Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2015 October 25

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

< October 24	October 26 >

October 25

File:Reeves Mothballs (5).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Questionable copyright status. The files were uploaded with {{PD-USGov-Military-Navy}}, but without sources. After investigating a bit, Dual Freq (talk · contribs) found the source at http://www.ussreeves.net/images_hp/indexmb1.htm, which does not indicate that the files are public domain or that the files were created by the US Navy. In fact, there is an all rights reserved copyright notice at the bottom. Until we can be sure Wikipedia has permission to use these images, these files should be deleted. Mz7 (talk) 02:27, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2D slice of nonsignaling polytope.pdf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 12:11, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Assignment 5 for Self efficacy.pdf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 12:21, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Behavior Tree - Selector Node.pdf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 12:23, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Brest, Belarus.pdf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 12:26, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CDS pressure and current.pdf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 12:29, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Caerphilly Heart Disease Study Healthy Habits poster.pdf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#3b and WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 12:31, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Causes of aviation accidents.pdf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 12:33, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Causes of fatal aviation accidents.pdf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 12:33, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Chebfun plotf.pdf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 12:35, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ComRes 2010 Opinion Poll.pdf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 12:38, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cyclicpaths-1.pdf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 12:46, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DARPA Robotics Challenge phase timeline.pdf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no foreseable use. Stefan2 (talk) 12:46, 25 October 2015 (UTC) Stefan2, why is the JPG version of this file considered useful and the PDF version not useful? 199.90.157.11 (talk)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DGT Schematic.pdf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no foreseeable use. No evidence of permission. Stefan2 (talk) 12:49, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:David Owsley Museum of Art Logo.pdf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused textlogo in inapprioriate file format. Stefan2 (talk) 12:52, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Die Bierothek®.pdf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused logo. The background is possibly copyrightable. No foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 12:55, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:EMIRAD footprints.pdf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 12:59, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Expo 17 Proposal (English Version).pdf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 13:12, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Extrinsic and intrinsic cellular noise.pdf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 13:13, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:FET Diode Comparison Chart.pdf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 13:14, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. My mistake on the unnecessary upload. I used a JPEG version instead and did not remove this one. Is deletion automated, or does the author need to delete? Or do you need to delete? Thanks for helping clean up. Omalley576 (talk) 13:07, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Fabricatorz-symbol.pdf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused logo. No foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 13:35, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Figure1-1linear-proposition.pdf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 13:35, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Figure2-2causal-propositions.pdf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 13:35, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Figure3-concatenated-casual-propositions.pdf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 13:37, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Forward time graph.pdf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 13:39, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:FreeRice grain totals.pdf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 13:39, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:GeneralTree.pdf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 13:43, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Geopolymer ortho-sialate molecules.pdf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 13:44, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Greiner Model Graph.pdf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 13:46, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HPI vs CPI vs Cost construction - effectively Land Price Inflation 1986 -2009.pdf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 13:48, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Heller-Issued US Patents.pdf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 13:49, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Heller-Publications.pdf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 13:50, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Histogram.pdf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 13:50, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HotNewWayToBurnWood 1984Nov26.pdf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#3b and WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 13:52, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:House Price Index vs CPI vs Cost of construction - 1986 - 2009.pdf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 13:53, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:House price vs CPI vs Cost of construction.pdf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 13:54, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Household Prices and Debt 1980 - 2010.pdf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 13:54, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hydrogen bond arrangements in Schellman loops.pdf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. — ξ ^xplicit 03:32, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 13:55, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. We've changed the leopard's name but not its spots. Schellman loop contained the image File:HbondArr.pdf which was speedy deleted WP:CSD#F1 because it was redundant to the current file.[1] The link to the first file was removed from the article because the file had been deleted.[2] Now the current file is requested for deletion as "unused, no foreseeable use". Thincat (talk) 09:53, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for the time being. It is all the fault of Steel1943 (talk · contribs) for tagging the in-use version of this image instead of the other one. I have put in a request to the uploader to provide it in a more sensible format. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:34, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@RHaworth: Not really because if I recall, the other image, I believe, had a fair-use claim and I believed that it was replaceable with a free version. This nominated image claims to be released with a free license by its uploader, so unless there is copyright infringement that can be proven (possibly by looking at the deleted file), I cannot make the same claim here. Steel1943 (talk) 01:53, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If the file also was uploaded under a fair use claim, then it is necessary to take a look at that file and check if there is contradicting copyright information. If the copyright information is wrong, then the file information page needs to address this properly. User:Steel1943: If two files have conflicting copyright information, it is typically better to list both files together in a section at PUF/FFD instead of tagging one for deletion per WP:F1 so that it more easily can be determined if the file is free or unfree. In this case, it is useful to keep the dupe for the moment as it makes it easier for people to participate in the discussion when the content is readily available. --Stefan2 (talk) 00:22, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Stefan2: I honestly don't fully remember what happened with my tags/edits on these. I think I may have thought that this image was copyright infringement since it looks like something that came out of a textbook, and the fact that it is a PDF file, a common extension for scanned images (at least that's my thought at this point.) Steel1943 (talk) 02:21, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I looked at the deleted image. Both files were uploaded by User:JamesMilnerWhite, but the deleted file lacked a license, which was most likely an honest oversight by the uploader. If you're looking to assign blame, User:Steel1943 tagged the correct file for speedy deletion, but probably should have swapped out the image first. User:RHaworth definitely shouldn't have deleted the file while it was still in use, since WP:CSD#F1 applies only to unused duplicates. Since the file is in use, the rationale for deletion no longer applies and it should be kept. - Eureka Lott 18:01, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hypercomplex Cell Detects Curves.pdf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 13:55, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hypercomplex Curve.pdf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 13:55, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hypercomplex cell endstopping.pdf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 13:56, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Illite Crystallinity Classification.pdf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 13:57, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This could potentially be used for black and white publications, but should be moved to commons and converted to .svg format. related version: commons:File:Illite Crystallinity classification chart.svg is in use. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:03, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A PDF file with this content is not useful, and the content is also unsourced, so anyone wishing to create a replacement in SVG format would first have to find reliable sources for the information, and then it would probably be easier to recreate the picture without using the PDF file in the first place. --Stefan2 (talk) 00:18, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Illite Crystallinity classification chart.pdf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 13:58, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It has been used to make commons:File:Illite Crystallinity classification chart.svg which is in use. It should probably be moved to commons. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:01, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Inver in a sphere, Fig 4.pdf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 14:03, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Inver in a sphere, fig 1.pdf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 14:04, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Inver in a sphere, fig 2.pdf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 14:04, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Inver in a sphere Fig 5.pdf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 14:04, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Irish Medicines Formulary Front Cover.pdf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 14:05, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2016 Carrera S.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#3: we don't need a picture of every single model version. Stefan2 (talk) 14:40, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It seems to be used and complies with the criteria OK. However it can be replaced by a free image next year. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:06, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Compliance with WP:NFCC#3 has nothing to do with whether it is in use or not. What WP:NFCC#3 says is that we only need a picture of one of the models mentioned in the article - and we already have free pictures of some of the other models. --Stefan2 (talk) 23:11, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Boston Breakers USFL Logo 1983.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8: former logo. Stefan2 (talk) 14:42, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is why it should not be deleted. This link is proof these logos did exist and are for historical purposes: [3]

