Jump to content

Examine individual changes

This page allows you to examine the variables generated by the Edit Filter for an individual change.

Variables generated for this change

VariableValue
Name of the user account (user_name)
'24.22.200.105'
Page ID (page_id)
8536201
Page namespace (page_namespace)
4
Page title without namespace (page_title)
'Reference desk/Entertainment'
Full page title (page_prefixedtitle)
'Wikipedia:Reference desk/Entertainment'
Action (action)
'edit'
Edit summary/reason (summary)
'all time favorite camp song'
Whether or not the edit is marked as minor (no longer in use) (minor_edit)
false
Old page wikitext, before the edit (old_wikitext)
'[[Category:Non-talk pages that are automatically signed]]<noinclude>{{Wikipedia:Reference desk/header|WP:RD/E}} </noinclude> {{Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Archives/Entertainment/2009 November 2}} {{Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Archives/Entertainment/2009 November 3}} {{Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Archives/Entertainment/2009 November 4}} = November 5 = == What movie? == What Movie? What movie was it where a teen's brother is crippled because they played football on the roof. And then he uses the brother's wheelchair to get into baseball game for free. And the brother explains the meaning of the poem about God carrying the footsteps to the teens stoner friend? And the stoner friend says god is one bad mother ff--? --[[User:Gary123|Gary123]] ([[User talk:Gary123|talk]]) 00:13, 5 November 2009 (UTC) : [[Outside Providence (film)|Outside Providence]]? -- [[User:KathrynLybarger|KathrynLybarger]] ([[User talk:KathrynLybarger|talk]]) 03:56, 5 November 2009 (UTC) == Another American football question... == A comment at [[Talk:1916 Cumberland vs. Georgia Tech football game]] says, "I *believe* this rule is actually still on the books, but at least at the time, the team scored upon had a choice to kick off or to receive." Any idea whether this really was/is a rule? I don't know where to go to find NCAA or NFL rules. [[User:Nyttend|Nyttend]] ([[User talk:Nyttend|talk]]) 03:51, 5 November 2009 (UTC) :Someone had a football question recently, and I and maybe others posted rules histories. I'll see if I can find that. ←[[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Baseball_Bugs|carrots]]→ 04:04, 5 November 2009 (UTC) ::The first place I looked was an official NFL rules book from 2007, which states "after a try [i.e. a point-after-touchdown attempt] the team on defense during the try shall receive." They do not have a choice in the matter, at present, in the NFL. I'll see what else I can find. ←[[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Baseball_Bugs|carrots]]→ 04:17, 5 November 2009 (UTC) :::From the question about substitutions, farther up the page, we have a link for the history of college rules [http://en.allexperts.com/q/College-Football-2792/2008/4/Div-1-College-Football.htm] and a link for the history of NFL rules [http://www.sportsattic.com/araig/NflRulesHistory.htm] ←[[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Baseball_Bugs|carrots]]→ 04:19, 5 November 2009 (UTC) ::::Hmm, I missed that; I was the asker for the substitutions questions, so I should have seen that. I'm surprised to see this usage of "try"; I would have expected that, if it were used at all today, it would be an alternate name for touchdown, given its relation to the [[try]] in Rugby. [[User:Nyttend|Nyttend]] ([[User talk:Nyttend|talk]]) 04:39, 5 November 2009 (UTC) :::::My first link was about subs, which is not too useful, and the NFL rules history doesn't bring up the subject. I have not found a history of college rules as such, nor even a link for current rules. Someone was saying something in a previous thread to the effect that a touchdown (which equates to a "try" in rugby) used to be fewer points than the "try" in American football. I had never heard that before, and I'm kind of skeptical. Back to the 222-0 game, I did find a ''Sports Illustrated'' article that simply parrots the play-by-play, and says Cumberland switched (for awhile) to kicking off after being scored upon, but with no explanation of when or if that approach was no longer allowed. American football was much more of a running and kicking game in those days than it is now, because the forward pass was in its infancy and was considered to be more a desparation play. So teams mostly ran, which meant it took longer to get from one of the field to the other, obviously. To push the other team back, a team might kick on 3rd, 2nd or even 1st down just to get the ball out of their territory. That's what Cumberland tried to do, and obviously it didn't work. Now I'm going to display my ignorance. These articles keep saying Tech never made a first down, because they scored on every set of downs. However, once they had reached 10 yards, wouldn't that count as a first down? It's just that they kept on running, and scored. Maybe that's a rule subtlety that I'm unfamiliar with. ←[[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Baseball_Bugs|carrots]]→ 04:57, 5 November 2009 (UTC) :If you want to know about when a certain rule was in place, and what the nature of rule changes in the history of American Football is, [[David M. Nelson]]'s ''The Anatomy of a Game'' is pretty much canonical. Nelson served on the rules committee longer than anyone except Walter Camp himself, and his book is at once comprehensive and an easy read on this subject. If ANY source will cover such a rule from such an old game, Nelson will. --[[User:Jayron32|<font style="color:#000099">Jayron</font>]]'''''[[User talk:Jayron32|<font style="color:#009900">32</font>]]''''' 05:34, 5 November 2009 (UTC) ::Do you happen to have a copy of that book and/or do you know if it's in print? ←[[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Baseball_Bugs|carrots]]→ 05:42, 5 November 2009 (UTC) :::[http://books.google.com/books?id=OmwfnipKuogC&lpg=PA25&ots=ojXTkmaDjp&dq=The%20Anatomy%20of%20a%20Game%3A%20Football%2C%20the%20Rules%2C%20and%20the%20Men%20Who%20Made%20the%20Game&pg=PP1#v=onepage&q=&f=false google books] does. The last copy I used was about 12 years ago in my college library, and I have not handled a copy since then. Its a bit of a rare book, but still awesome. --[[User:Jayron32|<font style="color:#000099">Jayron</font>]]'''''[[User talk:Jayron32|<font style="color:#009900">32</font>]]''''' 06:03, 5 November 2009 (UTC) ::::I saw. Unfortunately, the appendix with its chronology of rules stops just before it gets to the "kicking game" section. But the amount of tinkering with the rules every year was amazing. It's perfectly reasonable to assume that at one time, the team scored upon would have the option to kick the ball instead of receiving it. Baseball has done relatively little tinkering since the 60 foot 6 inch pitching distance was established in 1893. The designated hitter was probably the only truly innovative rule change in the 116 years since then. ←[[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Baseball_Bugs|carrots]]→ 06:20, 5 November 2009 (UTC) :::::Well, there has been some tinkering. They lowered the height of the mound after Bob Gibson; they have been playing with Instant Replay recently, and I expect that soon just about anything outside of balls & strikes will soon be reviewable. But as already noted in the last thread where we talked about this, MOST of the minutae of tinkering in football rules is to control exactly how and in what way you are allowed to collide with someone else; they have all been basically injury control rules, at least since the last major rules on free substitution happened in the 1960's. Back to Nelson's book, worldcat lists the book availible at MANY university libraries. If you click the "search libraries" link at the google books entry I note above, you can find a nearby library where you can find it. --[[User:Jayron32|<font style="color:#000099">Jayron</font>]]'''''[[User talk:Jayron32|<font style="color:#009900">32</font>]]''''' 06:30, 5 November 2009 (UTC) :::::::Also, depending