Edit count of the user (user_editcount) | 0 |
Name of the user account (user_name) | 'BOMBERTUTT' |
Age of the user account (user_age) | 74 |
Groups (including implicit) the user is in (user_groups) | [
0 => '*',
1 => 'user'
] |
Rights that the user has (user_rights) | [
0 => 'createaccount',
1 => 'read',
2 => 'edit',
3 => 'createtalk',
4 => 'writeapi',
5 => 'viewmywatchlist',
6 => 'editmywatchlist',
7 => 'viewmyprivateinfo',
8 => 'editmyprivateinfo',
9 => 'editmyoptions',
10 => 'abusefilter-log-detail',
11 => 'urlshortener-create-url',
12 => 'centralauth-merge',
13 => 'abusefilter-view',
14 => 'abusefilter-log',
15 => 'vipsscaler-test',
16 => 'collectionsaveasuserpage',
17 => 'reupload-own',
18 => 'move-rootuserpages',
19 => 'createpage',
20 => 'minoredit',
21 => 'editmyusercss',
22 => 'editmyuserjson',
23 => 'editmyuserjs',
24 => 'purge',
25 => 'sendemail',
26 => 'applychangetags',
27 => 'spamblacklistlog',
28 => 'mwoauthmanagemygrants'
] |
Whether the user is editing from mobile app (user_app) | false |
Whether or not a user is editing through the mobile interface (user_mobile) | false |
Page ID (page_id) | 40088985 |
Page namespace (page_namespace) | 0 |
Page title without namespace (page_title) | 'Canadian Senate expenses scandal' |
Full page title (page_prefixedtitle) | 'Canadian Senate expenses scandal' |
Edit protection level of the page (page_restrictions_edit) | [] |
Last ten users to contribute to the page (page_recent_contributors) | [
0 => 'Hirolovesswords',
1 => '2605:8D80:480:6B79:B9D2:A6BE:973:1F6C',
2 => '70.49.139.95',
3 => 'Jon Kolbert',
4 => '99.246.136.200',
5 => 'Jaquestheripper',
6 => 'AnomieBOT',
7 => 'Tom.Reding',
8 => 'InternetArchiveBot',
9 => 'KolbertBot'
] |
Page age in seconds (page_age) | 204562380 |
Action (action) | 'edit' |
Edit summary/reason (summary) | 'well htere was somewrong things that i fixed' |
Old content model (old_content_model) | 'wikitext' |
New content model (new_content_model) | 'wikitext' |
Old page wikitext, before the edit (old_wikitext) | 'The '''Canadian Senate expenses scandal''' was a controversy concerning the unrelated expense claims of several [[Canadians|Canadian]] senators which began in late 2012 and ended in 2016. Senators [[Patrick Brazeau]], [[Mike Duffy]], [[Mac Harb]], and [[Pamela Wallin]] claimed travel and living allowance expenses from the [[Senate of Canada|Senate]]. After an audit conducted by Deloitte LLP, Duffy -- whose expenses were later found by a Superior Court of Ontario judge to be legitimate -- Harb, and Wallin repaid some expenses. Harb retired a few months later. In November 2013, Brazeau, Duffy, and Wallin were suspended from the Senate without pay but were eventually reinstated. Duffy, the only senator to face criminal charges, was acquitted.<ref name=Djt>R. v. Duffy, 2016 ONCJ 220 (CanLII) (http://canlii.ca/t/gplvk) Retrieved June 4, 2016</ref> Charges against Harb were withdrawn and no charges were laid against Wallin.<ref>{{Cite news |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/senate-scandal-puts-harper-s-brand-at-risk-poll-suggests-1.2304444 |title=Senate scandal could be putting Harper's brand at risk |date=November 1, 2013 |work=CBC News |access-date=November 13, 2018 |language=en-US}}</ref>
The [[Auditor General of Canada]] examined expense claims made by 116 senators and former senators over a two-year period. In a June 2015 report, the Auditor General alleged thirty senators' claims were inappropriate. The report recommended nine cases be referred for police investigation. No charges were laid in those cases. <ref>Report of the Auditor General of Canada to the Senate of Canada—Senators' Expenses, (http://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/internet/docs/parl_otp_201506_e_40494.pdf). June 4, 2015.</ref> Fourteen of these senators opted for binding arbitration by former Supreme Court of Canada Justice Ian Binnie, and his report was issued on March 21, 2016.<ref name=arb>"Report of the special arbitrator on the expense claims identified by the Auditor General in his report dated June 4, 2015". Retrieved from http://sen.parl.gc.ca/portal/reporting/AG/index-e-htm</ref>
Senator Wallin delivered a speech in the Senate, where she condemned the body for ignoring the rule of law when it expelled four of its own members without any hearing or process:
