Jump to content

Examine individual changes

This page allows you to examine the variables generated by the Edit Filter for an individual change.

Variables generated for this change

VariableValue
Edit count of the user (user_editcount)
4
Name of the user account (user_name)
'Yonathanyeremy'
Age of the user account (user_age)
172655
Groups (including implicit) the user is in (user_groups)
[ 0 => '*', 1 => 'user' ]
Global groups that the user is in (global_user_groups)
[]
Whether or not a user is editing through the mobile interface (user_mobile)
false
Page ID (page_id)
23834912
Page namespace (page_namespace)
0
Page title without namespace (page_title)
'Arithmetic topology'
Full page title (page_prefixedtitle)
'Arithmetic topology'
Last ten users to contribute to the page (page_recent_contributors)
[ 0 => 'BG19bot', 1 => 'Solomon7968', 2 => 'Enyokoyama', 3 => 'David Eppstein', 4 => 'Brirush', 5 => '188.106.118.57', 6 => 'Yobot', 7 => 'Mistory', 8 => 'JohnBlackburne', 9 => 'Brad7777' ]
First user to contribute to the page (page_first_contributor)
'Charvest'
Action (action)
'edit'
Edit summary/reason (summary)
''
Whether or not the edit is marked as minor (no longer in use) (minor_edit)
true
Old page wikitext, before the edit (old_wikitext)
''''Arithmetic topology''' is an area of [[mathematics]] that is a combination of [[algebraic number theory]] and [[topology]]. It establishes an analogy between [[number field]]s and closed, orientable [[3-manifold]]s. ==Analogies== The following are some of the analogies used by mathematicians between number fields and 3-manifolds:<ref>Sikora, Adam S. "Analogies between group actions on 3-manifolds and number fields." Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici 78.4 (2003): 832-844.</ref> #A number field corresponds to a closed, orientable 3-manifold #[[Ideal (ring theory)|Ideals]] in the ring of integers correspond to [[link (knot theory)|links]], and [[prime ideal]]s correspond to knots. #The field '''Q''' of [[rational number]]s corresponds to the [[3-sphere]]. Expanding on the last two examples, there is an analogy between [[knot (mathematics)|knots]] and [[prime number]]s in which one considers "links" between primes. The triple of primes {{nowrap|(13, 61, 937)}} are "linked" modulo 2 (the [[Rédei symbol]] is −1) but are "pairwise unlinked" modulo 2 (the [[Legendre symbol]]s are all 1). Therefore these primes have been called a "proper Borromean triple modulo 2"<ref>{{Citation |last=Vogel |first=Denis |date=13 February 2004 |title=Massey products in the Galois cohomology of number fields |url=http://www.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/archiv/4418 |id={{URN|nbn|de:bsz:16-opus-44188}}}}</ref> or "mod 2 Borromean primes".<ref>{{Citation |last=Morishita |first=Masanori |date=22 April 2009 |title=Analogies between Knots and Primes, 3-Manifolds and Number Rings |arxiv=0904.3399}}</ref> ==History== In the 1960s topological interpretations of [[class field theory]] were given by [[John Tate]]<ref>J. Tate, Duality theorems in Galois cohomology over number fields, (Proc. Intern. Cong. Stockholm, 1962, p. 288-295).</ref> based on [[Galois cohomology]], and also by [[Michael Artin]] and [[Jean-Louis Verdier]]<ref>M. Artin and J.-L. Verdier, [http://www.jmilne.org/math/Documents/WoodsHole3.pdf Seminar on étale cohomology of number fields, Woods Hole], 1964.