Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zip's Drive-in
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 17:24, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Zip's Drive-in (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Notability hasn't been established in over four years that this article has existed (and 8 months since {{Notability}} was put on top). Quick internet search produced no relevant references. There was a prod two years ago, removed with explanation that "many people contributed, so it must be notable", which is an invalid argument. — Yerpo Eh? 12:13, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Other than one lone review by Spokesman.com back in 2007, there just aren't any sources out there that show that this chain is notable. It doesn't pass WP:GNG or WP:CORP.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 12:26, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- That review is actually a blog post, not considered a reliable reference by itself. — Yerpo Eh? 12:51, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- DeleteFor reasons stated above.JoelWhy (talk) 13:03, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:48, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:49, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.