Jump to content

Edit filter log

Details for log entry 18254694

15:53, 11 April 2017: 86.129.198.105 (talk) triggered filter 420, performing the action "edit" on Talk:Bee. Actions taken: Disallow; Filter description: Large removal of talk page content by IP (examine)

Changes made in edit

{{GA|14:27, 16 July 2015 (UTC)|topic=Biology|page=1|oldid=671716229}}
{{Talk header|search=yes}}

{{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}}
|maxarchivesize = 100K
|counter = 1
|minthreadsleft = 4
|algo = old(100d)
|archive = Talk:Bee/Archive %(counter)d
}}
{{Vital article|level=4|topic=Science|class=GA|subpage=Biology}}
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
{{WikiProject Agriculture|class=GA|importance=Mid|beekeeping=yes|beekeeping-importance=Top}}
{{WikiProject Insects|class=GA|importance=High|Hymenoptera=yes|Hymenoptera-importance=Top}}
{{WPCD}}
}}
{{archive box|auto=long|search=yes|bot=MiszaBot I|age=100}}
{{dyktalk|9 August|2015|entry= ... that as flowers developed longer tubes, '''[[bee]]s''' ''(pictured)'' [[Coevolution|coevolved]] by developing longer tongues to extract the [[nectar]]?|nompage=Template:Did you know nominations/Bee}}

== Learning unnatural tricks ==

Can't edit the article.

:[http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/10/hints-tool-use-culture-seen-bumble-bees "But that two bees figured out how to pull the string with no help and further, that other bees could pick up on that ability was “most impressive,”]

--[[User:BowlAndSpoon.science|BowlAndSpoon.science]] ([[User talk:BowlAndSpoon.science|talk]]) 22:04, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

==Eusociality section==

So many things have gone awry in this section, with references deleted, spellings changed ignoring the existing language setting, and materials left uncited, that I've reverted to the last known good version. We may be able to use some of the new materials, but they'll need to be added in more carefully. [[User:Chiswick Chap|Chiswick Chap]] ([[User talk:Chiswick Chap|talk]]) 12:14, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

*I've gone through the deleted edits, and done my best to incorporate all of the constructive changes and additions. [[User:Dyanega|Dyanega]] ([[User talk:Dyanega|talk]]) 20:49, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

== The "As commercial pollinators" section needs work ==

I don't really make edits to wikipedia, so I want to avoid going in and randomly deleting a paragraph, but something should be changed here.

The second paragraph is full of bull and misinformation. For example, "feral honey bees declined dramatically in the US, and they are now almost absent" is a demonstrably false statement, and the citation for that sentence is an article from 1994. In addition the part " In 2010 invertebrate iridescent virus and the fungus Nosema ceranae were shown to be in every killed colony, and deadly in combination" is a disputed and misleading statement that wrongly implies that the virus and fungus cause CCD. The 2nd to last statement is also misleading and the last sentence is also disputable, with a questionable reference from Radio Télévision Suisse.

Anyways, it's not clear to me why colony collapse disorder is discussed in this section rather than it's own dedicated one. I would like to propose the "As commercial pollinators" be scrubbed of all this colony collapse bs. It would be better just to link to the colony collapse disorder page, which is much better put together. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/144.39.133.137|144.39.133.137]] ([[User talk:144.39.133.137#top|talk]]) 17:01, 20 December 2016 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Bees can fly ==

This was in the controversy section, which I deleted:
::According to all known laws of aviation, there is no way a bee should be able to fly. Its wings are too small to get its fat little body off the ground.

::The bee, of course, flies anyway because bees don't care what humans think is impossible.
* The idea that bees can't fly applied to the bumble bee, not to bees in general.
* It was based on incomplete data. See http://www.snopes.com/science/bumblebees.asp
* The referenced source doesn't support it.
[[User:SlowJog|SlowJog]] ([[User talk:SlowJog|talk]]) 04:08, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

:: Many thanks for removing that. The topic is already covered in cited detail at [[Bee#Flight]]. [[User:Chiswick Chap|Chiswick Chap]] ([[User talk:Chiswick Chap|talk]]) 19:26, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Action parameters

