Examine individual changes

'{{Vital article|class=C|level=5|link=Wikipedia:Vital articles/Level/5/Everyday life/Sports, games and recreation|anchor=%7b%7banchor%7cSpecific video games and series%7d%7d Specific video games and series (132 articles)}} {{skip to talk}} {{Talk header}} {{afd-merged-from|Biohazard: Symphony Op. 91: Crime and Punishment|Biohazard: Symphony Op. 91: Crime and Punishment|28 March 2010|date=April 2010}} {{afd-merged-from|Biohazard Sound Chronicle|Biohazard Sound Chronicle|21 March 2010|date=April 2010}} {{ArticleHistory |action1=GAN |action1date=22:39, June 9 2006 |action1result=listed |action1oldid=57702725 |action2=FAC |action2date=22:46, 21 September 2006 |action2link=Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Resident Evil/archive1 |action2result=not promoted |action2oldid=76964365 |action3=GAR |action3date=04:54, 19 December 2008 (UTC) |action3link=Talk:Resident Evil/GA1 |action3result=delisted |action3oldid=258910206 |topic=Everydaylife |currentstatus=DGA }} {{WikiProject banner shell|1= {{WikiProject Video games|class=C|importance=High|old-peer=yes}} {{HorrorWikiProject|class=C|importance=High}} {{WikiProject Media franchises|class=C|importance=High}} {{WikiProject Science fiction}} }} {{refideas |1=https://web.archive.org/web/20121009031407/http://www.1up.com/features/cover-story-dark-descent-resident }} {{to do}} {{archives}} == [[Resident Evil: Survivor]] == Is there some reason this game is not in the infobox or is that just an oversight? [[User:Beeblebrox|Beeblebrox]] ([[User talk:Beeblebrox|talk]]) 21:57, 29 October 2009 (UTC) :Ok, per [[WP:SILENCE]], I've added it to the infobox. [[User:Beeblebrox|Beeblebrox]] ([[User talk:Beeblebrox|talk]]) 19:31, 14 November 2009 (UTC) == Film series== Seeing as there are already six films (4 live action and 2 animated), does anybody else feel like there should be a separate page dealing with the film series? [[User:ONEder Boy|ONEder Boy]] ([[User talk:ONEder Boy|talk]]) 20:14, 8 July 2010 (UTC) :The Infobox only lists 5 films. 4 live action and 1 animation. If you know of another animated movie please add it. [[User:123dylan456|Dylan]] ([[User talk:123dylan456|talk]]) 00:13, 11 August 2010 (UTC) Cool [[User:IJAWET CHRISTINE|IJAWET CHRISTINE]] ([[User talk:IJAWET CHRISTINE|talk]]) 09:11, 19 January 2020 (UTC) == Wikitable == I reformatted in the game list based on the slick wikitable from the guitar hero series wiki. Used Capcom for the developer for all the games, I'm sure they're not the developer for all of the games, and needs to be updated whenever possible. [[User:Tubeyes|Tubeyes]] ([[User talk:Tubeyes|talk]]) 16:10, 8 September 2010 (UTC) Why are Resident Evil 1, 2, and 3 listed as Yes for PS2? On their respective pages, there is no mention of a PS2 release. I don't see them listed as having PS2 releases on GameFAQs either (unless they have different names). If the Yes for these is merely because the PS2 can play PS1 games, I think it should be changed to No, as it otherwise makes the table less-useful (no way to tell whether a game genuinely has a PS2 release, or is merely a PS1 game compatible). [[Special:Contributions/72.48.75.131|72.48.75.131]] ([[User talk:72.48.75.131|talk]]) 06:45, 28 May 2011 (UTC) == Argument and characters == Where is the argument of the series and the characters? --[[Special:Contributions/190.163.57.146|190.163.57.146]] ([[User talk:190.163.57.146|talk]]) 11:39, 11 January 2011 (UTC) :A long long time ago, on a Wiki page that was deleted... There multiple individual articles for Resident Evil characters! Some of these articles were well written, while many failed [[WP:WAF]] and [[WP:V]]. Over time, some editors decided to take those articles to AFD, without holding a merge discussion first. Content was lost. The characters were moved to list pages, like [[Characters from Resident Evil 2]]. Then Character lists/articles were merged. More content was lost. Rather than having multiple bad articles, we eventually just had one large bad article. Eventually this article was copy-edited and sourced