Examine individual changes
Appearance
This page allows you to examine the variables generated by the Edit Filter for an individual change.
Variables generated for this change
Variable | Value |
---|---|
Edit count of the user (user_editcount ) | 7 |
Name of the user account (user_name ) | 'Joseph Feynman' |
Age of the user account (user_age ) | 3802530 |
Groups (including implicit) the user is in (user_groups ) | [
0 => '*',
1 => 'user'
] |
Rights that the user has (user_rights ) | [
0 => 'createaccount',
1 => 'read',
2 => 'edit',
3 => 'createtalk',
4 => 'writeapi',
5 => 'viewmywatchlist',
6 => 'editmywatchlist',
7 => 'viewmyprivateinfo',
8 => 'editmyprivateinfo',
9 => 'editmyoptions',
10 => 'abusefilter-log-detail',
11 => 'centralauth-merge',
12 => 'abusefilter-view',
13 => 'abusefilter-log',
14 => 'vipsscaler-test',
15 => 'collectionsaveasuserpage',
16 => 'reupload-own',
17 => 'move-rootuserpages',
18 => 'createpage',
19 => 'minoredit',
20 => 'editmyusercss',
21 => 'editmyuserjson',
22 => 'editmyuserjs',
23 => 'purge',
24 => 'sendemail',
25 => 'applychangetags',
26 => 'spamblacklistlog',
27 => 'mwoauthmanagemygrants'
] |
Whether the user is editing from mobile app (user_app ) | false |
Whether or not a user is editing through the mobile interface (user_mobile ) | false |
Page ID (page_id ) | 30259292 |
Page namespace (page_namespace ) | 0 |
Page title without namespace (page_title ) | 'Black hole complementarity' |
Full page title (page_prefixedtitle ) | 'Black hole complementarity' |
Edit protection level of the page (page_restrictions_edit ) | [] |
Last ten users to contribute to the page (page_recent_contributors ) | [
0 => 'Comp.arch',
1 => 'FrescoBot',
2 => 'Gusaxe',
3 => 'Monkbot',
4 => 'DannyS712',
5 => '2601:184:4A7F:9D9B:848F:B2FB:E5CB:A1C8',
6 => 'Hoomanneshat',
7 => '2A02:587:411B:7100:6C27:DAAD:9CA7:A43A',
8 => 'Headbomb',
9 => 'Citation bot'
] |
Page age in seconds (page_age ) | 334266563 |
Action (action ) | 'edit' |
Edit summary/reason (summary ) | 'Added more detail and extra information' |
Old content model (old_content_model ) | 'wikitext' |
New content model (new_content_model ) | 'wikitext' |
Old page wikitext, before the edit (old_wikitext ) | '{{refimprove|date=October 2017}}
'''Black hole complementarity''' is a conjectured solution to the [[black hole information paradox]], proposed by [[Leonard Susskind]], Larus Thorlacius,<ref>{{Cite journal|arxiv=hep-th/9306069 |author1=Susskind |author2=Thorlacius |author3=Uglum |title=The Stretched Horizon and Black Hole Complementarity |journal=Physical Review D |volume=48 |issue=8 |pages=3743–3761 |year=1993|doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.48.3743 |bibcode = 1993PhRvD..48.3743S }}</ref> and [[Gerard 't Hooft]].<ref>{{cite journal |last1='t Hooft |first1=G. |doi=10.1016/0550-3213(85)90418-3 |title=On the quantum structure of a black hole |journal=Nuclear Physics B |volume=256 |pages=727–745 |year=1985 |bibcode=1985NuPhB.256..727T}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1='t Hooft |first1=G. |doi=10.1016/0550-3213(90)90174-C |title=The black hole interpretation of string theory |journal=Nuclear Physics B |volume=335 |issue=1 |pages= 138–154|year=1990 |bibcode=1990NuPhB.335..138T}}</ref>
==Overview==
Ever since [[Stephen Hawking]] suggested information is lost in an evaporating [[black hole]] once it passes through the [[event horizon]] and is inevitably destroyed at the [[Gravitational singularity|singularity]], and that this can turn [[pure state|pure quantum state]]s into [[mixed state (physics)|mixed state]]s, some physicists have wondered if a complete theory of [[quantum gravity]] might be able to conserve information with a unitary [[time evolution]]. But how can this be possible if information cannot escape the event horizon without traveling faster than light? This seems to rule out [[Hawking radiation]] as the carrier of the missing information. It also appears as if information cannot be "reflected" at the event horizon as there is nothing special about it locally.
