Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Explosions.jpg

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Explosions.jpg

Great picture, included in the explosion article. Downloaded from: [pdphoto.org].

10:34, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

I've added the new nomination date up the top here so the bot doesn't get confused.Raven4x4x 08:11, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nominate and support. - 82.32.220.62 14:22, 11 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support, totally badass! Tom k&e 12:14, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Was Previously nominated, but never properly closed, so relisting now and

Support Night Gyr 10:34, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support That ball of burning gas and debris escaping - great! - Samsara _contrib ^talk 13:56, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support even if it is on the small side. Nice pyrotechnics! --Janke | Talk 14:19, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is one of my photos. I can provide a much higher res version, but we're in the middle of moving right now. It will take me a few days to get the computers set back up and find this in the archive. Two questions - 1) What is considered reasonably good for image size? 2) I'm new around here, even if my photos aren't, so where would I upload this? Anyone have a URL explaining that? --y6y6y6 16:05, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Answered on your talk page. Have fun! Mstroeck 17:24, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - I don't like it. Not stunning enough. Renata 23:35, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Agree with above. Good picture but just not striking. Sotakeit 13:12, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Sort of grimy-looking. Not that war should be glamorized, but one could get a better image of explosions. zafiroblue05 | Talk 23:55, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It seems to be firebombs rather than what one usually calls explosions. There were images like that in WW II movies, but I think they were napalm.
Oppose, agree with above; dark background. Thanks! Flcelloguy (A note?) 15:48, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. agree with above, I could imagine better illustrations for explosions. This one rather looks like a napalm strike. Mikeo 19:03, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Not bad, but not special. enochlau (talk) 14:20, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted . This is in fact ready to archive; it isn't in the right section because the bot kept getting confused for some reason. Raven4x4x 10:09, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]