over a period of time. So, all the discussions are either in ADFs, or merged Talk pages from Character Lists. --<small><span style="border: 1px solid">[[user:StarScream1007|'''<span style="background-color:White; color:#CC0000"> &nbsp;StarScream1007&nbsp;</span>''']][[User talk:StarScream1007|<span style="background-color:#003399; color:white">&nbsp;►Talk&nbsp;</span>]] </span></small> 16:44, 11 January 2011 (UTC) ::I see, thanks for the answer... --[[Special:Contributions/201.215.207.58|201.215.207.58]] ([[User talk:201.215.207.58|talk]]) 14:23, 16 January 2011 (UTC) Why isn't there a Wiki entry for the t-virus? Seemingly other important game and film trivia are included, it would seem the t-virus should be right up there. [[User:Nasukaren|Nasukaren]] ([[User talk:Nasukaren|talk]]) 11:13, 9 December 2011 (UTC) == Operation Raccon City == Outbreak series? [[User:TVippy|<span style="color:white;background:#070">&nbsp;T<span style="background:#090">V<span style="background:#0a0">i<span style="background:#0c0">p</span>p</span>y</span>&nbsp;</span>]] 12:10, 25 March 2011 (UTC) == Availability == Games, such as the ports/new titles announced for x360 and PS3 should not be listed as available in the wikitable when they are not avaialable at all, merely announced and in development. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Caspar esq.|Caspar esq.]] ([[User talk:Caspar esq.|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Caspar esq.|contribs]]) 00:15, 5 April 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> == Merging some games together onto a list == I suggest that [[Resident Evil: The Missions]] , [[Resident Evil: Genesis]] , [[Resident Evil Confidential Report]] be merged together into [[List of Resident Evil games]] along with short summaries of the other games that are not merged but have separate articles. [[Special:Contributions/65.93.12.101|65.93.12.101]] ([[User talk:65.93.12.101|talk]]) 08:31, 10 April 2011 (UTC) :A merge sounds reasonable, or better yet, a "[[Mobile games in the Resident Evil series|Mobile games in the ''Resident Evil'' series]]" article (with a paragraph or two in the series article) – the individual games look too unsubstantial for individual pages, but a common article could present them in a more attractive manner. [[User:Prime Blue|Prime Blue]] ([[User talk:Prime Blue|talk]]) 13:08, 10 April 2011 (UTC) ==Which year was the original released?== The Prose says 1997 and the table says 1998 - so which is it? --[[Special:Contributions/87.194.194.250|87.194.194.250]] ([[User talk:87.194.194.250|talk]]) 15:55, 10 April 2011 (UTC) == list of games == <div class="floatright"> <timeline> ImageSize = width:275 height:500 PlotArea = left:50 bottom:10 top:10 right:0 DateFormat = yyyy Period = from:1996 till:2012 TimeAxis = orientation:vertical order:reverse ScaleMajor = unit:year increment:1 start:1996 ScaleMinor = unit:year increment:1 start:1996 Colors = id:blue value:rgb(0,0,0) id:red value:rgb(0.9,0.05,0.05) # there is no automatic collision detection, # so shift texts up or down manually to avoid overlap Define $dx = 25 # shift text to right side of bar # shift texts up or down when two have same year Define $up = shift:($dx,1) Define $dw = shift:($dx,-8) PlotData= bar:Games anchor:till color:black width:15 textcolor:blue align:left fontsize:S mark:(line,white) shift:($dx,-4) from:1996 till:2012 at:1996 text:"[[Resident Evil (video game)|Resident Evil]]" at:1998 text:"[[Resident Evil 2]]" at:1999 text:"[[Resident Evil 3: Nemesis]]" at:2000 text:"[[Resident Evil Survivor]]" at:2000 shift:($dx,-14) text:"[[Resident Evil Code: Veronica]]" at:2001 text:"[[Resident Evil Survivor 2 Code: Veronica]]" at:2001 shift:($dx,-14) text:"[[Resident Evil Gaiden]]" at:2002 text:"[[Resident Evil Zero]]" at:2003 text:"[[Resident Evil: Dead Aim]]" at:2003 shift:($dx,-14) text:"[[Resident Evil Outbreak]]" at:2004 text:"[[Resident Evil Outbreak File 2|Resident Evil Outbreak File #2]]" at:2005 text:"[[Resident Evil 4]]" at:2007 text:"[[Resident Evil: The Umbrella Chronicles]]" at:2009 text:"[[Resident