Jump to content

Edit filter log

Details for log entry 30539650

13:38, 30 July 2021: 49.205.231.174 (talk) triggered filter 636, performing the action "edit" on Caste system among South Asian Muslims. Actions taken: none; Filter description: Unexplained removal of sourced content (examine | diff)

Changes made in edit

== Historical development ==

[[Islam]] does not recognize any castes,{{sfn|Ghaus Ansari|1960|p=27}} but, when it came to [[Muslim conquest of Persia|Persia]] and India, the existing divisions in these regions were adopted among the local Muslim societies. Evidence of social stratification can be found in several later Persian works, such as ''[[Siyasatnama]]'' of [[Nizam al-Mulk]] (11th century), ''[[Akhlaq-i Nasiri]]'' of [[Nasir al-Din al-Tusi]] (13th century), and ''Jam-i-Mufidi'' (17th century).{{sfn|Ghaus Ansari|1960|p=29}}

The Muslims who came to the subcontinent during the 12th century [[Muslim conquests on the Indian subcontinent]] were already divided into social classes such as priests, nobles and others. Further, a racial segregation demarcated the local Muslim converts from foreign origin Muslims. The foreigners claimed a superior status as they were associated with the conquerors, and categorized themselves as [[Ashraf]] ("noble").{{sfn|Ghaus Ansari|1960|p=30}} Over time, the Indian Muslim society also split on the basis of the existing [[Hindu caste system]].{{sfn|Ghaus Ansari|1960|p=30}} According to [[M. N. Srinivas]] (1986) and R.K. Bhattacharya, Indian Hindu converts to Islam brought their original caste system to the Muslim society in the region.{{sfn|Azra Khanam|2013|pp=116}} On the other hand, [[Louis Dumont]] (1957) believes that the Islamic conquerors consciously adopted the Hindu caste system "as a compromise which they had to make in a predominantly Hindu environment."{{sfn|Azra Khanam|2013|pp=115-116}}

[[Ziauddin Barani]], a 14th century political thinker of the [[Delhi Sultanate]], recommended that the "sons of Mohamed" (i.e. Ashrafs) be given a higher social status than the low-born (i.e. Ajlaf). His most significant contribution in the [[fatwa]] was his analysis of the castes with respect to Islam. His assertion was that castes would be mandated through state laws or "Zawabi" and would carry precedence over [[Sharia]] law whenever they were in conflict. According to Barani, every act which is "contaminated with meanness and based on ignominity, comes elegantly [from the Ajlaf]". Barani also developed an elaborate system of promotion and demotion of Imperial officers ("[[Vizier|Wazirs]]") that was primarily based on their caste.<ref name="Das">Das, Arbind, Arthashastra of Kautilya and Fatwa-i-Jahandari of Ziauddin Barrani: an analysis, Pratibha Publications, Delhi 1996, {{ISBN|81-85268-45-2}} pp. 124-143</ref><ref>{{citation |last=Sikand |first=Yoginder |title=Sacred Spaces: Exploring Traditions of Shared Faith in India |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=RBkwnoDPKgUC&pg=PA7 |year=2003 |publisher=Penguin Books India |isbn=978-0-14-302931-1 |pages=7–}}</ref>

Historically, many Muslims from the julaha or weaver caste began to identify as "Ansaris", the butchers as "Quereshis", and the sanitation and ''bishti'' caste Muslims as "Sheikh".<ref name="Sanober"/>

A justification for South Asian Muslim caste practices can be found in the concept of ''kafa'a/kufu'', which is invoked by ''ulama'' in support of endogamy.

=== Ashrafization and Syedization ===

Ashrafization is considered to be social climbing attempts by groups or individuals through hypergamy and adopting higher Muslim classes' ways of life.

=== History of research ===

There are various definitions of the term "caste", and therefore, various opinions on whether this term can be used to denote social stratification among non-Hindu communities. Ghaus Ansari (1960) uses the term "caste" to describe the Muslim social groups with following characteristics:[[endogamy]] within a given social group, hierarchical gradation of social groups, determination of the group membership by birth, and, in some cases, association of an occupation with the social group.{{sfn|Ghaus Ansari|1960|p=22}}

Beginning in the 19th century, the [[British India|British]] scholars of India first catalogued the various Muslim castes:{{sfn|Ghaus Ansari|1960|p=22}}

* [[Henry Miers Elliot]]'s ''Supplement to the glossary of Indian terms'' (1844), later amplied into ''Memoirs on the history, folk-lore, and distribution of the Races of the North Western Provinces of India''
* John Charles Williams's ''The Report on the Census of Oudh'' (1869)
* [[Denzil Ibbetson]]'s Census Report of Punjab (1883), later adapted into ''[[Panjab Castes]]''
* [[John Nesfield]]'s ''Brief View of the Caste System of the North-Western Provinces and Oudh'' (1885)
* [[Herbert Hope Risley]]'s ''Tribes and castes of Bengal'' (1893)
* [[William Crooke]]'s ''The tribes and castes of the North-western Provinces and Oudh'' (1896)

Nelson's book, in particular, included a whole chapter dedicated to the Muslim castes. In the 20th century British India, a number of works included the Muslim social groups in their descriptions of the Indian castes. These included [[H. A. Rose]]'s ''[[A Glossary of the Tribes and Castes of the Punjab and North-West Frontier Province]]'' (1911).{{sfn|Ghaus Ansari|1960|p=2}}

In independent India, Ghaus Ansari (1960) initiated academic discussion over the Muslim caste system. Subsequently, Imtiaz Ahmed elaborated the topic in his ''Caste and Social Stratification among the Muslims'' (1973).{{sfn|Azra Khanam|2013|p=115}}

== Syedism, Ashrafism, Biradarism, Zatism, and Divisions ==
== Syedism, Ashrafism, Biradarism, Zatism, and Divisions ==