on how crazy you want to get, Nelson's original files are still preserved at [http://www.lib.udel.edu/ud/spec/findaids/nelsond1.htm The University of Delaware Library], so it is still possible to literally go to THE SOURCE on this one. --[[User:Jayron32|<font style="color:#000099">Jayron</font>]]'''''[[User talk:Jayron32|<font style="color:#009900">32</font>]]''''' 06:34, 5 November 2009 (UTC) ::::::::I'll give that a look. Regarding baseball, nearly all the rules since the "Knickerbocker Rules" of 1845 have had to do with balancing offense and defense. Baseball used to be a high-scoring game. Not at the level of cricket, of course, which is like basketball played with bats in that sense. But over time the defense has gained certain advantages, of which the invention of the glove was only one. The rules makers changed the number of "balls" several times, and changed the nature of what a "strike" is to some extent. Once the pitchers were allowed to pitch overhand, it had a negative impact on hitting, so they repositioned the pitching distance, twice (or three times, actually). All of that stuff was prior to 1900, of course. Changes in equipment and expansion of seating (and shrinking of field size) led to changes in strategy, though with very little change to the actual rules. Following 1968, "the year of the pitcher", the rules makers didn't exactly lower the mound. What they did instead was to establish a maximum and uniform height. It was said at the time that the Dodgers pitching mound was the highest in baseball, and the Senators was the lowest. Guess which of those two teams was the more successful during that era. The DH came along over 35 years ago, and MLB still can't make up its mind about it. Instant replay, while it might affect the outcome of a call, doesn't change the basic nature of the game. Using a machine to call balls and strikes might. I think we're a long ways from that. ←[[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Baseball_Bugs|carrots]]→ 07:01, 5 November 2009 (UTC) :Found it! Page 454 of Nelson's book, [http://books.google.com/books?id=OmwfnipKuogC&lpg=PA25&ots=ojXTkmaDjp&dq=The%20Anatomy%20of%20a%20Game%3A%20Football%2C%20the%20Rules%2C%20and%20the%20Men%20Who%20Made%20the%20Game&pg=PA454#v=onepage&q=&f=false link here], states that in 1903 the rule was "The team scored upon shall have the option of kicking off or have the opponents kick off". The copy is missing some pages in this appendix, so, for example, I can't see anything from 1937-1976. The 1922 rule changes ''may have'' eliminated this rule, but the wording is hard to follow. We do know that the rule was explicitly allowed from 1903, and I see nothing to contradict that it was still in place by 1916. --[[User:Jayron32|<font style="color:#000099">Jayron</font>]]'''''[[User talk:Jayron32|<font style="color:#009900">32</font>]]''''' 06:58, 5 November 2009 (UTC) ::Beautiful! ←[[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Baseball_Bugs|carrots]]→ 07:01, 5 November 2009 (UTC) :::Finally found a reasonly current (2008) NCAA rules book [http://www.ncaapublications.com/Uploads/PDF/Football_Rulesadc982b5-03fb-4e27-828c-c2d26b95e6c1.pdf] in which it states on pages FR-110 and FR-111, respectively, that the team scoring the touchdown or field goal must kick off. So the answer to OP's question boils down to: Yes, it was legal for Cumberland to kick off the Tech in 1916 after Tech had scored a touchdown; and no, that option is no longer available. ←[[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Baseball_Bugs|carrots]]→ 07:36, 5 November 2009 (UTC) ::::+1 for Jayron32. That's awesome. [[User:Comet Tuttle|Comet Tuttle]] ([[User talk:Comet Tuttle|talk]]) 01:12, 6 November 2009 (UTC) == [[Richie Rome]] or Ritchie Rome == A famous producer called [[Richie Rome]]. I'm German, but I think ''Ri'''''t'''''chie Rome'' would be more correctly. Google and discogs knows both names of the same person. So what is right? Thanks in advance -- [[User:Jlorenz1|jlorenz1]] ([[User talk:Jlorenz1|talk]]) 08:50, 5 November 2009 (UTC) : [http://books.google.de/books?id=GG1jtWGU0S8C&pg=PA223&dq=Richie+Rome&client=firefox-a#v=onepage&q=Richie%20Rome&f=false This book] uses Ritchie Rome -- [[User:Jlorenz1|jlorenz1]] ([[User talk:Jlorenz1|talk]]) 09:17, 5 November 2009 (UTC) : The authority file at Library of Congress says Richie Rome.[http://authorities.loc.gov/cgi-bin/Pwebrecon.cgi?AuthRecID=1724487&v1=1&HC=1&SEQ=20091105091340&PID=u8f9ikzQCTT4pumtqZERdeAceyyp] -- [[User:KathrynLybarger|KathrynLybarger]] ([[User talk:KathrynLybarger|talk]]) 14:17, 5 November 2009 (UTC) :Richie is a nickname for [[Richard]]. There's no t in Richard, so the short version wouldn't usually include a t, and none of the notable [[Richie]]s we list are Ritchies; although some people ''may'' prefer to spell their name that way. Richie and [[Ritchie]] are also surnames. -- [[User:JackofOz|JackofOz]] ([[User talk:JackofOz|talk]]) 22:03, 5 November 2009 (UTC) == [[Bones (TV series)|Bones]] == Booth is talking to some guy who cleans cars. The guy mentions he works for a lot of drug dealers without knowing. He further mentions that he has an advert in a "[[laundromat]]" (unfamiliar term to me, I'm not American). Booth, shortly before being interrupted, starts to say something linking the drug dealers with the laundromat. Why? Do a lot of drug dealers pay to have their clothes washed? [[User:Vimescarrot|Vimescarrot]] ([[User talk:Vimescarrot|talk]]) 21:57, 5 November 2009 (UTC) :Might it have been a reference to [[money laundering]]? [[Special:Contributions/86.142.224.71|86.142.224.71]] ([[User talk:86.142.224.71|talk]]) 22:29, 5 November 2009 (UTC) ::Could the laundromat be a [[front organization|front business]] for a drug ring? Or a place where they make drops (maybe hide a package in a dryer for the next guy to pick it up? Could it just be a public place for criminals to have indiscreet meetings? &mdash;'''[[User:Akrabbim|Akrabbim]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Akrabbim|talk]]</sup> 22:41, 5 November 2009 (UTC) :::In case anyone thought otherwise, the episode was not about the drug dealing or this minor carwashing character - it was just a side conversation that was never referenced in any other part of the episode. So it's more likely to refer to something generally known than anything in-universe. [[User:Vimescarrot|Vimescarrot]] ([[User talk:Vimescarrot|talk]]) 22:46, 5 November 2009 (UTC) :Perhaps the "advert in the laundromat" was a card ("Your Local Car Wash") on a board provided by the laundromat owner. It would be a place where local people come, so a good place to advertise services.[[User:Sussexonian|Sussexonian]] ([[User talk:Sussexonian|talk]]) 23:24, 5 November 2009 (UTC) ::It probably was, from the context, yes. Do drug dealers advertise using these cards or something? O_o [[User:Vimescarrot|Vimescarrot]] ([[User talk:Vimescarrot|talk]]) 06:36, 6 November 2009 (UTC) :::Well, it's a place people can advertise at no cost and without the kind of critical attention that a newspaper's staff, for example, would give to printed ads. I think that's all. --Anonymous, 08:02 UTC, November 6, 2009. :Self-service businesses are often used for money laundering. It is very easy to do. You put a bunch of washing machines into a store and let people use them. Say you bring in $200 over the week. You can then add another $200 from another source (such as drugs). Then, when it comes time to service the machines, you pay some company $150 to "service" the machines (they don't actually do anything - just take the money). So, you took in $200 for nothing and sent out $150 for nothing, but it all looks legitimate on paper. Multiply those values about a couple thousand and you have a real money laundering business. -- [[User:Kainaw|<font color='#ff0000'>k</font><font color='#cc0033'>a</font><font color='#990066'>i</font><font color='#660099'>n</font><font color='#3300cc'>a</font><font color='#0000ff'>w</font>]][[User talk:Kainaw|&trade;]] 18:28, 6 November 2009 (UTC) ::Cheers! [[User:Vimescarrot|Vimescarrot]] ([[User