Evil 5]]" at:2009 shift:($dx,-14) text:"[[Resident Evil: The Darkside Chronicles]]" at:2011 text:"[[Resident Evil: The Mercenaries 3D]]" </timeline> </div> i think the tables make only sense for the "main games". most of the rest were only released on one system which makes the use of tables unnecessary. regardless of my opinion on the importance of the table, i think it has to be improved at least. the table needs a column for "mobile" (java games - mobile, not platform specific), while the columns for "zeebo" and "game.com" could be removed. (both of these platforms are not very popular and only contribute to the complexity of the table). one column that should be removed is the one regarding the "wii u". as far as i know there have been no statements regarding the release for a resident evil title for this platform (not to mention that the platform itself will not be released for quite some time). [[User:Stultitiam debello|Stultitiam debello]] ([[User talk:Stultitiam debello|talk]]) 14:58, 21 June 2011 (UTC) :: I think it's ok. But I'm just an anon. Yet I'd suggest one slight improvement of the table: :: 1st: Make a "mobile games" section for all the mobile phone games (which now make up the "other games section") :: 2nd: Take Operation Raccoon City and create an "other console games" section and put this section before the "portable games" (which if one insists could be renamed into "handheld (console) games", but I digest). :: That way you have a quite good structure moving from the core games to the spin-off series to stand alone spin-off titles on home consoles to the various portable and then mobile phone games. But even at this point, the list is pretty good (even though it does seem a little bulky and overblown at first glance - maybe it could be transformed into a seperate entry). <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/91.19.205.222|91.19.205.222]] ([[User talk:91.19.205.222|talk]]) 21:42, 21 June 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> For what it's worth, I agree with [[User:Tintor2|Tintor2]] that the current table is horribly bloated and redundant, and that a timeline template (without the 19 [!!] mobile phone games) would make more sense. Imagine the platform fields for the current table once two more generations of home consoles will be released. Ugh. [[User:Prime Blue|Prime Blue]] ([[User talk:Prime Blue|talk]]) 13:58, 3 July 2011 (UTC) :For some reason the table I added was reverted without an edit summary and was [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Resident_Evil&diff=437491564&oldid=437490886 later mentioned to have done vandalism to article].[[User:Tintor2|Tintor2]] ([[User talk:Tintor2|talk]]) 19:32, 3 July 2011 (UTC) ::I saw that edit, but don't think he really meant it ''that'' way. [[Template talk:Resident Evil#RE:Revelations as handheld game|I have told him]] that he should be more careful with labeling edits as vandalism. One thing on the timeline: is there a way to make the text on the right look less crude? [[User:Prime Blue|Prime Blue]] ([[User talk:Prime Blue|talk]]) 12:37, 4 July 2011 (UTC) :::I have seen the FA [[Final Fantasy]] use a smaller table, but it only focused on the main games. See [[Final Fantasy#Main series]].[[User:Tintor2|Tintor2]] ([[User talk:Tintor2|talk]]) 14:53, 4 July 2011 (UTC) ::::I noticed those before, but was turned off because they were so small. I reworked that table now to be easier to read, and implemented it here. [[User:Prime Blue|Prime Blue]] ([[User talk:Prime Blue|talk]]) 16:15, 4 July 2011 (UTC) :::::Looks good.[[User:Tintor2|Tintor2]] ([[User talk:Tintor2|talk]]) 00:25, 5 July 2011 (UTC) ''Resident Evil Portable'' needs to be removed, because that game isn't happening.