Action parameters

VariableValue
Edit count of the user (user_editcount)
null
Name of the user account (user_name)
'49.205.231.174'
Age of the user account (user_age)
0
Groups (including implicit) the user is in (user_groups)
[ 0 => '*' ]
Rights that the user has (user_rights)
[ 0 => 'createaccount', 1 => 'read', 2 => 'edit', 3 => 'createtalk', 4 => 'writeapi', 5 => 'viewmywatchlist', 6 => 'editmywatchlist', 7 => 'viewmyprivateinfo', 8 => 'editmyprivateinfo', 9 => 'editmyoptions', 10 => 'abusefilter-log-detail', 11 => 'centralauth-merge', 12 => 'abusefilter-view', 13 => 'abusefilter-log', 14 => 'vipsscaler-test' ]
Whether the user is editing from mobile app (user_app)
false
Whether or not a user is editing through the mobile interface (user_mobile)
true
Page ID (page_id)
8397228
Page namespace (page_namespace)
0
Page title without namespace (page_title)
'Caste system among South Asian Muslims'
Full page title (page_prefixedtitle)
'Caste system among South Asian Muslims'
Edit protection level of the page (page_restrictions_edit)
[]
Last ten users to contribute to the page (page_recent_contributors)
[ 0 => '49.205.231.174', 1 => 'ClueBot NG', 2 => '2401:4900:4BBB:5F19:11BB:6D39:941E:B8BA', 3 => 'Shakespeare143', 4 => 'OAbot', 5 => 'Keith D', 6 => '2409:4070:4707:C100:0:0:A68:8A0', 7 => 'Abir669', 8 => 'JJMC89 bot III', 9 => 'Khurseedmansoori' ]
Page age in seconds (page_age)
461749002
Action (action)
'edit'
Edit summary/reason (summary)
''
Old content model (old_content_model)
'wikitext'
New content model (new_content_model)
'wikitext'
Old page wikitext, before the edit (old_wikitext)
'== Historical development == [[Islam]] does not recognize any castes,{{sfn|Ghaus Ansari|1960|p=27}} but, when it came to [[Muslim conquest of Persia|Persia]] and India, the existing divisions in these regions were adopted among the local Muslim societies. Evidence of social stratification can be found in several later Persian works, such as ''[[Siyasatnama]]'' of [[Nizam al-Mulk]] (11th century), ''[[Akhlaq-i Nasiri]]'' of [[Nasir al-Din al-Tusi]] (13th century), and ''Jam-i-Mufidi'' (17th century).{{sfn|Ghaus Ansari|1960|p=29}} The Muslims who came to the subcontinent during the 12th century [[Muslim conquests on the Indian subcontinent]] were already divided into social classes such as priests, nobles and others. Further, a racial segregation demarcated the local Muslim converts from foreign origin Muslims. The foreigners claimed a superior status as they were associated with the conquerors, and categorized themselves as [[Ashraf]] ("noble").{{sfn|Ghaus Ansari|1960|p=30}} Over time, the Indian Muslim society also split on the basis of the existing [[Hindu caste system]].{{sfn|Ghaus Ansari|1960|p=30}} According to [[M. N. Srinivas]] (1986) and R.K. Bhattacharya, Indian Hindu converts to Islam brought their original caste system to the Muslim society in the region.{{sfn|Azra Khanam|2013|pp=116}} On the other hand, [[Louis Dumont]] (1957) believes that the Islamic conquerors consciously adopted the Hindu caste system "as a compromise which they had to make in a predominantly Hindu environment."{{sfn|Azra Khanam|2013|pp=115-116}} [[Ziauddin Barani]], a 14th century political thinker of the [[Delhi Sultanate]], recommended that the "sons of Mohamed" (i.e. Ashrafs) be given a higher social status than the low-born (i.e. Ajlaf). His most significant contribution in the [[fatwa]] was his analysis of the castes with respect to Islam. His assertion was that castes would be mandated through state laws or "Zawabi" and would carry precedence over [[Sharia]] law whenever they were in conflict. According to Barani, every act which is "contaminated with meanness and based on ignominity, comes elegantly [from the Ajlaf]". Barani also developed an elaborate system of promotion and demotion of Imperial officers ("[[Vizier|Wazirs]]") that was primarily based on their caste.<ref name="Das">Das, Arbind, Arthashastra of Kautilya and Fatwa-i-Jahandari of Ziauddin Barrani: an analysis, Pratibha Publications, Delhi 1996, {{ISBN|81-85268-45-2}} pp. 124-143</ref><ref>{{citation |last=Sikand |first=Yoginder |title=Sacred Spaces: Exploring Traditions of Shared Faith in India |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=RBkwnoDPKgUC&pg=PA7 |year=2003 |publisher=Penguin Books India |isbn=978-0-14-302931-1 |pages=7–}}</ref> Historically, many Muslims from the julaha or weaver caste began to identify as "Ansaris", the butchers as "Quereshis", and the sanitation and ''bishti'' caste Muslims as "Sheikh".<ref name="Sanober"/> A justification for South Asian Muslim caste practices can be found in the concept of ''kafa'a/kufu'', which is invoked by ''ulama'' in support of endogamy. === Ashrafization and Syedization === Ashrafization is considered to be social climbing attempts by groups or individuals through hypergamy and adopting higher Muslim classes' ways of life. === History of research === There are various definitions of the term "caste", and therefore, various opinions on whether this term can be used to denote social stratification among non-Hindu communities. Ghaus Ansari (1960) uses the term "caste" to describe the Muslim social groups with following characteristics:[[endogamy]] within a given social group, hierarchical gradation of social groups, determination of the group membership by birth, and, in some cases, association of an occupation with the social group.{{sfn|Ghaus Ansari|1960|p=22}} Beginning in the 19th century, the [[British India|British]] scholars of India first catalogued the various Muslim castes:{{sfn|Ghaus Ansari|1960|p=22}} * [[Henry Miers Elliot]]'s ''Supplement to the glossary of Indian terms'' (1844), later amplied into ''Memoirs on the history, folk-lore, and distribution of the Races of the North Western Provinces of India'' * John Charles Williams's ''The Report on the Census of Oudh'' (1869) * [[Denzil Ibbetson]]'s Census Report of Punjab (1883), later adapted into ''[[Panjab Castes]]'' * [[John Nesfield]]'s ''Brief View of the Caste System of the North-Western Provinces and Oudh'' (1885) * [[Herbert Hope Risley]]'s ''Tribes and castes of Bengal'' (1893) * [[William Crooke]]'s ''The tribes and castes of the North-western Provinces and Oudh'' (1896) Nelson's book, in particular, included a whole chapter dedicated to the Muslim castes. In the 20th century British India, a number of works included the Muslim social groups in their descriptions of the Indian castes. These included [[H. A. Rose]]'s ''[[A Glossary of the Tribes and Castes of the Punjab and North-West Frontier Province]]'' (1911).{{sfn|Ghaus Ansari|1960|p=2}} In independent India, Ghaus Ansari (1960) initiated academic discussion over the Muslim caste system. Subsequently, Imtiaz Ahmed elaborated the topic in his ''Caste and Social Stratification among the Muslims'' (1973).{{sfn|Azra Khanam|2013|p=115}} == Syedism, Ashrafism, Biradarism, Zatism, and Divisions == Syedism (or Sayedism) is considered to be a system of social inequality among South Asian Muslims.<ref name = "ThePrint"/> Syedism involves the belief that Syeds have a more authentic grasp on Islam and all social and political matters.