Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Contribute
Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
Languages
Search
Search
Appearance
Donate
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Donate
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Viewing filter 559: archive.is additions
Help
Home
Recent filter changes
Examine past edits
Edit filter log
English
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
General
Upload file
Special pages
Printable version
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
In other projects
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Editing filter 559 (see also a
graph
of recent actions)
Filter parameters
Filter ID:
559
Description:
(publicly viewable)
Filter hits:
17,723 hits
Conditions:
(
documentation
)
page_namespace == 0 & ( user_age < 10000 | ! "confirmed" in user_groups ) & ( ( added_lines irlike "//(.*?)archive\.is" & ! removed_lines irlike "//(.*?)archive\.is" ) | ( added_lines irlike "//(.*?)archive\.today" & ! removed_lines irlike "//(.*?)archive\.today" ) ) & ! "bot" in user_groups & ! summary irlike "rv|revert|undid"
page_namespace == 0 & ( user_age < 10000 | ! "confirmed" in user_groups ) & ( ( added_lines irlike "//(.*?)archive\.is" & ! removed_lines irlike "//(.*?)archive\.is" ) | ( added_lines irlike "//(.*?)archive\.today" & ! removed_lines irlike "//(.*?)archive\.today" ) ) & ! "bot" in user_groups & ! summary irlike "rv|revert|undid"
Notes:
removing block on archive.org As always, log only to start with. Will escalate to block once the filter proves its worth. changed to "added lines" updating to include new rogue archive expanded range seems to have gone away for now too many false hits from 2.89.*.* expanded range expanded range again retargeting to archive.is spambot Disabling. This should be handled by the spam blacklist. --Reaper 2014-01-02 Too prevalent to do so. --Kww Changed name - not all additions are spam; note that blacklisting could be implemented in the background now, but leave this on for some time (after the removal) so that editors will not be able to revert removals of this link, spam-blacklist is ignored on rollback and similar. Exempt bots as well as admins and rollbackers who are doing a rollback. - KoH Actually, it's affecting Twinkle vandal-fighters as well. Removing the admin/rollbacker requirement, leaving only edit summary (which is why it is important that this filter remains private). - KoH Isn't this uniformly blocked by the blacklist? Disabling for test purposes; will reënable if it's not. Nyttend Apparently not; I can't find anything relevant on the blacklist. Reverts need a broader criterion. - KoH Format. -DF Replaced with spam blacklist entry. The reasons to originally make this an abuse filter instead of a spam blacklist entry no longer exist -Jackmcbarn OK, for now this should be fine - reverted, and added others Bit more specific on external links Too many false positives (archive.lincoln.edu, archive.fortune.com, etc.). Reducing to just archive.is (the main URL) and archive.today (unlikely to have false positives). --Kaldari Disable as redundant/unmonitored and per Jackmcbarn. See [[Wikipedia:Edit_filter_noticeboard#559]]. Also making public as it's unclear why this is private (I don't think the edit summary line qualifies). --ProcrastinatingReader 21:02 30 Oct 2022
Flags:
Hide details of this filter from public view
Enable this filter
Mark as deleted
Filter last modified:
21:02, 30 October 2022
by
ProcrastinatingReader
(
talk
|
contribs
)
History:
View this filter's history
Tools:
Export this filter to another wiki
{"data":{"rules":"page_namespace == 0 \u0026\r\n(\r\n user_age \u003C 10000 |\r\n ! \"confirmed\" in user_groups\r\n) \u0026\r\n(\r\n (\r\n added_lines irlike \"//(.*?)archive\\.is\" \u0026 \r\n ! removed_lines irlike \"//(.*?)archive\\.is\"\r\n ) |\r\n (\r\n added_lines irlike \"//(.*?)archive\\.today\" \u0026 \r\n ! removed_lines irlike \"//(.*?)archive\\.today\"\r\n )\r\n) \u0026 \r\n! \"bot\" in user_groups \u0026\r\n! summary irlike \"rv|revert|undid\"","name":"archive.is additions","comments":"removing block on archive.org\r\n\r\nAs always, log only to start with. Will escalate to block once the filter proves its worth.\r\n\r\nchanged to \"added lines\"\r\n\r\nupdating to include new rogue archive\r\n\r\nexpanded range\r\n\r\nseems to have gone away for now\r\ntoo many false hits from 2.89.*.*\r\n\r\nexpanded range\r\nexpanded range again\r\n\r\nretargeting to archive.is spambot\r\n\r\nDisabling. This should be handled by the spam blacklist. --Reaper 2014-01-02\r\n\r\nToo prevalent to do so. --Kww\r\n\r\nChanged name - not all additions are spam; note that blacklisting could be implemented in the background now, but leave this on for some time (after the removal) so that editors will not be able to revert removals of this link, spam-blacklist is ignored on rollback and similar.\r\n\r\nExempt bots as well as admins and rollbackers who are doing a rollback. - KoH\r\n\r\nActually, it's affecting Twinkle vandal-fighters as well. Removing the admin/rollbacker requirement, leaving only edit summary (which is why it is important that this filter remains private). - KoH\r\n\r\nIsn't this uniformly blocked by the blacklist? Disabling for test purposes; will re\u00ebnable if it's not. Nyttend\r\n Apparently not; I can't find anything relevant on the blacklist.\r\n\r\nReverts need a broader criterion. - KoH\r\n\r\nFormat. -DF\r\n\r\nReplaced with spam blacklist entry. The reasons to originally make this an abuse filter instead of a spam blacklist entry no longer exist -Jackmcbarn\r\n\r\nOK, for now this should be fine - reverted, and added others\r\nBit more specific on external links\r\n\r\nToo many false positives (archive.lincoln.edu, archive.fortune.com, etc.). Reducing to just archive.is (the main URL) and archive.today (unlikely to have false positives). --Kaldari\r\n\r\nDisable as redundant/unmonitored and per Jackmcbarn. See [[Wikipedia:Edit_filter_noticeboard#559]]. Also making public as it's unclear why this is private (I don't think the edit summary line qualifies). --ProcrastinatingReader 21:02 30 Oct 2022","group":"default","actions":[],"enabled":false,"deleted":false,"privacylevel":0,"global":false},"actions":[]}
Actions to take when matched
Trigger actions only if the user trips a rate limit
Number of actions to allow:
Period of time (in seconds):
Group throttle by:
user
See
the documentation on mediawiki.org
.
Trigger these actions after giving the user a warning
System message to use for warning:
abusefilter-warning
Other message
Page name of other message:
(without "MediaWiki:" prefix)
Show/Hide preview of selected message
Prevent the user from performing the action in question
System message to use for disallowing:
abusefilter-disallowed
Other message
Page name of other message:
(without "MediaWiki:" prefix)
Show/Hide preview of selected message
Revoke the user's autoconfirmed status
Tag the edit in contributions lists and page histories
Tags to apply:
(see
Wikipedia:Tags
for use and formatting)
(please don't rename a tag here, see link above)
(one per line, no commas, publicly visible)
Require the user to complete a CAPTCHA in order to proceed with the action. Users with permission to skip a CAPTCHA are exempt.