[[Leonard Susskind]]<ref>
{{cite book
| last = Susskind
| first = Leonard
| author-link = Leonard Susskind
| first2 = James | last2 = Lindesay
| title = An introduction to black holes, information and the string theory revolution: The holographic universe
| date = 31 December 2004
| publisher = World Scientific Publishing Company
| isbn = 978-981-256-083-4
}}
</ref> proposed a radical resolution to this problem by claiming that the information is both reflected at the event horizon ''and'' passes through the event horizon and cannot escape, with the catch being no observer can confirm both stories simultaneously. According to an external observer, the infinite time dilation at the horizon itself makes it appear as if it takes an infinite amount of time to reach the horizon. He also postulated a '''stretched horizon''', which is a [[membrane paradigm|membrane]] hovering about a [[Planck length]] outside the event horizon and which is both physical and hot. According to the external observer, infalling information heats up the stretched horizon, which then reradiates it as Hawking radiation, with the entire evolution being unitary. However, according to an infalling observer, nothing special happens at the event horizon itself, and both the observer and the information will hit the singularity. This isn't to say there are two copies of the information lying about — one at or just outside the horizon, and the other inside the black hole — as that would violate the [[no-cloning theorem]]. Instead, an observer can only detect the information at the horizon itself, or inside, but never both simultaneously. Complementarity is a feature of the [[quantum mechanics]] of noncommuting observables, and Susskind proposed that both stories are complementary in the quantum sense.
An infalling observer will see the point of entry of the information as being localized on the event horizon, while an external observer will notice the information being spread out uniformly over the entire stretched horizon before being re-radiated.
To an infalling observer, information and [[entropy]] pass through the horizon with nothing strange happening. To an external observer, the information and entropy is absorbed into the stretched horizon which acts like a dissipative fluid with entropy, viscosity and electrical conductivity. See the [[membrane paradigm]] for more details. The stretched horizon is conducting with surface charges which rapidly spread out over the horizon.
Recently, it appears that black hole complementarity combined with the [[monogamy of entanglement]] suggests the existence of a "[[firewall (physics)|firewall]]".<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Almheiri|first=Ahmed|last2=Marolf|first2=Donald|last3=Polchinski|first3=Joseph|last4=Sully|first4=James|date=February 2013|title=Black holes: complementarity or firewalls?|journal=Journal of High Energy Physics|volume=2013|issue=2|pages=62|doi=10.1007/jhep02(2013)062|issn=1029-8479|bibcode=2013JHEP...02..062A|arxiv=1207.3123}}</ref>
== References ==
{{reflist|2}}
{{quantum gravity}}
{{black holes}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Black Hole Complementarity}}
[[Category:Quantum gravity]]' |
New page wikitext, after the edit (new_wikitext ) | '{{refimprove|date=October 2017}}
'''Black hole complementarity''' is a conjectured solution to the [[black hole information paradox]], proposed by [[Leonard Susskind]], Larus Thorlacius,<ref>{{Cite journal|arxiv=hep-th/9306069 |author1=Susskind |author2=Thorlacius |author3=Uglum |title=The Stretched Horizon and Black Hole Complementarity |journal=Physical Review D |volume=48 |issue=8 |pages=3743–3761 |year=1993|doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.48.3743 |bibcode = 1993PhRvD..48.3743S }}</ref> and [[Gerard 't Hooft]].<ref>{{cite journal |last1='t Hooft |first1=G. |doi=10.1016/0550-3213(85)90418-3 |title=On the quantum structure of a black hole |journal=Nuclear Physics B |volume=256 |pages=727–745 |year=1985 |bibcode=1985NuPhB.256..727T}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1='t Hooft |first1=G. |doi=10.1016/0550-3213(90)90174-C |title=The black hole interpretation of string theory |journal=Nuclear Physics B |volume=335 |issue=1 |pages= 138–154|year=1990 |bibcode=1990NuPhB.335..138T}}</ref>
==Overview==
Ever since [[Stephen Hawking]] suggested information is lost in an evaporating [[black hole]] once it passes through the [[event horizon]] and is inevitably destroyed at the [[Gravitational singularity|singularity]], and that this can turn [[pure state|pure quantum state]]s into [[mixed state (physics)|mixed state]]s, some physicists have wondered if a complete theory of [[quantum gravity]] might be able to conserve information with a unitary [[time evolution]]. But how can this be possible if information cannot escape the event horizon without traveling faster than light? This seems to rule out [[Hawking radiation]] as the carrier of the missing information. It also appears as if information cannot be "reflected" at the event horizon as there is nothing special about it locally.