Deleting it erases their history. NostalgiaBuff97501 (talk) 17:36, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:NFCC#3a, we only need one logo in the article. The standard rule is that we need sourced critical discussion about any additional logos, or else they shouldn't be in the article. --Stefan2 (talk) 00:15, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:New Orleans Breakers USFL Logo 1984.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8: former logo. Stefan2 (talk) 14:42, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is why it should not be deleted. This link is proof these logos did exist and are for historical purposes: [4]

Deleting it erases their history. NostalgiaBuff97501 (talk) 17:36, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:NFCC#3a, we only need one logo in the article. The standard rule is that we need sourced critical discussion about any additional logos, or else they shouldn't be in the article. --Stefan2 (talk) 00:14, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Portland Breakers USFL Logo 1985.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8: former logo. Stefan2 (talk) 14:42, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is why it should not be deleted. This link is proof these logos did exist and are for historical purposes: [5]

Deleting it erases their history. NostalgiaBuff97501 (talk) 17:36, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:NFCC#3a, we only need one logo in the article. The standard rule is that we need sourced critical discussion about any additional logos, or else they shouldn't be in the article. --Stefan2 (talk) 00:14, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Boston-New Orleans-Portland Breakers.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F5 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:04, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#3: only one logo is needed. Stefan2 (talk) 14:43, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is why it should not be deleted. This link is proof these logos did exist and are for historical purposes: [6]

Deleting it erases their history. NostalgiaBuff97501 (talk) 17:36, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:NFCC#3a, we only need one logo in the article. The standard rule is that we need sourced critical discussion about any additional logos, or else they shouldn't be in the article. --Stefan2 (talk) 00:13, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:AmyFilmSoundtrack.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F4 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fails MOS:FILM#Soundtrack and WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 14:48, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Peto.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused map of unknown state. No foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 15:57, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Signos.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused low-quality map presenting unsourced data. No foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 16:19, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rotis.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 16:43, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lokalbanen logo.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant to c:File:Lokalbanen logo.svg. Stefan2 (talk) 16:50, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sultan.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Overwritten file: three in one.

