Examine individual changes

'== Long Beach references in [[Mesa, Arizona]] == Thanks for adding an edit summary to clarify your second edit. I agree that Long Beach isn't much of a suburb, and looking at it again, I'd say the word "co-focus" used in the original wording applies. I stand corrected. I like your replacement text further up in the article. (Also, [[Suburb#North America]] says that Mesa is the most-populous suburb in the United States, so it's consistent.) Thank you, and (although this is a bit late), welcome to Wikipedia! &bull; [[User:Warpflyght|WarpFlyght]] <small>([[User talk:Warpflyght|talk]] &bull; [[Special:Contributions/Warpflyght|contribs]])</small> 21:30, 31 January 2007 (UTC) == Three Revert Rule Violation: [[Boomburb]] == This message is to notify you that you have violated the Wikipedia Three Revert Rule - [[WP:3RR]] - and that all further edits should be discussed on the :talk page first. A further violation will be posted on the administrator's noticeboard. Thank you. [[User:Snickerdo|Snickerdo]] 01:09, 14 March 2007 (UTC) <div class="user-block"> [[Image:Octagon-warning.svg|left|30px| ]] You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]]. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.</div><!-- Template:3RR5 --> [[User:Rlevse|Rlevse]] 02:39, 14 March 2007 (UTC) == Las Vegas Strip == It is in [[Paradise, Nevada]] and [[Winchester, Nevada]]. [[User:Vegaswikian|Vegaswikian]] ([[User talk:Vegaswikian|talk]]) 07:45, 18 February 2008 (UTC) == Reverting instead of discussion on Gabrielle Giffords == I see you have a history of just 3RRing instead of discussing on the talk page. There is a discussion on the talk page about just this issue. If you do not care to discuss, I will ask other editors to discuss the issue and come to a consensus. You have not provided a link to your original research. And, no, your quote from a wikipedia article doesn't count. Either source your addition, or stop adding it. If the news changes and says she was not shot in Tucson, then go ahead and add the information with a link. Until then, don't. --[[User:Kleopatra|Kleopatra]] ([[User talk:Kleopatra|talk]]) 05:42, 9 January 2011 (UTC) ==Maps== Hi! I'm trying to find the census maps for [[Mountain View High School (Marana, Arizona)]] - I'm trying to determine if it is in Marana, Tortolita, or an unincorporated area. Where is a high quality map that shows which municipality 3901 W. Linda Vista Blvd. Tucson, AZ 85742 is in? While I found the regular US Census Bureau maps for Tortolita and Marana, I'm having a hard time distinguishing which is in which Thanks, [[User:WhisperToMe|WhisperToMe]] ([[User talk:WhisperToMe|talk]]) 17:42, 9 January 2011 (UTC) :The current official U.S. Census BAS map is at http://www2.census.gov/geo/pvs/bas/bas11/st04_az/cou/c04019_pima/BAS11C20401900000_040.pdf :The high school is in an uncolored area of the map (i.e. it is neither in a municipality nor in a CDP), but it is right across the street from Casas Adobes (Thornydale Road forms its western boundary), and just over a mile from Oro Valley. The school’s location is best reported as “near Casas Adobes”; however, as for a mailing address, “Oro Valley, AZ 85742” is most appropriate (Casas Adobes is not postally acceptable). The school is about four miles north of the Tucson city limits, making “Tucson, AZ 85742” least accurate. [[User:Trorov|Trorov]] ([[User talk:Trorov#top|talk]]) 22:32, 9 January 2011 (UTC) ::Thanks for letting me know! I updated the article name to [[Mountain View High School (Pima County, Arizona)]] - BTW, where is the index of the official BAS maps? [[User:WhisperToMe|WhisperToMe]] ([[User talk:WhisperToMe|talk]]) 22:37, 9 January 2011 (UTC) :No problem! It is good to know that others appreciate accuracy when it comes to the messy practice of identifying places in the U.S. I agree with your update: though it is in the Marana School District, it is closer to Oro Valley than Marana and in a ZIP code that “Marana” cannot be used with. “Unincorporated Pima County” is best. :The index is at: http://www.census.gov/geo/www/bas/bas11/bas11_maps.html - enjoy! [[User:Trorov|Trorov]] ([[User talk:Trorov#top|talk]]) 22:51, 9 January 2011 (UTC) ==[[Winchester, Nevada]]== Regarding your reversion [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Winchester,_Nevada&diff=452834086&oldid=452832413], if you had actually looked at my edits you would see that I did not deny that Winchester is a CDP. I only changed the primary references (in the lead and infobox) to use the more informative classification of an "unincorporated town", a term that actually has a specific legal status in Nevada. The references to a CDP remain in those places where they are relevant, i.e. in regards to statistics from the Census. Also, you reverted my fixing of a dead link to the town board homepage. Please be more careful with your reverts in the future. [[User:Toohool|Toohool]] ([[User talk:Toohool|talk]]) 07:28, 28 September 2011 (UTC) == term confusion on county areas == Hi Trorov, I noticed your edit heading note on your edit to the article [[List of United States cities by area]] about apples, oranges and Yakutat. Could you explain the term CDP and give the areas for the two different regions that you discuss? [[User:Dleit Ḵaa|Dleit Ḵaa]] ([[User talk:Dleit Ḵaa|talk]]) 23:59, 8 January 2013 (UTC) == [[Interstate 805]] == The infobox is supposed to be a concise summary of the article; please stop readding in "San Diego" into every single junction line. This is the third time you have been reverted trying to do something similar to the article. --'''[[User:Rschen7754|Rs]][[User talk:Rschen7754|chen]][[Special:Contributions/Rschen7754|7754]]''' 05:50, 4 January 2015 (UTC) == [[WP:ACE2015|ArbCom elections are now open!]] == {{Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 16:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692047625 --> ==Disambiguation link notification for March 8== Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited [[List of countries with IKEA stores]], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page [[Nossa Senhora de Fátima]]. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the [[User:DPL bot/Dablink notification FAQ|FAQ]]{{*}} Join us at the [[Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages with links|DPL WikiProject]].