[[Leonard Susskind]]<ref>
{{cite book
| last = Susskind
| first = Leonard
| author-link = Leonard Susskind
| first2 = James | last2 = Lindesay
| title = An introduction to black holes, information and the string theory revolution: The holographic universe
| date = 31 December 2004
| publisher = World Scientific Publishing Company
| isbn = 978-981-256-083-4
}}
</ref> proposed a radical resolution to this problem by claiming that the information is both reflected at the event horizon ''and'' passes through the event horizon and cannot escape, with the catch being no observer can confirm both stories simultaneously. According to an external observer, the infinite time dilation at the horizon itself makes it appear as if it takes an infinite amount of time to reach the horizon. He also postulated a '''stretched horizon''', which is a [[membrane paradigm|membrane]] hovering about a [[Planck length]] outside the event horizon and which is both physical and hot. According to the external observer, infalling information heats up the stretched horizon, which then reradiates it as Hawking radiation, with the entire evolution being unitary. However, according to an infalling observer, nothing special happens at the event horizon itself, and both the observer and the information will hit the singularity. This isn't to say there are two copies of the information lying about — one at or just outside the horizon, and the other inside the black hole — as that would violate the [[no-cloning theorem]]. Instead, an observer can only detect the information at the horizon itself, or inside, but never both simultaneously. Complementarity is a feature of the [[quantum mechanics]] of noncommuting observables, and Susskind proposed that both stories are complementary in the quantum sense, that there is no contradiction which also means no violation of linearity in quantum mechanics.
An infalling observer will see the point of entry of the information as being localized on the event horizon, while an external observer will notice the information being spread out uniformly over the entire stretched horizon before being re-radiated, and perceives the event horizon as a dynamical membrane.
To an infalling observer, information and [[entropy]] pass through the horizon with nothing of interest happening. To an external observer, the information and entropy is absorbed into the stretched horizon which acts like a dissipative fluid with entropy, viscosity and electrical conductivity. See the [[membrane paradigm]] for more details. The stretched horizon is conducting with surface charges which rapidly spread out logarithmically over the horizon.
Recently, it appears that black hole complementarity combined with the [[monogamy of entanglement]] suggests the existence of an AMPS "[[firewall (physics)|firewall]]",<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Almheiri|first=Ahmed|last2=Marolf|first2=Donald|last3=Polchinski|first3=Joseph|last4=Sully|first4=James|date=February 2013|title=Black holes: complementarity or firewalls?|journal=Journal of High Energy Physics|volume=2013|issue=2|pages=62|doi=10.1007/jhep02(2013)062|issn=1029-8479|bibcode=2013JHEP...02..062A|arxiv=1207.3123}}</ref> where high energy, short wavelength photons are present in the horizon, although this is still being hypothesised.
== References ==
{{reflist|2}}
{{quantum gravity}}
{{black holes}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Black Hole Complementarity}}
[[Category:Quantum gravity]]' |
Unified diff of changes made by edit (edit_diff ) | '@@ -16,10 +16,10 @@
| isbn = 978-981-256-083-4
}}
-</ref> proposed a radical resolution to this problem by claiming that the information is both reflected at the event horizon ''and'' passes through the event horizon and cannot escape, with the catch being no observer can confirm both stories simultaneously. According to an external observer, the infinite time dilation at the horizon itself makes it appear as if it takes an infinite amount of time to reach the horizon. He also postulated a '''stretched horizon''', which is a [[membrane paradigm|membrane]] hovering about a [[Planck length]] outside the event horizon and which is both physical and hot. According to the external observer, infalling information heats up the stretched horizon, which then reradiates it as Hawking radiation, with the entire evolution being unitary. However, according to an infalling observer, nothing special happens at the event horizon itself, and both the observer and the information will hit the singularity. This isn't to say there are two copies of the information lying about — one at or just outside the horizon, and the other inside the black hole — as that would violate the [[no-cloning theorem]]. Instead, an observer can only detect the information at the horizon itself, or inside, but never both simultaneously. Complementarity is a feature of the [[quantum mechanics]] of noncommuting observables, and Susskind proposed that both stories are complementary in the quantum sense.
