Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ultraman King

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Mega Monster Battle: Ultra Galaxy. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:53, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ultraman King

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This character does not establish notability independent of Ultraman through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of overly in-depth plot details better suited to Wikia. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so extended coverage is unnecessary. TTN (talk) 17:45, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:09, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:10, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:10, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:10, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:10, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Ultraman King got some press because of who played him. For example: TIME, The Telegraph, and Reuters. I don't know if this conclusively establishes notability, as these articles are more about the actor than the character, but it's something to consider. I'm leaning toward keep on this one, but I'd be curious to hear further debate on the matter. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:55, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's already covered in the casting section of Mega Monster Battle: Ultra Galaxy, and it seems more relevant to that overall, especially with some of the quotes in those links. If there is other information unrelated to that one film available, it could potentially be viable, but the current info seems to be more suited to the film. TTN (talk) 21:03, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That's true; it does seem debatable for whom/what those articles have established notability: the film, the acting credentials of the PM, or the character. I guess it's more the case of the first two than the character itself. If that's the case, then maybe the character isn't independently notable of the series or the actor. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:40, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to the film page.—Ryulong (琉竜) 20:23, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 19:19, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.