Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ulthuan
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 13:27, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Ulthuan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This fictional location does not establish notability independent of Warhammer Fantasy Battle through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of original research and unnecessary plot details. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so any coverage in the main articles is enough. TTN (talk) 23:38, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Although, WP:ILIKEIT and I enjoy reading just this type of thing (like all the Star Wars, Wizards First Rule, and Lord of the Rings fictional locations) I have to admit IMO I don't see notability here. So, I'm forced !vote delete as the material should be included into the main article on this one. Sorry. DigitalNinjaWTF 00:08, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This appears to be an indiscriminate collection of information. --Kraftlos (talk) 04:38, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 21:59, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions. —Raven1977 (talk) 22:01, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as not notable. ChildofMidnight (talk) 06:58, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. coccyx bloccyx(toccyx) 18:49, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.