+</ref> proposed a radical resolution to this problem by claiming that the information is both reflected at the event horizon ''and'' passes through the event horizon and cannot escape, with the catch being no observer can confirm both stories simultaneously. According to an external observer, the infinite time dilation at the horizon itself makes it appear as if it takes an infinite amount of time to reach the horizon. He also postulated a '''stretched horizon''', which is a [[membrane paradigm|membrane]] hovering about a [[Planck length]] outside the event horizon and which is both physical and hot. According to the external observer, infalling information heats up the stretched horizon, which then reradiates it as Hawking radiation, with the entire evolution being unitary. However, according to an infalling observer, nothing special happens at the event horizon itself, and both the observer and the information will hit the singularity. This isn't to say there are two copies of the information lying about — one at or just outside the horizon, and the other inside the black hole — as that would violate the [[no-cloning theorem]]. Instead, an observer can only detect the information at the horizon itself, or inside, but never both simultaneously. Complementarity is a feature of the [[quantum mechanics]] of noncommuting observables, and Susskind proposed that both stories are complementary in the quantum sense, that there is no contradiction which also means no violation of linearity in quantum mechanics.
-An infalling observer will see the point of entry of the information as being localized on the event horizon, while an external observer will notice the information being spread out uniformly over the entire stretched horizon before being re-radiated.
-To an infalling observer, information and [[entropy]] pass through the horizon with nothing strange happening. To an external observer, the information and entropy is absorbed into the stretched horizon which acts like a dissipative fluid with entropy, viscosity and electrical conductivity. See the [[membrane paradigm]] for more details. The stretched horizon is conducting with surface charges which rapidly spread out over the horizon.
+An infalling observer will see the point of entry of the information as being localized on the event horizon, while an external observer will notice the information being spread out uniformly over the entire stretched horizon before being re-radiated, and perceives the event horizon as a dynamical membrane.
+To an infalling observer, information and [[entropy]] pass through the horizon with nothing of interest happening. To an external observer, the information and entropy is absorbed into the stretched horizon which acts like a dissipative fluid with entropy, viscosity and electrical conductivity. See the [[membrane paradigm]] for more details. The stretched horizon is conducting with surface charges which rapidly spread out logarithmically over the horizon.
-Recently, it appears that black hole complementarity combined with the [[monogamy of entanglement]] suggests the existence of a "[[firewall (physics)|firewall]]".<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Almheiri|first=Ahmed|last2=Marolf|first2=Donald|last3=Polchinski|first3=Joseph|last4=Sully|first4=James|date=February 2013|title=Black holes: complementarity or firewalls?|journal=Journal of High Energy Physics|volume=2013|issue=2|pages=62|doi=10.1007/jhep02(2013)062|issn=1029-8479|bibcode=2013JHEP...02..062A|arxiv=1207.3123}}</ref>
+Recently, it appears that black hole complementarity combined with the [[monogamy of entanglement]] suggests the existence of an AMPS "[[firewall (physics)|firewall]]",<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Almheiri|first=Ahmed|last2=Marolf|first2=Donald|last3=Polchinski|first3=Joseph|last4=Sully|first4=James|date=February 2013|title=Black holes: complementarity or firewalls?|journal=Journal of High Energy Physics|volume=2013|issue=2|pages=62|doi=10.1007/jhep02(2013)062|issn=1029-8479|bibcode=2013JHEP...02..062A|arxiv=1207.3123}}</ref> where high energy, short wavelength photons are present in the horizon, although this is still being hypothesised.
