Jump to content

Edit filter log

Details for log entry 16053370

17:41, 27 June 2016: ReggyNeeson (talk | contribs) triggered filter 61, performing the action "edit" on Thinking outside the box. Actions taken: none; Filter description: New user removing references (examine | diff)

Changes made in edit

The puzzle proposed an intellectual challenge&mdash;to connect the dots by drawing four straight, continuous lines that pass through each of the nine dots, and never lifting the pencil from the paper. The [[:wikt:conundrum|conundrum]] is easily resolved, but only by drawing the lines outside the confines of the square area defined by the nine dots themselves. The phrase "thinking outside the box" is a restatement of the solution strategy. The puzzle only seems difficult because people commonly imagine [[Convex hull|a boundary around the edge]] of the dot array.<ref>Daniel Kies, [http://papyr.com/hypertextbooks/comp2/9dots.htm "English Composition 2: Assumptions: Puzzle of the Nine Dots"], retr. Jun. 28, 2009.</ref> The heart of the matter is the unspecified barrier that people typically perceive.
The puzzle proposed an intellectual challenge&mdash;to connect the dots by drawing four straight, continuous lines that pass through each of the nine dots, and never lifting the pencil from the paper. The [[:wikt:conundrum|conundrum]] is easily resolved, but only by drawing the lines outside the confines of the square area defined by the nine dots themselves. The phrase "thinking outside the box" is a restatement of the solution strategy. The puzzle only seems difficult because people commonly imagine [[Convex hull|a boundary around the edge]] of the dot array.<ref>Daniel Kies, [http://papyr.com/hypertextbooks/comp2/9dots.htm "English Composition 2: Assumptions: Puzzle of the Nine Dots"], retr. Jun. 28, 2009.</ref> The heart of the matter is the unspecified barrier that people typically perceive.


Ironically, telling people to "think outside the box" does not help them think outside the box, at least not with the 9-dot problem.<ref>{{cite journal|last=MAIER|first=NORMAN R. F.|author2=CASSELMAN, GERTRUDE G. |title=LOCATING THE DIFFICULTY IN INSIGHT PROBLEMS: INDIVIDUAL AND SEX DIFFERENCES|journal=Psychological Reports|date=1 February 1970|volume=26|issue=1|pages=103–117|doi=10.2466/pr0.1970.26.1.103}}</ref> This is due to the distinction between [[procedural knowledge]] (implicit or [[tacit knowledge]]) and [[declarative knowledge]] (book knowledge). For example, a non-verbal cue such as drawing a square outside the 9 dots does allow people to solve the 9-dot problem better than average.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Lung|first=Ching-tung|author2=Dominowski, Roger L. |title=Effects of strategy instructions and practice on nine-dot problem solving.|journal=Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition|date=1 January 1985|volume=11|issue=4|pages=804–811|doi=10.1037/0278-7393.11.1-4.804}}</ref> However, a very particular kind of verbalization did indeed allow people to solve the problem better than average. This is to speak in a non-judgmental, free association style. These were the instructions in a study that showed facilitation in solving the 9-dot problem:
Ironically, telling people to "think outside the box" does not help them think outside the box, at least not with the 9-dot problem.<ref>{{cite journal|last=MAIER|first=NORMAN R. F.|author2=CASSELMAN, GERTRUDE G. |title=LOCATING THE DIFFICULTY IN INSIGHT PROBLEMS: INDIVIDUAL AND SEX DIFFERENCES|journal=Psychological Reports|date=1 February 1970|volume=26|issue=1|pages=103–117|doi=10.2466/pr0.1970.26.1.103}}</ref> This is due to the distinction between [[procedural knowledge]] (implicit or [[tacit knowledge]]) and [[declarative knowledge]] (book knowledge). For example, a non-verbal cue such as drawing a square outside the 9 dots does allow people to solve the 9-dot problem better than average.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Lung|first=Ching-tung|author2=Dominowski, Roger L. |title=Effects of strategy instructions and practice on nine-dot problem solving.|journal=Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition|date=1 January 1985|volume=11|issue=4|pages=804–811|doi=10.1037/0278-7393.11.1-4.804}}</ref>
<blockquote>While solving the problems you will be encouraged to think aloud. When thinking aloud you should do the following: Say whatever’s on your mind. Don’t hold back hunches, guesses, wild ideas, images, plans or goals. Speak as continuously as possible. Try to say something at least once every five seconds. Speak audibly. Watch for your voice dropping as you become involved. Don’t worry about complete sentences or eloquence. Don’t over explain or justify. Analyze no more than you would normally. Don’t elaborate on past events. Get into the pattern of saying what you’re thinking about now, not of thinking for a while and then describing your thoughts. Though the experimenter is present you are not talking to the experimenter. Instead, you are to perform this task as if you are talking aloud to yourself.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Fleck|first=Jessica I.|author2=Weisberg, Robert W. |title=The use of verbal protocols as data: An analysis of insight in the candle problem|journal=Memory & Cognition|date=1 September 2004|volume=32|issue=6|pages=990–1006|doi=10.3758/BF03196876}}</ref></blockquote>


The nine-dot problem is a well-defined problem. It has a clearly stated goal, and all necessary information to solve the problem is included (connect all of the dots using four straight lines). Furthermore, well-defined problems have a clear ending (you know when you have reached the solution). Although the solution is "outside the box" and not easy to see at first, once it has been found, it seems obvious. Other examples of well-defined problems are the [[Tower of Hanoi]] and the [[Rubik's Cube]].
The nine-dot problem is a well-defined problem. It has a clearly stated goal, and all necessary information to solve the problem is included (connect all of the dots using four straight lines). Furthermore, well-defined problems have a clear ending (you know when you have reached the solution). Although the solution is "outside the box" and not easy to see at first, once it has been found, it seems obvious. Other examples of well-defined problems are the [[Tower of Hanoi]] and the [[Rubik's Cube]].