</ref> based on [[Étale cohomology]]. Then [[David Mumford]] (and independently [[Yuri Manin]]) came up with an analogy between [[prime ideals]] and [[Knot (mathematics)|knots]]<ref>[http://www.neverendingbooks.org/index.php/who-dreamed-up-the-primesknots-analogy.html Who dreamed up the primes=knots analogy?], neverendingbooks, lieven le bruyn's blog, may 16, 2011,</ref> which was further explored by [[Barry Mazur]].<ref>[http://www.math.harvard.edu/~mazur/papers/alexander_polynomial.pdf Remarks on the Alexander Polynomial], Barry Mazur, c.1964</ref><ref>B. Mazur, [http://archive.numdam.org/ARCHIVE/ASENS/ASENS_1973_4_6_4/ASENS_1973_4_6_4_521_0/ASENS_1973_4_6_4_521_0.pdf Notes on ´etale cohomology of number fields], Ann. scient. ´Ec. Norm. Sup. 6 (1973), 521-552.</ref> In the 1990s Reznikov<ref>A. Reznikov, [http://www.springerlink.com/content/v9jc215brrhl4mxf/ Three-manifolds class field theory (Homology of coverings for a nonvirtually b1-positive manifold)], Sel. math. New ser. 3, (1997), 361–399.</ref> and Kapranov<ref>M. Kapranov, [http://books.google.co.uk/books?hl=en&lr=&id=TOPa9irmsGsC&oi=fnd&pg=PA119 Analogies between the Langlands correspondence and topological quantum field theory], Progress in Math., 131, Birkhäuser, (1995), 119–151.</ref> began studying these analogies, coining the term '''arithmetic topology''' for this area of study. ==See also== *[[Arithmetic geometry]] *[[Arithmetic dynamics]] *[[Topological quantum field theory]] *[[Langlands program]] ==Notes== <references/> ==Further reading== *Masanori Morishita (2011), [http://www.springer.com/mathematics/numbers/book/978-1-4471-2157-2 Knots and Primes], Springer, ISBN 978-1-4471-2157-2 *Masanori Morishita (2009), [http://arxiv.org/abs/0904.3399v1 Analogies Between Knots And Primes, 3-Manifolds And Number Rings] *Christopher Deninger (2002), [http://arxiv.org/abs/math/0204274v1 A note on arithmetic topology and dynamical systems] *Adam S. Sikora (2001), [http://arxiv.org/abs/math/0107210v2 Analogies between group actions on 3-manifolds and number fields] *[[Curtis T. McMullen]] (2003), [http://www.math.harvard.edu/~ctm/home/text/papers/fermat/fermat.pdf From dynamics on surfaces to rational points on curves] *Chao Li and Charmaine Sia (2012), [http://www.math.harvard.edu/~sia/notes/knots_and_primes.pdf Knots and Primes] ==External links== *[http://www.neverendingbooks.org/mazurs-dictionary Mazur’s knotty dictionary] {{Number theory-footer}} [[Category:Number theory]] [[Category:3-manifolds]] [[Category:Knot theory]]'
New page wikitext, after the edit (new_wikitext)
''''Arithmetic topology''' is an area of [[mathematics]] that is a combination of [[algebraic number theory]] and [[topology]]. It establishes an analogy between [[number field]]s and closed, orientable [[3-manifold]]s. ==Analogies== The following are some of the analogies used by mathematicians between number fields and 3-manifolds:<ref>Sikora, Adam S. "Analogies between group actions on 3-manifolds and number fields." Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici 78.4 (2003): 832-844.</ref> #A number field corresponds to a closed, orientable 3-manifold #[[Ideal (ring theory)|Ideals]] in the ring of integers correspond to [[link (knot theory)|links]], and [[prime ideal]]s correspond to knots. #The field '''Q''' of [[rational number]]s corresponds to the [[3-sphere]]. Expanding on the last two examples, there is an analogy between [[knot (mathematics)|knots]] and [[prime number]]s in which one considers "links" between primes. The triple of primes {{nowrap|(13, 61, 937)}} are "linked" modulo 2 (the [[Rédei symbol]] is −1) but are "pairwise unlinked" modulo 2 (the [[Legendre symbol]]s are all 1). Therefore these primes have been called a "proper Borromean triple modulo 2"<ref>{{Citation |last=Vogel |first=Denis |date=13 February 2004 |title=Massey products in the Galois cohomology of number fields |url=http://www.