Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas New

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 15:20, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas New

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable genealogy entry, looks like this was a person but likely not one of note: https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/15525949 wizzito | say hello! 07:30, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. wizzito | say hello! 07:30, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. wizzito | say hello! 07:30, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The article has no sources and I failed to find any. Seems completely un-notable. -- Bob drobbs (talk) 00:22, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I can't believe it's been unreferenced for 17 years. Fails WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 04:46, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No sign of notability. SL93 (talk) 23:11, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.