:"Why is the Senate acting as accuser, judge, jury, and executioner before I have had a day in court? That's exactly why this whole process [is] flawed. If this chamber can take this extreme action with regard to a sitting senator, imagine what it can do to an ordinary citizen who crosses the government of the day. ... The issue is no longer about expenses, or audits, or transparency, or accountability, or even the reputation of this chamber — it's about an abuse of power. ... They were targeted leaks, many of them incorrect, designed to cast my conduct in the worst possible light. They were personal and vindictive, and they violated the rules of this place. ... The government [put] the sentencing before the trial..."<ref>{{cite web|title=Debates of the Senate (Hansard)|url=http://www.parl.gc.ca/Content/Sen/Chamber/412/Debates/004db_2013-10-23-e.htm|website=Parliament of Canada|publisher=Senate of Canada|accessdate=5 April 2015|date=23 October 2013}}</ref>
==See also==
* [[List of Canadian political scandals]]
* [[United Kingdom parliamentary expenses scandal]]
==References==
{{reflist|30em}}
[[Category:Senate of Canada]]
[[Category:2013 in Canadian politics]]
[[Category:Political scandals in Canada]]
[[Category:Corruption in Canada]]' |
New page wikitext, after the edit (new_wikitext) | 'The '''Canadian Senate expenses scandallll''' was a controversy concerning the unrelated expense claims of several [[Canadians|Canadian]] senators which began in late 2012 and ended in 2016. Senators [[Patrick Brazeau]], [[Mike Duffy]], [[Mac Harb]], and [[Pamela Wallin]] claimed travel and living allowance expenses from the [[Senate of Canada|Senate]]. After an audit conducted by Deloitte LLP, Duffy -- whose expenses were later found by a Superior Court of Ontario judge to be legitimate -- Harb, and Wallin OH YEAH! repaid some expenses. Harb retired a few months later. In November 2013, Brazeau, Duffy, and Wallin were suspended from the Senate without pay but were eventually reinstated. Duffy, the only senator to face criminal charges, was acquitted.<ref name=Djt>R. v. Duffy, 2016 ONCJ 220 (CanLII) (http://canlii.ca/t/gplvk) Retrieved June 4, 2016</ref> Charges against Harb were withdrawn and no charges were laid against Wallin.<ref>{{Cite news |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/senate-scandal-puts-harper-s-brand-at-risk-poll-suggests-1.2304444 |title=Senate scandal could be putting Harper's brand at risk |date=November 1, 2013 |work=CBC News |access-date=November 13, 2018 |language=en-US}}</ref>
The [[Auditor General of Canada]] examined expense claims made by 116 UR MOMS A HOE senators and former senators over a two-year period. In a June 2015 report, the Auditor General alleged thirty senators' claims were inappropriate. The report recommended nine cases be referred for police investigation. No charges were laid in those cases. <ref>Report of the Auditor General of Canada to the Senate of Canada—Senators' Expenses, (http://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/internet/docs/parl_otp_201506_e_40494.pdf). June 4, 2015.</ref> Fourteen of these senators opted for binding arbitration by former Supreme Court of Canada Justice Ian Binnie, and his report was issued on March 21, 2016.<ref name=arb>"Report of the special arbitrator on the expense claims identified by the Auditor GAMER General in his report dated June 4, 2015". Retrieved from http://sen.parl.gc.ca/portal/reporting/AG/index-e-htm</ref>
Senator Wallin delivered a speech in the Senate, where she condemned the body for ignoring the rule of law when it expelled four of its own members without any hearing or process:
:"Why is the Senate acting as accuser, judge, jury, and executioner before I have had a day in court? That's exactly why this whole process [is] flawed. If this chamber can take this extreme action with regard to a sitting senator, imagine what it can do to an ordinary citizen who crosses the government of the day. ... The issue is no longer about expenses, or audits, or transparency, or accountability, or even the reputation of this chamber — it's about an abuse of power. ... They were targeted leaks, many of them incorrect, designed to cast my conduct in the worst possible light. They were personal and vindictive, and they violated the rules of this place. ... The government [put] the sentencing before the trial..."<ref>{{cite web|title=Debates of the Senate (Hansard)|url=http://www.parl.gc.ca/Content/Sen/Chamber/412/Debates/004db_2013-10-23-e.htm|website=Parliament of Canada|publisher=Senate of Canada|accessdate=5 April 2015|date=23 October 2013}}</ref>
==See also==
* [[List of Canadian political scandals]]
* [[United Kingdom parliamentary expenses scandal]]
==References==
{{reflist|30em}}
[[Category:Senate of Canada]]
[[Category:2013 in Canadian politics]]
[[Category:Political scandals in Canada]]
[[Category:Corruption in Canada]]' |