<ref name = "Patel"></ref> Zat is sometimes considered a broader category than Biradari. In Pakistani Punjab, being relatives is the main criterion to comprise a Biradari. {{see also|List of Muslim Other Backward Classes communities}} Ghaus Ansari (1960) named the following four broad categories of Muslim social divisions in India:{{sfn|Ghaus Ansari|1960|p=32-35}} *''Ashraf'', who claim foreign-origin descent. **e.g. , [[Mughal tribe|Mughal]], [[Sayyid]] *Converts from [[Forward caste|upper castes]] **e.g. [[Muslim Rajputs]], [[Gurjar|Gujjars]], [[Jat Muslim|Muslim Jat]] *Converts from other indan [[Tribes]] **e.g. [[Darzi]], [[Muslim Dhobi|Dhobi]], Mansoori, [[Muslim Gaddi|Gaddi]], [[Faqir (clan)|Faqir]], [[Hajjam]] (Nai), [[Julaha]], [[Kabaria]], [[Kumhar]], [[Kunjra]], [[Mirasi]], and [[Muslim Teli|Teli]] *Converts from [[untouchability|untouchable]] castes **e.g. [[Bhangi]] The non-Ashrafs are categorized as ''Ajlaf''. The untouchable Hindu converts are also categorized as ''Arzal'' ("degraded").<ref name="Ambedkar">{{cite book |last = Ambedkar |first = Bhimrao |author-link = B.R. Ambedkar |title = Pakistan or the Partition of India |publisher = Thackers Publishers }}</ref><ref name="Ambedkaronline">[http://www.columbia.edu/itc/mealac/pritchett/00ambedkar/ambedkar_partition/410.html Web resource for ''Pakistan or the Partition of India'']</ref> They are relegated to menial professions such as scavenging and carrying [[night soil]].<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://archive.indianexpress.com/news/dereserve-these-myths/12109/|title=Dereserve these myths - Indian Express|website=archive.indianexpress.com|language=en-gb|access-date=2017-09-30}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last1=Falahi|first1=Masood|title=Caste and caste based discrimination s Among Indian Muslims'|url=http://sas-space.sas.ac.uk/5664/1/AHRC_16,_Caste_and_Caste_Based_Discriminations_Among_Indian_Muslims.pdf|website=SAS|access-date=5 January 2015}}</ref> [[B.R. Ambedkar]], citing the Superintendent of the Census for 1901 for the Province of Bengal, mentions that the Ajlaf primarily include: * Cultivating Sheikhs, and others who were originally Hindus but who do not belong to any functional group, and have not gained admittance to the Ashraf Community, e.g. Pirali and Thakrai. * Darzi, Brahmin, Jolaha, Fakir, and Rangrez. * Barhi, Bhalhiara, Chik, Churihar, Dai, Dhawa, Dhunia, Gaddi, Kalal, Kasai, Kula Kunjara, Laheri, Mahifarosh, Mallah, Naliya, Nikari. * Abdal, Bako, Bediya, Bhal, Chamba, Dafali, Dhobi, Hajjam, Mucho, Nagarchi, Nal, Panwaria, Madaria, Tunlia. For the Arzal, the following castes are mentioned by the Superintendent of the Census: Bhanar, Halalkhor, Hijra, Kasbi, Lalbegi, Maugta, Mehtar.<ref>http://www.columbia.edu/itc/mealac/pritchett/00ambedkar/ambedkar_partition/410.html#part_2</ref> In [[Pakistan]], various social groups (called {{transl|ur|quoms}}) display a social stratification comparable to the Indian caste system. The various {{transl|ur|quoms}} differ widely in power, privilege and wealth. Both ethnic affiliation (e.g. [[Pashtuns|Pathan]], [[Sindhis|Sindhi]], [[Baloch people|Baloch]], [[Punjabis|Punjabi]], etc.) and membership of specific [[biraderi]]s or {{transl|ur|zaat/quoms}} are additional integral components of social identity.<ref name="barth">{{cite book | last = Barth | first = Fredrik | editor = E. R. Leach | title = The System Of Social Stratification In Swat, North Pakistan (Aspects of Caste in South India, Ceylon, and North-West Pakistan) | url= https://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=2995517 | publisher = Cambridge University Press | page = 113 | year = 1962 }}</ref> Within the bounds of endogamy defined by the above parameters, close [[cousin marriage|consanguineous unions]] are preferred due to a congruence of key features of group- and individual-level background factors as well as affinities. McKim Marriott adds that a social stratification that is hierarchical, closed, endogamous and hereditary is widely prevalent, particularly in western parts of Pakistan.<ref>{{cite journal|title=Ecologic Relationships of Ethnic Groups in Swat, North Pakistan|author=Fredrick Barth|journal=American Anthropologist|doi=10.1525/aa.1956.58.6.02a00080|volume=58|issue=6|pages=1079–1089|date=December 1956|doi-access=free}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|title=The New Wind: Changing Identities in South Asia (Editor: Kenneth David)|author=Zeyauddin Ahmed|pages=337–354|isbn=978-90-279-7959-9|publisher=Aldine Publishing Company|year=1977}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|title=Caste ranking and community structure in five regions of India and Pakistan|author=McKim Marriott|year=1960|publisher=Deccan College Postgraduate and Research Institute|oclc=186146571}}</ref> The numerically and socially influential tribes in Pakistani Punjab includes the agricultural tribes of [[Arain]], [[Awan (tribe)|Awan]], [[Jat Muslim]] and [[Gujjar]] as well as Rajput.<ref name="nihcr.edu.pk"/> In [[Nepal]], the castes of Muslims rank differs according to the criteria applied.<ref>{{cite book|title=Encyclopaedia of the World Muslims: Tribes, Castes and Communities, Volume 1|author=Nagendra Kr Singh, Abdul Mabud Khan|page=1124|publisher=Global Vision Pub House|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Zzfs_G7QHoAC&pg=PA1124|isbn=9788187746072|year=2001}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|title=Islamic Culture - Volume 52|page=207|author=Marmaduke William Pickthall, Muhammad Asad|year=1978}}</ref> In India the Ajlaf comprise of Qureshis, Ansaris, Saifis, and other groups of lower occupation. === Pakistani Punjab === In Pakistani Punjabi villages, there is a hierarchical division of two major caste based status groups: landowning castes, Zamindars, and service providing castes, Kammis. Zamindar Quoms and Kammi Quoms are distinct and rigid birth-ascribed status groups on the bases of their parentage occupations. Zamindars and Kammis are traditionally linked through the Seyp system (labor contract), in which Kammis are provided money, food, grains/crops, and favors in return for their services and labor. Zamindars are the dominant caste group, and they compete for leadership roles and control village affairs. Zamindar Quoms in Pakistani Punjab have had a monopolistic control over land against Kammi Quoms, and dominate political, economic, and social aspects of village life. Kammi Quoms are socially marginalized. Inter-Quom endogamy remains a strict divide between Zamindar and Kammi Quoms. Pakistani Punjabis associate the status of being a Zamindar with the possession of ancestral land and cultivation as the parentage occupation. In contemporary Pakistani Punjabi villages, "Zamindars" refer mostly to members of a landowning Quom involved in agriculture (Zamindari) as their occupation. Some Quoms, including Arains, are above the service providing castes but are not mostly given the landowning castes' status either. Caste endogamy is practiced in Pakistan and different Quoms generally do not inter-marry or at least generally do not prefer to marry out of the Quom. The caste endogamy between Zamindar and Kammi Quoms is an essential feature of the caste system in rural Pakistani Punjab. All the service providing, laborer, and artisan Quoms are grouped together as Kammis (for example, cobblers, carpenters, and barbers). Quoms form the Biradari system. A Kammi woman remarked how: {{quote|"Even if a Kammi acquires 100 acres of land, he remains Kammi and Zamindars will always consider him lower. A Zamindar who owns one acre of land would think "if a Kammi has bought 2 acres, so what after all he remains a Kammi". They do not accept us as equals."