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/archiv/4418 |id={{URN|nbn|de:bsz:16-opus-44188}}}}</ref> or "mod 2 Borromean primes".<ref>{{Citation |last=Morishita |first=Masanori |date=22 April 2009 |title=Analogies between Knots and Primes, 3-Manifolds and Number Rings |arxiv=0904.3399}}</ref> ==History== In the 1960s topological interpretations of [[class field theory]] were given by [[John Tate]]<ref>J. Tate, Duality theorems in Galois cohomology over number fields, (Proc. Intern. Cong. Stockholm, 1962, p. 288-295).</ref> based on [[Galois cohomology]], and also by [[Michael Artin]] and [[Jean-Louis Verdier]]<ref>M. Artin and J.-L. Verdier, [http://www.jmilne.org/math/Documents/WoodsHole3.pdf Seminar on étale cohomology of number fields, Woods Hole], 1964.</ref> based on [[Étale cohomology]]. Then [[David Mumford]] (and independently [[Yuri Manin]]) came up with an analogy between [[prime ideals]] and [[Knot (mathematics)|knots]]<ref>[http://www.neverendingbooks.org/index.php/who-dreamed-up-the-primesknots-analogy.html Who dreamed up the primes=knots analogy?], neverendingbooks, lieven le bruyn's blog, may 16, 2011,</ref> which was further explored by [[Barry Mazur]].<ref>[http://www.math.harvard.edu/~mazur/papers/alexander_polynomial.pdf Remarks on the Alexander Polynomial], Barry Mazur, c.1964</ref><ref>B. Mazur, [http://archive.numdam.org/ARCHIVE/ASENS/ASENS_1973_4_6_4/ASENS_1973_4_6_4_521_0/ASENS_1973_4_6_4_521_0.pdf Notes on ´etale cohomology of number fields], Ann. scient. ´Ec. Norm. Sup. 6 (1973), 521-552.</ref> In the 1990s Reznikov<ref>A. Reznikov, [http://www.springerlink.com/content/v9jc215brrhl4mxf/ Three-manifolds class field theory (Homology of coverings for a nonvirtually b1-positive manifold)], Sel. math. New ser. 3, (1997), 361–399.</ref> began studying these analogies, coining the term '''arithmetic topology''' for this area of study. ==See also== *[[Arithmetic geometry]] *[[Arithmetic dynamics]] *[[Langlands program]] ==Notes== <references/> ==Further reading== *Masanori Morishita (2011), [http://www.springer.com/mathematics/numbers/book/978-1-4471-2157-2 Knots and Primes], Springer, ISBN 978-1-4471-2157-2 *Masanori Morishita (2009), [http://arxiv.org/abs/0904.3399v1 Analogies Between Knots And Primes, 3-Manifolds And Number Rings] *Christopher Deninger (2002), [http://arxiv.org/abs/math/0204274v1 A note on arithmetic topology and dynamical systems] *Adam S. Sikora (2001), [http://arxiv.org/abs/math/0107210v2 Analogies between group actions on 3-manifolds and number fields] *[[Curtis T. McMullen]] (2003), [http://www.math.harvard.edu/~ctm/home/text/papers/fermat/fermat.pdf From dynamics on surfaces to rational points on curves] *Chao Li and Charmaine Sia (2012), [http://www.math.harvard.edu/~sia/notes/knots_and_primes.pdf Knots and Primes] ==External links== *[http://www.neverendingbooks.org/mazurs-dictionary Mazur’s knotty dictionary] {{Number theory-footer}} [[Category:Number theory]] [[Category:3-manifolds]] [[Category:Knot theory]]'
Unified diff of changes made by edit (edit_diff)
