Jump to content

Edit filter log

Details for log entry 34730391

00:17, 26 March 2023: IRTHEORY2021 (talk | contribs) triggered filter 1,188, performing the action "edit" on Giedroyc Doctrine. Actions taken: none; Filter description: Ukraine/Russia logging (examine | diff)

Changes made in edit



The doctrine has been questioned by some commentators and politicians, particularly in the 21st century,<ref name=spw/> and it has been suggested that in recent years the doctrine has been abandoned by the [[Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Poland)|Polish Foreign Ministry]].<ref name=liberteworld/> Others, however, argue that the policy remains in force and is endorsed by the Polish Foreign Ministry.<ref name=lit/><ref>[http://www.new.org.pl/files/docs/new110.pdf "''O Giedroycia sporu nie ma. Rozmowa z Radosławem Sikorskim''"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111106055715/http://www.new.org.pl/files/docs/new110.pdf |date=2011-11-06 }}, ''Nowa Europa Wschodnia'' 1/2010, pp. 69–77.</ref>
The doctrine has been questioned by some commentators and politicians, particularly in the 21st century,<ref name=spw/> and it has been suggested that in recent years the doctrine has been abandoned by the [[Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Poland)|Polish Foreign Ministry]].<ref name=liberteworld/> Others, however, argue that the policy remains in force and is endorsed by the Polish Foreign Ministry.<ref name=lit/><ref>[http://www.new.org.pl/files/docs/new110.pdf "''O Giedroycia sporu nie ma. Rozmowa z Radosławem Sikorskim''"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111106055715/http://www.new.org.pl/files/docs/new110.pdf |date=2011-11-06 }}, ''Nowa Europa Wschodnia'' 1/2010, pp. 69–77.</ref>
Pietrzak argues that "Although Giedroyć and Mieroszewski were idealistic, and they were very often criticized for the naïve character of their ideas, they were proven right, for they managed to inadvertently shape the future of the region and encourage most of the countries that border Russia to be more proactive in doing their utmost to preventing a domino effect in Eastern Europe – for Russia clearly attempted to implement a Sudetenland-type scenario in Ukraine in 2022"<ref>Piotr Pietrzak (2023, February 3). The Giedroyć-Mieroszewski Doctrine and Poland’s Response to Russia’s Assault on Ukraine. Modern Diplomacy. https://moderndiplomacy.eu/2023/02/03/the-giedroyc-mieroszewski-doctrine-and-polands-response-to-russias-assault-on-ukraine/</ref>.