</small> It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these [[User:DPL bot|opt-out instructions]]. Thanks, [[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 10:27, 8 March 2016 (UTC) == Metzger == I noticed the information [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Metzger,_Oregon&curid=131009&diff=736767977&oldid=670211659 you just added] to [[:Metzger, Oregon]]. How do you know that? Maybe you can add a [[WP:CITE|citation]]? —[[user:EncMstr|EncMstr]] ([[user talk:EncMstr|talk]]) 18:42, 29 August 2016 (UTC) == [[WP:ACE2016|ArbCom Elections 2016]]: Voting now open! == {{Ivmbox|Hello, Trorov. Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2016|2016 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2016/Candidates|the candidates' statements]] and submit your choices on '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/399|the voting page]]'''. [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) |Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52 bot@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User:Mdann52_bot/spamlist/21&oldid=750582913 --> ==Disambiguation link notification for October 3== Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited [[List of bicycle-sharing systems]], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page [[Meridian]] ([//toolserver.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/List_of_bicycle-sharing_systems check to confirm]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[//toolserver.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/List_of_bicycle-sharing_systems?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the [[User:DPL bot/Dablink notification FAQ|FAQ]]{{*}} Join us at the [[Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages with links|DPL WikiProject]].</small> It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these [[User:DPL bot|opt-out instructions]]. Thanks, [[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 11:44, 3 October 2017 (UTC) == ArbCom 2017 election voter message == {{Ivmbox|Hello, Trorov. Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2017|2017 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2017/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/400|voting page]]'''. [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) |Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} <!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2017/Coordination/MMS/11&oldid=813413898 --> == reliable sources saved to [[Internet Archive]] == *[[Talk:Florida International University pedestrian bridge collapse#Internet Archive]] [[Special:Contributions/69.181.23.220|69.181.23.220]] ([[User talk:69.181.23.220|talk]]) 10:16, 16 March 2018 (UTC) == ArbCom 2018 election voter message == {{Ivmbox|Hello, Trorov. Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2018|2018 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2018/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/710|voting page]]'''. [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) |Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2018/Coordination/MMS/11&oldid=866998401 --> == ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message == <table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;"> <tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2020|2020 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2020|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2020#Election timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2020/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2020|poll}}|voting page]]'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 01:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC) </td></tr> </table> <!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2020/Coordination/MMS/02&oldid=990308077 --> == ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message == <table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;"> <tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2021|2021 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2021|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2021#Election timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2021/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2021|poll}}|voting page]]'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 00:12, 23 November 2021 (UTC)</small> </td></tr> </table> <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2021/Coordination/MM/02&oldid=1056563129 --> == ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message == <div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> <div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px;">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</div> <div class="ivmbox-text"> Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2022|2022 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2022|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2022#Election timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2022/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2022|poll}}|voting page]]'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 00:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)</small> </div> </div> <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2022/Coordination/MM/02&oldid=1124425183 --> ==Disambiguation link notification for April 9== Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited [[Georg Gaertner]], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page [[German Republic]]<!-- ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Georg_Gaertner check to confirm]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Georg_Gaertner?client=notify fix with Dab solver])-->. Such links are [[WP:INTDABLINK|usually incorrect]], since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. <small>(Read the [[User:DPL bot/Dablink notification FAQ|FAQ]]{{*}} Join us at the [[Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages with links|DPL WikiProject]].)