File uploaded by M.azeem (talk · contribs) and Kernel Saunters (talk · contribs): Claimed to show the original uploader. Unused, no foreseeable use.
File uploaded by Qile0724 (talk · contribs), Kernel Saunters (talk · contribs) and Sreejithk2000 (talk · contribs): No source and no licence.
File uploaded by Sreejithk2000 (talk · contribs): Dupe of File:Sulthan.jpg. Stefan2 (talk) 17:08, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Number one is Sultan Alam from BBC article or cropped from thenorthernecho. Google image search seems to think the 2nd one is Iskandar of Johor. Neither seem licensed properly. --Dual Freq (talk) 04:16, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:OldClevelandIndiansLogo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relisted at Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2015 November 3#File:OldClevelandIndiansLogo.jpg. — ξ ^xplicit 03:32, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8 and WP:NFCC#9: former logo. Stefan2 (talk) 22:01, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. It's an important image for the Chief Wahoo article, where it's described and discussed. No free alternative exists. - Eureka Lott 17:12, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- The section does not discuss anything which is not present in File:Chief Wahoo (mascot character).svg, so it is sufficient to refer to that image. We don't need multiple pictures of the character. --Stefan2 (talk) 00:12, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - You're kidding, right? For an article about a visual identity (especially one as contentious as this), it's vital to show how it evolved over time. The text alone cannot serve as an adequate replacement. - Eureka Lott 17:52, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    - There is no sourced critical discussion about this part of the evolution of the visual identity, so there is no need to show an extra picture. The picture in the main infobox provides the same understanding with respect to this section. --Stefan2 (talk) 18:19, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
      - I re-read the article, and I respectfully disagree with your opinion. The section describes the history of the logo and its changes, and it has sources. - Eureka Lott