[[Special:Contributions/84.45.237.236|84.45.237.236]] ([[User talk:84.45.237.236|talk]]) 15:17, 21 October 2011 (UTC) == Name Change == I cant see any mention of the name change from ''Biohazard'' to ''Resident Evil'' in this article. [[Resident Evil (video game)#Title change|A section does exsist on the page for Resident Evil 1]], but I think it should be mentioned here too. [[User:Vuvuzela2010|Vuvuzela2010]] ([[User talk:Vuvuzela2010|talk]]) 20:32, 30 October 2011 (UTC) == B assessment == Expand Reception and I'll assess as B. --[[User:JDC808|<font color="green">JDC808</font>]] [[User talk:JDC808|<font color="black">♫</font>]] 04:34, 20 September 2012 (UTC) == Project: Let's make the original game a GA == What to do: *More references everywhere (the existsing sources might be used more too). *More reception, including reviews, annual awards and retrospective lists and articles. *More development. --[[User:Niemti|Niemti]] ([[User talk:Niemti|talk]]) 10:10, 14 February 2013 (UTC) == Were all games "developed in Japan"? == Including such titles as Gaiden and OPR? --[[User:Niemti|Niemti]] ([[User talk:Niemti|talk]]) 13:36, 8 October 2013 (UTC) == Resident Evil: Red Falls == I honestly do believe that "Resident Evil: Red Falls" deserves a section in the films. While not officially created by CAPCOM, it was officially "approved" by CAPCOM. And, let's face it, it's significant. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/70.210.68.193|70.210.68.193]] ([[User talk:70.210.68.193|talk]]) 18:05, 30 October 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> I agree. Resident Evil: Red Falls is a landmark. It deserves to be on the wiki, not because it's official. But because of the wave it has made. Plus the official RE page and twitter shared yet. <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:GameOfThrones1988|GameOfThrones1988]] ([[User talk:GameOfThrones1988|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/GameOfThrones1988|contribs]]) 18:12, 30 October 2013 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> ==TV Series== The other day [[Bloody Disgusting]] published an article indicating that a Resident Evil TV series was in the works.[http://bloody-disgusting.com/news/3306849/tv-resident-evil-series-heading-arklay/] Other online media sites, like [http://www.polygon.com/2014/8/8/5983179/resident-evil-tv-series-arklay Polygon] and [http://www.joystiq.com/2014/08/10/theres-a-resident-evil-television-show-in-the-works/ Joystiq] have also looked into the story. While it is in fact legit, please bear in mind that it is not a TV Show yet. Right now it is just a pitch that a director is trying to sell to a network or media outlet. If a network chooses to pick it up, then it will deserve mention in this article. --<small><span style="border: 1px solid">[[user:StarScream1007|'''<span style="background-color:White; color:#CC0000"> &nbsp;StarScream1007&nbsp;</span>''']][[User talk:StarScream1007|<span style="background-color:#003399; color:white">&nbsp;►Talk&nbsp;</span>]] </span></small> 21:26, 12 August 2014 (UTC) == Storyline of the games == I'm open to start writing a possible '''Story''' section in the article. I'm wondering what is required (source wise) and also which games ought to be included (Just 0 - 6? Are games like Code Veronica etc. notable enough for inclusion?). --[[Special:Contributions/80.222.39.97|80.222.39.97]] ([[User talk:80.222.39.97|talk]]) 19:27, 15 March 2016 (UTC) :The Story section is now split between main instalments and other related media. Could someone maybe help improve the ''Post-Raccoon City'' segment and maybe expand the other games section? Much obliged. --[[User:CaptainNtheGameMaster|CaptainNtheGameMaster]] ([[User talk:CaptainNtheGameMaster|talk]]) 16:25, 27 March 2016 (UTC) == Merge [[Resident Evil (animated film series)]] with this article == {{hatnote|It has been suggested that this page be merged with [[Resident Evil]]. Proposed since March 2016.