==See also==
==See also==

Action parameters

VariableValue
Edit count of the user (user_editcount)
0
Name of the user account (user_name)
'IRTHEORY2021'
Age of the user account (user_age)
242
Groups (including implicit) the user is in (user_groups)
[ 0 => '*', 1 => 'user' ]
Rights that the user has (user_rights)
[ 0 => 'createaccount', 1 => 'read', 2 => 'edit', 3 => 'createtalk', 4 => 'writeapi', 5 => 'viewmywatchlist', 6 => 'editmywatchlist', 7 => 'viewmyprivateinfo', 8 => 'editmyprivateinfo', 9 => 'editmyoptions', 10 => 'abusefilter-log-detail', 11 => 'urlshortener-create-url', 12 => 'centralauth-merge', 13 => 'abusefilter-view', 14 => 'abusefilter-log', 15 => 'vipsscaler-test', 16 => 'collectionsaveasuserpage', 17 => 'reupload-own', 18 => 'move-rootuserpages', 19 => 'createpage', 20 => 'minoredit', 21 => 'editmyusercss', 22 => 'editmyuserjson', 23 => 'editmyuserjs', 24 => 'purge', 25 => 'sendemail', 26 => 'applychangetags', 27 => 'spamblacklistlog', 28 => 'mwoauthmanagemygrants' ]
Whether the user is editing from mobile app (user_app)
false
Whether or not a user is editing through the mobile interface (user_mobile)
false
Page ID (page_id)
38740322
Page namespace (page_namespace)
0
Page title without namespace (page_title)
'Giedroyc Doctrine'
Full page title (page_prefixedtitle)
'Giedroyc Doctrine'
Edit protection level of the page (page_restrictions_edit)
[]
Last ten users to contribute to the page (page_recent_contributors)
[ 0 => 'Citation bot', 1 => 'InternetArchiveBot', 2 => 'HorCrux48', 3 => 'GreenC bot', 4 => 'Samf4u', 5 => '2600:1001:B11D:3365:B802:5707:76F3:3887', 6 => '2600:1001:B10B:4401:61E0:A41A:95B9:F3F8', 7 => '188.176.129.120', 8 => 'Poeticbent', 9 => 'Piotrus' ]
Page age in seconds (page_age)
317140853
Action (action)
'edit'
Edit summary/reason (summary)
'/* History */ '
Old content model (old_content_model)
'wikitext'
New content model (new_content_model)
'wikitext'
Old page wikitext, before the edit (old_wikitext)
'[[File:Jerzy Giedroyc 1997.jpg|thumbnail|[[Jerzy Giedroyc]] (Maisons-Laffitte, 1997)]] The '''Giedroyc doctrine''' ({{IPA-pl|ˈɡʲɛdrɔjt͡s|pron}}; {{lang-pl|doktryna Giedroycia}}) or ''' Giedroyc–Mieroszewski doctrine ''' was a [[political doctrine]] that urged reconciliation among [[Central and Eastern Europe]]an countries. It was developed by postwar Polish [[émigré]]s, and was named for [[Jerzy Giedroyc]], a Polish émigré publicist, with significant contributions by [[Juliusz Mieroszewski]] for whom it is also sometimes named. ==History== Giedroyc developed the doctrine in the 1970s in the journal ''[[Kultura]]'' with [[Juliusz Mieroszewski]] (the doctrine is sometimes called the Giedroyc-Mieroszewski doctrine<ref name=lit>Živilė Dambrauskaitė, Tomas Janeliūnas, Vytis Jurkonis, Vytautas Sirijos Gira, ''[http://lfpr.lt/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/LFPR-26-Dambrauskaite-el-al.pdf Lithuanian – Polish Relations Reconsidered: A Constrained Bilateral Agenda or an Empty Strategic Partnership?]'' pp. 126–27 online, direct PDF download.</ref><ref>{{cite web|author=Nazwa * |url=http://www.przeglad-tygodnik.pl/pl/artykul/do-uczniow-giedroycia |title=Do uczniów Giedroycia &#124; Tygodnik "Przegląd" |publisher=Przeglad-tygodnik.pl |date= |accessdate=2013-03-07}}</ref>) and other émigrés of the "[[Maisons-Laffitte]] group".<ref name=lit/><ref name="Szczerbiak2012">{{cite book|author=Aleks Szczerbiak|title=Poland within the European Union: New Awkward Partner or New Heart of Europe?|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=wACSxUX-wZAC&pg=PA1904|accessdate=7 March 2013|date=23 April 2012|publisher=CRC Press|isbn=978-1-134-17902-2|pages=1904–1905}}</ref><ref name=spw>Piotr A. Maciążek, [https://web.archive.org/web/20171228112314/http://politykawschodnia.pl/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/S%C5%82ownik-Polityki-Wschodniej1.pdf Słownik Polityki Wschodniej]. Polityka Wschodnia, 2011</ref><ref name=liberteworld>{{cite web|url=http://liberteworld.com/2011/03/08/the-giedroyc-era-ended-in-foreign-policy/ |title=The Giedroyc era ended in foreign policy |publisher=Liberte World |date=2011-03-08 |accessdate=2013-03-07}}</ref><ref name="Lorek2009"/> The doctrine can be traced to the interwar [[Prometheism|Prometheist]] project of [[Józef Piłsudski]].