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MarthandaVarma Reprints.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFG and WP:NFCC#9: non-free gallery. Stefan2 (talk) 22:23, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: The file, File:MarthandaVarma Reprints.png is used in the article Marthandavarma (novel), to represent the variation of different reprints brought-out by different publishers, and images are selected as possibly to be the out of print-ones and not-presently-used art works to avoid commercial implications, there by providing better clarity to the readers. The usage of images in gallery form may be debated here with with inclusion of mandatory users or readers who are knowledgeable related to the subject article, to resolute a better option to the existing usage, and may Delete as per nomination, if not then Keep.—(harith·discuss) 07:56, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- WP:NFCC#3a only permits the article to contain one cover of the book. Since there are covers of the book which are so old that the copyright has expired, all other book covers violate WP:NFCC#1. --Stefan2 (talk) 00:10, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Marthandavarma-Translations.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFG and WP:NFCC#9. Stefan2 (talk) 22:24, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: The usage of file File:Marthandavarma-Translations.png is made to help the readers to have a better visual identification titles, in conjunction with the translations of the subject title of the article. The usage of images in gallery form may be debated here with with inclusion of mandatory users or readers who are knowledgeable related to the subject article, to resolute a better option to the existing usage, and may Delete as per nomination, if not then Keep.—(harith·discuss) 07:56, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- WP:NFCC#3a only permits one cover of the book and since the original book is in the public domain because of age, any non-free book covers violate WP:NFCC#1. Besides, you may not upload galleries of book covers. --Stefan2 (talk) 00:09, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Maarthaanda-Varma-comics.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFG and WP:NFCC#9. Stefan2 (talk) 22:24, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: The file, File:Maarthaanda-Varma-comics.png is used in the section about the comics-adaptation of Marthandavarma (novel), where it is described about the change of different titles of comics by different publishers over the years, including a non-Latin title. The file image is created with multiple images to have clear depiction of the same to the readers, within the contextual significance. The image shall be retained in present form, than to earlier forms. if need → better image description of same shall be done with a new Information template (!!kindly suggest!!) accordingly.—(harith·discuss) 07:56, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Book covers should only be used in the article about the book itself. These book covers are currently used in the article about a different book, where the book covers don't belong. There is no sourced critical discussion about any of the book covers. --Stefan2 (talk) 00:08, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sandilyan Novels.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFG and WP:NFCC#9. Stefan2 (talk) 22:24, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: The file is used in the page Sandilyan to show the variance of different titles by the author, of whom all titles are listed in this section. The content of image is with a selection of most notable titles by the writer. The usage of images in gallery form may be debated here with mandatory inclusion of Tamil users or readers who are knowledgeable related to the subject article, to resolute a better option to the existing usage, and may Delete as per nomination, if not then Keep.—(harith·discuss) 07:56, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Book covers should only be used in the article about the book itself. These book covers are currently used in the article about a different book, where the book covers don't belong. There is no sourced critical discussion about any of the book covers. --Stefan2 (talk) 00:07, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:KULAM 1997.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. The file is now used in the infobox about the film Kulam (film). It will be removed from Marthandavarma (novel) per nomination. — ξ ^xplicit 03:32, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 22:26, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: The usage of file in the film adaptations section of Marthandavarma (novel) depicts the representation of the film title in non-Latin scripts, which is not in any way similar to that of the subject title of the article. The inclusion of image in this section help the readers to identify the film adaptation in relation to the subject title, which is unique to all forms of other adaptations, there by providing better understanding in the context of main section.—(harith·discuss) 07:56, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- The article Marthandavarma (novel) is not an article about film adaptations and should therefore not contain any pictures of film adaptations. Such pictures should only appear in the articles about the respective film adaptations themselves. Besides, there is no sourced critical discussion about the picture. See WP:NFCC#8. --Stefan2 (talk) 00:07, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Veera Marthanda Varma TV Serial.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 22:27, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: The file is used in the section, Television adaptations of Marthandavarma (novel), to identify the one which has a different title, with a prefeix Vīra to Marthanda Varma than to the two out of three adaptations, though it has been referred without the prefix among the public. The file File:Veera Marthanda Varma TV Serial.jpg, depicts the representation of the prefix, which is shown in smaller size than to the later part of the title, such a variation is not possible to depict in this section without the usage of an image. The inclusion of the file very much supports the variation of different titles (other titles are same as that of the subject article) mentioned in this section, provides better clarity on the same to the readers with contextual significance.—(harith·discuss) 07:56, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- There is no sourced critical discussion about the picture in that section. A picture like this should only be used in an article about the adaptation itself, but there is currently no article about the adaptation, so the picture shouldn't be on Wikipedia at all. See WP:NFCC#8. --Stefan2 (talk) 00:04, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CV Charithrkyayikakal Sampoornam.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 22:29, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: The file File:CV Charithrkyayikakal Sampoornam.jpg is used in sequels section of Marthandavarma (novel), where it has been narrated that subject title is also released along with the successive titles under a different label, Si. Vi. Rāmanpiḷḷayuṭe Caritṟakhyāyikakaḷ Sampūṟṇṇaṁ, in line with the common references of the trilogy (as discussed in the same section), which is scripted on the cover art. The inclusion of file in the section help the readers to identify the new label, which is not in Latin script, and have better understanding about common usage of trilogy labels (though there are three, with different meanings) related to the subject of the article. The inclusion of the image file certainly is within the contextual significance, as the same provides better understanding than without it.—(harith·discuss) 07:56, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Book covers should only be used in the article about the book itself. This book cover is currently used in the article about a different book, where the picture doesn't belong. --Stefan2 (talk) 00:05, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Madras375programmesheet.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 23:25, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that Wikipedia does not allow any useful stuff, especially if has something to do with the developing world. Oh yes, use the barest excuses to delete stuff related to Asia or Africa. We are, after all, dumb savages without any heritage or history. Aren't we. -Ravi _{My Tea Kadai} 17:31, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It has already been stated in the article how the programme sheet commemorates the 375th foundation day of Chennai and how the postal cover was the first ever commemorating Madras Day. This, I believe, highlights the importance of these images in the article fair enough. Moreover, I've already specified in the fair use rationale how the programme sheet does not carry any copyright notice. I had added a fair-use tag and not a "public domain" only because of the lack of copyright information not the presence of it. The publishers, I assume, will only be too happy if it was put up in Wikipedia. Also, I don't understand why the nominator has failed to participate in this discussion or the ones above.-Ravi _{My Tea Kadai} 04:14, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is no sourced critical discussion about the exact text in the programme sheet, so we do not need to see any pictures of it. See WP:NFCC#8. --Stefan2 (talk) 00:02, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MadrasDaySpecialPostalCover 2007.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 23:25, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It has already been stated in the article how the postal cover was the first ever commemorating Madras Day. This, I believe, highlights the importance of these images in the article fair enough. -Ravi _{My Tea Kadai} 04:15, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is no sourced critical discussion about the image in that section as far as I can see. This means that we do not need to see what the postal cover looks like. See WP:NFCC#8. --Stefan2 (talk) 00:02, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The fact that this cover was issued is already well stated in the article in prose, so the use of a non-free image is not necessary for the reader's understanding of the topic. Essentially it is just decorative. ww2censor (talk) 10:05, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.