Jump to content

Edit filter log

Details for log entry 2157189

02:58, 22 February 2010: 67.49.59.205 (talk) triggered filter 172, performing the action "edit" on Neurofeedback. Actions taken: Tag; Filter description: Section blanking (examine)

Changes made in edit



Related technologies include [[hemoencephalography]] biofeedback (HEG).
Related technologies include [[hemoencephalography]] biofeedback (HEG).

==Biofeedback and Neurofeedback Organizations==
The [[Association for Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback]] (AAPB) is a non-profit scientific and professional society for biofeedback and neurofeedback. The International Society for Neurofeedback and Research (ISNR) is a non-profit scientific and professional society for neurofeedback. The Biofeedback Foundation of Europe (BFE) sponsors international education, training, and research activities in biofeedback and neurofeedback.<ref>Peper, E., Tylova, H., Gibney, K. H., Harvey, R., & Combatalade, D. (2008). ''Biofeedback mastery: An experiential teaching and self-training manual''. Wheat Ridge, CO: Association for Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback.</ref>

==Board Certification in Neurofeedback (BCN)==
The [[Biofeedback Certification Institute of America]] (BCIA) is a non-profit organization that is a member of the Institute for Credentialing Excellence (ICE). BCIA certifies individuals who meet education and training standards in biofeedback and neurofeedback and progressively recertifies those who satisfy continuing education requirements.

The BCIA didactic education requirement includes a 36-hour course from a regionally-accredited academic institution or a BCIA-approved training program that covers the complete Neurofeedback Blueprint of Knowledge and study of human anatomy and physiology. The Neurofeedback Blueprint of Knowledge areas include: I. Orientation to EEG Biofeedback, II. Basic Neurophysiology and Neuroanatomy, III. Instrumentation and Electronics, IV. Research, V. Psychopharmacological Considerations, VI. Treatment Planning, and VII. Professional Conduct.

Applicants may demonstrate their knowledge of human anatomy and physiology by completing a course in human anatomy, human physiology, human biology, or neuroanatomy provided by a regionally-accredited academic institution or a BCIA-approved training program or by successfully completing an Anatomy and Physiology exam over the organization of the human body and its systems.
Applicants must also document practical skills training that includes 25 contact hours supervised by a BCIA-approved mentor designed to them teach how to apply clinical neurofeedback skills through self-regulation training, 100 patient/client sessions, and case conference presentations. They must recertify every 4 years, complete 55 hours of continuing education during each review period or complete the written exam, and attest that their license/credential (or their supervisor’s license/credential) has not been suspended, investigated or revoked.<ref>Shaffer, F., & Schwartz, M. S. (in press). Entering the field and assuring competence. In M. S. Schwartz, & F. Andrasik (Eds.). ''Biofeedback: A practitioner's guide'' (4th ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.</ref>


== History and Application ==
== History and Application ==

Action parameters

VariableValue
Name of the user account (user_name)
'67.49.59.205'
Page ID (page_id)
510370
Page namespace (page_namespace)
0
Page title without namespace (page_title)
'Neurofeedback'
Full page title (page_prefixedtitle)
'Neurofeedback'
Action (action)
'edit'
Edit summary/reason (summary)
''
Whether or not the edit is marked as minor (no longer in use) (minor_edit)
false
Old page wikitext, before the edit (old_wikitext)
'{{article issues|cleanup=September 2007|OR=December 2007|POV=December 2007}} '''Neurofeedback (NFB)''', also called '''neurotherapy''', '''neurobiofeedback''' or '''EEG biofeedback''' is a type of [[bioifeedback]] that uses realtime displays of [[electroencephalography]] to illustrate brain activity, often with a goal of controlling [[central nervous system]] activity. Sensors are placed on the scalp to measure activity, with measurements displayed using [[video display]]s or sound. ==Definition== Neurofeedback is a type of [[biofeedback]] that uses [[electroencephalography]] to provide a signal that can be used by a person to feedback neurological activity. ==Training process== Some approaches believe that conscious understanding and mediation of that information is important for the training process; however, this claim has never actually been verified. Those approaches also believe that neurofeedback training can be understood as being based on a form of operant and/or classical conditioning. In that frame of reference, when [[Electroencephalography|brain activity]] changes in the direction desired by the trainer directing the training, a positive "reward" feedback is given to the individual, and if the change is in the opposite direction from what was intended, then either different feedback is given or the provision of otherwise attained "positive" feedback is inhibited (or blocked). These ideas can be applied in various combinations depending on the protocol decided upon by the trainer. Rewards/Reinforcements can be as simple as a change in pitch of a tone or as complex as a certain type of movement of a character in a video game. This experience could be called [[operant conditioning]] for internal states even though no research has yet demonstrated that clear operant response curves occur under those scenarios. Nonetheless,a number of different brainwave goals have been proposed by different researchers in the field following on these general ideas. Usually, these goals are based upon extrapolations from research describing abnormal EEG patterns or on results from a quantitative EEG (QEEG - also known as brain mapping) upon the particular client being offered neurofeedback training. A popular goal is the increase of activity in the 12–18 Hz band ([[mu rhythm]]/[[sensorimotor rhythm| sensorimotor rhythm (SMR)]]) and a decrease in the 4–8 Hz and/or 22–28 Hz bands ([[theta rhythm|theta]] and/or [[beta rhythm|beta]]). The most common and well-documented use of neurofeedback is in the treatment of [[attention deficit hyperactivity disorder]]: multiple studies have shown neurofeedback to be useful in the treatment of ADHD [http://www.aapb.org/i4a/pages/index.cfm?pageid=3330] (Butnik 2005) (Masterpasqual ''et al.'' 2003). QEEG has been ambivalent with some studies showing that some forms of ADHD can be characterized by an abundance of slow brainwaves and a diminished quantity of fast wave activity (Butnik 2005); however, alternative patterns have also been described making the overall picture inconclusive at this time. Some ADHD researchers are unconvinced by these studies, including the psychiatry professor and author of several books on ADHD, [[Russell Barkley]]. Barkley opines that neurotherapy's effectiveness in treating ADHD can be ascribed to either uncontrolled [[case studies]] or the [[placebo effect]] [http://addadhdadvances.com/neurofeedback.html]. In