}} Discussion is over at the film series article. --[[User:CaptainNtheGameMaster|CaptainNtheGameMaster]] ([[User talk:CaptainNtheGameMaster|talk]]) 16:49, 27 March 2016 (UTC) :The material has now been merged with the main article. --[[User:CaptainNtheGameMaster|CaptainNtheGameMaster]] ([[User talk:CaptainNtheGameMaster|talk]]) 21:56, 2 May 2016 (UTC) == External links modified == Hello fellow Wikipedians, I have just modified 3 external links on [[Resident Evil]]. Please take a moment to review [[special:diff/813846776|my edit]]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes: *Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.gamespot.com/gamespot/features/video/res_evil/index.html *Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.gamespot.com/ps2/action/residentevildeadaim *Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/6BmAxJJB4?url=http://www.1up.com/news/psp-resident-evil-portable-2010 to http://www.1up.com/do/newsStory?cId=3174532 When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. {{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}} Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 15:17, 5 December 2017 (UTC) == Source == *https://web.archive.org/web/19980204085513/http://www.next-generation.com:80/news/121897ee.chtml == Solutions to the ugly blank space in the Reception section? == Is there any way to move the Reviews table into that blank space in the Reception section? I previewed a few attempts at moving the table but it's a bit of a headache to figure out. Anybody better versed in tables have a suggestion? [[User:PcPrincipal|PcPrincipal]] ([[User talk:PcPrincipal|talk]]) 21:53, 21 June 2018 (UTC) :Would anyone be aboosed to using a show-hide feature for the review scores? --<small><span style="border: 1px solid">[[user:StarScream1007|'''<span style="background-color:White; color:#CC0000"> &nbsp;StarScream1007&nbsp;</span>''']][[User talk:StarScream1007|<span style="background-color:#003399; color:white">&nbsp;►Talk&nbsp;</span>]] </span></small> 22:26, 21 June 2018 (UTC) :Do we actually need all those individual scores for each game on each system on this page? Why not remove the table entirely (perhaps discuss a few highlights if notable), and otherwise leave the individual game's scores to the individual game's pages? [[User:Aawood|Aawood]] ([[User talk:Aawood|talk]]) 11:07, 22 June 2018 (UTC) ::I think either of those would be good options. I'm gonna look into the show-hide function in the mean time and maybe we could discuss restructuring the table, etc. [[User:PcPrincipal|PcPrincipal]] ([[User talk:PcPrincipal|talk]]) 19:38, 22 June 2018 (UTC) ::Once again, I'm baffled by this table. The mark-up is such a mess. Or maybe it's just me. But either way, someone who gets wikitables better than me should look more into it. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Collapsing#Collapsible_tables This page] has code for collapsible tables. [[User:PcPrincipal|PcPrincipal]] ([[User talk:PcPrincipal|talk]]) 19:47, 22 June 2018 (UTC) Any ideas [[User:StarScream1007|StarScream1007]] or [[User:Aawood|Aawood]]? I'm gonna test a few more things out in the meantime. [[User:PcPrincipal|PcPrincipal]] ([[User talk:PcPrincipal|talk]]) 18:44, 28 June 2018 (UTC) Went through and condensed the ratings to just the original release consoles, removed the port ratings in order to at least shorten the table. [[User:PcPrincipal|PcPrincipal]] ([[User talk:PcPrincipal|talk]]) 19:38, 28 June 2018 (UTC) :I like what you've done, definitely an improvement. [[User:Aawood|Aawood]] ([[User talk:Aawood|talk]]) 20:09, 28 June 2018 (UTC) ::I agree that it looks much better. Good Job, {{user|PcPrincipal}}. I tried to research the code for a collapsing table, but it does not seem to be compatible with 'Template:Video game series reviews' at the moment. We could make something from scratch, but this is a better option for now. -- <small><span style="border: 1px solid">[[user:StarScream1007|'''<span style="background-color:White; color:#CC0000"> &nbsp;StarScream1007&nbsp;</span>''']][[User talk:StarScream1007|<span style="background-color:#003399; color:white">&nbsp;►Talk&nbsp;</span>]] </span></small> 22:54, 29 June 2018 (UTC) :::Thank you! And yeah I might be more willing to look into it later on now that it's simplified. Another solution I thought of was adding more to the reception to fill in the blank space. I don't really have anything in mind for that though, and at that point we'd just be using content to fix a