Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trumpisms (2nd nomination)

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 22:04, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Trumpisms

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This was deleted at AfD already and recreated. To be clear, the new article is quite different from the old, reframing from a list to something that's more about his rhetorical style. The neologism "trumpisms" does not seem particularly notable (in the sense that it does not have a clearly agreed upon definition, making our article an inevitable hodgepodge of various people's criticisms of wacky things he says). It's possible some of the content could be merged to public image of Donald Trump or one of the many many other articles about Trump's activities and persona, but there's just not enough to sustain a stand-alone article here per WP:NOPAGE and WP:NEO. It's possible someone could create an article "Speaking/rhetorical/communication style of Donald Trump", but this isn't the material we'd want to start that with. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 15:20, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See also: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bidenisms. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 15:22, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language, Politics, and United States of America. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 15:20, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As per the last AfD and the nominator's argument. It's also arguably WP:OR, as none of the articles go into depth regarding the term. SportingFlyer T·C 16:04, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete just like the other AfD, a trivial media term to refer to one's behaviors, can't see anything significant that deserves its own Wikipedia article. This is just WP:ORIGINAL research. Karnataka (talk) 16:52, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.