return, neurofeedback advocates note that Barkley has received research funds and personal remuneration from drug giant [[Eli Lilly and Company]] and other drug companies [http://www.playattention.com/attention-deficit/articles/adhd-study-faster-diagnosis-urged/] [http://www.ahrp.org/infomail/05/10/10.php] [http://www.russellbarkley.org/about-dr-barkley.htm]. Other areas where neurofeedback has been researched include treatment of [[substance abuse]] [http://www.eeginfo.com/research/addiction_main.html research], [[anxiety]] [http://www.eeginfo.com/research/anxiety_main.html research], [[clinical depression|depression]] [http://www.eeginfo.com/research/depression_main.html research], [[epilepsy]] [http://www.eeginfo.com/research/epilepsy_main.html research], [[OCD]] [http://www.eeginfo.com/research/ocd_main.html research], [http://www.eeginfo.com/research/learning_main.html learning disabilities], [[Bipolar Disorder]] [http://www.eeginfo.com/research/bipolar_main.html research], [[Conduct Disorder]], [http://www.eeginfo.com/research/violence_main.html anger and rage], cognitive impairment, [http://www.eeginfo.com/therapeutic-applications/ther-applications-m.htm#migraines migraines], headaches, [http://www.eeginfo.com/research/pain_main.html chronic pain], [[autism spectrum disorder]]s [http://www.eeginfo.com/research/autism_main.html research], [http://www.eeginfo.com/research/sleep_main.html sleep dysregulation], [[PTSD]] and [[MTBI]]. Other approaches to understanding and providing neurofeedback training use non-linear dynamical control processes and joint time-frequency analyses to characterize the ongoing dynamics of EEG during the training process itself. These approaches understand the functioning of the CNS in a more integrated or comprehensive fashion, including the structural ideas of the Russian neuropsychologist Luria and neuropsychiatrist Karl Pribram. Related technologies include [[hemoencephalography]] biofeedback (HEG). ==Biofeedback and Neurofeedback Organizations== The [[Association for Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback]] (AAPB) is a non-profit scientific and professional society for biofeedback and neurofeedback. The International Society for Neurofeedback and Research (ISNR) is a non-profit scientific and professional society for neurofeedback. The Biofeedback Foundation of Europe (BFE) sponsors international education, training, and research activities in biofeedback and neurofeedback.<ref>Peper, E., Tylova, H., Gibney, K. H., Harvey, R., & Combatalade, D. (2008). ''Biofeedback mastery: An experiential teaching and self-training manual''. Wheat Ridge, CO: Association for Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback.</ref> ==Board Certification in Neurofeedback (BCN)== The [[Biofeedback Certification Institute of America]] (BCIA) is a non-profit organization that is a member of the Institute for Credentialing Excellence (ICE). BCIA certifies individuals who meet education and training standards in biofeedback and neurofeedback and progressively recertifies those who satisfy continuing education requirements. The BCIA didactic education requirement includes a 36-hour course from a regionally-accredited academic institution or a BCIA-approved training program that covers the complete Neurofeedback Blueprint of Knowledge and study of human anatomy and physiology. The Neurofeedback Blueprint of Knowledge areas include: I. Orientation to EEG Biofeedback, II. Basic Neurophysiology and Neuroanatomy, III. Instrumentation and Electronics, IV. Research, V. Psychopharmacological Considerations, VI. Treatment Planning, and VII. Professional Conduct. Applicants may demonstrate their knowledge of human anatomy and physiology by completing a course in human anatomy, human physiology, human biology, or neuroanatomy provided by a regionally-accredited academic institution or a BCIA-approved training program or by successfully completing an Anatomy and Physiology exam over the organization of the human body and its systems. Applicants must also document practical skills training that includes 25 contact hours supervised by a BCIA-approved mentor designed to them teach how to apply clinical neurofeedback skills through self-regulation training, 100 patient/client sessions, and case conference presentations. They must recertify every 4 years, complete 55 hours of continuing education during each review period or complete the written exam, and attest that their license/credential (or their supervisor’s license/credential) has not been suspended, investigated or revoked.<ref>Shaffer, F., & Schwartz, M. S. (in press). Entering the field and assuring competence. In M. S. Schwartz, & F. Andrasik (Eds.). ''Biofeedback: A practitioner's guide'' (4th ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.</ref> == History and Application == In 1924, the German psychiatrist Hans Berger connected a couple of electrodes (small round discs of metal) to a patient's scalp and detected a small current by using a ballistic [[galvanometer]]. During the years 1929-1938 he published 14 reports about his studies of EEGs, and much of our modern knowledge of the subject, especially in the middle frequencies, is due to his research (Kaiser 2005). Berger analyzed EEGs qualitatively, but in 1932 G. Dietsch applied [[Fourier analysis]] to seven records of EEG and became the first researcher of what later is called QEEG (quantitative EEG). (Kaiser 2005) Later, Joe Kamiya popularized neurofeedback in the 1960s when an article<ref name=Kamiya1971>{{cite journal | author = Kamiya, J. | year = 1971 | title = Operant Control of the EEG Alpha Rhythm and Some of its Reported Effects on Consciousness | journal = Biofeedback and Self-Control: an Aldine Reader on the Regulation of Bodily Processes and Consciousness }}</ref> about the alpha brain wave experiments he had been conducting was published in ''Psychology Today'' in 1968. Kamiya’s experiment had two parts. In the first part, a subject was asked to keep his eyes closed and when a tone sounded to say whether he thought he was in [[alpha rhythm|alpha]]. He was then told whether he was correct or wrong. Initially the subject would get about fifty percent correct, but some subjects would eventually develop the ability to distinguish between states and be correct a highly significant percentage of the time. In the second part of the study, subjects were asked to go into alpha when a bell rang once and not go into the state when the bell rang twice. Once again some subjects were able to enter the state on command. Others, however, could not control it at all. Nevertheless, the results were significant and very attractive. Alpha states were connected with relaxation, and alpha training had the possibility to alleviate stress and stress-related conditions. Neurofeedback appealed greatly to the social movements of the 1960s as well, when altered states were a lifestyle. Despite these highly dramatic claims, the universal correlation of high alpha density to a subjective experience of calm cannot be assumed. Alpha states do not seem to have the universal stress-alleviating power indicated by early observations.