Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 September 23

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

< September 22	September 24 >

September 23

File:Dj Coublon photo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious own work, see watermark and Facebook link in {{information}} template. Stefan2 (talk) 00:16, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:James D zirin.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, no encyclopedic use — Jeff G. ツ 00:28, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Not in use and no encyclopedic value. -- Begoon 10:57, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete uploaded only for self-promotion. Home Lander (talk) 18:48, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Classy-crowdfunding-company-logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

superseded by superior format File:Classy (crowdfunding software company).svg Magog the Ogre (t • c) 00:29, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete (uploaded SVG version) Daylen (talk) 01:59, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete as per nom KylieTastic (talk) 11:56, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Answer Everyday Demons Special Edition Cover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Virtually identical to standard cover. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:45, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Linkin Park Good Goodbye.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Commons file deleted, point moot. (non-admin closure) – Train2104 (t • c) 02:12, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A superior version is available on the Commons (same file name File:Linkin Park Good Goodbye.jpg) Daylen (talk) 04:35, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I can't see any-place on www.linkinpark.com that says that images can be used as claimed on commons. Regards KylieTastic (talk) 09:44, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Commons version now deleted so this can be closed. Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 14:27, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dave rimmer in storm bay IMG 20170805 220427.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) --George Ho (talk) 17:25, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the phrase "Copyright 2017 Geordie Birch All rights reserved," and filled the Author, Date, and Permission fields. (This was the first file I uploaded to Wikipedia or commons.wikimedia.org.) — geordie 17:33, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Withdrawn ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:14, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Vict.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Reggio emilia.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly not own work, image already existed in 2005 taken 2004 [2] KylieTastic (talk) 12:21, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:James Craig Annan (Scottish - Frau Mathasius - Google Art Project.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This image is available on commons c:File:Frau Mathasius - James Craig Annan (Scottish, 1864 - 1946) - Paul Getty Museum.jpg. Is it not PD now as the Scottish creator has been dead for > 70 years? KylieTastic (talk) 13:26, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pymonenko self.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Much higher resolution image available at File:Mykola Pymonenko-Avtoportret.jpg. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 14:09, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Presskitphoto.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Just because it's in a press kit, doesn't necessarily make it Creative Commons. I didn't find an indication on the linked page that it was. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:05, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this goes, make sure to take it off Commons too. DS (talk) 03:49, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Apart from the incorrect copyright status, I don't see any foreseeable use for the logo on a Wikipedia page. See also c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Buildingglobalinnovators.jpg. --Stefan2 (talk) 11:12, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Frais hand sanitizer.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Claimed as own work, but this is packaging artwork. Is it too simple? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:18, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Justin Freeman Arguing Before The Georgia Supreme Court.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F3 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Georgia government works are not in the public domain. – Train2104 (t • c) 17:18, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Teignmouth Electron, Deck Plan, Rendering by Peter Sullivan.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Speedy deletion. An unambiguous copyright infringement with a blatantly false claim of being public domain. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 02:01, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bogus PD claim. Stefan2 (talk) 17:44, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Edith Kingdon Gould.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The source was only published in 1986 (see [3]). Very possibly unpublished before then. As such, {{PD-1923}} doesn't apply. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 18:08, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:WWIeralady.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The source was only published in 1986 (see [4]). Very possibly unpublished before then. As such, {{PD-1923}} doesn't apply. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 18:10, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:AEL Groupof2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Derivative work of copyrighted images on the card. (t) Josve05a (c) 18:49, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:190508-goodmorning-cover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:04, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is marked Keep Local so ineligible for F8 deletion. But it is now free in its home country and eligible for Commons. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 19:02, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Fine to import a duplicate to Commons, but I am adamant on retaining a copy on En-WP as I have been subject to retaliatory deletions by a couple of the thugs on Commons. Carrite (talk) 01:46, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, unnecessary duplicate of Commons file. I'll watchlist the file on Commons and personally re-upload it on enwiki if it is deleted, which it won't be. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 02:07, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rich-h3.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An image of a user who hasn't edited outside of his userspace, since 2007. It is an orphaned image, with no educational scope, and will be deleted if moved to Commons. (t) Josve05a (c) 19:23, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rgiuly.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, no encyclopedic use FASTILY 19:37, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nikkor 17-35mm f2.8D.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Flikr license is NC, Which license is correct the on here or the one at Flikr? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:58, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It also says taken by myself, Paul Tichonczuk. If this is correct, then it means that both licences are correct, but we would need evidence in order to verify this. --Stefan2 (talk) 20:44, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MG 4949wp.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"https://www.flickr.com/photos/achromatic1978/364318562/" is all rights reserved. Which license is correct, the Flikr licens or the one here? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 20:05, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:West Province - Bandjoun.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

