Examine individual changes

'===[[Trainfuck]]=== {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|S}} :{{la|Trainfuck}} (<span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:Trainfuck|wpReason={{urlencode: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trainfuck]]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trainfuck|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2009 August 10#{{anchorencode:Trainfuck}}|View log]])</noinclude> :({{find sources|Trainfuck}}) Neologism already covered at [[List of sex positions]] and [[Group sex]]. Stand-alone article is unnecessary duplication, and I'd further argue that the title is not the most common name for the act. [[User:Exploding Boy|Exploding Boy]] ([[User talk:Exploding Boy|talk]]) 06:35, 10 August 2009 (UTC) *'''Delete'''. This is a wonderful blog piece and inspiring in its novel synthesis but we are lacking actual encyclopedic content that supports a stand alone article. Absent a stubbifying process that removes all the original research and replaces it with reliable sourcing to demonstrate the need for a stand alone article I think this has to be deleted. A '''protected redirect''' to [[group sex]] may encourage the creator to build a reliably sourced and non-original research version in their userspace instead. [[User_talk:Benjiboi| -- <u style="font-size:14px; font-family: cursive;color:#8000FF">Banj<font color="#FF4400">e</font></u><u style="font-size:14px;font-family: Zapfino, sans-serif;color:deeppink">b<font color="#AA0022">oi</font></u>]] 07:12, 10 August 2009 (UTC) *'''Delete''' This type of activity is already covered in [[group sex]] in the "daisy chain" section, which is a much more common name for this. Not enough to write to merit a separate article on the subject, and if there were, it should not be under a neologistic title. Every few years teenagers think they have invented some clever sex act, without understanding that they already exist under established names; these don't all need separate articles. Protected redirect would be fine too, if anyone finds a reliable source showing the term has any popularity.[[User:Yobmod|<b><font color="#0000CD">Yob</font></b>]][[User talk:Yobmod|<b><font color="CC3399 ">Mod</font></b>]] 07:37, 10 August 2009 (UTC) *'''Merge''' or '''redirect''' as the case may be... neologism. --[[User:Merovingian|Merovingian]] ([[User talk:Merovingian|T]], [[Special:Contributions/Merovingian|C]], [[Special:Log/Merovingian|L]]) 07:41, 10 August 2009 (UTC) *'''Redirect''' to [[group sex]], where the act is mentioned and clarified. Well-written article, but weak topic. [[User:McMarcoP|McMarcoP]] ([[User talk:McMarcoP|talk]]) 12:28, 10 August 2009 (UTC) *'''Delete''' The topic is covered elsewhere, and is not sufficiently Notable to warrant its own article, anyway. Plus, I have never heard this term before in my life (and suffice it to say I have not lived a sheltered one). I've heard of "pulling a train" on probably hundreds of occasions, but "trainfuck?" I don't think people really say that. [[User:KevinOKeeffe|KevinOKeeffe]] ([[User talk:KevinOKeeffe|talk]]) 14:44, 10 August 2009 (UTC) *'''Delete''' with no redirect. Beat me to the AfD. I can't find a single reliable source that even uses "trainfuck"; the only hit for "train fuck" in this context seems to be ''Gay-2-zee: a dictionary of sex, subtext, and the sublime. DF Reuter - 2006 - St. Martin's Griffin''. The author of the article was using far too much original research and synthesis. It might be a slang phrase using in porn or the gay scene, but it's not a notable one. ~~~~'