<ref name=Hardt1978>{{cite journal | author = Hardt, J.V. | coauthors = Kamiya, J. | year = 1978 | title = Anxiety change through electroencephalographic alpha feedback seen only in high anxiety subjects | journal = Science | volume = 201 | issue = 4350 | pages = 79–81 | doi = 10.1126/science.663641 | pmid = 663641 }}</ref> However, this is not cause to reject the concept of biofeedback entirely. Many other biofeedback treatments have emerged, since Kamiya’s alpha experiments. At one point, [[Martin Theodore Orne|Martin Orne]] and others challenged the claim that alpha biofeedback actually involved the training of an individual to voluntarily regulate brainwave activity.<ref name=Paskewitz1973>{{cite journal | author = Paskewitz, D.A. | coauthors = Orne, M.T. | year = 1973 | title = Visual Effects on Alpha Feedback Training | journal = Science | volume = 181 | issue = 4097 | pages = 360–363 | doi = 10.1126/science.181.4097.360 | pmid = 4719909 }}</ref> James Hardt and Joe Kamiya, then at [[University of California, San Francisco|UC San Francisco]]'s [[UCSF Medical Center|Langley Porter Neuropsychiatric Institute]] published a paper, <ref name=Hardt1976>{{cite journal | author = Hardt, J.V. | coauthors = Kamiya, J. | year = 1976 | title = Conflicting results in EEG alpha feedback studies | journal = Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback | volume = 1 | issue = 1 | pages = 63–75 | url = http://www.springerlink.com/index/Q6XU641775678664.pdf | accessdate = 2007-12-05 }}</ref> proving the efficacy of EEG biofeedback training, and that it was not just related to visuo/motor eyes open or closed factors. In the late sixties and early seventies, [[Barbara Brown (scientist)|Barbara Brown]], one of the most effective popularizers of Biofeedback, wrote several books on biofeedback, making the public much more aware of the technology. The books included ''New Mind New Body'', with a foreword from [[Hugh Downs]], and ''Stress and the Art of Biofeedback''. Brown took a creative approach to neurofeedback, linking brainwave self regulation to a switching relay which turned on an electric train. The work of Barry Sterman, Joel F. Lubar and others has indicated a high efficacy for beta training, involving the role of sensorimotor rhythmic EEG activity.<ref name=Sterman1962>{{cite journal | author = Sterman, M.B. | coauthors = Clemente, C.D. | year = 1962 | title = Forebrain inhibitory mechanisms: cortical synchronization induced by basal forebrain stimulation | journal = Exp Neurol | volume = 6 | pages = 91–102 | url = http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?db=pubmed&uid=13916975&cmd=showdetailview&indexed=google | accessdate = 2007-12-05 | doi = 10.1016/0014-4886(62)90080-8 }}</ref> This training has been used in the treatment of epilepsy <ref name=Sterman1972>{{cite journal | author = Sterman, M.B. | coauthors = Friar, L. | year = 1972 | title = Suppression of seizures in an epileptic following sensorimotor EEG feedback training | journal = Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol | volume = 33 | issue = 1 | pages = 89–95 | url = http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?db=pubmed&uid=4113278&cmd=showdetailview&indexed=google | accessdate = 2007-12-05 | doi = 10.1016/0013-4694(72)90028-4 }}</ref><ref name=Sterman2000>{{cite journal | author = Sterman, M.B. | year = 2000 | title = Basic concepts and clinical findings in the treatment of seizure disorders with EEG operant conditioning | journal = Clin Electroencephalogr | volume = 31 | issue = 1 | pages = 45–55 | url = http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?db=pubmed&uid=10638352&cmd=showdetailview&indexed=google | accessdate = 2007-12-05 }}</ref>, attention deficit disorder and hyperactive disorder,<ref name=Lubar1995>{{cite journal | author = Lubar, J.F. | coauthors = Swartwood, M.O.; Swartwood, J.N.; O'Donnell, P.H. | year = 1995 | title = Evaluation of the effectiveness of EEG neurofeedback training for ADHD in a clinical setting as measured by changes in TOVA scores, behavioral ratings, and WISC-R performance | journal = Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback | volume = 20 | issue = 1 | pages = 83–99 | url = http://www.springerlink.com/index/L2213885102N16W6.pdf | accessdate = 2007-12-05 }}</ref>. The sensorimotor rhythm (SMR) is rhythmic activity between 12 and 16 hertz that can be recorded from an area near the sensorimotor cortex. SMR is found in waking states and is very similar if not identical to the sleep spindles that are recorded in the second stage of sleep. For example Sterman has shown that both monkeys and cats who had undergone SMR training had elevated thresholds for the convulsant chemical monomethylhydrazine. These studies indicate that SMR is associated with an inhibitory process in the motor system and therefore increasing SMR through operant conditioning increases the ability to control seizures.<ref name=Sterman2000 /> Neuroimaging studies have correlated ADHD with abnormal functioning in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) during tasks involving selective attention. In 2006, Johanne Levesque and colleagues at the University of Montreal published results from their fMRI study showing normalization of ACC activation during a selective-attention task in ADHD subjects who had undergone neurofeedback training (Levesque, 2006). Subjects in the study were randomly assigned to either the neurofeedback treatment group or a no-treatment control group, and subjects from the latter showed no difference in ACC activation compared to their baseline. A significant bibliography on the efficacy of EEG biofeedback documented in refereed journals is listed at isnr.org. For years, EEG biofeedback was treated as a minor part of the field of biofeedback, particularly by the primary biofeedback organization, [http://www.aapb.org AAPB]. In 1993, three different efforts, somewhat overlapping, dramatically increased the energy and influence of EEG biofeedback. In February 1993, Rob Kall, president of Futurehealth, organized the first annual [http://www.brainmeeting.com Winter Brain Meeting], in Key West Florida. The meeting brought together many of the leading figures in the field and it created a setting where the leaders could discuss and plan strategies for building greater influence and organization to move the field forward. In April 1993, Ken Tachiki, Jim Smith and Bob Grove organized a meeting of leaders in the field of Neurofeedback on Catalina Island, immediately before the 1993 AAPB meeting. Further planning took place at this meeting and the beginnings of SSNR occurred. SSNR= Society for the Study of Neuronal Regulation. Since then, SSNR has evolved to become ISNR International Society for Neuronal Regulation, and is now known as the International Society for Neurofeedback & Research (www.isnr.org). Immediately after the Catalina meeting, at the 1993 AAPB meeting, a new EEG section was formed, after plenty of lively discussion. It quickly grew to become the biggest section of the organization. Things were never the same at AAPB. Neurofeedback had become a mainstream part of the