'@@ -10,10 +10,9 @@ ==History== -In the 1960s topological interpretations of [[class field theory]] were given by [[John Tate]]<ref>J. Tate, Duality theorems in Galois cohomology over number fields, (Proc. Intern. Cong. Stockholm, 1962, p. 288-295).</ref> based on [[Galois cohomology]], and also by [[Michael Artin]] and [[Jean-Louis Verdier]]<ref>M. Artin and J.-L. Verdier, [http://www.jmilne.org/math/Documents/WoodsHole3.pdf Seminar on étale cohomology of number fields, Woods Hole], 1964.</ref> based on [[Étale cohomology]]. Then [[David Mumford]] (and independently [[Yuri Manin]]) came up with an analogy between [[prime ideals]] and [[Knot (mathematics)|knots]]<ref>[http://www.neverendingbooks.org/index.php/who-dreamed-up-the-primesknots-analogy.html Who dreamed up the primes=knots analogy?], neverendingbooks, lieven le bruyn's blog, may 16, 2011,</ref> which was further explored by [[Barry Mazur]].<ref>[http://www.math.harvard.edu/~mazur/papers/alexander_polynomial.pdf Remarks on the Alexander Polynomial], Barry Mazur, c.1964</ref><ref>B. Mazur, [http://archive.numdam.org/ARCHIVE/ASENS/ASENS_1973_4_6_4/ASENS_1973_4_6_4_521_0/ASENS_1973_4_6_4_521_0.pdf Notes on ´etale cohomology of number fields], Ann. scient. ´Ec. Norm. Sup. 6 (1973), 521-552.</ref> In the 1990s Reznikov<ref>A. Reznikov, [http://www.springerlink.com/content/v9jc215brrhl4mxf/ Three-manifolds class field theory (Homology of coverings for a nonvirtually b1-positive manifold)], Sel. math. New ser. 3, (1997), 361–399.</ref> and Kapranov<ref>M. Kapranov, [http://books.google.co.uk/books?hl=en&lr=&id=TOPa9irmsGsC&oi=fnd&pg=PA119 Analogies between the Langlands correspondence and topological quantum field theory], Progress in Math., 131, Birkhäuser, (1995), 119–151.</ref> began studying these analogies, coining the term '''arithmetic topology''' for this area of study. +In the 1960s topological interpretations of [[class field theory]] were given by [[John Tate]]<ref>J. Tate, Duality theorems in Galois cohomology over number fields, (Proc. Intern. Cong. Stockholm, 1962, p. 288-295).</ref> based on [[Galois cohomology]], and also by [[Michael Artin]] and [[Jean-Louis Verdier]]<ref>M. Artin and J.-L. Verdier, [http://www.jmilne.org/math/Documents/WoodsHole3.pdf Seminar on étale cohomology of number fields, Woods Hole], 1964.</ref> based on [[Étale cohomology]]. Then [[David Mumford]] (and independently [[Yuri Manin]]) came up with an analogy between [[prime ideals]] and [[Knot (mathematics)|knots]]<ref>[http://www.neverendingbooks.org/index.php/who-dreamed-up-the-primesknots-analogy.html Who dreamed up the primes=knots analogy?], neverendingbooks, lieven le bruyn's blog, may 16, 2011,</ref> which was further explored by [[Barry Mazur]].<ref>[http://www.math.harvard.edu/~mazur/papers/alexander_polynomial.pdf Remarks on the Alexander Polynomial], Barry Mazur, c.1964</ref><ref>B. Mazur, [http://archive.numdam.org/ARCHIVE/ASENS/ASENS_1973_4_6_4/ASENS_1973_4_6_4_521_0/ASENS_1973_4_6_4_521_0.pdf Notes on ´etale cohomology of number fields], Ann. scient. ´Ec. Norm. Sup. 6 (1973), 521-552.</ref> In the 1990s Reznikov<ref>A. Reznikov, [http://www.springerlink.com/content/v9jc215brrhl4mxf/ Three-manifolds class field theory (Homology of coverings for a nonvirtually b1-positive manifold)], Sel. math. New ser. 3, (1997), 361–399.</ref> began studying these analogies, coining the term '''arithmetic topology''' for this area of study. ==See also== *[[Arithmetic geometry]] *[[Arithmetic dynamics]] -*[[Topological quantum field theory]] *[[Langlands program]] '
New page size (new_size)
4331
Old page size (old_size)
4622
Size change in edit (edit_delta)
-291
Lines added in edit (added_lines)
