Wikipedia talk:Deletion review/Archives/2015/March
 | This is an archive of past discussions on Wikipedia:Deletion review. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Semi-protected edit request on 16 March 2015
 | This edit request to Wikipedia:Deletion review/Active has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I don´t know why Salva de la Cruz page has been deleted https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salva_de_la_Cruz_Pastor I breg for not deleted it. I don´t know how to make that pages, so please I breg someone help me and corretc it in order for not beiing deleted. Thanks Elenadh8120 (talk) 07:58, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
Not done This page is only for discussing improvements to the WP:Deletion review page, not the place to raise questions like yours.
The reasons for deletion are stated at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salva de la Cruz Pastor a review which ran from 13-20 February - Arjayay (talk) 14:55, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
Technical question: Reflists template?
What produces the refrences list at the very bottom of this page? I'm talking about the one that's below the table of 2006 archive links and above the Categories line. Presumably this is a Reflist-talk template transcluded from somewhere, but I can't figure out where. -- RoySmith (talk) 13:56, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
- I am pretty sure that the template transcluded in the page Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2015 March 11 is the source of it. It's being used to generate a list of sources "within the discussion" but there aren't any reflist temples transcluded anywhere closer to the bottom of the page. Eluchil404 (talk) 04:40, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
- Currently I don't see a references list at the bottom of this page. Perhaps earlier it might have had an Automatically generated reference list, and then the reference markup that was causing it to be generated was moved off of this page? – Margin1522 (talk) 14:45, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
Nakulmehra (talk) 04:53, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
The article named as Suraj Gowda has deleted. I had go through all moderators suggested links and I had understand the notability requirements. I feel the subject meets your requirements because I had mentioned all the verifiable evidence and also it's outside of Wikipedia as per notability guidelines. And he is a celebrity so also it's not a permastub. Our references are from good news sources and net blogs as mentioned in Wiki guideleines.
I want the draft back because I think it can be improved and relevant sources (be specific, with html links) establish notability. So plz re-consider it and if is there any changes needed, I will surely follow and do the changes as per your suggestions.
- It looks like it'd been moved to the draftspace where it was nominated for MfD. Can you show us an example of your sources? Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:52, 20 March 2015 (UTC)