field, though it took a few years to fully integrate into the annual meeting and journals. Within the last 5–10 years, neurofeedback has taken a new approach, in taking a second look at deep states. Alpha-theta training has been used in the treatment of alcoholism and other addictions. This low frequency training differs greatly from the high frequency beta and SMR training that has been practiced for over thirty years and is reminiscent of the original alpha training of Elmer Green and Joe Kamiya. Beta and SMR training can be considered a more directly physiological approach, strengthening sensorimotor inhibition in the cortex and inhibiting alpha patterns, which slow metabolism. Alpha-theta training, however, derives from the psychotherapeutic model and involves accessing of painful or repressed memories through the alpha-theta state. The alpha-theta state is a term that comes from the representation on the EEG. The physiological mechanisms behind these therapies are very unclear. ==Low Energy Neurofeedback System (LENS)== The Low Energy Neurofeedback System (LENS) uses a device, under control of a computer program, to produce electromagnetic fields that conduct the feedback to the client. The feedback is carried by EEG leads that serve as bi-directional conduits for both the carrier wave and the returning EEG signals. Sessions are very short, typically only a few minutes (sessions that are too long or use incorrect settings can cause fatigue or exacerbation of symptoms for an average of two days). When these effects wear off clients typically function at an even higher level than before they occurred. During treatment sessions, the subject is completely passive; there is no auditory or visual feedback. The client does not have to pay attention or concentrate during the sessions; no homework is prescribed. At times other feedback or biofeedback are used to complement the LENS work. The core of the LENS approach is to assess sensitivity, reactivity, behavioral suppression, hardiness, and anxiety to decide ''how much'' feedback might be useful. LENS treatment is begins with a topographic map (not a qEEG) to determine which sites to go to during a session. System settings must be adjusted by the clinician over the course of treatment to accommodate increasing functioning. The number of sessions needed to achieve improvements for ADD/ADHD, depression, PTSD, and seizures is claimed to be fewer than for more traditional neural feedback methods. While figures vary from practitioner to practitioner, the long term average duration across all problems is 20 sessions. 95% of the clients complete the work they need to do with the LENS in under 42 sessions. Over 100,000 clients have been worked with using the LENS and its antecedent systems since 1991. It is estimated to be 80% effective by its practitioners. The LENS works best with problems of functioning. However problems of functioning may also be caused by allergies, inflammation, infections, or toxicities. When these problems exist they must be first evaluated and treated medically. At least two books detailing the concept and methodology of LENS are available commercially: "The Healing Power of Neurofeedback: The Revolutionary LENS Technique for Restoring Optimal Brain Function" by Stephen Larsen and Thom Hartmann (Paperback - May 2, 2006); and "Lens: The Low Energy Neurofeedback System," by D. Corydon Hammond (Paperback - Feb 13, 2007). {{Expand-section|date=May 2008}} ==Neurofeedback in practice== A common professional neurofeedback therapy nowadays goes as follows: 1. In an intake of about 90 minutes the patient will get a questionnaire and a first EEG reading. The questionnaire specifies the complaints and filters out people with serious psychological problems. The EEG serves both for diagnosis and as a reference to check later whether there is progress. In about 20% of the patients neurofeedback has no effect. 2. The EEG recording is typically done on 19 - 21 sites on the scalp. It results in a brainmap ("quantative EEG"). This is a series of maps (for each frequency one) where for each measured spot the average level of activity is shown. The brainmap is compared to a database to determine spots of over- and underactivity compared to the average people of the patient's age and sex. There are several commercial providers of such databases. 3. On the basis of the complaints, the brainmap and the database results, a therapy is chosen. This involves an electrode on a single spot on the head that needs to become more or less active for specific frequencies. During the therapy the patient gets feedback that helps them improve. This feedback may involve, for example, a simple light or tone, some game where "good" brainwaves are rewarded and "bad" ones punished, or some image that becomes less sharp when the patient loses focus. 4. A typical therapy takes 20 to 40 sessions. Some forms of psychotherapy are considerably faster, so neurofeedback is not always the most efficient solution. At the beginning of each session the patient reports the course of his complaints and also mentions other mental effects. On the basis of this report the therapy may be adjusted. In some cases a patient is allowed to take a feedback machine home and have most - but not all - sessions there. See also: '''[[Psychophysiology]]''', the study of the connections between [[neurobiology]] and [[psychology]]. ==Neurofeedback Evidence Based== In 2009 in collaboration with researchers from Tübingen University (Germany), Radboud University (Nijmegen, the Netherlands), Brainclinics and EEG Resource Institute a meta-analysis <ref>Arns, M., de Ridder, S., Strehl, U., Breteler, M. & Coenen, A. Efficacy of Neurofeedback Treatment in ADHD: The effects on Inattention, Impulsivity and Hyperactivity: a Meta-Analysis. EEG and Clinical Neuroscience; 40(3), 180-189.(2009)</ref> was conducted on published research about Neurofeedback treatment in ADHD which concluded that neurofeedback is an ‘Evidence-Based’ treatment for ADHD. [[http://qeegsupport.com/neurofeedback-is-an-%E2%80%98evidence-based%E2%80%99-treatment-for-adhd// See reference]] ==See also== * [[Brainwave synchronization]] * [[Comparison of neurofeedback software]] * [[Binaural beats]] * [[Electroencephalography]] * [[Mind machine]] * [[Human enhancement]] * [[Intelligence amplification]] * [[Neural oscillation]] * [[Evoked potential]] * [[Event-related potential]] * [[Induced activity]] * [[Ongoing brain activity]] ==References== {{refbegin}} *Butnik, Steven M. "Neurofeedback in adolescents and adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder." Journal of Clinical Psychology, May 2005. Vol. 61 Issue 5, p621-625 *Evans, J.R., and Abarbnanel, A. ''An introduction to quantitative EEG and Neurofeedback.'' Academic Press: San Diego, 1999. *Hammond, Corydon D. "Neurofeedback Treatment of Depression and Anxiety." Journal of Adult Development, Vol 12, Nos. 2/3, August 2005 *Kaiser, David A. "Basic Principles of Quantitative EEG." Journal of Adult Development, Vol. 12, Nos. 2/3, August 2005. *Levesque, Johanne and Mario Beauregard. "Effect of neurofeedback training on the neural substrates of selective attention in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study." Neuroscience Letters, 394, 216-221. *Masterpasqual, Frank and Healey, Katherine N. "Neurofeedback in psychological practice." Professional Psychology: Research & Practice. Dec 2003, Vol. 34 Issue 6, p652-656 *Trudeau, David L. "EEG Biofeedback for Addictive Disorders -- The State of the Art in 2004." Journal of Adult Development, Vol 12, Nos. 2/3, August 2005. *Vernon, D. (2005). Can neurofeedback training enhance performance? An evaluation of the evidence with implications for future research. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 30(4), 347-364. {{refend}} <!-- Not sure how legit these references really are.... --> {{reflist}} == External links == '''Articles and research links:''' *[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/3091595.stm BBC article about neurofeedback improving the performance of musicians] *[http://archives.cnn.com/2000/HEALTH/alternative/02/17/neuro.feedback.wmd/ CNN article about growing field of bio- and neuro-feedback] *[http://www.eeginfo.com/research/ EEG Research links] *[http://www.coping-with-epilepsy.com/forums/f22/eeg-neurofeedback-501/ Summary of neurofeedback studies for epilepsy] *[http://www.bf-israel.org/neurofeedback/Gruzelier%20&%20Egner%202005.pdf Critical validation studies of neurofeedback] *[http://www.northwestern.edu/magazine/winter2008/feature/baehr.html On A Different Wavelength - NorthWestern Magazine article about Dr. Elsa Baehr] '''Organizations involved in research and development:''' *[http://www.isnr.org The International Society for Neurofeedback Research] hosts annual professional conferences, and publishes a peer-reviewed journal that focuses on neurofeedback. *[http://www.aapb.org The Association for Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback] hosts an annual and regional professional conferences on applied psychophysiology including neurofeedback. They have published a peer reviewed journal since about 1975. *[http://www.bcia.org The Biofeedback Certification Institute of America] is a recognized certification organization for professionals who demonstrate entry-level competence in applied psychophysiology, including biofeedback and neurofeedback. *[http://www.HomeComingForVeterans.org/ Home Coming for Veterans] is a national outreach program to provide free Neurofeedback training for veterans for the rehabilitation of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and issues of brain performance resulting from traumatic brain injury, blast injury, concussion, whiplash, and chemical exposure. *[http://openeeg.sourceforge.net/doc/ OpenEEG project] open source software for do-it-yourself EEG devices. [[Category:Devices to alter consciousness]] [[Category:Clinical psychology]] [[Category:Medical tests]] [[Category:Electroencephalography]] [[Category:Evoked potentials]] [[Category:Neurotechnology]] [[Category:Behaviorism]] [[Category:Mental health]] [[Category:Alternative medical systems]] [[Category:Naturopathic medicine]] [[Category:Neuropsychology]] [[de:Neurofeedback]] [[es:Neurorretroalimentación]] [[it:Neurofeedback]] [[lt:Neuroninis grįžtamasis ryšys]] [[nl:Neurofeedback]] [[pl:Neurotrening]]'
New page wikitext, after the edit (new_wikitext)
'{{article issues|cleanup=September 2007|OR=December 2007|POV=December 2007}} '''Neurofeedback (NFB)''', also called '''neurotherapy''', '''neurobiofeedback''' or '''EEG biofeedback''' is a type of [[bioifeedback]] that uses realtime displays of [[electroencephalography]] to illustrate brain activity, often with a goal of controlling [[central nervous system]] activity. Sensors are placed on the scalp to measure activity, with measurements displayed using [[video display]]s or sound. ==Definition== Neurofeedback is a type of [[biofeedback]] that uses [[electroencephalography]] to provide a signal that can be used by a person to feedback neurological activity. ==Training process== Some approaches believe that conscious understanding and mediation of that information is important for the training process; however, this claim has never actually been verified. Those approaches also believe that neurofeedback training can be understood as being based on a form of operant and/or classical conditioning. In that frame of reference, when [[Electroencephalography|brain activity]] changes in the direction desired by the trainer directing the training, a positive "reward" feedback is given to the individual, and if the change is in the opposite direction from what was intended, then either different feedback is given or the provision of otherwise attained "positive" feedback is inhibited (or blocked). These ideas can be applied in various combinations depending on the protocol decided upon by the trainer. Rewards/Reinforcements can be as simple as a change in pitch of a tone or as complex as a certain type of movement of a character in a video game. This experience could be called [[operant conditioning]] for internal states even though no research has yet demonstrated that clear operant response curves occur under those scenarios. Nonetheless,a number of different brainwave goals have been proposed by different researchers in the field following on these general ideas. Usually, these goals are based upon extrapolations from research describing abnormal EEG patterns or on results from a quantitative EEG (QEEG - also known as brain mapping) upon the particular client being offered neurofeedback training. A popular goal is the increase of activity in the 12–18 Hz band ([[mu rhythm]]/[[sensorimotor rhythm| sensorimotor rhythm (SMR)]]) and a decrease in the 4–8 Hz and/or 22–28 Hz bands ([[theta rhythm|theta]] and/or [[beta rhythm|beta]]). The most common and well-documented use of neurofeedback is in the treatment of [[attention deficit hyperactivity disorder]]: multiple studies have shown neurofeedback to be useful in the treatment of ADHD [http://www.aapb.org/i4a/pages/index.cfm?pageid=3330] (Butnik 2005) (Masterpasqual ''et al.'' 2003). QEEG has been ambivalent with some studies showing that some forms of ADHD can be characterized by an abundance of slow brainwaves and a diminished quantity of fast wave activity (Butnik 2005); however, alternative patterns have also been described making the overall picture inconclusive at this time. Some ADHD researchers are unconvinced by these studies, including the psychiatry professor and author of several books on ADHD, [[Russell Barkley]]. Barkley opines that neurotherapy's effectiveness in treating ADHD can be ascribed to either uncontrolled [[case studies]] or the [[placebo effect]] [http://addadhdadvances.com/neurofeedback.html]. In return, neurofeedback advocates note that Barkley has received research funds and personal remuneration from drug giant [[Eli Lilly and Company]] and other drug companies [http://www.playattention.com/attention-deficit/articles/adhd-study-faster-diagnosis-urged/] [http://www.ahrp.org/infomail/05/10/10.php] [http://www.russellbarkley.org/about-dr-barkley.htm]. Other areas where neurofeedback has been researched include treatment of [[substance abuse]] [http://www.eeginfo.com/research/addiction_main.html