertising fluff and social media links (self-published sourcing) nothing remains to firmly establish notability. ronaz ^Talk! 09:20, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:19, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:19, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:19, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Subject lacks significant coverage in reliable sources. Meatsgains (talk) 16:33, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Ronaz: I will attempt to trim the promotional fluff. Meatsgains (talk) 16:34, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.