Action parameters

VariableValue
Edit count of the user (user_editcount)
2
Name of the user account (user_name)
'ReggyNeeson'
Age of the user account (user_age)
5747136
Groups (including implicit) the user is in (user_groups)
[ 0 => '*', 1 => 'user' ]
Global groups that the user is in (global_user_groups)
[]
Whether or not a user is editing through the mobile interface (user_mobile)
false
Page ID (page_id)
4405937
Page namespace (page_namespace)
0
Page title without namespace (page_title)
'Thinking outside the box'
Full page title (page_prefixedtitle)
'Thinking outside the box'
Last ten users to contribute to the page (page_recent_contributors)
[ 0 => 'Fisje01', 1 => '2601:1C1:C100:B09D:C4E6:68B8:B91A:2665', 2 => 'Sroc', 3 => 'ChristophDemmer', 4 => 'Mashaunix', 5 => 'Pleiotrop3', 6 => '85.224.185.237', 7 => 'ClueBot NG', 8 => 'Pasixxxx', 9 => 'Diego Moya' ]
First user to contribute to the page (page_first_contributor)
'Rizuri'
Action (action)
'edit'
Edit summary/reason (summary)
'Deleting incorrect info., see talk for details'
Whether or not the edit is marked as minor (no longer in use) (minor_edit)
false
Old page wikitext, before the edit (old_wikitext)
'{{Redirect|Outside the box|other uses|Outside the Box (disambiguation){{!}}Outside the Box}} {{confused|Out of the box}} [[File:9dots.svg|thumb|upright=.5|The "nine dots" puzzle. The goal of the puzzle is to link all 9 dots using four straight lines or fewer, without lifting the pen and without tracing the same line more than once. One solution appears below.]] '''Thinking outside the box''' (also '''thinking out of the box'''<ref>[http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/box?q=think+out+of+the+box#box__46] </ref><ref>[http://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/think-outside-the-box?showCookiePolicy=true]</ref> or '''thinking beyond the box''') is a metaphor that means to think differently, unconventionally, or from a new perspective. This phrase often refers to novel or creative thinking. The term is thought to derive from management consultants in the 1970s and 1980s challenging their clients to solve the "nine dots" puzzle, whose solution requires some [[lateral thinking]].<ref name=":0" /> This phrase can also be found commonly in dance, as encouragement to move creatively, beyond simple, geometric box steps and their basic variations, to literally step outside the box into more complex patterns of expression. The [[catchphrase]], or [[cliché]], has become widely used in business environments, especially by [[management consultant]]s and executive coaches, and has been referenced in a number of [[advertising slogan]]s. To think outside the box is to look further and to try not thinking of the obvious things, but to try thinking of the things beyond them. ==Analogy== A simplified definition for ''[[paradigm]]'' is a habit of reasoning or a [[conceptual framework]]. A simplified analogy is "the box" in the commonly used phrase "thinking outside the box". What is encompassed by the words "inside the box" is analogous with the current, and often unnoticed, assumptions about a situation. Creative thinking acknowledges and rejects the accepted paradigm to come up with new ideas. == Nine dots puzzle == The notion of something outside a perceived "box" is related to a traditional [[topography|topographical]] [[puzzle]] called the ''nine dots puzzle''.<ref name=":0">Kihn, Martin. [http://www.fastcompany.com/magazine/95/debunk.html "'Outside the Box': the Inside Story,"] ''FastCompany'' 1995</ref> The origins of the phrase "thinking outside the box" are obscure; but it was popularized in part because of a nine-dot puzzle, which [[John Adair (author)|John Adair]] claims to have introduced in 1969.<ref>{{cite book | last = Adair | first = John | title = The art of creative thinking how to be innovative and develop great ideas | publisher = Kogan Page | location = London Philadelphia | year = 2007 | isbn = 9780749452186 | page = 127 }}</ref> [[Management consultant]] Mike Vance has claimed that the use of the nine-dot puzzle in consultancy circles stems from the [[corporate culture]] of the [[Walt Disney Company]], where the puzzle was used in-house.<ref>[http://www.creativethinkingassoc.com/mikevance.html Biography of Mike Vance] at Creative Thinking Association of America.</ref> [[File:Eggpuzzle.jpg|thumb|''Christopher Columbus's Egg Puzzle'' as it appeared in [[Sam Loyd]]'s ''Cyclopedia of Puzzles''.]] The nine dots puzzle is much older than the slogan. It appears in [[Sam Loyd]]'s 1914 ''Cyclopedia of Puzzles''.<ref>Sam Loyd, ''Cyclopedia of Puzzles''. (The Lamb Publishing Company, 1914)</ref> In the 1951 compilation ''The Puzzle-Mine: Puzzles Collected from the Works of the Late [[Henry Ernest Dudeney]]'', the puzzle is attributed to Dudeney himself.<ref>J. Travers, ''The Puzzle-Mine: Puzzles Collected from the Works of the Late Henry Ernest Dudeney''. (Thos. Nelson, 1951)</ref> Sam Loyd's original formulation of the puzzle<ref>[http://www.mathpuzzle.com/loyd/cop300-301.html Facsimile from ''Cyclopedia of Puzzles'' - Columbus's Egg Puzzle is on right-hand page]</ref> entitled it as "[[Christopher Columbus]]'s egg puzzle." This was an allusion to the story of [[Egg of Columbus]]. [[File:Ninedots.svg|thumb|upright=.5|One of many solutions to the puzzle at the beginning of this article is to go beyond the boundaries to link all dots in 4 straight lines.]] The puzzle proposed an intellectual challenge&mdash;to connect the dots by drawing four straight, continuous lines that pass through each of the nine dots, and never lifting the pencil from the paper. The [[:wikt:conundrum|conundrum]] is easily resolved, but only by drawing the lines outside the confines of the square area defined by the nine dots themselves. The phrase "thinking outside the box" is a restatement of the solution strategy. The puzzle only seems difficult because people commonly imagine [[Convex hull|a boundary around the edge]] of the dot array.<ref>Daniel Kies, [http://papyr.com/hypertextbooks/comp2/9dots.htm "English Composition 2: Assumptions: Puzzle of the Nine Dots"], retr. Jun. 28, 2009.