Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Fab-ri-cate/Cathy Waterman

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 20:27, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Fab-ri-cate/Cathy Waterman

Overly promotional article, userfied more than 1 1/2 years ago. Only two edits to add refs but in no way change the promotional status, and those almost a year ago. as per WP:NOTHOST wikipedia is not a free hosting space, particularly for advertising content. DES ^(talk) 20:00, 13 March 2010 (UTC) DES ^(talk) 20:00, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I don't mind cutting some slack for an editor who is contributing in other ways, but there is virtually no activity other than this page, and nothing at all for months.--SPhilbrick T 20:11, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 21:02, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.