Unified diff of changes made by edit (edit_diff) | '@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
-The '''Canadian Senate expenses scandal''' was a controversy concerning the unrelated expense claims of several [[Canadians|Canadian]] senators which began in late 2012 and ended in 2016. Senators [[Patrick Brazeau]], [[Mike Duffy]], [[Mac Harb]], and [[Pamela Wallin]] claimed travel and living allowance expenses from the [[Senate of Canada|Senate]]. After an audit conducted by Deloitte LLP, Duffy -- whose expenses were later found by a Superior Court of Ontario judge to be legitimate -- Harb, and Wallin repaid some expenses. Harb retired a few months later. In November 2013, Brazeau, Duffy, and Wallin were suspended from the Senate without pay but were eventually reinstated. Duffy, the only senator to face criminal charges, was acquitted.<ref name=Djt>R. v. Duffy, 2016 ONCJ 220 (CanLII) (http://canlii.ca/t/gplvk) Retrieved June 4, 2016</ref> Charges against Harb were withdrawn and no charges were laid against Wallin.<ref>{{Cite news |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/senate-scandal-puts-harper-s-brand-at-risk-poll-suggests-1.2304444 |title=Senate scandal could be putting Harper's brand at risk |date=November 1, 2013 |work=CBC News |access-date=November 13, 2018 |language=en-US}}</ref>
+The '''Canadian Senate expenses scandallll''' was a controversy concerning the unrelated expense claims of several [[Canadians|Canadian]] senators which began in late 2012 and ended in 2016. Senators [[Patrick Brazeau]], [[Mike Duffy]], [[Mac Harb]], and [[Pamela Wallin]] claimed travel and living allowance expenses from the [[Senate of Canada|Senate]]. After an audit conducted by Deloitte LLP, Duffy -- whose expenses were later found by a Superior Court of Ontario judge to be legitimate -- Harb, and Wallin OH YEAH! repaid some expenses. Harb retired a few months later. In November 2013, Brazeau, Duffy, and Wallin were suspended from the Senate without pay but were eventually reinstated. Duffy, the only senator to face criminal charges, was acquitted.<ref name=Djt>R. v. Duffy, 2016 ONCJ 220 (CanLII) (http://canlii.ca/t/gplvk) Retrieved June 4, 2016</ref> Charges against Harb were withdrawn and no charges were laid against Wallin.<ref>{{Cite news |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/senate-scandal-puts-harper-s-brand-at-risk-poll-suggests-1.2304444 |title=Senate scandal could be putting Harper's brand at risk |date=November 1, 2013 |work=CBC News |access-date=November 13, 2018 |language=en-US}}</ref>
-The [[Auditor General of Canada]] examined expense claims made by 116 senators and former senators over a two-year period. In a June 2015 report, the Auditor General alleged thirty senators' claims were inappropriate. The report recommended nine cases be referred for police investigation. No charges were laid in those cases. <ref>Report of the Auditor General of Canada to the Senate of Canada—Senators' Expenses, (http://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/internet/docs/parl_otp_201506_e_40494.pdf). June 4, 2015.</ref> Fourteen of these senators opted for binding arbitration by former Supreme Court of Canada Justice Ian Binnie, and his report was issued on March 21, 2016.<ref name=arb>"Report of the special arbitrator on the expense claims identified by the Auditor General in his report dated June 4, 2015". Retrieved from http://sen.parl.gc.ca/portal/reporting/AG/index-e-htm</ref>
+The [[Auditor General of Canada]] examined expense claims made by 116 UR MOMS A HOE senators and former senators over a two-year period. In a June 2015 report, the Auditor General alleged thirty senators' claims were inappropriate. The report recommended nine cases be referred for police investigation. No charges were laid in those cases. <ref>Report of the Auditor General of Canada to the Senate of Canada—Senators' Expenses, (http://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/internet/docs/parl_otp_201506_e_40494.pdf). June 4, 2015.</ref> Fourteen of these senators opted for binding arbitration by former Supreme Court of Canada Justice Ian Binnie, and his report was issued on March 21, 2016.<ref name=arb>"Report of the special arbitrator on the expense claims identified by the Auditor GAMER General in his report dated June 4, 2015". Retrieved from http://sen.parl.gc.ca/portal/reporting/AG/index-e-htm</ref>
Senator Wallin delivered a speech in the Senate, where she condemned the body for ignoring the rule of law when it expelled four of its own members without any hearing or process:
' |
New page size (new_size) | 3559 |