</ref> The heart of the matter is the unspecified barrier that people typically perceive. Ironically, telling people to "think outside the box" does not help them think outside the box, at least not with the 9-dot problem.<ref>{{cite journal|last=MAIER|first=NORMAN R. F.|author2=CASSELMAN, GERTRUDE G. |title=LOCATING THE DIFFICULTY IN INSIGHT PROBLEMS: INDIVIDUAL AND SEX DIFFERENCES|journal=Psychological Reports|date=1 February 1970|volume=26|issue=1|pages=103–117|doi=10.2466/pr0.1970.26.1.103}}</ref> This is due to the distinction between [[procedural knowledge]] (implicit or [[tacit knowledge]]) and [[declarative knowledge]] (book knowledge). For example, a non-verbal cue such as drawing a square outside the 9 dots does allow people to solve the 9-dot problem better than average.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Lung|first=Ching-tung|author2=Dominowski, Roger L. |title=Effects of strategy instructions and practice on nine-dot problem solving.|journal=Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition|date=1 January 1985|volume=11|issue=4|pages=804–811|doi=10.1037/0278-7393.11.1-4.804}}</ref> However, a very particular kind of verbalization did indeed allow people to solve the problem better than average. This is to speak in a non-judgmental, free association style. These were the instructions in a study that showed facilitation in solving the 9-dot problem: <blockquote>While solving the problems you will be encouraged to think aloud. When thinking aloud you should do the following: Say whatever’s on your mind. Don’t hold back hunches, guesses, wild ideas, images, plans or goals. Speak as continuously as possible. Try to say something at least once every five seconds. Speak audibly. Watch for your voice dropping as you become involved. Don’t worry about complete sentences or eloquence. Don’t over explain or justify. Analyze no more than you would normally. Don’t elaborate on past events. Get into the pattern of saying what you’re thinking about now, not of thinking for a while and then describing your thoughts. Though the experimenter is present you are not talking to the experimenter. Instead, you are to perform this task as if you are talking aloud to yourself.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Fleck|first=Jessica I.|author2=Weisberg, Robert W. |title=The use of verbal protocols as data: An analysis of insight in the candle problem|journal=Memory & Cognition|date=1 September 2004|volume=32|issue=6|pages=990–1006|doi=10.3758/BF03196876}}</ref></blockquote> The nine-dot problem is a well-defined problem. It has a clearly stated goal, and all necessary information to solve the problem is included (connect all of the dots using four straight lines). Furthermore, well-defined problems have a clear ending (you know when you have reached the solution). Although the solution is "outside the box" and not easy to see at first, once it has been found, it seems obvious. Other examples of well-defined problems are the [[Tower of Hanoi]] and the [[Rubik's Cube]]. In contrast, characteristics of ill-defined problems are: *not clear what the question really is *not clear how to arrive at a solution *no idea what the solution looks like An example of an ill-defined problem is "what is the essence of happiness?" The skills needed to solve this type of problem are the ability to reason and draw inferences, [[metacognition]], and [[epistemic]] monitoring. == Metaphor == This flexible English phrase is a [[rhetorical]] [[trope (literature)|trope]] with a range of variant applications. The metaphorical "box" in the phrase "outside the box" may be married with something real and measurable &mdash; for example, perceived budgetary<ref name="lupick">Lupick, Travis. [http://www.straight.com/article-158377/clone-wars-galactic-task "Clone Wars proved a galactic task for production team."] ''[[The Georgia Straight]]'', August 21, 2008; "... budgetary constraints forced the production team to <u>think outside the box in a positive way</u>.</ref> or organizational<ref name="behr">[http://www.premiumhollywood.com/2009/08/03/tca-tour-you-asked-for-it-ira-steven-behrs-opening-remarks TCA Tour – You Asked For It: Ira Steven Behr’s opening remarks]</ref> constraints in a Hollywood development project. Speculating beyond its restrictive confines the box can be both: :(a) positive&mdash; fostering creative leaps as in generating wild ideas (the conventional use of the term);<ref name="lupick"/> and :(b) negative&mdash; penetrating through to the "bottom of the box." [[James F. Bandrowski|James Bandrowski]] states that this could result in a frank and insightful re-appraisal of a situation, oneself, the organization, etc. On the other hand, [[James F. Bandrowski|Bandrowski]] argues that the process of thinking "inside the box" need not be construed in a pejorative sense. It is crucial for accurately parsing and executing a variety of tasks &mdash; making decisions, analyzing data, and managing the progress of standard operating procedures, etc. Hollywood screenwriter [[Ira Steven Behr]] appropriated this concept to inform plot and character in the context of a television series. Behr imagined a core character: :He is going to be "thinking outside the box," you know, and usually when we use that cliche, we think outside the box means a new thought. So we can situate ourselves back in the box, but in a somewhat better position.<ref name="behr"/> The phrase can be used as a shorthand way to describe speculation about what happens next in a multi-stage [[design thinking]] process.<ref name="behr"/> ==See also== {{Puzzles |Topics}} * [[Egg of Columbus]] * [[Einstellung effect]] * [[Eureka effect]] * ''[[Kobayashi Maru]]'' * [[Gordian Knot]] * [[Cube of Saturn]] * [[Lateral thinking]] ==References== {{Reflist}} ==Further reading== * {{cite book |first1=J. L. |last1=Adams |year=1979 |title=Conceptual Blockbusting: A Guide to Better Ideas |location=New York |publisher=[[W. W. Norton]] |isbn=978-0-201-10089-1 }} ISBN 0-201-10089-4 (more solutions to the nine dots problem - with less than 4 lines!) * {{cite journal |first1=M. |last1=Scheerer |year=1972 |title=Problem-solving |journal=[[Scientific American]] |volume=208 |issue=4 |pages=118–128 }} *{{cite journal |first1=Solom W. |last1=Golomb |authorlink1=Solomon W. Golomb |first2=John L. |last2=Selfridge |authorlink2=John L. Selfridge |journal=Pi Mu Epsilon Journal |year=1970 |volume=5 |pages=107–117 |mr=0268063 |title=Unicursal polygonal paths and other graphs on point lattices }} ==External links== {{Wiktionary|outside the box}} * [http://www.phrases.org.uk/bulletin_board/29/messages/1149.html Out-of-the-box vs. outside the box] citing Oxford Advanced Learners Dictionary (OALD), Word of the Month * [http://www.aplusclick.com/ThinkOutsideTheBox.htm Think Outside The Box 200 puzzles and Answers ] Think Outside The Box 200 logic Puzzles and Answers [[Category:Problem solving]] [[Category:Creativity]] [[Category:Clichés]] [[Category:Puzzles]] [[Category:Systems thinking]]'
