Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2018 October 4

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Eric Ding – Void close. I don't get what's going on here, but it's clearly a WP:BADNAC. I'm going to back it out and relist. Um, Kirbanzo, you support overturning your own close??? -- RoySmith (talk) 22:06, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it.

Closer cites "The result was speedy keep - unquestionably meets criteria for speedy keep." as a reason for speedy keep, but the only speedy keep vote doesn't actually cite any speedy keep criterion, and instead only cites WP:PROF#1 and Google Scholar citations. This is not a speedy keep criterion and therefore the close was invalid. The AFD should run for the full week. – FenixFeather ^{(talk)(Contribs)} 20:37, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support - likely misinterpreted one of the policies for speedy keep. Kirbanzo (talk) 21:14, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support I was quite put off by that speedy close and was considering bringing it here. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:18, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.