VariableValue
Whether or not the edit is marked as minor (no longer in use) (minor_edit)
false
Name of the user account (user_name)
'86.129.198.105'
Whether or not a user is editing through the mobile interface (user_mobile)
false
Page ID (page_id)
19637068
Page namespace (page_namespace)
1
Page title without namespace (page_title)
'Bee'
Full page title (page_prefixedtitle)
'Talk:Bee'
Action (action)
'edit'
Edit summary/reason (summary)
''
Old content model (old_content_model)
'wikitext'
New content model (new_content_model)
'wikitext'
Old page wikitext, before the edit (old_wikitext)
'{{GA|14:27, 16 July 2015 (UTC)|topic=Biology|page=1|oldid=671716229}} {{Talk header|search=yes}} {{User:MiszaBot/config |archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}} |maxarchivesize = 100K |counter = 1 |minthreadsleft = 4 |algo = old(100d) |archive = Talk:Bee/Archive %(counter)d }} {{Vital article|level=4|topic=Science|class=GA|subpage=Biology}} {{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= {{WikiProject Agriculture|class=GA|importance=Mid|beekeeping=yes|beekeeping-importance=Top}} {{WikiProject Insects|class=GA|importance=High|Hymenoptera=yes|Hymenoptera-importance=Top}} {{WPCD}} }} {{archive box|auto=long|search=yes|bot=MiszaBot I|age=100}} {{dyktalk|9 August|2015|entry= ... that as flowers developed longer tubes, '''[[bee]]s''' ''(pictured)'' [[Coevolution|coevolved]] by developing longer tongues to extract the [[nectar]]?|nompage=Template:Did you know nominations/Bee}} == Learning unnatural tricks == Can't edit the article. :[http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/10/hints-tool-use-culture-seen-bumble-bees "But that two bees figured out how to pull the string with no help and further, that other bees could pick up on that ability was “most impressive,”] --[[User:BowlAndSpoon.science|BowlAndSpoon.science]] ([[User talk:BowlAndSpoon.science|talk]]) 22:04, 10 October 2016 (UTC) ==Eusociality section== So many things have gone awry in this section, with references deleted, spellings changed ignoring the existing language setting, and materials left uncited, that I've reverted to the last known good version. We may be able to use some of the new materials, but they'll need to be added in more carefully. [[User:Chiswick Chap|Chiswick Chap]] ([[User talk:Chiswick Chap|talk]]) 12:14, 14 November 2016 (UTC) *I've gone through the deleted edits, and done my best to incorporate all of the constructive changes and additions. [[User:Dyanega|Dyanega]] ([[User talk:Dyanega|talk]]) 20:49, 14 November 2016 (UTC) == The "As commercial pollinators" section needs work == I don't really make edits to wikipedia, so I want to avoid going in and randomly deleting a paragraph, but something should be changed here. The second paragraph is full of bull and misinformation. For example, "feral honey bees declined dramatically in the US, and they are now almost absent" is a demonstrably false statement, and the citation for that sentence is an article from 1994. In addition the part " In 2010 invertebrate iridescent virus and the fungus Nosema ceranae were shown to be in every killed colony, and deadly in combination" is a disputed and misleading statement that wrongly implies that the virus and fungus cause CCD. The 2nd to last statement is also misleading and the last sentence is also disputable, with a questionable reference from Radio Télévision Suisse. Anyways, it's not clear to me why colony collapse disorder is discussed in this section rather than it's own dedicated one. I would like to propose the "As commercial pollinators" be scrubbed of all this colony collapse bs. It would be better just to link to the colony collapse disorder page, which is much better put together. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/144.39.133.137|144.39.133.137]] ([[User talk:144.39.133.137#top|talk]]) 17:01, 20 December 2016 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> == Bees can fly == This was in the controversy section, which I deleted: ::According to all known laws of aviation, there is no way a bee should be able to fly. Its wings are too small to get its fat little body off the ground. ::The bee, of course, flies anyway because bees don't care what humans think is impossible. * The idea that bees can't fly applied to the bumble bee, not to bees in general. * It was based on incomplete data. See http://www.snopes.com/science/bumblebees.asp * The referenced source doesn't support it. [[User:SlowJog|SlowJog]] ([[User talk:SlowJog|talk]]) 04:08, 26 March 2017 (UTC) :: Many thanks for removing that. The topic is already covered in cited detail at [[Bee#Flight]]. [[User:Chiswick Chap|Chiswick Chap]] ([[User talk:Chiswick Chap|talk]]) 19:26, 26 March 2017 (UTC)'
New page wikitext, after the edit (new_wikitext)
''
Whether or not the change was made through a Tor exit node (tor_exit_node)
0
Unix timestamp of change (timestamp)
1491925995
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:AbuseLog/18254694"