Old page size (old_size) | 3527 |
Size change in edit (edit_delta) | 32 |
Lines added in edit (added_lines) | [
0 => 'The '''Canadian Senate expenses scandallll''' was a controversy concerning the unrelated expense claims of several [[Canadians|Canadian]] senators which began in late 2012 and ended in 2016. Senators [[Patrick Brazeau]], [[Mike Duffy]], [[Mac Harb]], and [[Pamela Wallin]] claimed travel and living allowance expenses from the [[Senate of Canada|Senate]]. After an audit conducted by Deloitte LLP, Duffy -- whose expenses were later found by a Superior Court of Ontario judge to be legitimate -- Harb, and Wallin OH YEAH! repaid some expenses. Harb retired a few months later. In November 2013, Brazeau, Duffy, and Wallin were suspended from the Senate without pay but were eventually reinstated. Duffy, the only senator to face criminal charges, was acquitted.<ref name=Djt>R. v. Duffy, 2016 ONCJ 220 (CanLII) (http://canlii.ca/t/gplvk) Retrieved June 4, 2016</ref> Charges against Harb were withdrawn and no charges were laid against Wallin.<ref>{{Cite news |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/senate-scandal-puts-harper-s-brand-at-risk-poll-suggests-1.2304444 |title=Senate scandal could be putting Harper's brand at risk |date=November 1, 2013 |work=CBC News |access-date=November 13, 2018 |language=en-US}}</ref>',
1 => 'The [[Auditor General of Canada]] examined expense claims made by 116 UR MOMS A HOE senators and former senators over a two-year period. In a June 2015 report, the Auditor General alleged thirty senators' claims were inappropriate. The report recommended nine cases be referred for police investigation. No charges were laid in those cases. <ref>Report of the Auditor General of Canada to the Senate of Canada—Senators' Expenses, (http://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/internet/docs/parl_otp_201506_e_40494.pdf). June 4, 2015.</ref> Fourteen of these senators opted for binding arbitration by former Supreme Court of Canada Justice Ian Binnie, and his report was issued on March 21, 2016.<ref name=arb>"Report of the special arbitrator on the expense claims identified by the Auditor GAMER General in his report dated June 4, 2015". Retrieved from http://sen.parl.gc.ca/portal/reporting/AG/index-e-htm</ref>'
] |
Lines removed in edit (removed_lines) | [
0 => 'The '''Canadian Senate expenses scandal''' was a controversy concerning the unrelated expense claims of several [[Canadians|Canadian]] senators which began in late 2012 and ended in 2016. Senators [[Patrick Brazeau]], [[Mike Duffy]], [[Mac Harb]], and [[Pamela Wallin]] claimed travel and living allowance expenses from the [[Senate of Canada|Senate]]. After an audit conducted by Deloitte LLP, Duffy -- whose expenses were later found by a Superior Court of Ontario judge to be legitimate -- Harb, and Wallin repaid some expenses. Harb retired a few months later. In November 2013, Brazeau, Duffy, and Wallin were suspended from the Senate without pay but were eventually reinstated. Duffy, the only senator to face criminal charges, was acquitted.<ref name=Djt>R. v. Duffy, 2016 ONCJ 220 (CanLII) (http://canlii.ca/t/gplvk) Retrieved June 4, 2016</ref> Charges against Harb were withdrawn and no charges were laid against Wallin.<ref>{{Cite news |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/senate-scandal-puts-harper-s-brand-at-risk-poll-suggests-1.2304444 |title=Senate scandal could be putting Harper's brand at risk |date=November 1, 2013 |work=CBC News |access-date=November 13, 2018 |language=en-US}}</ref>',
1 => 'The [[Auditor General of Canada]] examined expense claims made by 116 senators and former senators over a two-year period. In a June 2015 report, the Auditor General alleged thirty senators' claims were inappropriate. The report recommended nine cases be referred for police investigation. No charges were laid in those cases. <ref>Report of the Auditor General of Canada to the Senate of Canada—Senators' Expenses, (http://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/internet/docs/parl_otp_201506_e_40494.pdf). June 4, 2015.</ref> Fourteen of these senators opted for binding arbitration by former Supreme Court of Canada Justice Ian Binnie, and his report was issued on March 21, 2016.<ref name=arb>"Report of the special arbitrator on the expense claims identified by the Auditor General in his report dated June 4, 2015". Retrieved from http://sen.parl.gc.ca/portal/reporting/AG/index-e-htm</ref>'
] |
Whether or not the change was made through a Tor exit node (tor_exit_node) | false |
Unix timestamp of change (timestamp) | 1579546089 |