}} Quoms are an important factor in marriage practices. Different Zamindar Quoms sometimes intermarry, and this may form a Biradari. A large majority of Kammis are associated with low graded tasks or daily wage labour. In elections, people show loyalty to their Quoms. Local bodies' elections in Pakistani Punjab are purely on Biradari basis. Kammis are lesser in population than Zamindars. Kammis generally do not contest elections, including because contesting elections involves a lot of financial resources. A study in a Pakistani Punjabi village found that in the ''Seyp'' (contractual relationships) between a ''Zamindar'' (landholding) family and ''Kammi'' (artisan castes) families, Kammi families provide services and goods to the Zamindars in exchange for grain; the Kammi families also perform some other ritual and customary roles - for example, the barber cooks in the house of the Zamindar on special occasions and performs circumcision. == Discrimination == Over the centuries, like other South Asian societies, the Muslim society in the region has evolved into the concept of caste purity and pollution.{{sfn|Azra Khanam|2013|pp=120-121}}<ref name=":7">{{Cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=1O2kBgAAQBAJ&q=caste+purity+among+Muslims&pg=PT84 |title=The Migration Process: Capital, Gifts and Offerings among British Pakistanis |last1=Webner |first1=Pnina |date=2007 |access-date=30 October 2016|isbn=9781472518477 }}</ref> Hence, the low-class (''Ajlaf'') Muslims in the region have faced other kinds of discrimination. In 20th century India, the upper-class (''Ashraf'') Muslims dominated the government jobs and parliamentary representation. As a result, there have been campaigns to include lower social classes among the groups eligible for [[reservation in India|affirmative action in India]] under ''SC and STs provision act''.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.milligazette.com/Archives/2004/01-15Sep04-Print-Edition/011509200449.htm |title=On reservation for Muslims |author=Asghar Ali Engineer |work=The Milli Gazette |publisher=Pharos |access-date=2004-09-01 }}</ref> In [[Bihar]] state of India, cases have been reported in which the higher caste Muslims have opposed the burials of lower caste Muslims in the same graveyard.<ref name="rediff_burial">{{cite web |url=http://www.rediff.com/news/2003/mar/06bihar.htm |title=Backward Muslims protest denial of burial |author=Anand Mohan Sahay |publisher=[[Rediff.com]] |access-date=2003-03-06 }}</ref><ref>[https://s3.amazonaws.com/academia.edu.documents/37638134/Studies_in_Inequality_and_Social_Justice.pdf?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAIWOWYYGZ2Y53UL3A&Expires=1541194554&Signature=H2Izo6MfoI2%2Byg4B8zrBb1bJDTQ%3D&response-content-disposition=inline%3B%20filename%3DStudies_in_Inequality_and_Social_Justice.pdf#page=109 Ahmad, I., 2010. Can There Be a Category Called Dalit Muslims?. STUDIES IN INEQUALITY AND SOCIAL JUSTICE, p.79.]{{dead link|date=May 2021|bot=medic}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}}</ref> A study in a Pakistani village found that a caste-like hierarchy exists in the Muslim community of the village. The sweeper group is ranked the lowest. The other Muslim communities do not allow the sweepers to touch the cooking vessels of the upper ranking groups of Muslims.<ref name="Donnan1988">{{cite book|author=Hastings Donnan|title=Marriage Among Muslims: Preference and Choice in Northern Pakistan|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=PL_ACoFwJ2gC&pg=PR9|year=1988|publisher=BRILL|isbn=978-90-04-08416-2|pages=51–56}}</ref> An analysis of Muslim representation in India's Lok Sabha found that of the roughly 400 Muslim representatives from the 1st to the 14th Lok Sabha, 340 were Ashraf, while 60 were Pasmanda (meaning oppressed or marginalized); Pasmandas make up 85% of India's Muslim population and Ashrafs 15%.<ref name="ThePrint"/> Medieval Ashraf scholars mentioned that Muslims of Afghan, Iranian, Arab, and Central Asian origin were superior while local converts were inferior.<ref name = "Kanmony">{{cite book | title = Dalits and Tribes of India | page = 200 | year = 2010 | publisher = Mittal Publications | first = J. Cyril | last = Kanmony}}</ref> This was due not only to racial differences with local concerts generally being dark skinned and Ashrafs being lighter skinned, but also due to Ashraf being the dominant political elite, while the majority of Ajlaf were associated with ancestral professions as peasants and artisans which were looked down upon as inferior and demeaning.<ref name = "Kanmony"/> Based on classical literature, particularly the ''Fatawa-i-Jahandari'' written by Turkish scholar Ziauddin Barani, a leading courtier of Muhammad bin Tughlaq (Sultan of Delhi), caste divisions were recommended among Indian Muslims. Barani warned the Sultan not to educate the lowborn and that they are not allowed to mingle with the superior race.<ref name = "Kanmony"/> Historians and Urdu writers such as Masood Alam Falahi have discussed how condescension of Ashraf Muslims towards the lower caste and Dalit Muslims often masqueraded under conceptions of class and "''khandaani''" (family line) values among Muslims in Uttar Pradesh.<ref name = "Sanober">{{cite journal |title= The Identity of Language and the Language of Erasure: Urdu and the Racialized-Decastification of the "Backward Musalmaan" in India | first = Sanober | last = Umar | publisher = [[Brandeis University]] | page = 187}}</ref> Some scholars say that Ashraf Muslims are over-represented in government-run institutions for minorities (including Aligarh Muslim University).<ref name = "ThePrint">{{ cite web | url = https://theprint.in/opinion/indias-muslim-community-under-a-churn-85-backward-pasmandas-up-against-15-ashrafs/ | title = India's Muslim community under a churn: 85% backward Pasmandas up against 15% Ashrafs | publisher = Times of India | first = Khalid | last = Anis Ansari | date = 13 May 2019}}</ref> Another practice that has been noted includes the existence of separate burial grounds.<ref name="ThePrint" /> ==See also== {{Portal|Islam}} *[[Caste system among Indian Christians]] *[[Caste system in India]] *[[Islam in India]] *[[Pasmanda Muslim Mahaz]] *[[Social class in the United Kingdom]] *[[Social class in the United States]] == References == === Citations === {{reflist|30em}} === Bibliography === {{ref begin}} * {{cite book |author=Azra Khanam |title=Muslim Backward Classes: A Sociological Perspective |publisher=SAGE |year=2013 |isbn=9788132116509 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Sdz9AAAAQBAJ&pg=PA115 }} * {{cite book |author=Fredrik Barth |author-link=Fredrik Barth |editor=Edmund Leach |title=Aspects of Caste in South India, Ceylon and North-West Pakistan |publisher=CUP Archive |year=1960 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=OlU7AAAAIAAJ&pg=PA113 |isbn=9780521096645 }} * {{cite book |author=Ghaus Ansari |title=Muslim Caste in Uttar Pradesh: A Study of Culture Contact |publisher=Ethnographic and Folk Culture Society |year=1960 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=i0HRAAAAMAAJ |oclc=1104993 }} {{ref end}} ==Further reading== * {{cite book | last = Ahmad | first = Imtiaz | title = Caste and social stratification among Muslims in India | year = 1978 | publisher = Manohar | location = New Delhi | oclc = 5147249 }} * {{cite book | last = Ali | first = A.F. Imam | title = Changing Social Stratification in Rural Bangladesh |date=September 1993 | publisher = South Asia Books | isbn = 978-81-7169-267-5 }} * {{cite book | last = Sikand | first = Yoginder | title = Islam, Caste and Muslim Relations in India | year = 2004 | publisher = Global Media Publications | isbn = 978-81-88869-06-0 }} * {{cite journal | last = Ali | first = Syed |date=December 2002 | title = Collective and Elective Ethnicity: Caste Among Urban Muslims in India | journal = Sociological Forum | volume = 17 | issue = 4 | pages = 593–620 | issn = 0884-8971 | doi = 10.1023/A:1021077323866 | s2cid = 146701489 }} * {{cite journal | last = Ahmad | first = S. Shamim |author2=A. K. Chakravarti |date=January 1981 | title = Some regional characteristics of Muslim caste systems in India | journal = GeoJournal | volume =5 | issue = 1 | pages = 55–60 | issn = 0343-2521 | doi = 10.1007/BF00185243 | s2cid = 153606947 }} * {{cite journal | last = Berreman | first = Gerald D. |date=June 1972 | title = Social Categories and Social Interaction in Urban India | journal = American Anthropologist | volume =74 | issue = 3 | pages = 567–586 | issn = 0002-7294 | doi =10.1525/aa.1972.74.3.02a00220 | doi-access = free }} {{Segregation by type|state=collapsed}} {{Discrimination}} {{DEFAULTSORT:Caste System Among South Asian Muslims}} [[Category:Caste system in India|Muslims]] [[Category:Islam in India]] [[Category:Islam in Pakistan]] [[Category:Islam in South Asia]] [[Category:Islam in Nepal]] [[Category:Social class in India]] [[Category:Discrimination in India]] [[Category:Discrimination in Pakistan]] [[Category:Discrimination in Bangladesh]] [[Category:Discrimination in Nepal]] [[Category:Discrimination in Sri Lanka]] [[Category:Caste-related violence in India]] [[Category:Caste system in Nepal]] [[Category:Caste]]'
New page wikitext, after the edit (new_wikitext)
'== Syedism, Ashrafism, Biradarism, Zatism, and Divisions == Syedism (or Sayedism) is considered to be a system of social inequality among South Asian Muslims.<ref name = "ThePrint"/> Syedism involves the belief that Syeds have a more authentic grasp on Islam and all social and political matters.<ref name = "Patel"></ref> Zat is sometimes considered a broader category than Biradari. In Pakistani Punjab, being relatives is the main criterion to comprise a Biradari. {{see also|List of Muslim Other Backward Classes communities}} Ghaus Ansari (1960) named the following four broad categories of Muslim social divisions in India:{{sfn|Ghaus Ansari|1960|p=32-35}} *''Ashraf'', who claim foreign-origin descent. **e.g. , [[Mughal tribe|Mughal]], [[Sayyid]] *Converts from [[Forward caste|upper castes]] **e.g. [[Muslim Rajputs]], [[Gurjar|Gujjars]], [[Jat Muslim|Muslim Jat]] *Converts from other indan [[Tribes]] **e.g. [[Darzi]], [[Muslim Dhobi|Dhobi]], Mansoori, [[Muslim Gaddi|Gaddi]], [[Faqir (clan)|Faqir]], [[Hajjam]] (Nai), [[Julaha]], [[Kabaria]], [[Kumhar]], [[Kunjra]], [[Mirasi]], and [[Muslim Teli|Teli]] *Converts from [[untouchability|untouchable]] castes **e.g. [[Bhangi]] The non-Ashrafs are categorized as ''Ajlaf''. The untouchable Hindu converts are also categorized as ''Arzal'' ("degraded").<ref name="Ambedkar">{{cite book |last = Ambedkar |first = Bhimrao |author-link = B.R. Ambedkar |title = Pakistan or the Partition of India |publisher = Thackers Publishers }}</ref><ref name="Ambedkaronline">[http://www.columbia.edu/itc/mealac/pritchett/00ambedkar/ambedkar_partition/410.html Web resource for ''Pakistan or the Partition of India'']</ref> They are relegated to menial professions such as scavenging and carrying [[night soil]].<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://archive.indianexpress.com/news/dereserve-these-myths/12109/|title=Dereserve these myths - Indian Express|website=archive.indianexpress.com|language=en-gb|access-date=2017-09-30}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last1=Falahi|first1=Masood|title=Caste and caste based discrimination s Among Indian Muslims'|url=http://sas-space.sas.ac.uk/5664/1/AHRC_16,_Caste_and_Caste_Based_Discriminations_Among_Indian_Muslims.pdf|website=SAS|access-date=5 January 2015}}</ref> [[B.R. Ambedkar]], citing the Superintendent of the Census for 1901 for the Province of Bengal, mentions that the Ajlaf primarily include: * Cultivating Sheikhs, and others who were originally Hindus but who do not belong to any functional group, and have not gained admittance to the Ashraf Community, e.g. Pirali and Thakrai. * Darzi, Brahmin, Jolaha, Fakir, and Rangrez. * Barhi, Bhalhiara, Chik, Churihar, Dai, Dhawa, Dhunia, Gaddi, Kalal, Kasai, Kula Kunjara, Laheri, Mahifarosh, Mallah, Naliya, Nikari. * Abdal, Bako, Bediya, Bhal, Chamba, Dafali, Dhobi, Hajjam, Mucho, Nagarchi, Nal, Panwaria, Madaria, Tunlia. For the Arzal, the following castes are mentioned by the Superintendent of the Census: Bhanar, Halalkhor, Hijra, Kasbi, Lalbegi, Maugta, Mehtar.<ref>http://www.columbia.edu/itc/mealac/pritchett/00ambedkar/ambedkar_partition/410.html#part_2</ref> In [[Pakistan]], various social groups (called {{transl|ur|quoms}}) display a social stratification comparable to the Indian caste system. The various {{transl|ur|quoms}} differ widely in power, privilege and wealth. Both ethnic affiliation (e.g. [[Pashtuns|Pathan]], [[Sindhis|Sindhi]], [[Baloch people|Baloch]], [[Punjabis|Punjabi]], etc.) and membership of specific [[biraderi]]s or {{transl|ur|zaat/quoms}} are additional integral components of social identity.<ref name="barth">{{cite book | last = Barth | first = Fredrik | editor = E. R. Leach | title = The System Of Social Stratification In Swat, North Pakistan (Aspects of Caste in South India, Ceylon, and North-West Pakistan) | url= https://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=2995517 | publisher = Cambridge University Press | page = 113 | year = 1962 }}</ref> Within the bounds of endogamy defined by the above parameters, close [[cousin marriage|consanguineous unions]] are preferred due to a congruence of key features of group- and individual-level background factors as well as affinities. McKim Marriott adds that a social stratification that is hierarchical, closed, endogamous and hereditary is widely prevalent, particularly in western parts of Pakistan.<ref>{{cite journal|title=Ecologic Relationships of Ethnic Groups in Swat, North Pakistan|author=Fredrick Barth|journal=American Anthropologist|doi=10.1525/aa.1956.58.6.02a00080|volume=58|issue=6|pages=1079–1089|date=December 1956|doi-access=free}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|title=The New Wind: Changing Identities in South Asia (Editor: Kenneth David)|author=Zeyauddin Ahmed|pages=337–354|isbn=978-90-279-7959-9|publisher=Aldine Publishing Company|year=1977}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|title=Caste ranking and community structure in five regions of India and Pakistan|author=McKim Marriott|year=1960|publisher=Deccan College Postgraduate and Research Institute|oclc=186146571}}</ref> The numerically and socially influential tribes in Pakistani Punjab includes the agricultural tribes of [[Arain]], [[Awan (tribe)|Awan]], [[Jat Muslim]] and [[Gujjar]] as well as Rajput.<ref name="nihcr.edu.pk"/> In [[Nepal]], the castes of Muslims rank differs according to the criteria applied.