[ 0 => 'In the 1960s topological interpretations of [[class field theory]] were given by [[John Tate]]<ref>J. Tate, Duality theorems in Galois cohomology over number fields, (Proc. Intern. Cong. Stockholm, 1962, p. 288-295).</ref> based on [[Galois cohomology]], and also by [[Michael Artin]] and [[Jean-Louis Verdier]]<ref>M. Artin and J.-L. Verdier, [http://www.jmilne.org/math/Documents/WoodsHole3.pdf Seminar on étale cohomology of number fields, Woods Hole], 1964.</ref> based on [[Étale cohomology]]. Then [[David Mumford]] (and independently [[Yuri Manin]]) came up with an analogy between [[prime ideals]] and [[Knot (mathematics)|knots]]<ref>[http://www.neverendingbooks.org/index.php/who-dreamed-up-the-primesknots-analogy.html Who dreamed up the primes=knots analogy?], neverendingbooks, lieven le bruyn's blog, may 16, 2011,</ref> which was further explored by [[Barry Mazur]].<ref>[http://www.math.harvard.edu/~mazur/papers/alexander_polynomial.pdf Remarks on the Alexander Polynomial], Barry Mazur, c.1964</ref><ref>B. Mazur, [http://archive.numdam.org/ARCHIVE/ASENS/ASENS_1973_4_6_4/ASENS_1973_4_6_4_521_0/ASENS_1973_4_6_4_521_0.pdf Notes on ´etale cohomology of number fields], Ann. scient. ´Ec. Norm. Sup. 6 (1973), 521-552.</ref> In the 1990s Reznikov<ref>A. Reznikov, [http://www.springerlink.com/content/v9jc215brrhl4mxf/ Three-manifolds class field theory (Homology of coverings for a nonvirtually b1-positive manifold)], Sel. math. New ser. 3, (1997), 361–399.</ref> began studying these analogies, coining the term '''arithmetic topology''' for this area of study.' ]
Lines removed in edit (removed_lines)
[ 0 => 'In the 1960s topological interpretations of [[class field theory]] were given by [[John Tate]]<ref>J. Tate, Duality theorems in Galois cohomology over number fields, (Proc. Intern. Cong. Stockholm, 1962, p. 288-295).</ref> based on [[Galois cohomology]], and also by [[Michael Artin]] and [[Jean-Louis Verdier]]<ref>M. Artin and J.-L. Verdier, [http://www.jmilne.org/math/Documents/WoodsHole3.pdf Seminar on étale cohomology of number fields, Woods Hole], 1964.</ref> based on [[Étale cohomology]]. Then [[David Mumford]] (and independently [[Yuri Manin]]) came up with an analogy between [[prime ideals]] and [[Knot (mathematics)|knots]]<ref>[http://www.neverendingbooks.org/index.php/who-dreamed-up-the-primesknots-analogy.html Who dreamed up the primes=knots analogy?], neverendingbooks, lieven le bruyn's blog, may 16, 2011,</ref> which was further explored by [[Barry Mazur]].<ref>[http://www.math.harvard.edu/~mazur/papers/alexander_polynomial.pdf Remarks on the Alexander Polynomial], Barry Mazur, c.1964</ref><ref>B. Mazur, [http://archive.numdam.org/ARCHIVE/ASENS/ASENS_1973_4_6_4/ASENS_1973_4_6_4_521_0/ASENS_1973_4_6_4_521_0.pdf Notes on ´etale cohomology of number fields], Ann. scient. ´Ec. Norm. Sup. 6 (1973), 521-552.</ref> In the 1990s Reznikov<ref>A. Reznikov, [http://www.springerlink.com/content/v9jc215brrhl4mxf/ Three-manifolds class field theory (Homology of coverings for a nonvirtually b1-positive manifold)], Sel. math. New ser. 3, (1997), 361–399.</ref> and Kapranov<ref>M. Kapranov, [http://books.google.co.uk/books?hl=en&lr=&id=TOPa9irmsGsC&oi=fnd&pg=PA119 Analogies between the Langlands correspondence and topological quantum field theory], Progress in Math., 131, Birkhäuser, (1995), 119–151.</ref> began studying these analogies, coining the term '''arithmetic topology''' for this area of study.', 1 => '*[[Topological quantum field theory]]' ]
Whether or not the change was made through a Tor exit node (tor_exit_node)
0
Unix timestamp of change (timestamp)
1460982061