<ref name="Lorek2009">{{cite book|author=Andreas Lorek|title=Poland's Role in the Development of an 'Eastern Dimension' of the European Union|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=lsmgmbbKD9MC&pg=PA23|accessdate=7 March 2013|date=February 2009|publisher=GRIN Verlag|isbn=978-3-640-25671-6|pages=23–24}}</ref> The doctrine urged the need to rebuild good relations among [[East Central Europe|East-Central]] and [[Eastern European|East European]] countries. The doctrine also claimed that the preservation of independence by the new post-Soviet states that lie between Poland and the Russian Federation is a fundamental Polish long-term interest.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Wesley |first1=Michael |last2=Rodkiewicz |first2=Witold |title=Global Allies: Comparing US Alliances in the 21st Century |date=2017 |publisher=ANU Press |page=134 |jstor=j.ctt1sq5twz |isbn=9781760461171 |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1sq5twz |access-date=20 June 2022}}</ref> This called for Poland to reject any imperial ambitions and controversial territorial claims, and to accept the postwar border changes.<ref name="Szczerbiak2012"/><ref name=liberteworld/><ref name="Lorek2009"/> The doctrine supported independence for [[Belarus]] and [[Ukraine]].<ref name="Szczerbiak2012"/> It also advocated treating all East European countries as equal in importance to Russia, and refusing special treatment for Russia.<ref name=lit/><ref name=spw/> The doctrine was not hostile to Russia, but called on both Poland and Russia to abandon their struggle over domination of other East European countries — in this context, mainly the [[Baltic states]], Belarus, and Ukraine (hence another name for the doctrine: the "ULB doctrine", where "ULB" stands for "Ukraine, Lithuania, Belarus").<ref name=lit/><ref name="Szczerbiak2012"/><ref name=spw/><ref name=liberteworld/> Initially it was addressing the attitude of the [[post-World War II]] Polish emigres, especially around the [[Polish government-in-exile]] in London, and basically calling for the recognition of the post-war ''status quo''. <ref>[https://www.tygodnikprzeglad.pl/do-uczniow-giedroycia/ "Do uczniów Giedroycia"], ''[[Przeglad]]'', November 7, 2002</ref> Later it was adapted towards the goal of the moving of Belarus, Ukraine and Lithuania away from the Soviet and later Russian sphere of influence.<ref>[http://wyborcza.pl/7,75968,21216602,bialorus-dobry-sasiad-mowi-po-polsku.html "Białoruś. Dobry sąsiad mówi po polsku"], ''[[Gazeta Wyborcza]]'', January 8, 2017</ref> The doctrine supported the [[European Union]] and aimed at removing East-Central and East European countries from the [[Soviet]] [[sphere of influence]].<ref name="Szczerbiak2012"/> After Poland regained its independence from Soviet influence following the [[fall of communism]] in 1989, the doctrine was implemented in Poland's Eastern foreign policies. Poland itself began integrating into the [[European Union]], eventually [[Poland and the European Union|joining the EU in 2004]].<ref name="Szczerbiak2012"/><ref name=spw/><ref name="Lorek2009"/> Poland has likewise supported Ukrainian membership in the European Union and [[NATO]].<ref name="Szczerbiak2012"/> The doctrine has resulted in some tensions in [[Polish-Russian relations]].<ref name="Szczerbiak2012"/> The doctrine has been questioned by some commentators and politicians, particularly in the 21st century,<ref name=spw/> and it has been suggested that in recent years the doctrine has been abandoned by the [[Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Poland)|Polish Foreign Ministry]].<ref name=liberteworld/> Others, however, argue that the policy remains in force and is endorsed by the Polish Foreign Ministry.<ref name=lit/><ref>[http://www.new.org.pl/files/docs/new110.pdf "''O Giedroycia sporu nie ma. Rozmowa z Radosławem Sikorskim''"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111106055715/http://www.new.org.pl/files/docs/new110.pdf |date=2011-11-06 }}, ''Nowa Europa Wschodnia'' 1/2010, pp. 69–77.