<ref>{{cite book|title=Encyclopaedia of the World Muslims: Tribes, Castes and Communities, Volume 1|author=Nagendra Kr Singh, Abdul Mabud Khan|page=1124|publisher=Global Vision Pub House|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Zzfs_G7QHoAC&pg=PA1124|isbn=9788187746072|year=2001}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|title=Islamic Culture - Volume 52|page=207|author=Marmaduke William Pickthall, Muhammad Asad|year=1978}}</ref> In India the Ajlaf comprise of Qureshis, Ansaris, Saifis, and other groups of lower occupation. === Pakistani Punjab === In Pakistani Punjabi villages, there is a hierarchical division of two major caste based status groups: landowning castes, Zamindars, and service providing castes, Kammis. Zamindar Quoms and Kammi Quoms are distinct and rigid birth-ascribed status groups on the bases of their parentage occupations. Zamindars and Kammis are traditionally linked through the Seyp system (labor contract), in which Kammis are provided money, food, grains/crops, and favors in return for their services and labor. Zamindars are the dominant caste group, and they compete for leadership roles and control village affairs. Zamindar Quoms in Pakistani Punjab have had a monopolistic control over land against Kammi Quoms, and dominate political, economic, and social aspects of village life. Kammi Quoms are socially marginalized. Inter-Quom endogamy remains a strict divide between Zamindar and Kammi Quoms. Pakistani Punjabis associate the status of being a Zamindar with the possession of ancestral land and cultivation as the parentage occupation. In contemporary Pakistani Punjabi villages, "Zamindars" refer mostly to members of a landowning Quom involved in agriculture (Zamindari) as their occupation. Some Quoms, including Arains, are above the service providing castes but are not mostly given the landowning castes' status either. Caste endogamy is practiced in Pakistan and different Quoms generally do not inter-marry or at least generally do not prefer to marry out of the Quom. The caste endogamy between Zamindar and Kammi Quoms is an essential feature of the caste system in rural Pakistani Punjab. All the service providing, laborer, and artisan Quoms are grouped together as Kammis (for example, cobblers, carpenters, and barbers). Quoms form the Biradari system. A Kammi woman remarked how: {{quote|"Even if a Kammi acquires 100 acres of land, he remains Kammi and Zamindars will always consider him lower. A Zamindar who owns one acre of land would think "if a Kammi has bought 2 acres, so what after all he remains a Kammi". They do not accept us as equals."}} Quoms are an important factor in marriage practices. Different Zamindar Quoms sometimes intermarry, and this may form a Biradari. A large majority of Kammis are associated with low graded tasks or daily wage labour. In elections, people show loyalty to their Quoms. Local bodies' elections in Pakistani Punjab are purely on Biradari basis. Kammis are lesser in population than Zamindars. Kammis generally do not contest elections, including because contesting elections involves a lot of financial resources. A study in a Pakistani Punjabi village found that in the ''Seyp'' (contractual relationships) between a ''Zamindar'' (landholding) family and ''Kammi'' (artisan castes) families, Kammi families provide services and goods to the Zamindars in exchange for grain; the Kammi families also perform some other ritual and customary roles - for example, the barber cooks in the house of the Zamindar on special occasions and performs circumcision. == Discrimination == Over the centuries, like other South Asian societies, the Muslim society in the region has evolved into the concept of caste purity and pollution.{{sfn|Azra Khanam|2013|pp=120-121}}<ref name=":7">{{Cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=1O2kBgAAQBAJ&q=caste+purity+among+Muslims&pg=PT84 |title=The Migration Process: Capital, Gifts and Offerings among British Pakistanis |last1=Webner |first1=Pnina |date=2007 |access-date=30 October 2016|isbn=9781472518477 }}</ref> Hence, the low-class (''Ajlaf'') Muslims in the region have faced other kinds of discrimination. In 20th century India, the upper-class (''Ashraf'') Muslims dominated the government jobs and parliamentary representation. As a result, there have been campaigns to include lower social classes among the groups eligible for [[reservation in India|affirmative action in India]] under ''SC and STs provision act''.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.milligazette.com/Archives/2004/01-15Sep04-Print-Edition/011509200449.htm |title=On reservation for Muslims |author=Asghar Ali Engineer |work=The Milli Gazette |publisher=Pharos |access-date=2004-09-01 }}</ref> In [[Bihar]] state of India, cases have been reported in which the higher caste Muslims have opposed the burials of lower caste Muslims in the same graveyard.<ref name="rediff_burial">{{cite web |url=http://www.rediff.com/news/2003/mar/06bihar.htm |title=Backward Muslims protest denial of burial |author=Anand Mohan Sahay |publisher=[[Rediff.com]] |access-date=2003-03-06 }}</ref><ref>[https://s3.amazonaws.com/academia.edu.documents/37638134/Studies_in_Inequality_and_Social_Justice.pdf?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAIWOWYYGZ2Y53UL3A&Expires=1541194554&Signature=H2Izo6MfoI2%2Byg4B8zrBb1bJDTQ%3D&response-content-disposition=inline%3B%20filename%3DStudies_in_Inequality_and_Social_Justice.pdf#page=109 Ahmad, I., 2010. Can There Be a Category Called Dalit Muslims?. STUDIES IN INEQUALITY AND SOCIAL JUSTICE, p.79.]{{dead link|date=May 2021|bot=medic}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}}</ref> A study in a Pakistani village found that a caste-like hierarchy exists in the Muslim community of the village. The sweeper group is ranked the lowest. The other Muslim communities do not allow the sweepers to touch the cooking vessels of the upper ranking groups of Muslims.<ref name="Donnan1988">{{cite book|author=Hastings Donnan|title=Marriage Among Muslims: Preference and Choice in Northern Pakistan|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=PL_ACoFwJ2gC&pg=PR9|year=1988|publisher=BRILL|isbn=978-90-04-08416-2|pages=51–56}}</ref> An analysis of Muslim representation in India's Lok Sabha found that of the roughly 400 Muslim representatives from the 1st to the 14th Lok Sabha, 340 were Ashraf, while 60 were Pasmanda (meaning oppressed or marginalized); Pasmandas make up 85% of India's Muslim population and Ashrafs 15%.<ref name="ThePrint"/> Medieval Ashraf scholars mentioned that Muslims of Afghan, Iranian, Arab, and Central Asian origin were superior while local converts were inferior.<ref name = "Kanmony">{{cite book | title = Dalits and Tribes of India | page = 200 | year = 2010 | publisher = Mittal Publications | first = J. Cyril | last = Kanmony}}</ref> This was due not only to racial differences with local concerts generally being dark skinned and Ashrafs being lighter skinned, but also due to Ashraf being the dominant political elite, while the majority of Ajlaf were associated with ancestral professions as peasants and artisans which were looked down upon as inferior and demeaning.<ref name = "Kanmony"/> Based on classical literature, particularly the ''Fatawa-i-Jahandari'' written by Turkish scholar Ziauddin Barani, a leading courtier of Muhammad bin Tughlaq (Sultan of Delhi), caste divisions were recommended among Indian Muslims. Barani warned the Sultan not to educate the lowborn and that they are not allowed to mingle with the superior race.<ref name = "Kanmony"/> Historians and Urdu writers such as Masood Alam Falahi have discussed how condescension of Ashraf Muslims towards the lower caste and Dalit Muslims often masqueraded under conceptions of class and "''khandaani''" (family line) values among Muslims in Uttar Pradesh.<ref name = "Sanober">{{cite journal |title= The Identity of Language and the Language of Erasure: Urdu and the Racialized-Decastification of the "Backward Musalmaan" in India | first = Sanober | last = Umar | publisher = [[Brandeis University]] | page = 187}}</ref> Some scholars say that Ashraf Muslims are over-represented in government-run institutions for minorities (including Aligarh Muslim University).