New page wikitext, after the edit (new_wikitext)
'{{Redirect|Outside the box|other uses|Outside the Box (disambiguation){{!}}Outside the Box}} {{confused|Out of the box}} [[File:9dots.svg|thumb|upright=.5|The "nine dots" puzzle. The goal of the puzzle is to link all 9 dots using four straight lines or fewer, without lifting the pen and without tracing the same line more than once. One solution appears below.]] '''Thinking outside the box''' (also '''thinking out of the box'''<ref>[http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/box?q=think+out+of+the+box#box__46] </ref><ref>[http://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/think-outside-the-box?showCookiePolicy=true]</ref> or '''thinking beyond the box''') is a metaphor that means to think differently, unconventionally, or from a new perspective. This phrase often refers to novel or creative thinking. The term is thought to derive from management consultants in the 1970s and 1980s challenging their clients to solve the "nine dots" puzzle, whose solution requires some [[lateral thinking]].<ref name=":0" /> This phrase can also be found commonly in dance, as encouragement to move creatively, beyond simple, geometric box steps and their basic variations, to literally step outside the box into more complex patterns of expression. The [[catchphrase]], or [[cliché]], has become widely used in business environments, especially by [[management consultant]]s and executive coaches, and has been referenced in a number of [[advertising slogan]]s. To think outside the box is to look further and to try not thinking of the obvious things, but to try thinking of the things beyond them. ==Analogy== A simplified definition for ''[[paradigm]]'' is a habit of reasoning or a [[conceptual framework]]. A simplified analogy is "the box" in the commonly used phrase "thinking outside the box". What is encompassed by the words "inside the box" is analogous with the current, and often unnoticed, assumptions about a situation. Creative thinking acknowledges and rejects the accepted paradigm to come up with new ideas. == Nine dots puzzle == The notion of something outside a perceived "box" is related to a traditional [[topography|topographical]] [[puzzle]] called the ''nine dots puzzle''.<ref name=":0">Kihn, Martin. [http://www.fastcompany.com/magazine/95/debunk.html "'Outside the Box': the Inside Story,"] ''FastCompany'' 1995</ref> The origins of the phrase "thinking outside the box" are obscure; but it was popularized in part because of a nine-dot puzzle, which [[John Adair (author)|John Adair]] claims to have introduced in 1969.<ref>{{cite book | last = Adair | first = John | title = The art of creative thinking how to be innovative and develop great ideas | publisher = Kogan Page | location = London Philadelphia | year = 2007 | isbn = 9780749452186 | page = 127 }}</ref> [[Management consultant]] Mike Vance has claimed that the use of the nine-dot puzzle in consultancy circles stems from the [[corporate culture]] of the [[Walt Disney Company]], where the puzzle was used in-house.<ref>[http://www.creativethinkingassoc.com/mikevance.html Biography of Mike Vance] at Creative Thinking Association of America.</ref> [[File:Eggpuzzle.jpg|thumb|''Christopher Columbus's Egg Puzzle'' as it appeared in [[Sam Loyd]]'s ''Cyclopedia of Puzzles''.]] The nine dots puzzle is much older than the slogan. It appears in [[Sam Loyd]]'s 1914 ''Cyclopedia of Puzzles''.<ref>Sam Loyd, ''Cyclopedia of Puzzles''. (The Lamb Publishing Company, 1914)</ref> In the 1951 compilation ''The Puzzle-Mine: Puzzles Collected from the Works of the Late [[Henry Ernest Dudeney]]'', the puzzle is attributed to Dudeney himself.<ref>J. Travers, ''The Puzzle-Mine: Puzzles Collected from the Works of the Late Henry Ernest Dudeney''. (Thos. Nelson, 1951)</ref> Sam Loyd's original formulation of the puzzle<ref>[http://www.mathpuzzle.com/loyd/cop300-301.html Facsimile from ''Cyclopedia of Puzzles'' - Columbus's Egg Puzzle is on right-hand page]</ref> entitled it as "[[Christopher Columbus]]'s egg puzzle." This was an allusion to the story of [[Egg of Columbus]]. [[File:Ninedots.svg|thumb|upright=.5|One of many solutions to the puzzle at the beginning of this article is to go beyond the boundaries to link all dots in 4 straight lines.]] The puzzle proposed an intellectual challenge&mdash;to connect the dots by drawing four straight, continuous lines that pass through each of the nine dots, and never lifting the pencil from the paper. The [[:wikt:conundrum|conundrum]] is easily resolved, but only by drawing the lines outside the confines of the square area defined by the nine dots themselves. The phrase "thinking outside the box" is a restatement of the solution strategy. The puzzle only seems difficult because people commonly imagine [[Convex hull|a boundary around the edge]] of the dot array.<ref>Daniel Kies, [http://papyr.com/hypertextbooks/comp2/9dots.htm "English Composition 2: Assumptions: Puzzle of the Nine Dots"], retr. Jun. 28, 2009.</ref> The heart of the matter is the unspecified barrier that people typically perceive. Ironically, telling people to "think outside the box" does not help them think outside the box, at least not with the 9-dot problem.<ref>{{cite journal|last=MAIER|first=NORMAN R. F.