talk:Vimescarrot|talk]]) 11:29, 7 November 2009 (UTC) = November 6 = == names of Jeff Beck songs == What are the names of the two songs that Jeff Beck performed at the 2007 Crossroads Guitar Festival that is shown on TV (they aren't on the DVD). [[User:Bubba73|Bubba73]] [[User talk:Bubba73|(the argument clinic)]], 08:53, 6 November 2009 (UTC) == beatles songs == What names are used in Beatles songs? I've looked and looked, but there is no comprehensive list anywhere. Listening to or reading every album is a daunting task. My daughter, and several others, are expecting babies and want to add Beatles characters to their "possible names" list. Someone said there was already a Wiki article with this information, but I can't find it. I figured if anyone would have it, it would be the Wiki. Thanks for your help <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/75.175.49.21|75.175.49.21]] ([[User talk:75.175.49.21|talk]]) 10:57, 6 November 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> :Have a look at [[:Category:The Beatles songs]]. To get you started three off the top of my head are Eleanor Rigby, Julia and Polythene Pam. --[[User:Richardrj|Richardrj]] [[User talk:Richardrj|<sup>talk </sup>]][[Special:Emailuser/Richardrj|<sup>email</sup>]] 11:56, 6 November 2009 (UTC) ::Desmond, Molly, Rita, Sadie, Bungalo Bill, Rocky, Dan, McGill, Lil, Nancy... [[User:Staecker|Staecker]] ([[User talk:Staecker|talk]]) 13:02, 6 November 2009 (UTC) :::"[[Dizzy Miss Lizzie]]" (or "Lizzy"), although they didn't write it. ←[[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Baseball_Bugs|carrots]]→ 13:20, 6 November 2009 (UTC) ::::To find names in titles, start with the album ''[[Please Please Me]]'' and work your way through the "nexts". ←[[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Baseball_Bugs|carrots]]→ 13:25, 6 November 2009 (UTC) :::::"[[Anna (Go to Him)]]" (also not written by the Beatles). Their early work very seldom mentioned names, other than "Baby". They also covered "[[Long Tall Sally]]". "[[Michelle (song)]]" appears to be their first original song that mentions a name. ←[[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Baseball_Bugs|carrots]]→ 13:32, 6 November 2009 (UTC) ::::::"[[Doctor Robert]]", although that has questionable connotations. "[[Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds]]". Several names mentioned in "[[Being for the Benefit of Mr. Kite!]]", which also has underlying drug implications, supposedly. "[[When I'm Sixty-Four]]", which mentions Vera, Chuck and Dave. ←[[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Baseball_Bugs|carrots]]→ 13:39, 6 November 2009 (UTC) <small>[http://www.beatleslyricsarchive.com/viewSong.php?songID=116 Vera, Chuck and Dave are the grandchildren] [[User:Mitch Ames|Mitch Ames]] ([[User talk:Mitch Ames|talk]]) 03:13, 7 November 2009 (UTC)</small> :::::::Not exactly characters, but Ringo mentioned George by name in some of his songs; and John mentioned Paul in "I Am the Walrus". "Dear Prudence" from the white album, along with the names Staecker mentioned that turn up in various other songs on that work, as well as "Martha My Dear". "Julia" was actually about Julian Lennon, as I recall. ←[[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Baseball_Bugs|carrots]]→ 13:44, 6 November 2009 (UTC) ::::::::Let's not forget "Hey, Jude", which I think was also about Julian. "[[Maxwell's Silver Hammer]]", about Maxwell Edison, majoring in Medicine, mentions a woman named Joan. "[[Her Majesty (song)]]" doesn't mention the Queen by name. If they had thought about it, they could have called it "Straight-Laced Lizzy". ←[[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Baseball_Bugs|carrots]]→ 13:50, 6 November 2009 (UTC) :::::::::Julia is about John's mother (or possibly Yoko in an Oedipal sort of way). Hey Jude is about Julian. [[User:Adam Bishop|Adam Bishop]] ([[User talk:Adam Bishop|talk]]) 13:51, 6 November 2009 (UTC) ::::::::::Aha. I do believe you're right. Continuing... "[[Get Back]]" mentions a guy named Joe-Joe, and a woman named Loretta. The ''Let It Be'' album also includes the song "Maggie Mae". I seem to have misplaced the song "Lady Madonna" somewhere. There's also an obscure number from that session called "Teddy Boy". Ok, I'm about Beatled out by now. ←[[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Baseball_Bugs|carrots]]→ 13:55, 6 November 2009 (UTC) :::::::::::If you count Anthology stuff, then there is also [[What's the New Mary Jane]]. [[User:Adam Bishop|Adam Bishop]] ([[User talk:Adam Bishop|talk]]) 16:46, 6 November 2009 (UTC) :Does "Albert" count? "Now they know how many holes it takes to fill the [[Albert Hall]]". I know it's referring to a concert hall, but still... [[Special:Contributions/99.166.95.142|99.166.95.142]] ([[User talk:99.166.95.142|talk]]) 17:07, 6 November 2009 (UTC) ::That also gets into the less-interesting and irrelevant-to-the-questioner's subject about any kind of proper names the Beatles might have used, e.g. Blackburn, Lancashire; Penny Lane; etc. It also occurred to me that in "Honey Don't", Ringo said, "All right George, rock on for Ringo one time," which means John would be the only one of the four not mentioned by name in a Beatles song. ←[[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Baseball_Bugs|carrots]]→ 18:44, 6 November 2009 (UTC) :::He was mentioned in the title (but not the lyrics) of "[[The Ballad of John and Yoko]]", so is the only one of the four mentioned in a title. That more than balances it out, I think. [[User:Dendodge|<em style="color:blue">Den</em><em style="color:red">dodge</em>]] <sub>[[User talk:Dendodge|T]]</sub>\<sup>[[Special:Contributions/Dendodge|C]]</sup> 18:52, 6 November 2009 (UTC) ::::Duh! I was only checking the albums and forgot about that one. Or else I forgot it was considered Beatles and not just John and Yoko. So the OP's grandaughters could be called Yoko also. Or maybe NOT. ←[[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Baseball_Bugs|carrots]]→ 18:56, 6 November 2009 (UTC) :The continuing story of Bungalow Bill. Michelle. Martha My Dear. Lovely Rita Meter Maid. Penny (in Penny Lane, maybe it doesn't count as it's not a person's name there). Billy (Billy Shears in With A Little Help From My Friends). (Lady) Madonna. Jo-Jo, Sweet Loretta Martin (in Get Back). (Mother) Mary in Let It Be. Polythene Pam. My Bonnie (not their song). Maggie Mae. Doctor Robert. Sexy Sadie. Georgia (in Back in the USSR, not as a name). [[User:Tinfoilcat|Tinfoilcat]] ([[User talk:Tinfoilcat|talk]]) 21:57, 6 November 2009 (UTC) == Tracking down a [[Porn Star]] == I just found out that a girl I knew in school a couple of years ago has made an adult film. I know her real name and the title of the film. Where can I look up stage names she used and other films she was in? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/75.60.31.103|75.60.31.103]] ([[User talk:75.60.31.103|talk]]) 17:36, 6 November 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> :I'd try iafd.com to see if the film's name is listed. -- [[User:Kainaw|<font color='#ff0000'>k</font><font color='#cc0033'>a</font><font color='#990066'>i</font><font color='#660099'>n</font><font color='#3300cc'>a</font><font color='#0000ff'>w</font>]][[User talk:Kainaw|&trade;]] 18:23, 6 November 2009 (UTC) ::We have a ''porn''acopia of links in our own [[WP:P*|Pornography WikiProject]] here for other reliable sources of film info. <span style="font-family:monospace;">[[User:Dismas|Dismas]]</span>|[[User talk:Dismas|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 01:32, 7 November 2009 (UTC) It's possible that the [[IMDB]] has entries for her and the film. Whether they have a listing with her real name depends on whether anyone's ever submitted that information to them, which I guess is unlikely if she's only been doing this for a couple of years. But you could try searching there on her real name. Or you could look up the movie by title (you have to be a registered user to do this for porn titles) and follow the links to female cast members and their "biography" pages. --Anonymous, 03:10 UTC, November 7, 2009. = November 7 = == music video of replay by iyaz == Who is the main actress in the music video? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/99.54.128.229|99.54.128.229]] ([[User talk:99.54.128.229|talk]]) 04:14, 7 November 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> Sorry, which video? [[User:Britmax|Britmax]] ([[User talk:Britmax|talk]]) 08:19, 7 November 2009 (UTC) :I'm pretty sure they mean [[Replay (I.Y.A.Z. song)|this song]]. &mdash;'''[[User:Akrabbim|Akrabbim]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Akrabbim|talk]]</sup> 14:52, 7 November 2009 (UTC) == Films based on advertising characters == I'm aware of ''[[Johnny English]]'' and ''[[Michael Power (advert)|Critical Assignment]]'', but are there any other films based around a character previously seen only in commercials? [[User:GeeJo|GeeJo]] <sup>[[User talk:GeeJo|(t)]]</sup>⁄<sub>[[Special:Contributions/GeeJo|(c)]]</sub> <small>&bull;&nbsp;08:17, 7 November 2009 (UTC)</small> :Not exactly films, but close: [[The California Raisins]] had several albums and a few TV shows. [[Chester Cheetah]] and [[The Noid]] both had videogames, there were some [[Ronald McDonald]] films (all straight-to-video), and of course [[Cookie Monster]] began as an advertising character (though the ads never aired). [[User:Staecker|Staecker]] ([[User talk:Staecker|talk]]) 12:59, 7 November 2009 (UTC) ::It's not a film, but there was a (short) [[Cavemen (TV series)|TV show]] based on the [[GEICO]] [[GEICO Cavemen|cavemen]]. &mdash;'''[[User:Akrabbim|Akrabbim]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Akrabbim|talk]]</sup> 14:56, 7 November 2009 (UTC) :::[[Ernest P. Worrell]] was originally created for television commercials. [[User:Adam Bishop|Adam Bishop]] ([[User talk:Adam Bishop|talk]]) 15:04, 7 November 2009 (UTC) ::::[[Jack Carson]] starred in ''The Good Humor Man''. Aunt Jemima began as a song, then as a character associated with a pancake mix, then as a spokesperson portrayed by several actresses. [[Tess Gardella]] portrayed the character in a film and then adopted the name as a pseudonym for both her Broadway and film roles. [[User:Pepso2|Pepso2]] ([[User talk:Pepso2|talk]]) 16:02, 7 November 2009 (UTC) :Crash test dummies (made popular by [[public service announcement|PSA]]s) had their own toy line ([[The Incredible Crash Dummies]]), and on those was based a short made-for-tv movie ([[The Incredible Crash Dummies (film)]]). There is also a series of (direct to video) features, [[Ronald McDonald#The Wacky Adventures of Ronald McDonald|The Wacky Adventures of Ronald McDonald]]. ::I suppose the Transformers might also count, since they had a movie and TV show based on the toys. [[User:Adam Bishop|Adam Bishop]] ([[User talk:Adam Bishop|talk]]) 22:08, 7 November 2009 (UTC) :The character [[C. W. McCall]] was originally created for an advertising campaign, and the singer in the advertising campaign (the actor who played McCall was a different person) later went on to score hits with songs like [[Convoy (song)|Convoy]] which was itself made into a movie, 1973's ''[[Convoy (film)|Convoy]]''. Thus, we have an ad campaign that gives birth to a fake singer, who has a real hit song, which was later made into a plot for a movie. --[[User:Jayron32|<font style="color:#000099">Jayron</font>]]'''''[[User talk:Jayron32|<font style="color:#009900">32</font>]]''''' 01:41, 8 November 2009 (UTC) == futurama-godfellas == In the futurama episode godfellas (season 3) when bender is drifting through space and starts playing the little piano does anyone know the name of the piano piece he is playing and who wrote it?[[User:Syme1|Syme1]] ([[User talk:Syme1|talk]]) 18:31, 7 November 2009 (UTC) :It is [[Chopin]]'s [[Polonaises Op. 40 (Chopin)|Polonaise in C Minor]]. -- [[User:Kainaw|<font color='#ff0000'>k</font><font color='#cc0033'>a</font><font color='#990066'>i</font><font color='#660099'>n</font><font color='#3300cc'>a</font><font color='#0000ff'>w</font>]][[User talk:Kainaw|&trade;]] 20:40, 7 November 2009 (UTC) :Further, the recording they used is played by [[Ken Keeler]] - who is not a professional pianist. -- [[User:Kainaw|<font color='#ff0000'>k</font><font color='#cc0033'>a</font><font color='#990066'>i</font><font color='#660099'>n</font><font color='#3300cc'>a</font><font color='#0000ff'>w</font>]][[User talk:Kainaw|&trade;]] 20:43, 7 November 2009 (UTC) == The name of this Australian band and its female singer == I'm having trouble remembering the name and the singer of a band. The singer is female, blonde hair and has a very large and noticeable red birthymark on her upper body. I believe the band is Australian and has a name beginning with 'The'. The first name of the of the leader singer was something uncommonly used as a name. I'm thinking it starts with a P though I am not quite sure. I haven't heard any of their songs or know what genre they are, though I would venture to guess they are indie/pop/rock. Thanks [[Special:Contributions/99.250.7.109|99.250.7.109]] ([[User talk:99.250.7.109|talk]]) 22:20, 7 November 2009 (UTC) :Tricky one... I've gone through the dozen or so Aussie bands with lead female vocalists I could think of, but I'm drawing a blank - have you tried searching through [[:Category:Australian rock music groups]]? Of course, if they're not Aussies, it opens the door to a load of others... [[User:Grutness|Grutness]]...''<small><font color="#008822">[[User_talk:Grutness|wha?]]</font></small>'' 23:15, 7 November 2009 (UTC) :I'm going to go with Patience, the lead singer for the band [[The Grates]]. (Looks like she doesn't have her own article) --[[User:Onorem|Onorem]][[Special:Contributions/Onorem|♠]][[User talk:Onorem|Dil]] 23:18, 7 November 2009 (UTC) ::Good call - it looks like Patience Hodgson does indeed have a birthmark covering much of her upper body, if [[http://www.zimbio.com/pictures/YqrK6zdj8QE/Falls+Music+Arts+Festival+2008+Day+3/4LeXaX3IVd_/Patience+Hodgson these], [http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/music_blog/images/2009/03/19/patience.jpg images] are anything to go by. [[User:Grutness|Grutness]]...''<small><font color="#008822">[[User_talk:Grutness|wha?]]</font></small>'' 00:18, 8 November 2009 (UTC) == Sailor song == Anybody know the name of this song, It was produced in early 2000s , 2000 - 2003 , and the music vid was an big ship with sailors singing and i THINk it was in an movie. The sailors wore light blue and white clothes and an light blue hat... like donald duck. It was not animated --- [[Special:Contributions/85.220.45.158|85.220.45.158]] ([[User talk:85.220.45.158|talk]]) 23:10, 7 November 2009 (UTC) THANX. :Probably wrong time period, but perhaps ''[[There Is Nothing Like a Dame]]'' on the [[Morecambe and Wise]] Christmas show, 1977? It featured many celebrities of time, including [[Eddie Waring]], all dressed as sailors shoving mops and buckets around a stage made up to look like a ship. [[User:Astronaut|Astronaut]] ([[User talk:Astronaut|talk]]) 02:16, 8 November 2009 (UTC) Thanks but I don't think it was this old, maybe from 1990s - early 2000s. [[Special:Contributions/85.220.45.158|85.220.45.158]] ([[User talk:85.220.45.158|talk]]) 03:07, 8 November 2009 (UTC) == What song is this? == I remember seeing a music video either from the 80s or the 90s which started out with a giant woman wrapped in layer upon layer of clothes but with a normal-sized head, and as the artist sang to her crews on scaffolding and in helicopters peeled off the clothes, until at the end of the video, the now normal-sized woman stood in front of the artist, who took off the last article of clothing, only to find out that she had no body and was just a floating head. The head then floated away. What was the song and artist? I don't remember any lyrics, just the strange imagery. [[Special:Contributions/71.161.60.125|71.161.60.125]] ([[User talk:71.161.60.125|talk]]) 23:45, 7 November 2009 (UTC) = November 8 ='
New page wikitext, after the edit (new_wikitext)