== References ==
' |
New page size (new_size ) | 5277 |
Old page size (old_size ) | 4981 |
Size change in edit (edit_delta ) | 296 |
Lines added in edit (added_lines ) | [
0 => '</ref> proposed a radical resolution to this problem by claiming that the information is both reflected at the event horizon ''and'' passes through the event horizon and cannot escape, with the catch being no observer can confirm both stories simultaneously. According to an external observer, the infinite time dilation at the horizon itself makes it appear as if it takes an infinite amount of time to reach the horizon. He also postulated a '''stretched horizon''', which is a [[membrane paradigm|membrane]] hovering about a [[Planck length]] outside the event horizon and which is both physical and hot. According to the external observer, infalling information heats up the stretched horizon, which then reradiates it as Hawking radiation, with the entire evolution being unitary. However, according to an infalling observer, nothing special happens at the event horizon itself, and both the observer and the information will hit the singularity. This isn't to say there are two copies of the information lying about — one at or just outside the horizon, and the other inside the black hole — as that would violate the [[no-cloning theorem]]. Instead, an observer can only detect the information at the horizon itself, or inside, but never both simultaneously. Complementarity is a feature of the [[quantum mechanics]] of noncommuting observables, and Susskind proposed that both stories are complementary in the quantum sense, that there is no contradiction which also means no violation of linearity in quantum mechanics. ',
1 => 'An infalling observer will see the point of entry of the information as being localized on the event horizon, while an external observer will notice the information being spread out uniformly over the entire stretched horizon before being re-radiated, and perceives the event horizon as a dynamical membrane.',
2 => 'To an infalling observer, information and [[entropy]] pass through the horizon with nothing of interest happening. To an external observer, the information and entropy is absorbed into the stretched horizon which acts like a dissipative fluid with entropy, viscosity and electrical conductivity. See the [[membrane paradigm]] for more details. The stretched horizon is conducting with surface charges which rapidly spread out logarithmically over the horizon.',
3 => 'Recently, it appears that black hole complementarity combined with the [[monogamy of entanglement]] suggests the existence of an AMPS "[[firewall (physics)|firewall]]",<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Almheiri|first=Ahmed|last2=Marolf|first2=Donald|last3=Polchinski|first3=Joseph|last4=Sully|first4=James|date=February 2013|title=Black holes: complementarity or firewalls?|journal=Journal of High Energy Physics|volume=2013|issue=2|pages=62|doi=10.1007/jhep02(2013)062|issn=1029-8479|bibcode=2013JHEP...02..062A|arxiv=1207.3123}}</ref> where high energy, short wavelength photons are present in the horizon, although this is still being hypothesised. '
] |
Lines removed in edit (removed_lines ) | [
0 => '</ref> proposed a radical resolution to this problem by claiming that the information is both reflected at the event horizon ''and'' passes through the event horizon and cannot escape, with the catch being no observer can confirm both stories simultaneously. According to an external observer, the infinite time dilation at the horizon itself makes it appear as if it takes an infinite amount of time to reach the horizon. He also postulated a '''stretched horizon''', which is a [[membrane paradigm|membrane]] hovering about a [[Planck length]] outside the event horizon and which is both physical and hot. According to the external observer, infalling information heats up the stretched horizon, which then reradiates it as Hawking radiation, with the entire evolution being unitary. However, according to an infalling observer, nothing special happens at the event horizon itself, and both the observer and the information will hit the singularity. This isn't to say there are two copies of the information lying about — one at or just outside the horizon, and the other inside the black hole — as that would violate the [[no-cloning theorem]]. Instead, an observer can only detect the information at the horizon itself, or inside, but never both simultaneously. Complementarity is a feature of the [[quantum mechanics]] of noncommuting observables, and Susskind proposed that both stories are complementary in the quantum sense.',