<ref name = "ThePrint">{{ cite web | url = https://theprint.in/opinion/indias-muslim-community-under-a-churn-85-backward-pasmandas-up-against-15-ashrafs/ | title = India's Muslim community under a churn: 85% backward Pasmandas up against 15% Ashrafs | publisher = Times of India | first = Khalid | last = Anis Ansari | date = 13 May 2019}}</ref> Another practice that has been noted includes the existence of separate burial grounds.<ref name="ThePrint" /> ==See also== {{Portal|Islam}} *[[Caste system among Indian Christians]] *[[Caste system in India]] *[[Islam in India]] *[[Pasmanda Muslim Mahaz]] *[[Social class in the United Kingdom]] *[[Social class in the United States]] == References == === Citations === {{reflist|30em}} === Bibliography === {{ref begin}} * {{cite book |author=Azra Khanam |title=Muslim Backward Classes: A Sociological Perspective |publisher=SAGE |year=2013 |isbn=9788132116509 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Sdz9AAAAQBAJ&pg=PA115 }} * {{cite book |author=Fredrik Barth |author-link=Fredrik Barth |editor=Edmund Leach |title=Aspects of Caste in South India, Ceylon and North-West Pakistan |publisher=CUP Archive |year=1960 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=OlU7AAAAIAAJ&pg=PA113 |isbn=9780521096645 }} * {{cite book |author=Ghaus Ansari |title=Muslim Caste in Uttar Pradesh: A Study of Culture Contact |publisher=Ethnographic and Folk Culture Society |year=1960 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=i0HRAAAAMAAJ |oclc=1104993 }} {{ref end}} ==Further reading== * {{cite book | last = Ahmad | first = Imtiaz | title = Caste and social stratification among Muslims in India | year = 1978 | publisher = Manohar | location = New Delhi | oclc = 5147249 }} * {{cite book | last = Ali | first = A.F. Imam | title = Changing Social Stratification in Rural Bangladesh |date=September 1993 | publisher = South Asia Books | isbn = 978-81-7169-267-5 }} * {{cite book | last = Sikand | first = Yoginder | title = Islam, Caste and Muslim Relations in India | year = 2004 | publisher = Global Media Publications | isbn = 978-81-88869-06-0 }} * {{cite journal | last = Ali | first = Syed |date=December 2002 | title = Collective and Elective Ethnicity: Caste Among Urban Muslims in India | journal = Sociological Forum | volume = 17 | issue = 4 | pages = 593–620 | issn = 0884-8971 | doi = 10.1023/A:1021077323866 | s2cid = 146701489 }} * {{cite journal | last = Ahmad | first = S. Shamim |author2=A. K. Chakravarti |date=January 1981 | title = Some regional characteristics of Muslim caste systems in India | journal = GeoJournal | volume =5 | issue = 1 | pages = 55–60 | issn = 0343-2521 | doi = 10.1007/BF00185243 | s2cid = 153606947 }} * {{cite journal | last = Berreman | first = Gerald D. |date=June 1972 | title = Social Categories and Social Interaction in Urban India | journal = American Anthropologist | volume =74 | issue = 3 | pages = 567–586 | issn = 0002-7294 | doi =10.1525/aa.1972.74.3.02a00220 | doi-access = free }} {{Segregation by type|state=collapsed}} {{Discrimination}} {{DEFAULTSORT:Caste System Among South Asian Muslims}} [[Category:Caste system in India|Muslims]] [[Category:Islam in India]] [[Category:Islam in Pakistan]] [[Category:Islam in South Asia]] [[Category:Islam in Nepal]] [[Category:Social class in India]] [[Category:Discrimination in India]] [[Category:Discrimination in Pakistan]] [[Category:Discrimination in Bangladesh]] [[Category:Discrimination in Nepal]] [[Category:Discrimination in Sri Lanka]] [[Category:Caste-related violence in India]] [[Category:Caste system in Nepal]] [[Category:Caste]]'
Unified diff of changes made by edit (edit_diff)
'@@ -1,35 +1,2 @@ -== Historical development == - -[[Islam]] does not recognize any castes,{{sfn|Ghaus Ansari|1960|p=27}} but, when it came to [[Muslim conquest of Persia|Persia]] and India, the existing divisions in these regions were adopted among the local Muslim societies. Evidence of social stratification can be found in several later Persian works, such as ''[[Siyasatnama]]'' of [[Nizam al-Mulk]] (11th century), ''[[Akhlaq-i Nasiri]]'' of [[Nasir al-Din al-Tusi]] (13th century), and ''Jam-i-Mufidi'' (17th century).{{sfn|Ghaus Ansari|1960|p=29}} - -The Muslims who came to the subcontinent during the 12th century [[Muslim conquests on the Indian subcontinent]] were already divided into social classes such as priests, nobles and others. Further, a racial segregation demarcated the local Muslim converts from foreign origin Muslims. The foreigners claimed a superior status as they were associated with the conquerors, and categorized themselves as [[Ashraf]] ("noble").{{sfn|Ghaus Ansari|1960|p=30}} Over time, the Indian Muslim society also split on the basis of the existing [[Hindu caste system]].{{sfn|Ghaus Ansari|1960|p=30}} According to [[M. N. Srinivas]] (1986) and R.K. Bhattacharya, Indian Hindu converts to Islam brought their original caste system to the Muslim society in the region.{{sfn|Azra Khanam|2013|pp=116}} On the other hand, [[Louis Dumont]] (1957) believes that the Islamic conquerors consciously adopted the Hindu caste system "as a compromise which they had to make in a predominantly Hindu environment."{{sfn|Azra Khanam|2013|pp=115-116}} - -[[Ziauddin Barani]], a 14th century political thinker of the [[Delhi Sultanate]], recommended that the "sons of Mohamed" (i.e. Ashrafs) be given a higher social status than the low-born (i.e. Ajlaf). His most significant contribution in the [[fatwa]] was his analysis of the castes with respect to Islam. His assertion was that castes would be mandated through state laws or "Zawabi" and would carry precedence over [[Sharia]] law whenever they were in conflict. According to Barani, every act which is "contaminated with meanness and based on ignominity, comes elegantly [from the Ajlaf]". Barani also developed an elaborate system of promotion and demotion of Imperial officers ("[[Vizier|Wazirs]]") that was primarily based on their caste.<ref name="Das">Das, Arbind, Arthashastra of Kautilya and Fatwa-i-Jahandari of Ziauddin Barrani: an analysis, Pratibha Publications, Delhi 1996, {{ISBN|81-85268-45-2}} pp. 124-143</ref><ref>{{citation |last=Sikand |first=Yoginder |title=Sacred Spaces: Exploring Traditions of Shared Faith in India |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=RBkwnoDPKgUC&pg=PA7 |year=2003 |publisher=Penguin Books India |isbn=978-0-14-302931-1 |pages=7–}}</ref> - -Historically, many Muslims from the julaha or weaver caste began to identify as "Ansaris", the butchers as "Quereshis", and the sanitation and ''bishti'' caste Muslims as "Sheikh".<ref name="Sanober"/> - -A justification for South Asian Muslim caste practices can be found in the concept of ''kafa'a/kufu'', which is invoked by ''ulama'' in support of endogamy. - -=== Ashrafization and Syedization === - -Ashrafization is considered to be social climbing attempts by groups or individuals through hypergamy and adopting higher Muslim classes' ways of life. - -=== History of research === - -There are various definitions of the term "caste", and therefore, various opinions on whether this term can be used to denote social stratification among non-Hindu communities. Ghaus Ansari (1960) uses the term "caste" to describe the Muslim social groups with following characteristics:[[endogamy]] within a given social group, hierarchical gradation of social groups, determination of the group membership by birth, and, in some cases, association of an occupation with the social group.