Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2013 October 24

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

< October 23	October 25 >

October 24

File:Poserasim.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have serious doubts that we can host this image, as the background is a significant portion of a non-free work of art, and there's no indication that Asimicus is Asim Butt and therefore has the legal right to claim own work for the art in the background or for File:Scaryasim.jpg, the other image in that he uploaded. Sven Manguard Wha? 07:28, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also for deletion: File:Scaryasim.jpg Sven Manguard Wha? 07:28, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I'd be inclined to go for a tighter crop before deletion unless there is a reason to believe the uploader has no right to the photo irrespective of the background copyrighted work. gren グレン 03:54, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - There is no proof that the uploader is the artist in question, the person therefore remains the focal point of the picture. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 02:33, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Fiolmadh aig Sabhal Mor Ostaig, 1992.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:28, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Violation of WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 12:29, 24 October 2013 (UTC) Just to let you know that the copyright holder, Sabhal Mòr Ostaig, has given me permission to use the image on the Wikipedia page. Leodhasach eile (talk) 13:49, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Luchd-obrach & Oileanaich 1982.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:28, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Violation of WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 12:31, 24 October 2013 (UTC) Just to let you know that the copyright holder, Sabhal Mòr Ostaig, has given me permission to use the image on the Wikipedia page. Leodhasach eile (talk) 13:49, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sudhir Kumar.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:28, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope: unused userphoto. Stefan2 (talk) 13:41, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cybele YoungGGaward.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:28, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Violation of WP:NFCC#8: you don't need to see a picture of her receiving the prize to know that she has received it. Stefan2 (talk) 13:42, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pikachu seizure-2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. Acather96 (click here to contact me) 22:04, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Non-free content review#File:Pikachu seizure-2.jpg was closed as No consensus, but the file still violates WP:NFCC#8 in all articles where it is used. -- Toshio Yamaguchi 14:55, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - There's enough sourced information about this particularly episode/scene and causing some viewers to have seizures that it (without the seizure-inducing effects, naturally) is a reasonably thing to show, at least in Pokémon episodes removed from rotation. The use at the Photosensitive_epilepsy is probably unnecessary. (As a side, it's interesting that we have an article on that episode, that uses a video clip of that scene, unfiltered. I think that needs to go in favor of this image there.) --MASEM (t) 15:09, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I closed the request at WP:NFCR as no consensus, and I honestly believe that that discussion should have no bearing on this discussion save for the fact that it was listed for many months, and the uploader has had plenty of time to state a defense. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:15, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Can it be re-added in the episode page? If not, then "delete" it. The use in non-Pokemon pages won't help readers much, and I'm unsure that the use in removed episodes list is minimal and significant. I won't vote "keep" until it is re-added in the episode page. George Ho (talk) 02:44, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The image is not needed in Dennō Senshi Porygon, since there is an animated version (which however doesn't work for me). If the animation can be fixed, the still image is not needed. If it can't be fixed, the still image still isn't needed, because I don't see what purpose the still image would serve in the article that cannot be accurately described with text. -- Toshio Yamaguchi 12:32, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hm? The film works for me. --Stefan2 (talk) 16:22, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Im surprised that this is still up, the image does not violate copyright but I feel it is redundant to File:Denno.ogg - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 02:05, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Balbuena in Italia Jersey.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:28, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

poor quality image of unnamed team. Unlikely to be used in any article NtheP (talk) 20:10, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note that the file also is on Commons (and equally useless there). --Stefan2 (talk) 20:17, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Total Lunar Eclipse.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:28, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

We have lots of artworks by her at Commons, see Commons:Category:Sarah Morris. I don't think we need any non-free artworks. Stefan2 (talk) 21:42, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the {{OTRS pending}} tag was added in April, suggesting that no permission ever was sent. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:44, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - unable to locate any OTRS ticket relating to this image. NtheP (talk) 12:53, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.