missing clear evidence of permission FASTILY 20:44, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Spiggle Forums.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused logo of unclear notability. No foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 20:50, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Star wars episode viii.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, low quality. File:Star Wars- Episodio VIII logo.jpg is better. Stefan2 (talk) 20:51, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:University of community health.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is a logo, so the claim that this is own work by the uploader might not be correct. Stefan2 (talk) 20:52, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hussein Saeed and Suhail Saber.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused (personal) image, possibly invalid copyright status (pd-iraq tag may be wrong), no encyclopedic use FASTILY 21:00, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

- It is a photographic or cinematic work that is not compositive (artistic in nature) first published before 1 January 1999. Hashima20 (talk) 07:37, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

How can I verify that the photo was first published in Iraq (and not published in any other country within 30 days after publication in Iraq) and that the photographer was a citizen and resident of Iraq? If this isn't the case, then Iraq isn't the source country. --Stefan2 (talk) 08:37, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mont blanc 2007.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:13, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@ShakespeareFan00: Do you have the link to the Flickr image? I'm struggling to find it. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 00:03, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind, think I figured out what's going on here. The uploader's account name matches the Flickr user's name, so it's probably the photographer who uploaded these. Of course, we can't take that on faith. I've sent them a message on Flickr. If they respond affirmatively that the account is theirs, than the release they provided on Wikipedia is valid, and I'll document the identity verification in OTRS. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 00:09, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@ShakespeareFan00: I've now been able to verify his identity via OTRS and have marked his account as verified to be the same person as the Flickr uploader. Any licenses he chose when uploading his images to Wikipedia are valid. Can you withdraw these? Thanks. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 14:28, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn Pending OTRS confirmation., Please add the relevant ticket number to the file information. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:30, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@ShakespeareFan00: There isn't a ticket relevant to permission, so there's nothing to add to the file. Rather, the connection between the photographer and the account is confirmed on their user page via the {{OTRS identity}} template, meaning any release they include when they upload their own photos is valid and doesn't need permission. Hope that clears things up. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 11:51, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mont blanc 2007 02.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:13, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Flikr license is All right resrved, local license is Creative Commons, which is the correct license please? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 21:09, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FLikr image is - https://www.flickr.com/photos/matstrange/1249904025/in/dateposted/ ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:43, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn Pending OTRS confirmation. Please add the relevant ticket number to the file information. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:31, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HunterPortrait.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unknown creation/publication date, but the artist lived after 1923. Very possible that copyright was restored under the URAA, as the work would have been copyrighted in the UK at that time. Orphaned to boot. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 22:28, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Scouting Ireland logo2016.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free file issues - The non-free file may not meet all requirements outlined in the non-free file use policy, or may not be necessary to retain on Wikipedia or specific articles due to either free alternatives or better non-free alternative(s) existing. NFCC#8, and article already prominently displays the emblem, extra logoing is redundant Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 23:40, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Scouting Ireland embroidery.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free file issues - The non-free file may not meet all requirements outlined in the non-free file use policy, or may not be necessary to retain on Wikipedia or specific articles due to either free alternatives or better non-free alternative(s) existing. NFCC#8, and article already prominently displays the emblem, extra logoing is redundant Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 23:51, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.