'[[Category:Non-talk pages that are automatically signed]]<noinclude>{{Wikipedia:Reference desk/header|WP:RD/E}} </noinclude> {{Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Archives/Entertainment/2009 November 2}} {{Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Archives/Entertainment/2009 November 3}} {{Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Archives/Entertainment/2009 November 4}} = November 5 = == What movie? == What Movie? What movie was it where a teen's brother is crippled because they played football on the roof. And then he uses the brother's wheelchair to get into baseball game for free. And the brother explains the meaning of the poem about God carrying the footsteps to the teens stoner friend? And the stoner friend says god is one bad mother ff--? --[[User:Gary123|Gary123]] ([[User talk:Gary123|talk]]) 00:13, 5 November 2009 (UTC) : [[Outside Providence (film)|Outside Providence]]? -- [[User:KathrynLybarger|KathrynLybarger]] ([[User talk:KathrynLybarger|talk]]) 03:56, 5 November 2009 (UTC) == Another American football question... == A comment at [[Talk:1916 Cumberland vs. Georgia Tech football game]] says, "I *believe* this rule is actually still on the books, but at least at the time, the team scored upon had a choice to kick off or to receive." Any idea whether this really was/is a rule? I don't know where to go to find NCAA or NFL rules. [[User:Nyttend|Nyttend]] ([[User talk:Nyttend|talk]]) 03:51, 5 November 2009 (UTC) :Someone had a football question recently, and I and maybe others posted rules histories. I'll see if I can find that. ←[[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Baseball_Bugs|carrots]]→ 04:04, 5 November 2009 (UTC) ::The first place I looked was an official NFL rules book from 2007, which states "after a try [i.e. a point-after-touchdown attempt] the team on defense during the try shall receive." They do not have a choice in the matter, at present, in the NFL. I'll see what else I can find. ←[[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Baseball_Bugs|carrots]]→ 04:17, 5 November 2009 (UTC) :::From the question about substitutions, farther up the page, we have a link for the history of college rules [http://en.allexperts.com/q/College-Football-2792/2008/4/Div-1-College-Football.htm] and a link for the history of NFL rules [http://www.sportsattic.com/araig/NflRulesHistory.htm] ←[[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Baseball_Bugs|carrots]]→ 04:19, 5 November 2009 (UTC) ::::Hmm, I missed that; I was the asker for the substitutions questions, so I should have seen that. I'm surprised to see this usage of "try"; I would have expected that, if it were used at all today, it would be an alternate name for touchdown, given its relation to the [[try]] in Rugby. [[User:Nyttend|Nyttend]] ([[User talk:Nyttend|talk]]) 04:39, 5 November 2009 (UTC) :::::My first link was about subs, which is not too useful, and the NFL rules history doesn't bring up the subject. I have not found a history of college rules as such, nor even a link for current rules. Someone was saying something in a previous thread to the effect that a touchdown (which equates to a "try" in rugby) used to be fewer points than the "try" in American football. I had never heard that before, and I'm kind of skeptical. Back to the 222-0 game, I did find a ''Sports Illustrated'' article that simply parrots the play-by-play, and says Cumberland switched (for awhile) to kicking off after being scored upon, but with no explanation of when or if that approach was no longer allowed. American football was much more of a running and kicking game in those days than it is now, because the forward pass was in its infancy and was considered to be more a desparation play. So teams mostly ran, which meant it took longer to get from one of the field to the other, obviously. To push the other team back, a team might kick on 3rd, 2nd or even 1st down just to get the ball out of their territory. That's what Cumberland tried to do, and obviously it didn't work. Now I'm going to display my ignorance. These articles keep saying Tech never made a first down, because they scored on every set of downs. However, once they had reached 10 yards, wouldn't that count as a first down? It's just that they kept on running, and scored. Maybe that's a rule subtlety that I'm unfamiliar with. ←[[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Baseball_Bugs|carrots]]→ 04:57, 5 November 2009 (UTC) :If you want to know about when a certain rule was in place, and what the nature of rule changes in the history of American Football is, [[David M. Nelson]]'s ''The Anatomy of a Game'' is pretty much canonical. Nelson served on the rules committee longer than anyone except Walter Camp himself, and his book is at once comprehensive and an easy read on this subject. If ANY source will cover such a rule from such an old game, Nelson will. --[[User:Jayron32|<font style="color:#000099">Jayron</font>]]'''''[[User talk:Jayron32|<font style="color:#009900">32</font>]]''''' 05:34, 5 November 2009 (UTC) ::Do you happen to have a copy of that book and/or do you know if it's in print? ←[[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Baseball_Bugs|carrots]]→ 05:42, 5 November 2009 (UTC) :::[http://books.google.com/books?id=OmwfnipKuogC&lpg=PA25&ots=ojXTkmaDjp&dq=The%20Anatomy%20of%20a%20Game%3A%20Football%2C%20the%20Rules%2C%20and%20the%20Men%20Who%20Made%20the%20Game&pg=PP1#v=onepage&q=&f=false google books] does. The last copy I used was about 12 years ago in my college library, and I have not handled a copy since then. Its a bit of a rare book, but still awesome. --[[User:Jayron32|<font style="color:#000099">Jayron</font>]]'''''[[User talk:Jayron32|<font style="color:#009900">32</font>]]''''' 06:03, 5 November 2009 (UTC) ::::I saw. Unfortunately, the appendix with its chronology of rules stops just before it gets to the "kicking game" section. But the amount of tinkering with the rules every year was amazing. It's perfectly reasonable to assume that at one time, the team scored upon would have the option to kick the ball instead of receiving it. Baseball has done relatively little tinkering since the 60 foot 6 inch pitching distance was established in 1893. The designated hitter was probably the only truly innovative rule change in the 116 years since then. ←[[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Baseball_Bugs|carrots]]→ 06:20, 5 November 2009 (UTC) :::::Well, there has been some tinkering. They lowered the height of the mound after Bob Gibson; they have been playing with Instant Replay recently, and I expect that soon just about anything outside of balls & strikes will soon be reviewable. But as already noted in the last thread where we talked about this, MOST of the minutae of tinkering in football rules is to control exactly how and in what way you are allowed to collide with someone else; they have all been basically injury control rules, at least since the last major rules on free substitution happened in the 1960's. Back to Nelson's book, worldcat lists the book availible at MANY university libraries. If you click the "search libraries" link at the google books entry I note above, you can find a nearby library where you can find it. --[[User:Jayron32|<font style="color:#000099">Jayron</font>]]'''''[[User talk:Jayron32|<font style="color:#009900">32</font>]]''''' 06:30, 5 November 2009 (UTC) :::::::Also, depending on how crazy you want to get, Nelson's original files are still preserved at [http://www.lib.udel.edu/ud/spec/findaids/nelsond1.htm The University of Delaware Library], so it is still possible to literally go to THE SOURCE on this one. --[[User:Jayron32|<font style="color:#000099">Jayron</font>]]'''''[[User talk:Jayron32|<font style="color:#009900">32</font>]]''''' 06:34, 5 November 2009 (UTC) ::::::::I'll give that a look. Regarding baseball, nearly all the rules since the "Knickerbocker Rules" of 1845 have had to do with balancing offense and defense. Baseball used to be a high-scoring game. Not at the level of cricket, of course, which is like basketball played with bats in that sense. But over time the defense has gained certain advantages, of