Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2008 June 28
Appearance
June 28
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 00:09, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per unenyclopedic, orphaned TALKIN PIE EATER REVIEW ME 19:18, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Orphaned, no apparent encyclopedic use (though I could think of a few such as CGI, but they already have plenty of images). — BQZip01 — talk 03:02, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 00:10, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Orphaned. No apparent encyclopedic use. The status of the uploader is irrelevant. — BQZip01 — talk 03:04, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 00:11, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Orphaned. No apparent encyclopedic use. The status of the uploader is irrelevant. — BQZip01 — talk 03:04, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
- Fortressdvd (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Copyright violation, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 00:12, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 00:14, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Additionally, there is a danger it might be assumed that this image depicts Jacqueline Dark, which I'm sure it doesn't — see Opera Australia. Michael Bednarek (talk) 11:14, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
- The uploader thought it was... Are you sure it just isn't her without makeup? -Nard 12:35, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
- None of those individuals look to me anything like her photo at Opera Australia or other stage photos. Also: 1) I can't find any record of J. Dark ever having performed in Sweeney Todd; there is one reference which mentions both, but it doesn't actually say she played in the musical — it is somewhat unlikely, given that Dark is an opera singer. 2) Even if it's an image of her, it is thoroughly unsuitable. Michael Bednarek (talk) 14:24, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
- The uploader thought it was... Are you sure it just isn't her without makeup? -Nard 12:35, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Orphaned. Not appropriate for encyclopedic use. The status of the uploader is irrelevant. — BQZip01 — talk 03:05, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
- Gretagolding (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Copyright violation, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 00:16, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Orphaned. No apparent encyclopedic use. More importantly, though, I see no specific evidence of a copyvio. The status of the uploader is irrelevant. — BQZip01 — talk 03:07, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
- Jeffrey213 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 00:19, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Orphaned. No apparent encyclopedic use. The status of the uploader is irrelevant. Wikipedia is not an image repository. — BQZip01 — talk 03:09, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
- Jeffrey213 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 00:20, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Orphaned. No apparent encyclopedic use. The status of the uploader is irrelevant. Wikipedia is not an image repository. — BQZip01 — talk 03:10, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
- Jeffrey213 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 00:20, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Orphaned. No apparent encyclopedic use. The status of the uploader is irrelevant. Wikipedia is not an image repository. — BQZip01 — talk 03:09, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
- Jeffrey213 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 00:21, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Orphaned. No apparent encyclopedic use. The status of the uploader is irrelevant. Wikipedia is not an image repository. — BQZip01 — talk 03:09, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
- Jeffrey213 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 00:21, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Orphaned. No apparent encyclopedic use. The status of the uploader is irrelevant. Wikipedia is not an image repository. — BQZip01 — talk 03:11, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
- Jeffrey213 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 00:21, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Orphaned. No apparent encyclopedic use. The status of the uploader is irrelevant. Wikipedia is not an image repository. — BQZip01 — talk 03:11, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
- Jeffrey213 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 00:22, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Orphaned. Plenty of encyclopedic use possible, but not probable. Given this user, this is probably a copyvio. The status of the uploader is irrelevant. Wikipedia is not an image repository. — BQZip01 — talk 03:13, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 00:28, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Orphaned. No apparent encyclopedic use. The status of the uploader is irrelevant. Probable copyvio. — BQZip01 — talk 03:16, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Copyright violation, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 00:28, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Orphaned. No apparent encyclopedic use. The status of the uploader is irrelevant. Probable copyvio. Wikipedia is not an image repository. — BQZip01 — talk 03:17, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, false GFDL license. -Nard 00:44, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
- Given user's many other copyvios I do not believe this is self-made. -Nard 00:45, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete concur with nom. — BQZip01 — talk 03:19, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