|author2=CASSELMAN, GERTRUDE G. |title=LOCATING THE DIFFICULTY IN INSIGHT PROBLEMS: INDIVIDUAL AND SEX DIFFERENCES|journal=Psychological Reports|date=1 February 1970|volume=26|issue=1|pages=103–117|doi=10.2466/pr0.1970.26.1.103}}</ref> This is due to the distinction between [[procedural knowledge]] (implicit or [[tacit knowledge]]) and [[declarative knowledge]] (book knowledge). For example, a non-verbal cue such as drawing a square outside the 9 dots does allow people to solve the 9-dot problem better than average.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Lung|first=Ching-tung|author2=Dominowski, Roger L. |title=Effects of strategy instructions and practice on nine-dot problem solving.|journal=Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition|date=1 January 1985|volume=11|issue=4|pages=804–811|doi=10.1037/0278-7393.11.1-4.804}}</ref> The nine-dot problem is a well-defined problem. It has a clearly stated goal, and all necessary information to solve the problem is included (connect all of the dots using four straight lines). Furthermore, well-defined problems have a clear ending (you know when you have reached the solution). Although the solution is "outside the box" and not easy to see at first, once it has been found, it seems obvious. Other examples of well-defined problems are the [[Tower of Hanoi]] and the [[Rubik's Cube]]. In contrast, characteristics of ill-defined problems are: *not clear what the question really is *not clear how to arrive at a solution *no idea what the solution looks like An example of an ill-defined problem is "what is the essence of happiness?" The skills needed to solve this type of problem are the ability to reason and draw inferences, [[metacognition]], and [[epistemic]] monitoring. == Metaphor == This flexible English phrase is a [[rhetorical]] [[trope (literature)|trope]] with a range of variant applications. The metaphorical "box" in the phrase "outside the box" may be married with something real and measurable &mdash; for example, perceived budgetary<ref name="lupick">Lupick, Travis. [http://www.straight.com/article-158377/clone-wars-galactic-task "Clone Wars proved a galactic task for production team."] ''[[The Georgia Straight]]'', August 21, 2008; "... budgetary constraints forced the production team to <u>think outside the box in a positive way</u>.</ref> or organizational<ref name="behr">[http://www.premiumhollywood.com/2009/08/03/tca-tour-you-asked-for-it-ira-steven-behrs-opening-remarks TCA Tour – You Asked For It: Ira Steven Behr’s opening remarks]</ref> constraints in a Hollywood development project. Speculating beyond its restrictive confines the box can be both: :(a) positive&mdash; fostering creative leaps as in generating wild ideas (the conventional use of the term);<ref name="lupick"/> and :(b) negative&mdash; penetrating through to the "bottom of the box." [[James F. Bandrowski|James Bandrowski]] states that this could result in a frank and insightful re-appraisal of a situation, oneself, the organization, etc. On the other hand, [[James F. Bandrowski|Bandrowski]] argues that the process of thinking "inside the box" need not be construed in a pejorative sense. It is crucial for accurately parsing and executing a variety of tasks &mdash; making decisions, analyzing data, and managing the progress of standard operating procedures, etc. Hollywood screenwriter [[Ira Steven Behr]] appropriated this concept to inform plot and character in the context of a television series. Behr imagined a core character: :He is going to be "thinking outside the box," you know, and usually when we use that cliche, we think outside the box means a new thought. So we can situate ourselves back in the box, but in a somewhat better position.<ref name="behr"/> The phrase can be used as a shorthand way to describe speculation about what happens next in a multi-stage [[design thinking]] process.<ref name="behr"/> ==See also== {{Puzzles |Topics}} * [[Egg of Columbus]] * [[Einstellung effect]] * [[Eureka effect]] * ''[[Kobayashi Maru]]'' * [[Gordian Knot]] * [[Cube of Saturn]] * [[Lateral thinking]] ==References== {{Reflist}} ==Further reading== * {{cite book |first1=J. L. |last1=Adams |year=1979 |title=Conceptual Blockbusting: A Guide to Better Ideas |location=New York |publisher=[[W. W. Norton]] |isbn=978-0-201-10089-1 }} ISBN 0-201-10089-4 (more solutions to the nine dots problem - with less than 4 lines!) * {{cite journal |first1=M. |last1=Scheerer |year=1972 |title=Problem-solving |journal=[[Scientific American]] |volume=208 |issue=4 |pages=118–128 }} *{{cite journal |first1=Solom W. |last1=Golomb |authorlink1=Solomon W. Golomb |first2=John L. |last2=Selfridge |authorlink2=John L. Selfridge |journal=Pi Mu Epsilon Journal |year=1970 |volume=5 |pages=107–117 |mr=0268063 |title=Unicursal polygonal paths and other graphs on point lattices }} ==External links== {{Wiktionary|outside the box}} * [http://www.phrases.org.uk/bulletin_board/29/messages/1149.html Out-of-the-box vs. outside the box] citing Oxford Advanced Learners Dictionary (OALD), Word of the Month * [http://www.aplusclick.com/ThinkOutsideTheBox.htm Think Outside The Box 200 puzzles and Answers ] Think Outside The Box 200 logic Puzzles and Answers [[Category:Problem solving]] [[Category:Creativity]] [[Category:Clichés]] [[Category:Puzzles]] [[Category:Systems thinking]]'
Unified diff of changes made by edit (edit_diff)