which the invention of the glove was only one. The rules makers changed the number of "balls" several times, and changed the nature of what a "strike" is to some extent. Once the pitchers were allowed to pitch overhand, it had a negative impact on hitting, so they repositioned the pitching distance, twice (or three times, actually). All of that stuff was prior to 1900, of course. Changes in equipment and expansion of seating (and shrinking of field size) led to changes in strategy, though with very little change to the actual rules. Following 1968, "the year of the pitcher", the rules makers didn't exactly lower the mound. What they did instead was to establish a maximum and uniform height. It was said at the time that the Dodgers pitching mound was the highest in baseball, and the Senators was the lowest. Guess which of those two teams was the more successful during that era. The DH came along over 35 years ago, and MLB still can't make up its mind about it. Instant replay, while it might affect the outcome of a call, doesn't change the basic nature of the game. Using a machine to call balls and strikes might. I think we're a long ways from that. ←[[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Baseball_Bugs|carrots]]→ 07:01, 5 November 2009 (UTC) :Found it! Page 454 of Nelson's book, [http://books.google.com/books?id=OmwfnipKuogC&lpg=PA25&ots=ojXTkmaDjp&dq=The%20Anatomy%20of%20a%20Game%3A%20Football%2C%20the%20Rules%2C%20and%20the%20Men%20Who%20Made%20the%20Game&pg=PA454#v=onepage&q=&f=false link here], states that in 1903 the rule was "The team scored upon shall have the option of kicking off or have the opponents kick off". The copy is missing some pages in this appendix, so, for example, I can't see anything from 1937-1976. The 1922 rule changes ''may have'' eliminated this rule, but the wording is hard to follow. We do know that the rule was explicitly allowed from 1903, and I see nothing to contradict that it was still in place by 1916. --[[User:Jayron32|<font style="color:#000099">Jayron</font>]]'''''[[User talk:Jayron32|<font style="color:#009900">32</font>]]''''' 06:58, 5 November 2009 (UTC) ::Beautiful! ←[[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Baseball_Bugs|carrots]]→ 07:01, 5 November 2009 (UTC) :::Finally found a reasonly current (2008) NCAA rules book [http://www.ncaapublications.com/Uploads/PDF/Football_Rulesadc982b5-03fb-4e27-828c-c2d26b95e6c1.pdf] in which it states on pages FR-110 and FR-111, respectively, that the team scoring the touchdown or field goal must kick off. So the answer to OP's question boils down to: Yes, it was legal for Cumberland to kick off the Tech in 1916 after Tech had scored a touchdown; and no, that option is no longer available. ←[[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Baseball_Bugs|carrots]]→ 07:36, 5 November 2009 (UTC) ::::+1 for Jayron32. That's awesome. [[User:Comet Tuttle|Comet Tuttle]] ([[User talk:Comet Tuttle|talk]]) 01:12, 6 November 2009 (UTC) == [[Richie Rome]] or Ritchie Rome == A famous producer called [[Richie Rome]]. I'm German, but I think ''Ri'''''t'''''chie Rome'' would be more correctly. Google and discogs knows both names of the same person. So what is right? Thanks in advance -- [[User:Jlorenz1|jlorenz1]] ([[User talk:Jlorenz1|talk]]) 08:50, 5 November 2009 (UTC) : [http://books.google.de/books?id=GG1jtWGU0S8C&pg=PA223&dq=Richie+Rome&client=firefox-a#v=onepage&q=Richie%20Rome&f=false This book] uses Ritchie Rome -- [[User:Jlorenz1|jlorenz1]] ([[User talk:Jlorenz1|talk]]) 09:17, 5 November 2009 (UTC) : The authority file at Library of Congress says Richie Rome.[http://authorities.loc.gov/cgi-bin/Pwebrecon.cgi?AuthRecID=1724487&v1=1&HC=1&SEQ=20091105091340&PID=u8f9ikzQCTT4pumtqZERdeAceyyp] -- [[User:KathrynLybarger|KathrynLybarger]] ([[User talk:KathrynLybarger|talk]]) 14:17, 5 November 2009 (UTC) :Richie is a nickname for [[Richard]]. There's no t in Richard, so the short version wouldn't usually include a t, and none of the notable [[Richie]]s we list are Ritchies; although some people ''may'' prefer to spell their name that way. Richie and [[Ritchie]] are also surnames. -- [[User:JackofOz|JackofOz]] ([[User talk:JackofOz|talk]]) 22:03, 5 November 2009 (UTC) == [[Bones (TV series)|Bones]] == Booth is talking to some guy who cleans cars. The guy mentions he works for a lot of drug dealers without knowing. He further mentions that he has an advert in a "[[laundromat]]" (unfamiliar term to me, I'm not American). Booth, shortly before being interrupted, starts to say something linking the drug dealers with the laundromat. Why? Do a lot of drug dealers pay to have their clothes washed? [[User:Vimescarrot|Vimescarrot]] ([[User talk:Vimescarrot|talk]]) 21:57, 5 November 2009 (UTC) :Might it have been a reference to [[money laundering]]? [[Special:Contributions/86.142.224.71|86.142.224.71]] ([[User talk:86.142.224.71|talk]]) 22:29, 5 November 2009 (UTC) ::Could the laundromat be a [[front organization|front business]] for a drug ring? Or a place where they make drops (maybe hide a package in a dryer for the next guy to pick it up? Could it just be a public place for criminals to have indiscreet meetings? &mdash;'''[[User:Akrabbim|Akrabbim]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Akrabbim|talk]]</sup> 22:41, 5 November 2009 (UTC) :::In case anyone thought otherwise, the episode was not about the drug dealing or this minor carwashing character - it was just a side conversation that was never referenced in any other part of the episode. So it's more likely to refer to something generally known than anything in-universe. [[User:Vimescarrot|Vimescarrot]] ([[User talk:Vimescarrot|talk]]) 22:46, 5 November 2009 (UTC) :Perhaps the "advert in the laundromat" was a card ("Your Local Car Wash") on a board provided by the laundromat owner. It would be a place where local people come, so a good place to advertise services.[[User:Sussexonian|Sussexonian]] ([[User talk:Sussexonian|talk]]) 23:24, 5 November 2009 (UTC) ::It probably was, from the context, yes. Do drug dealers advertise using these cards or something? O_o [[User:Vimescarrot|Vimescarrot]] ([[User talk:Vimescarrot|talk]]) 06:36, 6 November 2009 (UTC) :::Well, it's a place people can advertise at no cost and without the kind of critical attention that a newspaper's staff, for example, would give to printed ads. I think that's all. --Anonymous, 08:02 UTC, November 6, 2009. :Self-service businesses are often used for money laundering. It is very easy to do. You put a bunch of washing machines into a store and let people use them. Say you bring in $200 over the week. You can then add another $200 from another source (such as drugs). Then, when it comes time to service the machines, you pay some company $150 to "service" the machines (they don't actually do anything - just take the money). So, you took in $200 for nothing and sent out $150 for nothing, but it all looks legitimate on paper. Multiply those values about a couple thousand and you have a real money laundering business. -- [[User:Kainaw|<font color='#ff0000'>k</font><font color='#cc0033'>a</font><font color='#990066'>i</font><font color='#660099'>n</font><font color='#3300cc'>a</font><font color='#0000ff'>w</font>]][[User talk:Kainaw|&trade;]] 18:28, 6 November 2009 (UTC) ::Cheers! [[User:Vimescarrot|Vimescarrot]] ([[User talk:Vimescarrot|talk]]) 11:29, 7 November 2009 (UTC) = November 6 = == names of Jeff Beck songs == What are the names of the two songs that Jeff Beck performed at the 2007 Crossroads Guitar Festival that is shown on TV (they aren't on the DVD). [[User:Bubba73|Bubba73]] [[User talk:Bubba73|(the argument clinic)]], 08:53, 6 November 2009 (UTC) == beatles songs == What names are used in Beatles songs? I've looked and looked, but there is no comprehensive list anywhere. Listening to or reading every album is a daunting task. My daughter, and several others, are expecting babies and want to add Beatles characters to their "possible names" list. Someone said there was already a Wiki article with this information, but I can't find it. I figured if anyone would have