1 => 'An infalling observer will see the point of entry of the information as being localized on the event horizon, while an external observer will notice the information being spread out uniformly over the entire stretched horizon before being re-radiated.',
2 => 'To an infalling observer, information and [[entropy]] pass through the horizon with nothing strange happening. To an external observer, the information and entropy is absorbed into the stretched horizon which acts like a dissipative fluid with entropy, viscosity and electrical conductivity. See the [[membrane paradigm]] for more details. The stretched horizon is conducting with surface charges which rapidly spread out over the horizon.',
3 => 'Recently, it appears that black hole complementarity combined with the [[monogamy of entanglement]] suggests the existence of a "[[firewall (physics)|firewall]]".<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Almheiri|first=Ahmed|last2=Marolf|first2=Donald|last3=Polchinski|first3=Joseph|last4=Sully|first4=James|date=February 2013|title=Black holes: complementarity or firewalls?|journal=Journal of High Energy Physics|volume=2013|issue=2|pages=62|doi=10.1007/jhep02(2013)062|issn=1029-8479|bibcode=2013JHEP...02..062A|arxiv=1207.3123}}</ref>'
] |
All external links added in the edit (added_links ) | [] |
All external links removed in the edit (removed_links ) | [] |
All external links in the new text (all_links ) | [
0 => '//arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9306069',
1 => 'https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993PhRvD..48.3743S',
2 => '//doi.org/10.1103%2FPhysRevD.48.3743',
3 => 'https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1985NuPhB.256..727T',
4 => '//doi.org/10.1016%2F0550-3213(85)90418-3',
5 => 'https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1990NuPhB.335..138T',
6 => '//doi.org/10.1016%2F0550-3213(90)90174-C',
7 => '//arxiv.org/abs/1207.3123',
8 => 'https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013JHEP...02..062A',
9 => '//doi.org/10.1007%2Fjhep02(2013)062',
10 => '//www.worldcat.org/issn/1029-8479',
11 => '//www.google.com/search?as_eq=wikipedia&q=%22Black+hole+complementarity%22',
12 => '//www.google.com/search?tbm=nws&q=%22Black+hole+complementarity%22+-wikipedia',
13 => '//www.google.com/search?&q=%22Black+hole+complementarity%22&tbs=bkt:s&tbm=bks',
14 => '//www.google.com/search?tbs=bks:1&q=%22Black+hole+complementarity%22+-wikipedia',
15 => '//scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22Black+hole+complementarity%22',
16 => 'https://www.jstor.org/action/doBasicSearch?Query=%22Black+hole+complementarity%22&acc=on&wc=on'
] |
Links in the page, before the edit (old_links ) | [
0 => '//arxiv.org/abs/1207.3123',
1 => '//arxiv.org/abs/1207.3123',
2 => '//arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9306069',
3 => '//arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9306069',
4 => '//doi.org/10.1007%2Fjhep02(2013)062',
5 => '//doi.org/10.1007%2Fjhep02(2013)062',
6 => '//doi.org/10.1016%2F0550-3213(85)90418-3',
7 => '//doi.org/10.1016%2F0550-3213(85)90418-3',
8 => '//doi.org/10.1016%2F0550-3213(90)90174-C',
9 => '//doi.org/10.1016%2F0550-3213(90)90174-C',
10 => '//doi.org/10.1103%2FPhysRevD.48.3743',
11 => '//doi.org/10.1103%2FPhysRevD.48.3743',
12 => '//scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22Black+hole+complementarity%22',
13 => '//scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22Black+hole+complementarity%22',
14 => '//www.google.com/search?&q=%22Black+hole+complementarity%22&tbs=bkt:s&tbm=bks',
15 => '//www.google.com/search?&q=%22Black+hole+complementarity%22&tbs=bkt:s&tbm=bks',
16 => '//www.google.com/search?as_eq=wikipedia&q=%22Black+hole+complementarity%22',
17 => '//www.google.com/search?as_eq=wikipedia&q=%22Black+hole+complementarity%22',
18 => '//www.google.com/search?tbm=nws&q=%22Black+hole+complementarity%22+-wikipedia',
19 => '//www.google.com/search?tbm=nws&q=%22Black+hole+complementarity%22+-wikipedia',
20 => '//www.google.com/search?tbs=bks:1&q=%22Black+hole+complementarity%22+-wikipedia',
21 => '//www.google.com/search?tbs=bks:1&q=%22Black+hole+complementarity%22+-wikipedia',
22 => '//www.worldcat.org/issn/1029-8479',
23 => '//www.worldcat.org/issn/1029-8479',
24 => 'https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1985NuPhB.256..727T',
25 => 'https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1990NuPhB.335..138T',
26 => 'https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993PhRvD..48.3743S',
27 => 'https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013JHEP...02..062A',
28 => 'https://www.jstor.org/action/doBasicSearch?Query=%22Black+hole+complementarity%22&acc=on&wc=on'
] |
Whether or not the change was made through a Tor exit node (tor_exit_node ) | false |
Unix timestamp of change (timestamp ) | 1628083867 |