Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Supa Dupa Diva
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus with leave to speedy renominate. the band's AFD was closed "keep". Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:07, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Supa Dupa Diva (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
non-notable - recent song by a band in afd (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dal Shabet) Melaen (talk) 16:34, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep. The Korean WP:GOODCHARTS is GAON and their website shows that this song has been in their chart, which makes the song "probably" notable. However, this chart appearance definitely does make the artist notable. As the only reason advanced for deletion is that the band article is up for AfD - and yet the band is notable - I see no valid reason for deletion. RichardOSmith (talk) 16:57, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete NN. Japanese knotweed (talk) 17:26, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:39, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:39, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:49, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:49, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply] - The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.