research], [[anxiety]] [http://www.eeginfo.com/research/anxiety_main.html research], [[clinical depression|depression]] [http://www.eeginfo.com/research/depression_main.html research], [[epilepsy]] [http://www.eeginfo.com/research/epilepsy_main.html research], [[OCD]] [http://www.eeginfo.com/research/ocd_main.html research], [http://www.eeginfo.com/research/learning_main.html learning disabilities], [[Bipolar Disorder]] [http://www.eeginfo.com/research/bipolar_main.html research], [[Conduct Disorder]], [http://www.eeginfo.com/research/violence_main.html anger and rage], cognitive impairment, [http://www.eeginfo.com/therapeutic-applications/ther-applications-m.htm#migraines migraines], headaches, [http://www.eeginfo.com/research/pain_main.html chronic pain], [[autism spectrum disorder]]s [http://www.eeginfo.com/research/autism_main.html research], [http://www.eeginfo.com/research/sleep_main.html sleep dysregulation], [[PTSD]] and [[MTBI]]. Other approaches to understanding and providing neurofeedback training use non-linear dynamical control processes and joint time-frequency analyses to characterize the ongoing dynamics of EEG during the training process itself. These approaches understand the functioning of the CNS in a more integrated or comprehensive fashion, including the structural ideas of the Russian neuropsychologist Luria and neuropsychiatrist Karl Pribram. Related technologies include [[hemoencephalography]] biofeedback (HEG). == History and Application == In 1924, the German psychiatrist Hans Berger connected a couple of electrodes (small round discs of metal) to a patient's scalp and detected a small current by using a ballistic [[galvanometer]]. During the years 1929-1938 he published 14 reports about his studies of EEGs, and much of our modern knowledge of the subject, especially in the middle frequencies, is due to his research (Kaiser 2005). Berger analyzed EEGs qualitatively, but in 1932 G. Dietsch applied [[Fourier analysis]] to seven records of EEG and became the first researcher of what later is called QEEG (quantitative EEG). (Kaiser 2005) Later, Joe Kamiya popularized neurofeedback in the 1960s when an article<ref name=Kamiya1971>{{cite journal | author = Kamiya, J. | year = 1971 | title = Operant Control of the EEG Alpha Rhythm and Some of its Reported Effects on Consciousness | journal = Biofeedback and Self-Control: an Aldine Reader on the Regulation of Bodily Processes and Consciousness }}</ref> about the alpha brain wave experiments he had been conducting was published in ''Psychology Today'' in 1968. Kamiya’s experiment had two parts. In the first part, a subject was asked to keep his eyes closed and when a tone sounded to say whether he thought he was in [[alpha rhythm|alpha]]. He was then told whether he was correct or wrong. Initially the subject would get about fifty percent correct, but some subjects would eventually develop the ability to distinguish between states and be correct a highly significant percentage of the time. In the second part of the study, subjects were asked to go into alpha when a bell rang once and not go into the state when the bell rang twice. Once again some subjects were able to enter the state on command. Others, however, could not control it at all. Nevertheless, the results were significant and very attractive. Alpha states were connected with relaxation, and alpha training had the possibility to alleviate stress and stress-related conditions. Neurofeedback appealed greatly to the social movements of the 1960s as well, when altered states were a lifestyle. Despite these highly dramatic claims, the universal correlation of high alpha density to a subjective experience of calm cannot be assumed. Alpha states do not seem to have the universal stress-alleviating power indicated by early observations.<ref name=Hardt1978>{{cite journal | author = Hardt, J.V. | coauthors = Kamiya, J. | year = 1978 | title = Anxiety change through electroencephalographic alpha feedback seen only in high anxiety subjects | journal = Science | volume = 201 | issue = 4350 | pages = 79–81 | doi = 10.1126/science.663641 | pmid = 663641 }}</ref> However, this is not cause to reject the concept of biofeedback entirely. Many other biofeedback treatments have emerged, since Kamiya’s alpha experiments. At one point, [[Martin Theodore Orne|Martin Orne]] and others challenged the claim that alpha biofeedback actually involved the training of an individual to voluntarily regulate brainwave activity.<ref name=Paskewitz1973>{{cite journal | author = Paskewitz, D.A. | coauthors = Orne, M.T. | year = 1973 | title = Visual Effects on Alpha Feedback Training | journal = Science | volume = 181 | issue = 4097 | pages = 360–363 | doi = 10.1126/science.181.4097.360 | pmid = 4719909 }}</ref> James Hardt and Joe Kamiya, then at [[University of California, San Francisco|UC San Francisco]]'s [[UCSF Medical Center|Langley Porter Neuropsychiatric Institute]] published a paper, <ref name=Hardt1976>{{cite journal | author = Hardt, J.V. | coauthors = Kamiya, J. | year = 1976 | title = Conflicting results in EEG alpha feedback studies | journal = Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback | volume = 1 | issue = 1 | pages = 63–75 | url = http://www.springerlink.com/index/Q6XU641775678664.pdf | accessdate = 2007-12-05 }}</ref> proving the efficacy of EEG biofeedback training, and that it was not just related to visuo/motor eyes open or closed factors. In the late sixties and early seventies, [[Barbara Brown (scientist)|Barbara Brown]], one of the most effective popularizers of Biofeedback, wrote several books on biofeedback, making the public much more aware of the technology. The books included ''New Mind New Body'', with a foreword from [[Hugh Downs]], and ''Stress and the Art of Biofeedback''. Brown took a creative approach to neurofeedback, linking brainwave self regulation to a switching relay which turned on an electric train. The work of Barry Sterman, Joel F. Lubar and others has indicated a high efficacy for beta training, involving the role of sensorimotor rhythmic EEG activity.