it, it would be the Wiki. Thanks for your help <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/75.175.49.21|75.175.49.21]] ([[User talk:75.175.49.21|talk]]) 10:57, 6 November 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> :Have a look at [[:Category:The Beatles songs]]. To get you started three off the top of my head are Eleanor Rigby, Julia and Polythene Pam. --[[User:Richardrj|Richardrj]] [[User talk:Richardrj|<sup>talk </sup>]][[Special:Emailuser/Richardrj|<sup>email</sup>]] 11:56, 6 November 2009 (UTC) ::Desmond, Molly, Rita, Sadie, Bungalo Bill, Rocky, Dan, McGill, Lil, Nancy... [[User:Staecker|Staecker]] ([[User talk:Staecker|talk]]) 13:02, 6 November 2009 (UTC) :::"[[Dizzy Miss Lizzie]]" (or "Lizzy"), although they didn't write it. ←[[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Baseball_Bugs|carrots]]→ 13:20, 6 November 2009 (UTC) ::::To find names in titles, start with the album ''[[Please Please Me]]'' and work your way through the "nexts". ←[[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Baseball_Bugs|carrots]]→ 13:25, 6 November 2009 (UTC) :::::"[[Anna (Go to Him)]]" (also not written by the Beatles). Their early work very seldom mentioned names, other than "Baby". They also covered "[[Long Tall Sally]]". "[[Michelle (song)]]" appears to be their first original song that mentions a name. ←[[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Baseball_Bugs|carrots]]→ 13:32, 6 November 2009 (UTC) ::::::"[[Doctor Robert]]", although that has questionable connotations. "[[Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds]]". Several names mentioned in "[[Being for the Benefit of Mr. Kite!]]", which also has underlying drug implications, supposedly. "[[When I'm Sixty-Four]]", which mentions Vera, Chuck and Dave. ←[[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Baseball_Bugs|carrots]]→ 13:39, 6 November 2009 (UTC) <small>[http://www.beatleslyricsarchive.com/viewSong.php?songID=116 Vera, Chuck and Dave are the grandchildren] [[User:Mitch Ames|Mitch Ames]] ([[User talk:Mitch Ames|talk]]) 03:13, 7 November 2009 (UTC)</small> :::::::Not exactly characters, but Ringo mentioned George by name in some of his songs; and John mentioned Paul in "I Am the Walrus". "Dear Prudence" from the white album, along with the names Staecker mentioned that turn up in various other songs on that work, as well as "Martha My Dear". "Julia" was actually about Julian Lennon, as I recall. ←[[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Baseball_Bugs|carrots]]→ 13:44, 6 November 2009 (UTC) ::::::::Let's not forget "Hey, Jude", which I think was also about Julian. "[[Maxwell's Silver Hammer]]", about Maxwell Edison, majoring in Medicine, mentions a woman named Joan. "[[Her Majesty (song)]]" doesn't mention the Queen by name. If they had thought about it, they could have called it "Straight-Laced Lizzy". ←[[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Baseball_Bugs|carrots]]→ 13:50, 6 November 2009 (UTC) :::::::::Julia is about John's mother (or possibly Yoko in an Oedipal sort of way). Hey Jude is about Julian. [[User:Adam Bishop|Adam Bishop]] ([[User talk:Adam Bishop|talk]]) 13:51, 6 November 2009 (UTC) ::::::::::Aha. I do believe you're right. Continuing... "[[Get Back]]" mentions a guy named Joe-Joe, and a woman named Loretta. The ''Let It Be'' album also includes the song "Maggie Mae". I seem to have misplaced the song "Lady Madonna" somewhere. There's also an obscure number from that session called "Teddy Boy". Ok, I'm about Beatled out by now. ←[[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Baseball_Bugs|carrots]]→ 13:55, 6 November 2009 (UTC) :::::::::::If you count Anthology stuff, then there is also [[What's the New Mary Jane]]. [[User:Adam Bishop|Adam Bishop]] ([[User talk:Adam Bishop|talk]]) 16:46, 6 November 2009 (UTC) :Does "Albert" count? "Now they know how many holes it takes to fill the [[Albert Hall]]". I know it's referring to a concert hall, but still... [[Special:Contributions/99.166.95.142|99.166.95.142]] ([[User talk:99.166.95.142|talk]]) 17:07, 6 November 2009 (UTC) ::That also gets into the less-interesting and irrelevant-to-the-questioner's subject about any kind of proper names the Beatles might have used, e.g. Blackburn, Lancashire; Penny Lane; etc. It also occurred to me that in "Honey Don't", Ringo said, "All right George, rock on for Ringo one time," which means John would be the only one of the four not mentioned by name in a Beatles song. ←[[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Baseball_Bugs|carrots]]→ 18:44, 6 November 2009 (UTC) :::He was mentioned in the title (but not the lyrics) of "[[The Ballad of John and Yoko]]", so is the only one of the four mentioned in a title. That more than balances it out, I think. [[User:Dendodge|<em style="color:blue">Den</em><em style="color:red">dodge</em>]] <sub>[[User talk:Dendodge|T]]</sub>\<sup>[[Special:Contributions/Dendodge|C]]</sup> 18:52, 6 November 2009 (UTC) ::::Duh! I was only checking the albums and forgot about that one. Or else I forgot it was considered Beatles and not just John and Yoko. So the OP's grandaughters could be called Yoko also. Or maybe NOT. ←[[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Baseball_Bugs|carrots]]→ 18:56, 6 November 2009 (UTC) :The continuing story of Bungalow Bill. Michelle. Martha My Dear. Lovely Rita Meter Maid. Penny (in Penny Lane, maybe it doesn't count as it's not a person's name there). Billy (Billy Shears in With A Little Help From My Friends). (Lady) Madonna. Jo-Jo, Sweet Loretta Martin (in Get Back). (Mother) Mary in Let It Be. Polythene Pam. My Bonnie (not their song). Maggie Mae. Doctor Robert. Sexy Sadie. Georgia (in Back in the USSR, not as a name). [[User:Tinfoilcat|Tinfoilcat]] ([[User talk:Tinfoilcat|talk]]) 21:57, 6 November 2009 (UTC) == Tracking down a [[Porn Star]] == I just found out that a girl I knew in school a couple of years ago has made an adult film. I know her real name and the title of the film. Where can I look up stage names she used and other films she was in? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/75.60.31.103|75.60.31.103]] ([[User talk:75.60.31.103|talk]]) 17:36, 6 November 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> :I'd try iafd.com to see if the film's name is listed. -- [[User:Kainaw|<font color='#ff0000'>k</font><font color='#cc0033'>a</font><font color='#990066'>i</font><font color='#660099'>n</font><font color='#3300cc'>a</font><font color='#0000ff'>w</font>]][[User talk:Kainaw|&trade;]] 18:23, 6 November 2009 (UTC) ::We have a ''porn''acopia of links in our own [[WP:P*|Pornography WikiProject]] here for other reliable sources of film info. <span style="font-family:monospace;">[[User:Dismas|Dismas]]</span>|[[User talk:Dismas|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 01:32, 7 November 2009 (UTC) It's possible that the [[IMDB]] has entries for her and the film. Whether they have a listing with her real name depends on whether anyone's ever submitted that information to them, which I guess is unlikely if she's only been doing this for a couple of years. But you could try searching there on her real name. Or you could look up the movie by title (you have to be a registered user to do this for porn titles) and follow the links to female cast members and their "biography" pages. --Anonymous, 03:10 UTC, November 7, 2009. = November 7 = == music video of replay by iyaz == Who is the main actress in the music video? