User contributions for Barberio

5 August 2016

• 13:4213:42, 5 August 2016 diff hist +466 Talk:History of the Internet →Reverse copyright infringement: DCMA notice filed with Lulu

15 July 2016

• 12:1612:16, 15 July 2016 diff hist +478 Talk:MI6 →"Minister Responsible": JIC is the director of intelligence services, not Boris, who is notationally "responsible".
• 11:4211:42, 15 July 2016 diff hist +576 Talk:MI6 →"Minister Responsible": new section

22 December 2015

• 18:1318:13, 22 December 2015 diff hist +161 Talk:Christmas and holiday season →"Happy Christmas" more common in GB and IR: Additionally, OED informs me that in the 19th century Happy and Merry both had uses where the connotation was being drunk, so it seems dubious a line of origin.
• 18:0918:09, 22 December 2015 diff hist +1,366 Talk:Christmas and holiday season →"Happy Christmas" more common in GB and IR: Please provide cites.
• 14:2914:29, 22 December 2015 diff hist −276 Christmas and holiday season →History of the phrase: The citation actually contradicts what this paragraph was saying. It's a neologism popularised in the 20th century following Queen Elizabeth II's personal preference and there is no evidence of predominant use or Victorian link

15 July 2015

• 00:3900:39, 15 July 2015 diff hist +676 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Lightbreather/Proposed decision →Protonk's section: The findings of fact, and the principles, appear to attempt to define being "annoying" as the same as being "vexatious".

14 July 2015

• 23:4923:49, 14 July 2015 diff hist +238 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Lightbreather/Proposed decision →Protonk's section: "she'd never take no for an answer"
• 20:2620:26, 14 July 2015 diff hist +811 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Lightbreather/Proposed decision →Protonk's section: attempting to use all of her options has been cited as factual evidence of "Battleground behaviour and responses to good-faith criticism"
• 13:3013:30, 14 July 2015 diff hist +413 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Lightbreather/Proposed decision →Protonk's section: We can't do everything, therefore we ''must'' do nothing.

13 July 2015

• 12:0812:08, 13 July 2015 diff hist +52 m Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Lightbreather/Proposed decision →Barberio's Section: sign
• 12:0812:08, 13 July 2015 diff hist −4 m Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Lightbreather/Proposed decision →Barberio's Section: copy-edit
• 12:0712:07, 13 July 2015 diff hist +1,277 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Lightbreather/Proposed decision →Barberio's Section: new section

1 February 2015

• 17:2917:29, 1 February 2015 diff hist +2,481 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard →Arbitrary section break the Nth: negative effects from having an undocumented, not very well understood process
• 14:2114:21, 1 February 2015 diff hist +315 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard →Arbitrary section break the Nth: Inferance
• 14:1914:19, 1 February 2015 diff hist +1 m Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard →Arbitrary section break the Nth: fix {
• 14:1814:18, 1 February 2015 diff hist +1,070 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard →Arbitrary section break the Nth: Wiki-lawyering is happening over this anyway.
• 12:2412:24, 1 February 2015 diff hist +41 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard →Request to Roger Davies: Arbitrary section break
• 12:2112:21, 1 February 2015 diff hist +1,304 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard →Request to Roger Davies: "double secret probation"
• 12:0012:00, 1 February 2015 diff hist +909 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard →Request to Roger Davies: Policy *should* reflect current practice, so that process is understood by all editors not just the ones "in the know".

31 January 2015

• 23:4023:40, 31 January 2015 diff hist +640 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard →Statement by Guy Macon: Not reflective of the current system.
• 23:3423:34, 31 January 2015 diff hist +243 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard →Request to Roger Davies: Evidence language.
• 23:2823:28, 31 January 2015 diff hist −1 m Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard →Request to Roger Davies: fix again
• 23:2523:25, 31 January 2015 diff hist 0 m Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard →Request to Roger Davies: fix
• 23:1723:17, 31 January 2015 diff hist +2 m Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard →Request to Roger Davies: fix
• 23:0623:06, 31 January 2015 diff hist +2 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard →Should the committee have a direct mandate to accept and consider evidence of mitigating circumstances?: Correct template
• 22:5722:57, 31 January 2015 diff hist +355 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard →Request to Roger Davies: sample language
• 22:0622:06, 31 January 2015 diff hist +591 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard →Request to Roger Davies: You appear to have just written the guideline on accepting mitigating circumstances you said could not be written.
• 20:2020:20, 31 January 2015 diff hist +363 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard →Statement by Guy Macon: "Support"
• 20:1420:14, 31 January 2015 diff hist +282 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard →Request to Roger Davies: Your suggestion would in fact, be one more of those "Wrong ways to change policy".
• 20:0420:04, 31 January 2015 diff hist +77 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard →Statement by Guy Macon: ruthless and strict
• 20:0320:03, 31 January 2015 diff hist +348 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard →Statement by Guy Macon: Trim the herd.
• 20:0020:00, 31 January 2015 diff hist +422 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard →Request to Roger Davies: Bike shed.
• 19:5719:57, 31 January 2015 diff hist +386 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard →Request to Roger Davies: Reply to Doug
• 19:4019:40, 31 January 2015 diff hist +728 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard →Request to Roger Davies: Misreading of WP:DR?
• 18:4218:42, 31 January 2015 diff hist +877 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard →Request to Roger Davies: And yes, we absolutely need policy reform here.
• 18:2318:23, 31 January 2015 diff hist +1,091 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard Request to Roger Davis to sort something out on what community reform process should actually be followed.
• 18:0218:02, 31 January 2015 diff hist −570 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard →Should the committee have a direct mandate to accept and consider evidence of mitigating circumstances?: Moving threaded discussion to my talk page.
• 18:0218:02, 31 January 2015 diff hist +943 User talk:Barberio →Moved here from ArbCom Notice Board: new section
• 16:4816:48, 31 January 2015 diff hist +1,405 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard →Should the committee have a direct mandate to accept and consider evidence of mitigating circumstances?: new section
• 16:3616:36, 31 January 2015 diff hist +595 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard →Consensus forming: If "use common sense" were such an easy thing, then ArbCom wouldn't need to exist in the first place.

30 January 2015

• 11:2111:21, 30 January 2015 diff hist +734 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard →Consensus forming: Not an issue of individual difference of point of view.
• 10:0610:06, 30 January 2015 diff hist +237 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard →Consensus forming: Reply to Roger.
• 10:0110:01, 30 January 2015 diff hist +576 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard →Topic bans relating to "gender or sexuality, broadly construed.”: Reply to Roger.
• 09:5309:53, 30 January 2015 diff hist +531 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard →Consensus forming: Reply to Roger.
• 09:2009:20, 30 January 2015 diff hist +938 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard →Consensus forming: inconsistency
• 08:3608:36, 30 January 2015 diff hist +341 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard →Consensus forming: This seems to be a sign that there needs to be review of the policy in this area.
• 00:0100:01, 30 January 2015 diff hist +301 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard →Consensus forming: Can we also say that there's consensus that there has been general confusion around submitting evidence of off-site harassment, rooted in unclear and inconsistent understanding of what the committee will consider

29 January 2015

• 23:5023:50, 29 January 2015 diff hist +524 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard Potential consensus forming on the press release being a mistake?
• 23:0323:03, 29 January 2015 diff hist +46 User talk:Barberio/sandbox →Reform: and collect evidence.