{{sfn|Ghaus Ansari|1960|p=22}} - -Beginning in the 19th century, the [[British India|British]] scholars of India first catalogued the various Muslim castes:{{sfn|Ghaus Ansari|1960|p=22}} - -* [[Henry Miers Elliot]]'s ''Supplement to the glossary of Indian terms'' (1844), later amplied into ''Memoirs on the history, folk-lore, and distribution of the Races of the North Western Provinces of India'' -* John Charles Williams's ''The Report on the Census of Oudh'' (1869) -* [[Denzil Ibbetson]]'s Census Report of Punjab (1883), later adapted into ''[[Panjab Castes]]'' -* [[John Nesfield]]'s ''Brief View of the Caste System of the North-Western Provinces and Oudh'' (1885) -* [[Herbert Hope Risley]]'s ''Tribes and castes of Bengal'' (1893) -* [[William Crooke]]'s ''The tribes and castes of the North-western Provinces and Oudh'' (1896) - -Nelson's book, in particular, included a whole chapter dedicated to the Muslim castes. In the 20th century British India, a number of works included the Muslim social groups in their descriptions of the Indian castes. These included [[H. A. Rose]]'s ''[[A Glossary of the Tribes and Castes of the Punjab and North-West Frontier Province]]'' (1911).{{sfn|Ghaus Ansari|1960|p=2}} - -In independent India, Ghaus Ansari (1960) initiated academic discussion over the Muslim caste system. Subsequently, Imtiaz Ahmed elaborated the topic in his ''Caste and Social Stratification among the Muslims'' (1973).{{sfn|Azra Khanam|2013|p=115}} - == Syedism, Ashrafism, Biradarism, Zatism, and Divisions == '
New page size (new_size)
17122
Old page size (old_size)
22398
Size change in edit (edit_delta)
-5276
Lines added in edit (added_lines)
[]
Lines removed in edit (removed_lines)
[ 0 => '== Historical development ==', 1 => '', 2 => '[[Islam]] does not recognize any castes,{{sfn|Ghaus Ansari|1960|p=27}} but, when it came to [[Muslim conquest of Persia|Persia]] and India, the existing divisions in these regions were adopted among the local Muslim societies. Evidence of social stratification can be found in several later Persian works, such as ''[[Siyasatnama]]'' of [[Nizam al-Mulk]] (11th century), ''[[Akhlaq-i Nasiri]]'' of [[Nasir al-Din al-Tusi]] (13th century), and ''Jam-i-Mufidi'' (17th century).{{sfn|Ghaus Ansari|1960|p=29}}', 3 => '', 4 => 'The Muslims who came to the subcontinent during the 12th century [[Muslim conquests on the Indian subcontinent]] were already divided into social classes such as priests, nobles and others. Further, a racial segregation demarcated the local Muslim converts from foreign origin Muslims. The foreigners claimed a superior status as they were associated with the conquerors, and categorized themselves as [[Ashraf]] ("noble").{{sfn|Ghaus Ansari|1960|p=30}} Over time, the Indian Muslim society also split on the basis of the existing [[Hindu caste system]].{{sfn|Ghaus Ansari|1960|p=30}} According to [[M. N. Srinivas]] (1986) and R.K. Bhattacharya, Indian Hindu converts to Islam brought their original caste system to the Muslim society in the region.{{sfn|Azra Khanam|2013|pp=116}} On the other hand, [[Louis Dumont]] (1957) believes that the Islamic conquerors consciously adopted the Hindu caste system "as a compromise which they had to make in a predominantly Hindu environment."{{sfn|Azra Khanam|2013|pp=115-116}}', 5 => '', 6 => '[[Ziauddin Barani]], a 14th century political thinker of the [[Delhi Sultanate]], recommended that the "sons of Mohamed" (i.e. Ashrafs) be given a higher social status than the low-born (i.e. Ajlaf). His most significant contribution in the [[fatwa]] was his analysis of the castes with respect to Islam. His assertion was that castes would be mandated through state laws or "Zawabi" and would carry precedence over [[Sharia]] law whenever they were in conflict. According to Barani, every act which is "contaminated with meanness and based on ignominity, comes elegantly [from the Ajlaf]". Barani also developed an elaborate system of promotion and demotion of Imperial officers ("[[Vizier|Wazirs]]") that was primarily based on their caste.<ref name="Das">Das, Arbind, Arthashastra of Kautilya and Fatwa-i-Jahandari of Ziauddin Barrani: an analysis, Pratibha Publications, Delhi 1996, {{ISBN|81-85268-45-2}} pp. 124-143</ref><ref>{{citation |last=Sikand |first=Yoginder |title=Sacred Spaces: Exploring Traditions of Shared Faith in India |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=RBkwnoDPKgUC&pg=PA7 |year=2003 |publisher=Penguin Books India |isbn=978-0-14-302931-1 |pages=7–}}</ref>', 7 => '', 8 => 'Historically, many Muslims from the julaha or weaver caste began to identify as "Ansaris", the butchers as "Quereshis", and the sanitation and ''bishti'' caste Muslims as "Sheikh".<ref name="Sanober"/>', 9 => '', 10 => 'A justification for South Asian Muslim caste practices can be found in the concept of ''kafa'a/kufu'', which is invoked by ''ulama'' in support of endogamy.', 11 => '', 12 => '=== Ashrafization and Syedization ===', 13 => '', 14 => 'Ashrafization is considered to be social climbing attempts by groups or individuals through hypergamy and adopting higher Muslim classes' ways of life. ', 15 => '', 16 => '=== History of research ===', 17 => '', 18 => 'There are various definitions of the term "caste", and therefore, various opinions on whether this term can be used to denote social stratification among non-Hindu communities. Ghaus Ansari (1960) uses the term "caste" to describe the Muslim social groups with following characteristics:[[endogamy]] within a given social group, hierarchical gradation of social groups, determination of the group membership by birth, and, in some cases, association of an occupation with the social group.{{sfn|Ghaus Ansari|1960|p=22}}', 19 => '', 20 => 'Beginning in the 19th century, the [[British India|British]] scholars of India first catalogued the various Muslim castes:{{sfn|Ghaus Ansari|1960|p=22}}', 21 => '', 22 => '* [[Henry Miers Elliot]]'s ''Supplement to the glossary of Indian terms'' (1844), later amplied into ''Memoirs on the history, folk-lore, and distribution of the Races of the North Western Provinces of India''', 23 => '* John Charles Williams's ''The Report on the Census of Oudh'' (1869)', 24 => '* [[Denzil Ibbetson]]'s Census Report of Punjab (1883), later adapted into ''[[Panjab Castes]]''', 25 => '* [[John Nesfield]]'s ''Brief View of the Caste System of the North-Western Provinces and Oudh'' (1885)', 26 => '* [[Herbert Hope Risley]]'s ''Tribes and castes of Bengal'' (1893)', 27 => '* [[William Crooke]]'s ''The tribes and castes of the North-western Provinces and Oudh'' (1896)', 28 => '', 29 => 'Nelson's book, in particular, included a whole chapter dedicated to the Muslim castes. In the 20th century British India, a number of works included the Muslim social groups in their descriptions of the Indian castes. These included [[H. A. Rose]]'s ''[[A Glossary of the Tribes and Castes of the Punjab and North-West Frontier Province]]'' (1911).{{sfn|Ghaus Ansari|1960|p=2}}', 30 => '', 31 => 'In independent India, Ghaus Ansari (1960) initiated academic discussion over the Muslim caste system. Subsequently, Imtiaz Ahmed elaborated the topic in his ''Caste and Social Stratification among the Muslims'' (1973).{{sfn|Azra Khanam|2013|p=115}}', 32 => '' ]
Whether or not the change was made through a Tor exit node (tor_exit_node)
false
Unix timestamp of change (timestamp)
1627652294