- Christina_nacr (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 00:51, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Orphaned. No apparent encyclopedic use. The status of the uploader is irrelevant. — BQZip01 — talk 03:22, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
- Icpgroupmedia (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 00:56, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Orphaned. No encyclopedic use that can't be replaced by text. The status of the uploader is irrelevant. — BQZip01 — talk 03:35, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
- Jamesritala (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 00:57, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
- Jamesritala (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 00:58, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
- Wernerluis (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- The specific NASA link isn't provided and now orphaned. Ricky81682 (talk) 01:23, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
- Chickenlegs501 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned UE image. Ricky81682 (talk) 01:50, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
- Smaller version of Image:Sunset in Bauang Beach.JPG, which is PD. Not really necessary and WP is not a webhost. Ricky81682 (talk) 02:03, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned smaller version of Image:Field in Bauang.JPG, which is PD. Not needed. Ricky81682 (talk) 02:04, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
- Orphan. Unclear copyright status. This photo is of an older Cobb and no evidence was given that it was published before January 1, 1923. Eubulides (talk) 04:34, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Orphaned. Plenty of images already on Ty Cobb, so no need for one more that isn't used. Ty Cobb ceased playing in 1921, therefore, this image was before 1923. — BQZip01 — talk 03:39, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
- This non-free image is
not low-resolution andis not being used in compliance with its licensing tag. As a scan of a newspaper page, it must be used "to illustrate either the publication of the article or issue in question", but it isn't. It's merely being used to show that Tim Russert's death was front-page news, which can be adequately expressed by text. Neither this specific newspaper nor this specific newspaper article is discussed in the article Reaction to Tim Russert's death at all. —Angr 06:34, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
- Comment - The image size has been reduced to 400 pixels on it's longest side. This is still large enough to read enough of the text on this newspaper front page satisfying it's purpose in the article. That hopefully resolves resolution concerns. As for it's use in the article in question, the image serves as a specific example to the topic covered in that section. No there aren't pointed references to the image in the section's text but there doesn't need to be. If others disagree and think the article can be improved by some discussion which specifically references this image, that's going to have to wait until the article is unprotected. For what it's worth, the Reaction to Tim Russert's death article has gone through a heated AFD recently and all images on that page have had fair-use dispute tags added and removed over the past couple days.--Rtphokie (talk) 11:26, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
- Image size is no longer an issue. If the article isn't kept, the image will have to be deleted as orphaned anyway. If the article is kept, the image isn't being used in compliance with its tag or with WP:NFCC#8. So the decision to delete the image is independent of the fate of the article. —Angr 11:32, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Image fails WP:NFCC#10c as it's lacking a detailed fair-use rationale for this image's usage. — pd_THOR | =/\= | 00:48, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete No encyclopedic use that text can't simply state. No need for the image. — BQZip01 — talk 03:41, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
- Comment I've replaced the image description with a CSD. I just dont have the time or energy to deal with the wiki free use avengers here.--Rtphokie (talk) 16:43, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
- Orphan, created for a user page (WP:NOTBLOG), I have no idea what it says. kevyn (talk) 09:27, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
- Speedy delete I've created this with the single purpose of using it on my userpage. Not using anymore, guess I forgot to delete. Húsönd 12:18, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
- Thank You. kevyn (talk) 06:56, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
- DarkBlueOreos (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- not beling used, wasting server space
var wgUserName ('Talk')
09:57, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
- Generic episode screenshot with no discernible significance for understanding the work, no caption or connection to the text to even identify what it shows, let alone analytical commentary in the text that it could support. FUR is meaningless boilerplate text with no concrete connection to the individual image and article. Fails NFCC #8, as per multiple precedent in similar cases. Fut.Perf. ☼ 14:42, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Fails copyright exceptions for screenshot. — BQZip01 — talk 03:47, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
- Generic episode screenshot with no discernible significance for understanding the work, no caption or connection to the text to even identify what it shows, let alone analytical commentary in the text that it could support. FUR is meaningless boilerplate text with no concrete connection to the individual image and article. Fails NFCC #8, as per multiple precedent in similar cases. Fut.Perf. ☼ 14:44, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Fails copyright exceptions for screenshot. — BQZip01 — talk 03:47, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
