Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2018 November 7

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

< November 6	November 8 >

November 7

File:Picture license free for personal and commercial use.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image is stated to be publci domain and sourced to pexels.com via a direct link to the image. I was able to find the image page here. Pexels.com has a license with a lot of freedom, however, it is not public domain as claimed by the uploader. Furthermore, the license includes restrictions such as "Don't sell unaltered copies of a photo, e.g. don't sell it as a stock photo, poster, print or on a physical product without adding any value." which is a partial restriction on commercial use and as such is not sufficiently free for usage on Wikipedia. Whpq (talk) 00:40, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pexels does allow commercial use. Wikipedia is complying with those guidelines, as the image isn't being sold in any way. It is the same with public domain logos which can be used for any purpose as long as it doesn't break trademark laws. --Atomicdragon136 (talk) 01:46, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Maria 18-19Sep17 guad.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Radar image is from Meteo-France, which is copyrighted B dash (talk) 08:36, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pressphoto.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Proposed action has been carried out. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:13, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File was overwritten without proper sourcing or licensing. Newest version should be deleted. [1] Magog the Ogre (t • c) 16:20, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete image already moved to commons. Needs splitting. c:File:Pressphoto.jpg--DBig Xrayᗙ 14:09, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Done Magog the Ogre (t • c) 17:01, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Um, what kind of action is requested here?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:18, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:28, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:55, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:A sun of our own newspaper headline.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 18:26, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Newspapers are always text and copyrighted. I've never seen PD-textlogo on a newspaper. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 19:45, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I figured I'd wait a day or so and see if the discussion at WP:CQ went anywhere. But we were headed here eventually anyway I recon.
It's PD-text, not PD-text-logo, because it's not a logo. Not that it matters since the rationale is the same. Incidentally, here is a PD-text headline and here's another, both published after 1923.
As was pointed out in the prior discussion, titles and phrases are not eligible for copyright under US law. The type setting is also well below the threshold for originality in the US, and is no more original than this arrangement (ruling) or this arrangement (ruling).
The other elements are incidental to the image and likely not sufficient on their own to even identify the work of which they are a part. GMG ^talk 19:59, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per GMG. Galobtter (pingó mió) 15:43, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment @GreenMeansGo: I'd feel better about keeping this if the partial image on the left side were cropped out. --B (talk) 19:42, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I could certainly be fine with a compromise of cropping out more, but the drive of the discussion at CQ was including slivers of the surrounding material for context of the headline as it appeared in the newspaper, while still including little enough that it would be covered under DM. GMG ^talk 20:09, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:I Will Survive 1993.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2018 November 15. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:15, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:I Will Survive 1993.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.