Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Ontario Highway 427/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was archived by Graham Beards via FACBot (talk) 07:00, 15 August 2015 [1].
- Nominator(s): Floydian τ ¢ 00:33, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This article is about the second busiest freeway in Canada. I recently put subjected this to ACR so it should be pretty polished. Hopefully it will attract more attention than my previous nomination Floydian τ ¢ 00:33, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Procedural note -- Floydian, per FAC instructions, when a review has been archived you're expected to wait two weeks before nominating any other article (not just the same one), unless given leave to do so by a coordinator. We hadn't caught this one before it attracted some commentary so will leave it open, but pls follow the instructions in future. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 00:44, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- I apologize, as you'll see on my talk page I did not notice that stipulation, but when I was informed, I requested a hall pass since my last FAC only failed due to going stale. - Floydian τ ¢ 06:47, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - I reviewed this at the mentioned ACR and feel that it meets all the FA criteria. Dough4872 00:31, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Noting that I did an image review at the ACR - Evad37 [talk] 13:27, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Support per my ACR review, though I wish the shields and labels had been added to the map, so users not familiar with the area know what they are looking at. --Rschen7754 16:20, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comments by Cobblet
- Lead
- How does one define "four-level interchange"? This only appears in the lead and isn't explained in the text, and looking at the interchanges themselves I'm not sure how one arrives at such a conclusion. Is there a source for this terminology? Stack interchange suggests that there's only one such interchange in Canada, the 407-400 interchange. And if they're not four-level interchanges then I'm not sure they're all that notable as the construction of the Allen Road-401 interchange (for example) predates the 1967-1971 timeline given (although the History section seems to suggest these interchanges did exist earlier in perhaps a less complex configuration – perhaps this could be clarified).
- I simply reworded this to say they are two of the largest in the province. - Floydian τ ¢ 20:09, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Run-on sentence in the second paragraph of the lead (the second sentence). Rexdale refers to northern Etobicoke, not western; the reference to it should be removed. Also is Claireville big enough to be worth mentioning? Maybe the newly built suburb of Ebenezer, Brampton is a better choice?
- Reference 2 (the MTO AADT counts pdf) is broken.
- Fixed - Floydian τ ¢ 20:09, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Route description
- "QEW / Gardiner Expressway" does not always appear with a spaced slash. Frankly I'm not sure this construction is necessary in the situations where it's used in this article – is there a problem with referring to them as two distinct expressways? If you're trying to allude to the fact this section of the Gardiner used to be part of the QEW, I'm not sure that's necessary either.
- the 427 is the dividing line between the two, so I'm not sure what would be a simpler construct. Any thoughts? - Floydian τ ¢ 20:09, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- While the statement at the end of the second paragraph is undoubtedly true, pointing to a road map as a reference for the intentions of the people who designed the highway is inappropriate.
- Actually, unlike the 401, the design of the 427 inherently limits vehicles to the appropriate carriageway because there aren't numerous transfers between the two. I do see what you mean however, and I'll see if I can find a good source for this. - Floydian τ ¢ 20:14, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Whenever I've heard the expression "The Basketweave" on Toronto traffic radio it's always referring to the one on the 401. I think MapArt maps also explicitly label the 401 structure as such, but not the 427 one. Suggest removing if no reliable source can be found for referring to this structure as "the Basketweave", particularly since the wikilink redirects to the article on the 401.
- "from express to collector lanes, or vice versa" seems clumsy. How about "between express and collector lanes"?
- Done - Floydian τ ¢ 20:09, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Avoid the use of "complicated" and "sprawling" to describe interchanges unless there are reliable sources for these labels. The complexity of these interchanges can be expressed without resorting to peacock words – for example it could be noted that the 427-401 interchange is essentially a six-way interchange between the 427, 401, Highway 27 and the Richview Expressway stub. Also the source for the size of the 427-401 interchange given in the History section should be given here too.
- By "demarcation line" do you mean the municipal boundary? This is also mentioned at the beginning of the next paragraph.
- "as it drains" should more precisely be "where it drains". Also this is the West Humber, not the Humber itself, as noted in the History section.
- Fixed - Floydian τ ¢ 20:09, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- "undeveloped area" – judging from the latest satellite maps this no longer seems accurate.
- Expressions like "two-lane" and "four-lane" should be consistently hyphenated.
- I removed the hyphen, as I've been told it should only be used in instances such as "four-laned" or "four-laning", but not "four lane". - Floydian τ ¢ 20:09, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- History
- For clarity, "minister" should be "Minister of Transportation".
- Done - Floydian τ ¢ 20:09, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- The heading "Upgrade to Collector-Express" might be better phrased as "Upgrade to collector-express system" or simply "Widening".
- Done, used "Expansion". - Floydian τ ¢ 20:09, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- "the largest interchange in Canada" – at the time, or is this still true?
- AFAIK, haven't seen any claims raised otherwise. - Floydian τ ¢ 20:09, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- "Dixon/Airport Road" should take a spaced slash.
- Done - Floydian τ ¢ 20:09, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- What does "defaulted" mean here?
- I don't think "left-turn" needs a hyphen.
- Fixed - Floydian τ ¢ 20:09, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Weird that you mention the dates of construction of the interchanges with the 409 and 407 in the lead but not in this section.
- Future
- I believe the construction of HOV lanes is currently ongoing, so use the present tense.
- Done - Floydian τ ¢ 20:09, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Exit list
- "north (700 m (2,300 ft))" - maybe "north for 700 m (2,300 ft)" to avoid the double parentheses.
- Done - Floydian τ ¢ 20:09, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Cobblet (talk) 05:05, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Made a number of fixes, with replies presented indented above. Still have a few points to address yet. - Floydian τ ¢ 20:09, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Coord note -- Floydian, I was about to archive this as abandoned but I see you're currently active; what is happening with this? Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 06:35, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- My apologies, I completely forgot about this combined with a very very busy IRL right now. Can you give me until the end of Monday? I've bookmarked this for top priority! - Floydian τ ¢ 05:12, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been archived, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FAC/ar, and leave the {{featured article candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Graham Beards (talk) 07:00, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.