Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stitchpunks
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy convert to redirect. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 17:50, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Stitchpunks (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article appears to only refer to the characters of 9 (2009 film). I don't think it is necessary to have a whole article about a fictional class of robot that only appears in one fictional universe. Brightgalrs (/braɪtˈɡæl.ərˌɛs/)[1] 17:22, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: This looks to be a copyvio from [1].Tokyogirl79 (talk) 17:29, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to 9 (2009 film) or delete. If this doesn't get deleted via a copyvio, this should be a redirect to the movie article if it needs to be here at all. This group of characters doesn't have any notability outside the movie, so there's no reason why we should have an article even if the section was re-written to be non-copyvio.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 17:32, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note to closing admin: The person adding this article to Wikipedia also seems to be keen on adding other copyvios from the 9 Wiki to various pages. It might be worth your while to protect the pages, as they keep reverting from various different IPs.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 17:36, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Eeep- a look at the talk page for the IP shows that they've been a problem editor. You might want to just block the IP altogether, if possible.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 17:40, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.