<ref name=Sterman1962>{{cite journal | author = Sterman, M.B. | coauthors = Clemente, C.D. | year = 1962 | title = Forebrain inhibitory mechanisms: cortical synchronization induced by basal forebrain stimulation | journal = Exp Neurol | volume = 6 | pages = 91–102 | url = http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?db=pubmed&uid=13916975&cmd=showdetailview&indexed=google | accessdate = 2007-12-05 | doi = 10.1016/0014-4886(62)90080-8 }}</ref> This training has been used in the treatment of epilepsy <ref name=Sterman1972>{{cite journal | author = Sterman, M.B. | coauthors = Friar, L. | year = 1972 | title = Suppression of seizures in an epileptic following sensorimotor EEG feedback training | journal = Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol | volume = 33 | issue = 1 | pages = 89–95 | url = http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?db=pubmed&uid=4113278&cmd=showdetailview&indexed=google | accessdate = 2007-12-05 | doi = 10.1016/0013-4694(72)90028-4 }}</ref><ref name=Sterman2000>{{cite journal | author = Sterman, M.B. | year = 2000 | title = Basic concepts and clinical findings in the treatment of seizure disorders with EEG operant conditioning | journal = Clin Electroencephalogr | volume = 31 | issue = 1 | pages = 45–55 | url = http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?db=pubmed&uid=10638352&cmd=showdetailview&indexed=google | accessdate = 2007-12-05 }}</ref>, attention deficit disorder and hyperactive disorder,<ref name=Lubar1995>{{cite journal | author = Lubar, J.F. | coauthors = Swartwood, M.O.; Swartwood, J.N.; O'Donnell, P.H. | year = 1995 | title = Evaluation of the effectiveness of EEG neurofeedback training for ADHD in a clinical setting as measured by changes in TOVA scores, behavioral ratings, and WISC-R performance | journal = Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback | volume = 20 | issue = 1 | pages = 83–99 | url = http://www.springerlink.com/index/L2213885102N16W6.pdf | accessdate = 2007-12-05 }}</ref>. The sensorimotor rhythm (SMR) is rhythmic activity between 12 and 16 hertz that can be recorded from an area near the sensorimotor cortex. SMR is found in waking states and is very similar if not identical to the sleep spindles that are recorded in the second stage of sleep. For example Sterman has shown that both monkeys and cats who had undergone SMR training had elevated thresholds for the convulsant chemical monomethylhydrazine. These studies indicate that SMR is associated with an inhibitory process in the motor system and therefore increasing SMR through operant conditioning increases the ability to control seizures.<ref name=Sterman2000 /> Neuroimaging studies have correlated ADHD with abnormal functioning in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) during tasks involving selective attention. In 2006, Johanne Levesque and colleagues at the University of Montreal published results from their fMRI study showing normalization of ACC activation during a selective-attention task in ADHD subjects who had undergone neurofeedback training (Levesque, 2006). Subjects in the study were randomly assigned to either the neurofeedback treatment group or a no-treatment control group, and subjects from the latter showed no difference in ACC activation compared to their baseline. A significant bibliography on the efficacy of EEG biofeedback documented in refereed journals is listed at isnr.org. For years, EEG biofeedback was treated as a minor part of the field of biofeedback, particularly by the primary biofeedback organization, [http://www.aapb.org AAPB]. In 1993, three different efforts, somewhat overlapping, dramatically increased the energy and influence of EEG biofeedback. In February 1993, Rob Kall, president of Futurehealth, organized the first annual [http://www.brainmeeting.com Winter Brain Meeting], in Key West Florida. The meeting brought together many of the leading figures in the field and it created a setting where the leaders could discuss and plan strategies for building greater influence and organization to move the field forward. In April 1993, Ken Tachiki, Jim Smith and Bob Grove organized a meeting of leaders in the field of Neurofeedback on Catalina Island, immediately before the 1993 AAPB meeting. Further planning took place at this meeting and the beginnings of SSNR occurred. SSNR= Society for the Study of Neuronal Regulation. Since then, SSNR has evolved to become ISNR International Society for Neuronal Regulation, and is now known as the International Society for Neurofeedback & Research (www.isnr.org). Immediately after the Catalina meeting, at the 1993 AAPB meeting, a new EEG section was formed, after plenty of lively discussion. It quickly grew to become the biggest section of the organization. Things were never the same at AAPB. Neurofeedback had become a mainstream part of the field, though it took a few years to fully integrate into the annual meeting and journals. Within the last 5–10 years, neurofeedback has taken a new approach, in taking a second look at deep states. Alpha-theta training has been used in the treatment of alcoholism and other addictions. This low frequency training differs greatly from the high frequency beta and SMR training that has been practiced for over thirty years and is reminiscent of the original alpha training of Elmer Green and Joe Kamiya. Beta and SMR training can be considered a more directly physiological approach, strengthening sensorimotor inhibition in the cortex and inhibiting alpha patterns, which slow metabolism. Alpha-theta training, however, derives from the psychotherapeutic model and involves accessing of painful or repressed memories through the alpha-theta state. The alpha-theta state is a term that comes from the representation on the EEG. The physiological mechanisms behind these therapies are very unclear. ==Low Energy Neurofeedback System (LENS)== The Low Energy Neurofeedback System (LENS) uses a device, under control of a computer program, to produce electromagnetic fields that conduct the feedback to the client. The feedback is carried by EEG leads that serve as bi-directional conduits for both the carrier wave and the returning EEG signals. Sessions are very short, typically only a few minutes (sessions that are too long or use incorrect settings can cause fatigue or exacerbation of symptoms for an average of two days). When these effects wear off clients typically function at an even higher level than before they occurred. During treatment sessions, the subject is completely passive; there is no auditory or visual feedback. The client does not have to pay attention or concentrate during the sessions; no homework is prescribed. At times other feedback or biofeedback are used to complement the LENS work. The core of the LENS approach is to assess sensitivity, reactivity, behavioral suppression, hardiness, and anxiety to decide ''how much'' feedback might be useful. LENS treatment is begins with a topographic map (not a qEEG) to determine which sites to go to during a session. System settings must be adjusted by the clinician over the course of treatment to accommodate increasing functioning. The number of sessions needed to achieve improvements for ADD/ADHD, depression, PTSD, and seizures is claimed to be fewer than for more traditional neural feedback methods. While figures vary from practitioner to practitioner, the long term average duration across all problems is 20 sessions. 95% of the clients complete the work they need to do with the LENS in under 42 sessions. Over 100,000 clients have been worked with using the LENS and its antecedent systems since 1991. It is estimated to be 80% effective by its practitioners. The LENS works best with problems of functioning. However problems of functioning may also be caused by allergies, inflammation, infections, or toxicities. When these problems exist they must be first evaluated and treated medically. At least two books detailing the concept and methodology of LENS are available commercially: "The Healing Power of Neurofeedback: The Revolutionary LENS Technique for Restoring Optimal Brain Function" by Stephen Larsen and Thom Hartmann (Paperback - May 2, 2006); and "Lens: The Low Energy Neurofeedback System," by D. Corydon Hammond (Paperback - Feb 13, 2007). {{Expand-section|date=May 2008}} ==Neurofeedback in practice== A common professional neurofeedback therapy nowadays goes as follows: 1. In an intake of about 90 minutes the patient will get a questionnaire and a first EEG reading. The questionnaire specifies the complaints and filters out people with serious psychological problems. The EEG serves both for diagnosis and as a reference to check later whether there is progress. In about 20% of the patients neurofeedback has no effect. 