Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Ryanbstevens/userboxes/Pepsi Over Coca-Cola

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Keep. RL0919 (talk) 00:15, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ryanbstevens/userboxes/Pepsi Over Coca-Cola

Duplicate of User:N4nojohn/Userboxes/Pepsi Over Coke, used in only one spot. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 18:53, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - not quite the same, no need to delete. –xeno^talk 18:55, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Does no harm. The way to save space on the server is to not have these unnecessary discussions. The way to improve Wikipedia is to work on dealing with actually harmful things--for example, trying to source the unsourced BLPs. ` DGG ( talk ) 15:41, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per DGG. Can we stop proposing userboxes for deletion unless there's actually a real problem? This is a waste of time.SPhilbrick T 20:08, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Userbox is harmless. Discussion about whether to delete it consumes more space than the userbox itself. --SJK (talk) 09:54, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I agree that this is a benign userbox. Warrah (talk) 12:50, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.