cosmetic issue. Maybe a backwards method. For now I'm fine with it, glad to hear it's looking better! [[User:PcPrincipal|PcPrincipal]] ([[User talk:PcPrincipal|talk]]) 17:55, 30 June 2018 (UTC) == Should the franchise be referred to as Biohazard and only remarked to be called Resident Evil in the US? == Biohazard has been the original name published by the Japanese company as the authentic name, and published in parallel in the US as Resident Evil. The scope of Wikipedia is of a worldwide and some English-speaking countries (for instance, Hong Kong), has known this franchise as Biohazard instead of the American name. And also how this article does not contain the Biohazard logo is also beyond me. It has been mentioned in both the English and the Japanese articles that Biohazard has been the series name, only to be shown as Resident Evil for publishing in the US due to a used Trademark. Biohazard represents better the authentically intentional name of the original authors, and not to mention their preferred publishing name. -[[User:Joshua.yathin.yu|Joshua.yathin.yu]] ([[User talk:Joshua.yathin.yu|talk]]) 07:49, 1 May 2019 (UTC) *'''Oppose'''. Resident Evil is overwhelmingly the common name in the English-speaking world (not just the US). See [[WP:COMMONNAME]]. [[User:Popcornduff|Popcornduff]] ([[User talk:Popcornduff|talk]]) 08:03, 1 May 2019 (UTC) *'''Oppose'''. per Popcornduff --<small><span style="border: 1px solid">[[user:StarScream1007|'''<span style="background-color:White; color:#CC0000"> &nbsp;StarScream1007&nbsp;</span>''']][[User talk:StarScream1007|<span style="background-color:#003399; color:white">&nbsp;►Talk&nbsp;</span>]] </span></small> 15:10, 1 May 2019 (UTC) * '''Comment''' He has a point when it comes to the ''Biohazard'' logo. Shouldn't that be included in the infobox? [[User:DA1|DA1]] ([[User talk:DA1|talk]]) 04:47, 16 April 2020 (UTC) *:Why would we include the Biohazard logo? Wikipedia articles typically contain the single main logo for the subject and in our case we use the [[WP:COMMONNAME]] per the arguments above. [[User:Popcornfud|Popcornfud]] ([[User talk:Popcornfud|talk]]) 10:16, 16 April 2020 (UTC) *::{{ping|Popcornfud}} Explain the rationale behind why [[Nintendo Entertainment System]] has the logo for ''Famicom'', or why [[TurboGrafx-16]] has the logo for ''PC Engine'', in the infobox then? COMMONNAME guidelines apply to Article titles only otherwise we wouldn't mention the alternate names in the lede either. [[User:DA1|DA1]] ([[User talk:DA1|talk]]) 03:31, 17 April 2020 (UTC) *:::{{u|DA1}}, well then, it seems my claim that "Wikipedia articles typically contain the single main logo for the subject" is not necessarily true. I guess I wouldn't object, on that basis, to seeing the Biohazard logo in there too. *::: *:::... But are we sure the Biohazard logo isn't the same as the RE logo - just a different name in the same font? https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRQct9-vtPYUOT8wox0YwL1PyVQepNKO6rM5gFy8AVCbxHegyGO&s In which case having both logos isn't really adding much value. [[User:Popcornfud|Popcornfud]] ([[User talk:Popcornfud|talk]]) 10:44, 17 April 2020 (UTC) == Umbrellas real life pendant. == Funny Story is that the Developers used mostly unrecognized, the Logo of one of the most powerful racist misogyne Organizations active in Worlds History, responcible for massive Genozides during the Crusades, and the ethnic enlistening Program of the third Empire, together with IBM / Holerith Machines preparing the selection and poisoning in CO/CO2 Chamber in Truck Freight Boxes, never reaching Annihilation Camps. Umbrealla stand for Malet, perhaps is carthage for a Shelter, the Souvereign Military Order of Malta, a most dangerous an reckless Sect, possessing a big Island in the mediterranian Sea, that prohibits Women the Full Souvereignity about their Bodys during pregnancy, and taking them the Right to extort the Semendonator for good of earlier Childrens, like any emancipated culture would did not. They are out there. Buhahahahaha T Virus is also called JHWH/Iehova.'