2. The EEG recording is typically done on 19 - 21 sites on the scalp. It results in a brainmap ("quantative EEG"). This is a series of maps (for each frequency one) where for each measured spot the average level of activity is shown. The brainmap is compared to a database to determine spots of over- and underactivity compared to the average people of the patient's age and sex. There are several commercial providers of such databases. 3. On the basis of the complaints, the brainmap and the database results, a therapy is chosen. This involves an electrode on a single spot on the head that needs to become more or less active for specific frequencies. During the therapy the patient gets feedback that helps them improve. This feedback may involve, for example, a simple light or tone, some game where "good" brainwaves are rewarded and "bad" ones punished, or some image that becomes less sharp when the patient loses focus. 4. A typical therapy takes 20 to 40 sessions. Some forms of psychotherapy are considerably faster, so neurofeedback is not always the most efficient solution. At the beginning of each session the patient reports the course of his complaints and also mentions other mental effects. On the basis of this report the therapy may be adjusted. In some cases a patient is allowed to take a feedback machine home and have most - but not all - sessions there. See also: '''[[Psychophysiology]]''', the study of the connections between [[neurobiology]] and [[psychology]]. ==Neurofeedback Evidence Based== In 2009 in collaboration with researchers from Tübingen University (Germany), Radboud University (Nijmegen, the Netherlands), Brainclinics and EEG Resource Institute a meta-analysis <ref>Arns, M., de Ridder, S., Strehl, U., Breteler, M. & Coenen, A. Efficacy of Neurofeedback Treatment in ADHD: The effects on Inattention, Impulsivity and Hyperactivity: a Meta-Analysis. EEG and Clinical Neuroscience; 40(3), 180-189.(2009)</ref> was conducted on published research about Neurofeedback treatment in ADHD which concluded that neurofeedback is an ‘Evidence-Based’ treatment for ADHD. [[http://qeegsupport.com/neurofeedback-is-an-%E2%80%98evidence-based%E2%80%99-treatment-for-adhd// See reference]] ==See also== * [[Brainwave synchronization]] * [[Comparison of neurofeedback software]] * [[Binaural beats]] * [[Electroencephalography]] * [[Mind machine]] * [[Human enhancement]] * [[Intelligence amplification]] * [[Neural oscillation]] * [[Evoked potential]] * [[Event-related potential]] * [[Induced activity]] * [[Ongoing brain activity]] ==References== {{refbegin}} *Butnik, Steven M. "Neurofeedback in adolescents and adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder." Journal of Clinical Psychology, May 2005. Vol. 61 Issue 5, p621-625 *Evans, J.R., and Abarbnanel, A. ''An introduction to quantitative EEG and Neurofeedback.'' Academic Press: San Diego, 1999. *Hammond, Corydon D. "Neurofeedback Treatment of Depression and Anxiety." Journal of Adult Development, Vol 12, Nos. 2/3, August 2005 *Kaiser, David A. "Basic Principles of Quantitative EEG." Journal of Adult Development, Vol. 12, Nos. 2/3, August 2005. *Levesque, Johanne and Mario Beauregard. "Effect of neurofeedback training on the neural substrates of selective attention in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study." Neuroscience Letters, 394, 216-221. *Masterpasqual, Frank and Healey, Katherine N. "Neurofeedback in psychological practice." Professional Psychology: Research & Practice. Dec 2003, Vol. 34 Issue 6, p652-656 *Trudeau, David L. "EEG Biofeedback for Addictive Disorders -- The State of the Art in 2004." Journal of Adult Development, Vol 12, Nos. 2/3, August 2005. *Vernon, D. (2005). Can neurofeedback training enhance performance? An evaluation of the evidence with implications for future research. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 30(4), 347-364. {{refend}} <!-- Not sure how legit these references really are.... --> {{reflist}} == External links == '''Articles and research links:''' *[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/3091595.stm BBC article about neurofeedback improving the performance of musicians] *[http://archives.cnn.com/2000/HEALTH/alternative/02/17/neuro.feedback.wmd/ CNN article about growing field of bio- and neuro-feedback] *[http://www.eeginfo.com/research/ EEG Research links] *[http://www.coping-with-epilepsy.com/forums/f22/eeg-neurofeedback-501/ Summary of neurofeedback studies for epilepsy] *[http://www.bf-israel.org/neurofeedback/Gruzelier%20&%20Egner%202005.pdf Critical validation studies of neurofeedback] *[http://www.northwestern.edu/magazine/winter2008/feature/baehr.html On A Different Wavelength - NorthWestern Magazine article about Dr. Elsa Baehr] '''Organizations involved in research and development:''' *[http://www.isnr.org The International Society for Neurofeedback Research] hosts annual professional conferences, and publishes a peer-reviewed journal that focuses on neurofeedback. *[http://www.aapb.org The Association for Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback] hosts an annual and regional professional conferences on applied psychophysiology including neurofeedback. They have published a peer reviewed journal since about 1975. *[http://www.bcia.org The Biofeedback Certification Institute of America] is a recognized certification organization for professionals who demonstrate entry-level competence in applied psychophysiology, including biofeedback and neurofeedback. *[http://www.HomeComingForVeterans.org/ Home Coming for Veterans] is a national outreach program to provide free Neurofeedback training for veterans for the rehabilitation of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and issues of brain performance resulting from traumatic brain injury, blast injury, concussion, whiplash, and chemical exposure. *[http://openeeg.sourceforge.net/doc/ OpenEEG project] open source software for do-it-yourself EEG devices. [[Category:Devices to alter consciousness]] [[Category:Clinical psychology]] [[Category:Medical tests]] [[Category:Electroencephalography]] [[Category:Evoked potentials]] [[Category:Neurotechnology]] [[Category:Behaviorism]] [[Category:Mental health]] [[Category:Alternative medical systems]] [[Category:Naturopathic medicine]] [[Category:Neuropsychology]] [[de:Neurofeedback]] [[es:Neurorretroalimentación]] [[it:Neurofeedback]] [[lt:Neuroninis grįžtamasis ryšys]] [[nl:Neurofeedback]] [[pl:Neurotrening]]'
Whether or not the change was made through a Tor exit node (tor_exit_node)
0
Unix timestamp of change (timestamp)
1266807492