Examine individual changes

[ 0 => '== Peer review ==', 1 => '', 2 => 'This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.', 3 => '', 4 => '=== General info ===', 5 => '', 6 => '* Whose work are you reviewing? Seanapplegate', 7 => '* Link to draft you're reviewing: [[User:Seanapplegate/Online Tutoring]]', 8 => '', 9 => '=== Lead ===', 10 => '', 11 => ''''Guiding questions:'''', 12 => '', 13 => '* Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?', 14 => '* Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?', 15 => '* Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?', 16 => '* Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?', 17 => '* Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?', 18 => '', 19 => '==== Lead evaluation ====', 20 => '', 21 => '=== Content ===', 22 => '', 23 => ''''Guiding questions:'''', 24 => '', 25 => '* Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes', 26 => '* Is the content added up-to-date? Yes', 27 => '* Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? No', 28 => '* Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? Yes', 29 => '', 30 => '==== Content evaluation ====', 31 => '', 32 => '=== Tone and Balance ===', 33 => '', 34 => ''''Guiding questions:'''', 35 => '', 36 => '* Is the content added neutral? Yes', 37 => '* Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No', 38 => '* Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No', 39 => '* Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No', 40 => '', 41 => '==== Tone and balance evaluation ====', 42 => '', 43 => '=== Sources and References ===', 44 => '', 45 => ''''Guiding questions:'''', 46 => '', 47 => '* Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yup', 48 => '* Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yup', 49 => '* Are the sources current? Yup ', 50 => '* Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? Yup', 51 => '* Check a few links. Do they work? Yup', 52 => '', 53 => '==== Sources and references evaluation ====', 54 => '', 55 => '=== Organization ===', 56 => '', 57 => ''''Guiding questions:'''', 58 => '', 59 => '* Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes', 60 => '* Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? No', 61 => '* Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes', 62 => '', 63 => '==== Organization evaluation ====', 64 => '', 65 => '=== Images and Media ===', 66 => '', 67 => ''''Guiding questions:''' If your peer added images or media', 68 => '', 69 => '* Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?', 70 => '* Are images well-captioned?', 71 => '* Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?', 72 => '* Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?', 73 => '', 74 => '==== Images and media evaluation ====', 75 => '', 76 => '=== For New Articles Only ===', 77 => '', 78 => ''''If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.'''', 79 => '', 80 => '* Does the article meet Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Notability|Notability]] requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject? Yes', 81 => '* How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject? yes', 82 => '* Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles? yes', 83 => '* Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable? Tes', 84 => '', 85 => '==== New Article Evaluation ====', 86 => '', 87 => '=== Overall impressions ===', 88 => '', 89 => ''''Guiding questions:'''', 90 => '', 91 => '* Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? Tes', 92 => '* What are the strengths of the content added? very detailed', 93 => '* How can the content added be improved? more linked to other wiki pages', 94 => '', 95 => '==== Overall evaluation ==== ', 96 => '', 97 => '[[Category:Wikipedia Student Program]]' ]