- Generic episode screenshot with no caption or discernible connection to the text, not supporting analytical commentary. FUR is meaningless boilerplate text with no concrete connection to the individual image and article. A second screenshot showing what seems to be essentially the same situation is already in the article (and integrated with the text somewhat better). Fails NFCC #3 (minimality of use) and NFCC #8, as per multiple precedent in similar cases. Fut.Perf. ☼ 14:54, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Fails copyright exceptions for screenshot. — BQZip01 — talk 03:48, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
- Generic episode screenshot with no discernible significance for understanding the work, no caption or connection to the text to even identify what it shows, let alone analytical commentary in the text that it could support. FUR is meaningless boilerplate text with no concrete connection to the individual image and article. Fails NFCC #8, as per multiple precedent in similar cases. Fut.Perf. ☼ 14:55, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Fails copyright exceptions for screenshot. — BQZip01 — talk 03:48, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
- Generic episode screenshot with no discernible significance for understanding the work, no caption or connection to the text to even identify what it shows, let alone analytical commentary in the text that it could support. FUR is meaningless boilerplate text with no concrete connection to the individual image and article. Fails NFCC #8, as per multiple precedent in similar cases. Also NFCC #3, as there is also a second, somewhat better integrated, screenshot image in the same article. Fut.Perf. ☼ 14:57, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Fails copyright exceptions for screenshot. — BQZip01 — talk 03:48, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
- Generic episode screenshot with no discernible significance for understanding the work, no caption or connection to the text to even identify what it shows, let alone analytical commentary in the text that it could support. FUR is meaningless boilerplate text with no concrete connection to the individual image and article. Fails NFCC #8, as per multiple precedent in similar cases. Fut.Perf. ☼ 14:57, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Fails copyright exceptions for screenshot. — BQZip01 — talk 03:49, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
- Generic episode screenshot with no discernible significance for understanding the work, no caption or connection to the text to even identify what it shows, let alone analytical commentary in the text that it could support. FUR is meaningless boilerplate text with no concrete connection to the individual image and article. Fails NFCC #8, as per multiple precedent in similar cases. Fut.Perf. ☼ 14:58, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Fails copyright exceptions for screenshot. — BQZip01 — talk 03:49, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
- Generic episode screenshot with no discernible significance for understanding the work, no caption or connection to the text to even identify what it shows, let alone analytical commentary in the text that it could support. FUR is meaningless boilerplate text with no concrete connection to the individual image and article. Fails NFCC #8, as per multiple precedent in similar cases. Fut.Perf. ☼ 15:00, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Fails copyright exceptions for screenshot. — BQZip01 — talk 03:49, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
- [ notify] | contribs). - uploaded by [[User talk:#Image:Buffy104.jpg listed for deletion|]] (
- Generic episode screenshot with no discernible significance for understanding the work, no caption or connection to the text to even identify what it shows, let alone analytical commentary in the text that it could support. FUR is meaningless boilerplate text with no concrete connection to the individual image and article. Fails NFCC #8, as per multiple precedent in similar cases. Fut.Perf. ☼ 15:00, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Fails copyright exceptions for screenshot. — BQZip01 — talk 03:50, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
- Generic episode screenshot with no discernible significance for understanding the work, no caption or connection to the text to even identify what it shows, let alone analytical commentary in the text that it could support. FUR is meaningless boilerplate text with no concrete connection to the individual image and article. Fails NFCC #8, as per multiple precedent in similar cases. Fut.Perf. ☼ 15:01, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Fails copyright exceptions for screenshot. — BQZip01 — talk 03:50, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
- Generic episode screenshot with no discernible significance for understanding the work, no caption or connection to the text to even identify what it shows, let alone analytical commentary in the text that it could support. FUR is meaningless boilerplate text with no concrete connection to the individual image and article. Fails NFCC #8, as per multiple precedent in similar cases. Fut.Perf. ☼ 15:03, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Fails fair use rationale criteria & therefore copyvio. — BQZip01 — talk 03:01, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
An svg. image for Virginia International Raceway is already available. 24.185.49.151 (talk) 15:12, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Orphaned, Image already replaced. — BQZip01 — talk 02:59, 4 July 2008 (UTC)