'@@ -23,6 +23,5 @@ The puzzle proposed an intellectual challenge&mdash;to connect the dots by drawing four straight, continuous lines that pass through each of the nine dots, and never lifting the pencil from the paper. The [[:wikt:conundrum|conundrum]] is easily resolved, but only by drawing the lines outside the confines of the square area defined by the nine dots themselves. The phrase "thinking outside the box" is a restatement of the solution strategy. The puzzle only seems difficult because people commonly imagine [[Convex hull|a boundary around the edge]] of the dot array.<ref>Daniel Kies, [http://papyr.com/hypertextbooks/comp2/9dots.htm "English Composition 2: Assumptions: Puzzle of the Nine Dots"], retr. Jun. 28, 2009.</ref> The heart of the matter is the unspecified barrier that people typically perceive. -Ironically, telling people to "think outside the box" does not help them think outside the box, at least not with the 9-dot problem.<ref>{{cite journal|last=MAIER|first=NORMAN R. F.|author2=CASSELMAN, GERTRUDE G. |title=LOCATING THE DIFFICULTY IN INSIGHT PROBLEMS: INDIVIDUAL AND SEX DIFFERENCES|journal=Psychological Reports|date=1 February 1970|volume=26|issue=1|pages=103–117|doi=10.2466/pr0.1970.26.1.103}}</ref> This is due to the distinction between [[procedural knowledge]] (implicit or [[tacit knowledge]]) and [[declarative knowledge]] (book knowledge). For example, a non-verbal cue such as drawing a square outside the 9 dots does allow people to solve the 9-dot problem better than average.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Lung|first=Ching-tung|author2=Dominowski, Roger L. |title=Effects of strategy instructions and practice on nine-dot problem solving.|journal=Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition|date=1 January 1985|volume=11|issue=4|pages=804–811|doi=10.1037/0278-7393.11.1-4.804}}</ref> However, a very particular kind of verbalization did indeed allow people to solve the problem better than average. This is to speak in a non-judgmental, free association style. These were the instructions in a study that showed facilitation in solving the 9-dot problem: -<blockquote>While solving the problems you will be encouraged to think aloud. When thinking aloud you should do the following: Say whatever’s on your mind. Don’t hold back hunches, guesses, wild ideas, images, plans or goals. Speak as continuously as possible. Try to say something at least once every five seconds. Speak audibly. Watch for your voice dropping as you become involved. Don’t worry about complete sentences or eloquence. Don’t over explain or justify. Analyze no more than you would normally. Don’t elaborate on past events. Get into the pattern of saying what you’re thinking about now, not of thinking for a while and then describing your thoughts. Though the experimenter is present you are not talking to the experimenter. Instead, you are to perform this task as if you are talking aloud to yourself.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Fleck|first=Jessica I.|author2=Weisberg, Robert W. |title=The use of verbal protocols as data: An analysis of insight in the candle problem|journal=Memory & Cognition|date=1 September 2004|volume=32|issue=6|pages=990–1006|doi=10.3758/BF03196876}}</ref></blockquote> +Ironically, telling people to "think outside the box" does not help them think outside the box, at least not with the 9-dot problem.<ref>{{cite journal|last=MAIER|first=NORMAN R. F.|author2=CASSELMAN, GERTRUDE G. |title=LOCATING THE DIFFICULTY IN INSIGHT PROBLEMS: INDIVIDUAL AND SEX DIFFERENCES|journal=Psychological Reports|date=1 February 1970|volume=26|issue=1|pages=103–117|doi=10.2466/pr0.1970.26.1.103}}</ref> This is due to the distinction between [[procedural knowledge]] (implicit or [[tacit knowledge]]) and [[declarative knowledge]] (book knowledge). For example, a non-verbal cue such as drawing a square outside the 9 dots does allow people to solve the 9-dot problem better than average.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Lung|first=Ching-tung|author2=Dominowski, Roger L. |title=Effects of strategy instructions and practice on nine-dot problem solving.|journal=Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition|date=1 January 1985|volume=11|issue=4|pages=804–811|doi=10.1037/0278-7393.11.1-4.804}}</ref> The nine-dot problem is a well-defined problem. It has a clearly stated goal, and all necessary information to solve the problem is included (connect all of the dots using four straight lines). Furthermore, well-defined problems have a clear ending (you know when you have reached the solution). Although the solution is "outside the box" and not easy to see at first, once it has been found, it seems obvious. Other examples of well-defined problems are the [[Tower of Hanoi]] and the [[Rubik's Cube]]. '
New page size (new_size)
10637
Old page size (old_size)
12032
Size change in edit (edit_delta)
-1395
Lines added in edit (added_lines)
[ 0 => 'Ironically, telling people to "think outside the box" does not help them think outside the box, at least not with the 9-dot problem.<ref>{{cite journal|last=MAIER|first=NORMAN R. F.|author2=CASSELMAN, GERTRUDE G. |title=LOCATING THE DIFFICULTY IN INSIGHT PROBLEMS: INDIVIDUAL AND SEX DIFFERENCES|journal=Psychological Reports|date=1 February 1970|volume=26|issue=1|pages=103–117|doi=10.2466/pr0.1970.26.1.103}}</ref> This is due to the distinction between [[procedural knowledge]] (implicit or [[tacit knowledge]]) and [[declarative knowledge]] (book knowledge). For example, a non-verbal cue such as drawing a square outside the 9 dots does allow people to solve the 9-dot problem better than average.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Lung|first=Ching-tung|author2=Dominowski, Roger L. |title=Effects of strategy instructions and practice on nine-dot problem solving.|journal=Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition|date=1 January 1985|volume=11|issue=4|pages=804–811|doi=10.1037/0278-7393.11.1-4.804}}</ref> ' ]
Lines removed in edit (removed_lines)