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/99.54.128.229|99.54.128.229]] ([[User talk:99.54.128.229|talk]]) 04:14, 7 November 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> Sorry, which video? [[User:Britmax|Britmax]] ([[User talk:Britmax|talk]]) 08:19, 7 November 2009 (UTC) :I'm pretty sure they mean [[Replay (I.Y.A.Z. song)|this song]]. &mdash;'''[[User:Akrabbim|Akrabbim]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Akrabbim|talk]]</sup> 14:52, 7 November 2009 (UTC) == Films based on advertising characters == I'm aware of ''[[Johnny English]]'' and ''[[Michael Power (advert)|Critical Assignment]]'', but are there any other films based around a character previously seen only in commercials? [[User:GeeJo|GeeJo]] <sup>[[User talk:GeeJo|(t)]]</sup>⁄<sub>[[Special:Contributions/GeeJo|(c)]]</sub> <small>&bull;&nbsp;08:17, 7 November 2009 (UTC)</small> :Not exactly films, but close: [[The California Raisins]] had several albums and a few TV shows. [[Chester Cheetah]] and [[The Noid]] both had videogames, there were some [[Ronald McDonald]] films (all straight-to-video), and of course [[Cookie Monster]] began as an advertising character (though the ads never aired). [[User:Staecker|Staecker]] ([[User talk:Staecker|talk]]) 12:59, 7 November 2009 (UTC) ::It's not a film, but there was a (short) [[Cavemen (TV series)|TV show]] based on the [[GEICO]] [[GEICO Cavemen|cavemen]]. &mdash;'''[[User:Akrabbim|Akrabbim]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Akrabbim|talk]]</sup> 14:56, 7 November 2009 (UTC) :::[[Ernest P. Worrell]] was originally created for television commercials. [[User:Adam Bishop|Adam Bishop]] ([[User talk:Adam Bishop|talk]]) 15:04, 7 November 2009 (UTC) ::::[[Jack Carson]] starred in ''The Good Humor Man''. Aunt Jemima began as a song, then as a character associated with a pancake mix, then as a spokesperson portrayed by several actresses. [[Tess Gardella]] portrayed the character in a film and then adopted the name as a pseudonym for both her Broadway and film roles. [[User:Pepso2|Pepso2]] ([[User talk:Pepso2|talk]]) 16:02, 7 November 2009 (UTC) :Crash test dummies (made popular by [[public service announcement|PSA]]s) had their own toy line ([[The Incredible Crash Dummies]]), and on those was based a short made-for-tv movie ([[The Incredible Crash Dummies (film)]]). There is also a series of (direct to video) features, [[Ronald McDonald#The Wacky Adventures of Ronald McDonald|The Wacky Adventures of Ronald McDonald]]. ::I suppose the Transformers might also count, since they had a movie and TV show based on the toys. [[User:Adam Bishop|Adam Bishop]] ([[User talk:Adam Bishop|talk]]) 22:08, 7 November 2009 (UTC) :The character [[C. W. McCall]] was originally created for an advertising campaign, and the singer in the advertising campaign (the actor who played McCall was a different person) later went on to score hits with songs like [[Convoy (song)|Convoy]] which was itself made into a movie, 1973's ''[[Convoy (film)|Convoy]]''. Thus, we have an ad campaign that gives birth to a fake singer, who has a real hit song, which was later made into a plot for a movie. --[[User:Jayron32|<font style="color:#000099">Jayron</font>]]'''''[[User talk:Jayron32|<font style="color:#009900">32</font>]]''''' 01:41, 8 November 2009 (UTC) == futurama-godfellas == In the futurama episode godfellas (season 3) when bender is drifting through space and starts playing the little piano does anyone know the name of the piano piece he is playing and who wrote it?[[User:Syme1|Syme1]] ([[User talk:Syme1|talk]]) 18:31, 7 November 2009 (UTC) :It is [[Chopin]]'s [[Polonaises Op. 40 (Chopin)|Polonaise in C Minor]]. -- [[User:Kainaw|<font color='#ff0000'>k</font><font color='#cc0033'>a</font><font color='#990066'>i</font><font color='#660099'>n</font><font color='#3300cc'>a</font><font color='#0000ff'>w</font>]][[User talk:Kainaw|&trade;]] 20:40, 7 November 2009 (UTC) :Further, the recording they used is played by [[Ken Keeler]] - who is not a professional pianist. -- [[User:Kainaw|<font color='#ff0000'>k</font><font color='#cc0033'>a</font><font color='#990066'>i</font><font color='#660099'>n</font><font color='#3300cc'>a</font><font color='#0000ff'>w</font>]][[User talk:Kainaw|&trade;]] 20:43, 7 November 2009 (UTC) == The name of this Australian band and its female singer == I'm having trouble remembering the name and the singer of a band. The singer is female, blonde hair and has a very large and noticeable red birthymark on her upper body. I believe the band is Australian and has a name beginning with 'The'. The first name of the of the leader singer was something uncommonly used as a name. I'm thinking it starts with a P though I am not quite sure. I haven't heard any of their songs or know what genre they are, though I would venture to guess they are indie/pop/rock. Thanks [[Special:Contributions/99.250.7.109|99.250.7.109]] ([[User talk:99.250.7.109|talk]]) 22:20, 7 November 2009 (UTC) :Tricky one... I've gone through the dozen or so Aussie bands with lead female vocalists I could think of, but I'm drawing a blank - have you tried searching through [[:Category:Australian rock music groups]]? Of course, if they're not Aussies, it opens the door to a load of others... [[User:Grutness|Grutness]]...''<small><font color="#008822">[[User_talk:Grutness|wha?]]</font></small>'' 23:15, 7 November 2009 (UTC) :I'm going to go with Patience, the lead singer for the band [[The Grates]]. (Looks like she doesn't have her own article) --[[User:Onorem|Onorem]][[Special:Contributions/Onorem|♠]][[User talk:Onorem|Dil]] 23:18, 7 November 2009 (UTC) ::Good call - it looks like Patience Hodgson does indeed have a birthmark covering much of her upper body, if [[http://www.zimbio.com/pictures/YqrK6zdj8QE/Falls+Music+Arts+Festival+2008+Day+3/4LeXaX3IVd_/Patience+Hodgson these], [http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/music_blog/images/2009/03/19/patience.jpg images] are anything to go by. [[User:Grutness|Grutness]]...''<small><font color="#008822">[[User_talk:Grutness|wha?]]</font></small>'' 00:18, 8 November 2009 (UTC) == Sailor song == Anybody know the name of this song, It was produced in early 2000s , 2000 - 2003 , and the music vid was an big ship with sailors singing and i THINk it was in an movie. The sailors wore light blue and white clothes and an light blue hat... like donald duck. It was not animated --- [[Special:Contributions/85.220.45.158|85.220.45.158]] ([[User talk:85.220.45.158|talk]]) 23:10, 7 November 2009 (UTC) THANX. :Probably wrong time period, but perhaps ''[[There Is Nothing Like a Dame]]'' on the [[Morecambe and Wise]] Christmas show, 1977? It featured many celebrities of time, including [[Eddie Waring]], all dressed as sailors shoving mops and buckets around a stage made up to look like a ship. [[User:Astronaut|Astronaut]] ([[User talk:Astronaut|talk]]) 02:16, 8 November 2009 (UTC) Thanks but I don't think it was this old, maybe from 1990s - early 2000s. [[Special:Contributions/85.220.45.158|85.220.45.158]] ([[User talk:85.220.45.158|talk]]) 03:07, 8 November 2009 (UTC) == What song is this? == I remember seeing a music video either from the 80s or the 90s which started out with a giant woman wrapped in layer upon layer of clothes but with a normal-sized head, and as the artist sang to her crews on scaffolding and in helicopters peeled off the clothes, until at the end of the video, the now normal-sized woman stood in front of the artist, who took off the last article of clothing, only to find out that she had no body and was just a floating head. The head then floated away. What was the song and artist? I don't remember any lyrics, just the strange imagery. [[Special:Contributions/71.161.60.125|71.161.60.125]] ([[User talk:71.161.60.125|talk]]) 23:45, 7 November 2009 (UTC) = November 8 = == all time favorite camp song == My son and i just got back from a boyscout overnight dad & lad camping trip at camp thunderbird in olympia washington. At breakfast the scouts that were running this event sang a song called johnny rabec(sp) or maybe sausages. the chouris gose something like "Ooh mr. mr. Johnny rabec how could you be so mean. I told you you'd be sory for inventing that machine. Now all the neightbors cats and dogs will never again be seen. Ooh mr mr johnny Rabec how could you be so mean." Now that we are back home my son and i would like to get the rest of the words to the song if you could help that would be much appriciated. Karter and David Aberdeen Washington P.S. if there are any other camp songs that you Know the words to I would like them also.'
Whether or not the change was made through a Tor exit node (tor_exit_node)
0
Unix timestamp of change (timestamp)
1257651568