</small> It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these [[User:DPL bot|opt-out instructions]]. Thanks, [[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 06:07, 9 April 2023 (UTC) == ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message == <div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> <div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px; max-width: 100px">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</div> <div class="ivmbox-text"> Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2023|2023 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2023#Election timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2023/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|poll}}|voting page]]'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)</small> </div> </div> <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2023/Coordination/MM/02&oldid=1187132049 --> == Francis Scott Key Bridge == Please stop changing it to"between Baltimore and Dundalk." As I discuss at length on the article talk page, Baltimore and Dundalk adjoin each other on the north shore of the Patapsco River. While Wagner's Point is within the city limits of Baltimore, it is an outlying section within the extreme outer city limits of Baltimore, mainly used for landfill. Your description is as misleading as an assertion that the [[Outerbridge Crossing]] spans from Perth Amboy to New York City, instead of Staten Island. You can walk across the line from Baltimore to Dundalk, they aren't separated by the Patapsco. You are expected to explain your edits on the article talkpage, not to simply revert to what you think is appropriate. '''<span style="font-family: Arial;">[[User:Acroterion|<span style="color: black;">Acroterion</span>]] <small>[[User talk:Acroterion|<span style="color: gray;">(talk)</span>]]</small></span>''' 13:22, 30 March 2024 (UTC) == March 2024 == [[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=Stop icon]] Your recent editing history at [[:Francis Scott Key Bridge collapse]] shows that you are currently engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to work toward making a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about [[WP:EPTALK|how this is done]]. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''&mdash;especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;'''even if you do not violate the three-revert rule'''&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> '''<span style="font-family: Arial;">[[User:Acroterion|<span style="color: black;">Acroterion</span>]] <small>[[User talk:Acroterion|<span style="color: gray;">(talk)</span>]]</small></span>''' 13:32, 30 March 2024 (UTC) == April 2024 == [[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=Stop icon]] Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to work toward making a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about [[WP:EPTALK|how this is done]]. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''&mdash;especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;'''even if you do not violate the three-revert rule'''&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> '''<span style="font-family: Arial;">[[User:Acroterion|<span style="color: black;">Acroterion</span>]] <small>[[User talk:Acroterion|<span style="color: gray;">(talk)</span>]]</small></span>''' 00:43, 30 April 2024 (UTC) :[[Talk:Francis Scott Key Bridge (Baltimore)]] and is thataway for both your insistence on U.S. and a discussion I initiated weeks ago concerning the landing points of the bridge. Make your case there. '''<span style="font-family: Arial;">[[User:Acroterion|<span style="color: black;">Acroterion</span>]] <small>[[User talk:Acroterion|<span style="color: gray;">(talk)</span>]]</small></span>''' 00:51, 30 April 2024 (UTC) @Trorov: I came here to say the same as above. If you make that change at [[Francis Scott Key Bridge (Baltimore)]] again without first gaining a clear consensus on article talk, you will be blocked. [[User:Johnuniq|Johnuniq]] ([[User talk:Johnuniq|talk]]) 01:21, 30 April 2024 (UTC) == July 2024 == [[File:Information orange.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Please do not add or change content, as you did at [[:2024 shooting at a Donald Trump rally]], without citing a [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable source]]. Please review the guidelines at [[Wikipedia:Citing sources]] and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ''Your edit summary here was deceptive. https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=2024_shooting_at_a_Donald_Trump_rally&diff=1234379485&oldid=1234379463''<!-- Template:uw-unsourced2 --> [[User:Marcus Markup|Marcus Markup]] ([[User talk:Marcus Markup|talk]]) 02:08, 14 July 2024 (UTC) == Edit warring == Based on the notices above it's clear you should be aware of edit warring. You are violating ONUS with this edit [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Aurora,_Colorado&diff=prev&oldid=1250852832]. Onus says the editors who wish to add content need to get consensus before restoring disputed material. That means the burden is on you to establish consensus, not the editors who are challenging the material to remove it. [[User:Springee|Springee]] ([[User talk:Springee|talk]]) 23:59, 12 October 2024 (UTC) == Introduction to contentious topics == {{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = You have recently edited a page related to '''post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people''', a topic designated as '''[[WP:AC/CT|contentious]]'''. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and <em>does <strong>not</strong> imply that there are any issues with your editing</em>. A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as ''contentious topics''. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project. Within contentious topics, editors should edit <strong>carefully</strong> and <strong>constructively</strong>, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and: *adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia; *comply with all applicable policies and guidelines; *follow editorial and behavioural best practice; *comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and *refrain from gaming the system. <p>Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics ''procedures'' you may ask them at the [[WT:AC/C|arbitration clerks' noticeboard]] or you may learn more about this contentious topic [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/American politics 2|here]]. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{tl|Ctopics/aware}} template. </p>}}<!-- Derived from Template:Contentious topics/alert/first --> [[User:Springee|Springee]] ([[User talk:Springee|talk]]) 14:19, 13 October 2024 (UTC)'