Examine individual changes

'Welcome to Blueboar's talk page... I am away from my computer right now, and can not respond to you. Please leave a message at the sound of the beep..... (Please note that I regularly ''delete'' messages after I have read them. If you have posted a message for me, and no longer find it on the page, it means I have seen it. I do not archive old messages. If you need to retrieve something posted on this user page, you can find it in the page's history.) BEEEEEP.... == Leave Messages and Comments below this line == _____________________________________<br> Hello, Blueboar. On 18 Oct. I made several changes to the Freemasonry article - and I notice that you have reverted all of them. The action that is most puzzling is the removal of "(UGLE)" after the first use on "United Grand Lodge of England" in the first sentence of the second paragraph under Organisation | '''Grand Lodges'''. [[United Grand Lodge of England]] (with hyperlink) is used in full two sentences later, and without hyperlink four paragraphs later. Oddly, after creating the acronym, the full expression is used in '''Schism''' - with hyperlink in the first paragraph, and without hyperlink in the third and sixth paragraphs; in the fourth paragraph under '''Freemasonry and women''', but with hyperlink in the fifth paragraph. The generally accepted principle is that the acronym is presented after the first use of the full expression, and used regularly thereafter; such is the case for "GLE" in the fourth paragraph under History | '''Origins''' - though GLE is used only once, so was there really any point in creating an acronym? The final sentence mentions "United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE)" - 16 paragraphs after its first use! There are other anomalies:<br> * Under '''Prince Hall Freemasonry''', mention is made of the "Premier Grand Lodge of England (GLE)" ... should the acronym be "PGLE"? Or should "Premier" be "premier" (as in "the first")? Perhaps "Premier" should be deleted?<br> * The article refers to the Grand Lodge of Scotland and the Grand Lodge of Ireland (under Organisation | '''Grand Lodges''') ... and both are mentioned 15 paragraphs later (under History | '''Origins''') and again three paragraphs later (under History | '''North America''') - so, to be consistent with "GLE", shouldn't they have their own acronyms (GLS and GLI respectively)? This should be sufficient to indicate that this is a dog's breakfast, and that the consistency can be improved. It may be that this is not Wikipedia's way ... can you enlighten me?<br> [[User:Prisoner of Zenda|Prisoner of Zenda]] ([[User talk:Prisoner of Zenda|talk]]) 03:24, 21 October 2021 (UTC) :::My take is that the article over uses acronyms. They are not needed at all, unless multiple grand lodges ''with similar names'' are mentioned within a short span in the same section (in which case, they can help the reader differentiate between them). I will take another look at the article and try to clean it up. [[User:Blueboar|Blueboar]] ([[User talk:Blueboar#top|talk]]) 11:30, 21 October 2021 (UTC) ==Big grin== Well [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AReference_desk%2FHumanities&type=revision&diff=1052554883&oldid=1052552014 said] B. Thanks for sending my into the weekend with a smile on my face :-D Cheers. [[User:MarnetteD|MarnetteD]]&#124;[[User talk:MarnetteD|Talk]] 21:28, 29 October 2021 (UTC) == ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message == <table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;"> <tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2021|2021 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2021|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2021#Election timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2021/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2021|poll}}|voting page]]'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 00:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)</small> </td></tr> </table> <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2021/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1056562944 --> == Discretionary sanctions alert - gender and sexuality == {{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.'' You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions|discretionary sanctions]] is in effect. Any administrator may impose [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Sanctions|sanctions]] on editors who do not strictly follow [[Wikipedia:List of policies|Wikipedia's policies]], or the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Page restrictions|page-specific restrictions]], when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Guidance for editors|guidance on discretionary sanctions]] and the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee's]] decision [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gender and sexuality|here]]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. }}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> Just letting you know about the stricter rules for gender and sexuality related topics on Wikipedia. Don't worry, it's just a standard notice that has to be given and you've not done anything wrong. [[User:Sideswipe9th|Sideswipe9th]] ([[User talk:Sideswipe9th|talk]])'