[ 0 => 'Ironically, telling people to "think outside the box" does not help them think outside the box, at least not with the 9-dot problem.<ref>{{cite journal|last=MAIER|first=NORMAN R. F.|author2=CASSELMAN, GERTRUDE G. |title=LOCATING THE DIFFICULTY IN INSIGHT PROBLEMS: INDIVIDUAL AND SEX DIFFERENCES|journal=Psychological Reports|date=1 February 1970|volume=26|issue=1|pages=103–117|doi=10.2466/pr0.1970.26.1.103}}</ref> This is due to the distinction between [[procedural knowledge]] (implicit or [[tacit knowledge]]) and [[declarative knowledge]] (book knowledge). For example, a non-verbal cue such as drawing a square outside the 9 dots does allow people to solve the 9-dot problem better than average.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Lung|first=Ching-tung|author2=Dominowski, Roger L. |title=Effects of strategy instructions and practice on nine-dot problem solving.|journal=Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition|date=1 January 1985|volume=11|issue=4|pages=804–811|doi=10.1037/0278-7393.11.1-4.804}}</ref> However, a very particular kind of verbalization did indeed allow people to solve the problem better than average. This is to speak in a non-judgmental, free association style. These were the instructions in a study that showed facilitation in solving the 9-dot problem:', 1 => '<blockquote>While solving the problems you will be encouraged to think aloud. When thinking aloud you should do the following: Say whatever’s on your mind. Don’t hold back hunches, guesses, wild ideas, images, plans or goals. Speak as continuously as possible. Try to say something at least once every five seconds. Speak audibly. Watch for your voice dropping as you become involved. Don’t worry about complete sentences or eloquence. Don’t over explain or justify. Analyze no more than you would normally. Don’t elaborate on past events. Get into the pattern of saying what you’re thinking about now, not of thinking for a while and then describing your thoughts. Though the experimenter is present you are not talking to the experimenter. Instead, you are to perform this task as if you are talking aloud to yourself.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Fleck|first=Jessica I.|author2=Weisberg, Robert W. |title=The use of verbal protocols as data: An analysis of insight in the candle problem|journal=Memory & Cognition|date=1 September 2004|volume=32|issue=6|pages=990–1006|doi=10.3758/BF03196876}}</ref></blockquote>' ]
New page wikitext, pre-save transformed (new_pst)
'{{Redirect|Outside the box|other uses|Outside the Box (disambiguation){{!}}Outside the Box}} {{confused|Out of the box}} [[File:9dots.svg|thumb|upright=.5|The "nine dots" puzzle. The goal of the puzzle is to link all 9 dots using four straight lines or fewer, without lifting the pen and without tracing the same line more than once. One solution appears below.]] '''Thinking outside the box''' (also '''thinking out of the box'''<ref>[http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/box?q=think+out+of+the+box#box__46] </ref><ref>[http://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/think-outside-the-box?showCookiePolicy=true]</ref> or '''thinking beyond the box''') is a metaphor that means to think differently, unconventionally, or from a new perspective. This phrase often refers to novel or creative thinking. The term is thought to derive from management consultants in the 1970s and 1980s challenging their clients to solve the "nine dots" puzzle, whose solution requires some [[lateral thinking]].<ref name=":0" /> This phrase can also be found commonly in dance, as encouragement to move creatively, beyond simple, geometric box steps and their basic variations, to literally step outside the box into more complex patterns of expression. The [[catchphrase]], or [[cliché]], has become widely used in business environments, especially by [[management consultant]]s and executive coaches, and has been referenced in a number of [[advertising slogan]]s. To think outside the box is to look further and to try not thinking of the obvious things, but to try thinking of the things beyond them. ==Analogy== A simplified definition for ''[[paradigm]]'' is a habit of reasoning or a [[conceptual framework]]. A simplified analogy is "the box" in the commonly used phrase "thinking outside the box". What is encompassed by the words "inside the box" is analogous with the current, and often unnoticed, assumptions about a situation. Creative thinking acknowledges and rejects the accepted paradigm to come up with new ideas. == Nine dots puzzle == The notion of something outside a perceived "box" is related to a traditional [[topography|topographical]] [[puzzle]] called the ''nine dots puzzle''.<ref name=":0">Kihn, Martin. [http://www.fastcompany.com/magazine/95/debunk.html "'Outside the Box': the Inside Story,"] ''FastCompany'' 1995</ref> The origins of the phrase "thinking outside the box" are obscure; but it was popularized in part because of a nine-dot puzzle, which [[John Adair (author)|John Adair]] claims to have introduced in 1969.<ref>{{cite book | last = Adair | first = John | title = The art of creative thinking how to be innovative and develop great ideas | publisher = Kogan Page | location = London Philadelphia | year = 2007 | isbn = 9780749452186 | page = 127 }}</ref> [[Management consultant]] Mike Vance has claimed that the use of the nine-dot puzzle in consultancy circles stems from the [[corporate culture]] of the [[Walt Disney Company]], where the puzzle was used in-house.<ref>[http://www.creativethinkingassoc.com/mikevance.html Biography of Mike Vance] at Creative Thinking Association of America.</ref> [[File:Eggpuzzle.jpg|thumb|''Christopher Columbus's Egg Puzzle'' as it appeared in [[Sam Loyd]]'s ''Cyclopedia of Puzzles''.]] The nine dots puzzle is much older than the slogan. It appears in [[Sam Loyd]]'s 1914 ''Cyclopedia of Puzzles''.<ref>Sam Loyd, ''Cyclopedia of Puzzles''. (The Lamb Publishing Company, 1914)</ref> In the 1951 compilation ''The Puzzle-Mine: Puzzles Collected from the Works of the Late [[Henry Ernest Dudeney]]'', the puzzle is attributed to Dudeney himself.<ref>J. Travers, ''The Puzzle-Mine: Puzzles Collected from the Works of the Late Henry Ernest Dudeney''. (Thos. Nelson, 1951)</ref> Sam Loyd's original formulation of the puzzle<ref>[http://www.mathpuzzle.com/loyd/cop300-301.html Facsimile from ''Cyclopedia of Puzzles'' - Columbus's Egg Puzzle is on right-hand page]</ref> entitled it as "[[Christopher Columbus]]'s egg puzzle." This was an allusion to the story of [[Egg of Columbus]]. [[File:Ninedots.svg|thumb|upright=.5|One of many solutions to the puzzle at the beginning of this article is to go beyond the boundaries to link all dots in 4 straight lines.]] The puzzle proposed an intellectual challenge&mdash;to connect the dots by drawing four straight, continuous lines that pass through each of the nine dots, and never lifting the pencil from the paper. The [[:wikt:conundrum|conundrum]] is easily resolved, but only by drawing the lines outside the confines of the square area defined by the nine dots themselves. The phrase "thinking outside the box" is a restatement of the solution strategy. The puzzle only seems difficult because people commonly imagine [[Convex hull|a boundary around the edge]] of the dot array.<ref>Daniel Kies, [http://papyr.com/hypertextbooks/comp2/9dots.htm "English Composition 2: Assumptions: Puzzle of the Nine Dots"], retr. Jun. 28, 2009.</ref> The heart of the matter is the unspecified barrier that people typically perceive. Ironically, telling people to "think outside the box" does not help them think outside the box, at least not with the 9-dot problem.<ref>{{cite journal|last=MAIER|first=NORMAN R. F.|author2=CASSELMAN, GERTRUDE G. |title=LOCATING THE DIFFICULTY IN INSIGHT PROBLEMS: INDIVIDUAL AND SEX DIFFERENCES|journal=Psychological Reports|date=1 February 1970|volume=26|issue=1|pages=103–117|doi=10.2466/pr0.1970.26.1.103}}</ref> This is due to the distinction between [[procedural knowledge]] (implicit or [[tacit knowledge]]) and [[declarative knowledge]] (book knowledge). For example, a non-verbal cue such as drawing a square outside the 9 dots does allow people to solve the 9-dot problem better than average.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Lung|first=Ching-tung|author2=Dominowski, Roger L. |title=Effects of strategy instructions and practice on nine-dot problem solving.|journal=Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition|date=1 January 1985|volume=11|issue=4|pages=804–811|doi=10.1037/0278-7393.11.1-4.804}}</ref> The nine-dot problem is a well-defined problem. It has a clearly stated goal, and all necessary information to solve the problem is included (connect all of the dots using four straight lines). Furthermore, well-defined problems have a clear ending (you know when you have reached the solution). Although the solution is "outside the box" and not easy to see at first, once it has been found, it seems obvious. Other examples of well-defined problems are the [[Tower of Hanoi]] and the [[Rubik's Cube]]. In contrast, characteristics of ill-defined problems are: *not clear what the question really is *not clear how to arrive at a solution *no idea what the solution looks like An example of an ill-defined problem is "what is the essence of happiness?" The skills needed to solve this type of problem are the ability to reason and draw inferences, [[metacognition]], and [[epistemic]] monitoring. == Metaphor == This flexible English phrase is a [[rhetorical]] [[trope (literature)|trope]] with a range of variant applications. The metaphorical "box" in the phrase "outside the box" may be married with something real and measurable &mdash; for example, perceived budgetary<ref name="lupick">Lupick, Travis. [http://www.straight.com/article-158377/clone-wars-galactic-task "Clone Wars proved a galactic task for production team."] ''[[The Georgia Straight]]'', August 21, 2008; "... budgetary constraints forced the production team to <u>think outside the box in a positive way</u>.</ref> or organizational<ref name="behr">[http://www.premiumhollywood.com/2009/08/03/tca-tour-you-asked-for-it-ira-steven-behrs-opening-remarks TCA Tour – You Asked For It: Ira Steven Behr’s opening remarks]</ref> constraints in a Hollywood development project. Speculating beyond its restrictive confines the box can be both: :(a) positive&mdash; fostering creative leaps as in generating wild ideas (the conventional use of the term);<ref name="lupick"/> and :(b) negative&mdash; penetrating through to the "bottom of the box." [[James F. Bandrowski|James Bandrowski]] states that this could result in a frank and insightful re-appraisal of a situation, oneself, the organization, etc. On the other hand, [[James F. Bandrowski|Bandrowski]] argues that the process of thinking "inside the box" need not be construed in a pejorative sense. It is crucial for accurately parsing and executing a variety of tasks &mdash; making decisions, analyzing data, and managing the progress of standard operating procedures, etc. Hollywood screenwriter [[Ira Steven Behr]] appropriated this concept to inform plot and character in the context of a television series. Behr imagined a core character: :He is going to be "thinking outside the box," you know, and usually when we use that cliche, we think outside the box means a new thought. So we can situate ourselves back in the box, but in a somewhat better position.<ref name="behr"/> The phrase can be used as a shorthand way to describe speculation about what happens next in a multi-stage [[design thinking]] process.<ref name="behr"/> ==See also== {{Puzzles |Topics}} * [[Egg of Columbus]] * [[Einstellung effect]] * [[Eureka effect]] * ''[[Kobayashi Maru]]'' * [[Gordian Knot]] * [[Cube of Saturn]] * [[Lateral thinking]] ==References== {{Reflist}} ==Further reading== * {{cite book |first1=J. L. |last1=Adams |year=1979 |title=Conceptual Blockbusting: A Guide to Better Ideas |location=New York |publisher=[[W. W. Norton]] |isbn=978-0-201-10089-1 }} ISBN 0-201-10089-4 (more solutions to the nine dots problem - with less than 4 lines!) * {{cite journal |first1=M. |last1=Scheerer |year=1972 |title=Problem-solving |journal=[[Scientific American]] |volume=208 |issue=4 |pages=118–128 }} *{{cite journal |first1=Solom W. |last1=Golomb |authorlink1=Solomon W. Golomb |first2=John L. |last2=Selfridge |authorlink2=John L. Selfridge |journal=Pi Mu Epsilon Journal |year=1970 |volume=5 |pages=107–117 |mr=0268063 |title=Unicursal polygonal paths and other graphs on point lattices }} ==External links== {{Wiktionary|outside the box}} * [http://www.phrases.org.uk/bulletin_board/29/messages/1149.html Out-of-the-box vs. outside the box] citing Oxford Advanced Learners Dictionary (OALD), Word of the Month * [http://www.aplusclick.com/ThinkOutsideTheBox.htm Think Outside The Box 200 puzzles and Answers ] Think Outside The Box 200 logic Puzzles and Answers [[Category:Problem solving]] [[Category:Creativity]] [[Category:Clichés]] [[Category:Puzzles]] [[Category:Systems thinking]]'
Whether or not the change was made through a Tor exit node (tor_exit_node)
0
Unix timestamp of change (timestamp)
1467049293