</ref> ==See also== *[[Intermarium]] (''Międzymorze'') *[[Polish Government in exile]] *[[Prometheism]] *[[Territorial changes of Poland]] ==References== {{reflist}} ==External links== *[http://pulaski.pl/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=342%3Ajeli-nie-ulb-to-co-doktryna-giedroycia-w-xxi-w-&catid=13%3Aprogram-wschodni&Itemid=53&lang=pl „''Jeśli nie ULB, to co? Doktryna Giedroycia w XXI w.''”] ("If Not ULB, Then What? The Giedroyc Doctrine in the 21st Century", 17 June 2010) *Bartłomiej Sienkiewicz, [http://www.rp.pl/artykul/486685.html "''Pożegnanie z Giedroyciem''"]{{Dead link|date=December 2022 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }} ("Farewell to Giedroyc", ''Rzeczpospolita'', 28-05-2010). *[[Zdzisław Najder]], [https://web.archive.org/web/20161114120556/http://www.new.org.pl/2010-06-10,abdoktryna_ulb_koncepcja_giedroycia_i_mieroszewskiego_w_xxi_wieku.html "'Doktryna ULB – koncepcja Giedroycia i Mieroszewskiego w XXI wieku''"] ("The ULB Doctrine: Giedroyc's and Mieroszewski's Concept in the 21st century"). [https://web.archive.org/web/20160304003017/http://www.new.org.pl/2010-07-02,zndoktryna_ulb_koncepcja_giedroycia_i_mieroszewskiego_w_xxi_wieku.html]. *Marcin Wojciechowski, [https://web.archive.org/web/20111106055715/http://www.new.org.pl/files/docs/new110.pdf "''Co po Giedroyciu? Giedroyc!''"] ("What Comes after Giedroyc? Giedroyc!"), ''Nowa Europa Wschodnia'' (New Eastern Europe), 1/2010, pp.&nbsp;69–77. [[Category:Foreign relations of Poland]] [[Category:Polish People's Republic]] [[Category:History of Poland (1989–present)]] [[Category:Political history of Poland]] [[Category:Foreign policy doctrines]] [[Category:Aftermath of World War II in Poland]]'
New page wikitext, after the edit (new_wikitext)
'[[File:Jerzy Giedroyc 1997.jpg|thumbnail|[[Jerzy Giedroyc]] (Maisons-Laffitte, 1997)]] The '''Giedroyc doctrine''' ({{IPA-pl|ˈɡʲɛdrɔjt͡s|pron}}; {{lang-pl|doktryna Giedroycia}}) or ''' Giedroyc–Mieroszewski doctrine ''' was a [[political doctrine]] that urged reconciliation among [[Central and Eastern Europe]]an countries. It was developed by postwar Polish [[émigré]]s, and was named for [[Jerzy Giedroyc]], a Polish émigré publicist, with significant contributions by [[Juliusz Mieroszewski]] for whom it is also sometimes named. ==History== Giedroyc developed the doctrine in the 1970s in the journal ''[[Kultura]]'' with [[Juliusz Mieroszewski]] (the doctrine is sometimes called the Giedroyc-Mieroszewski doctrine<ref name=lit>Živilė Dambrauskaitė, Tomas Janeliūnas, Vytis Jurkonis, Vytautas Sirijos Gira, ''[http://lfpr.lt/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/LFPR-26-Dambrauskaite-el-al.pdf Lithuanian – Polish Relations Reconsidered: A Constrained Bilateral Agenda or an Empty Strategic Partnership?]'' pp. 126–27 online, direct PDF download.</ref><ref>{{cite web|author=Nazwa * |url=http://www.przeglad-tygodnik.pl/pl/artykul/do-uczniow-giedroycia |title=Do uczniów Giedroycia &#124; Tygodnik "Przegląd" |publisher=Przeglad-tygodnik.pl |date= |accessdate=2013-03-07}}</ref>) and other émigrés of the "[[Maisons-Laffitte]] group".<ref name=lit/><ref name="Szczerbiak2012">{{cite book|author=Aleks Szczerbiak|title=Poland within the European Union: New Awkward Partner or New Heart of Europe?|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=wACSxUX-wZAC&pg=PA1904|accessdate=7 March 2013|date=23 April 2012|publisher=CRC Press|isbn=978-1-134-17902-2|pages=1904–1905}}</ref><ref name=spw>Piotr A. Maciążek, [https://web.archive.org/web/20171228112314/http://politykawschodnia.pl/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/S%C5%82ownik-Polityki-Wschodniej1.pdf Słownik Polityki Wschodniej]. Polityka Wschodnia, 2011</ref><ref name=liberteworld>{{cite web|url=http://liberteworld.com/2011/03/08/the-giedroyc-era-ended-in-foreign-policy/ |title=The Giedroyc era ended in foreign policy |publisher=Liberte World |date=2011-03-08 |accessdate=2013-03-07}}</ref><ref name="Lorek2009"/> The doctrine can be traced to the interwar [[Prometheism|Prometheist]] project of [[Józef Piłsudski]].<ref name="Lorek2009">{{cite book|author=Andreas Lorek|title=Poland's Role in the Development of an 'Eastern Dimension' of the European Union|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=lsmgmbbKD9MC&pg=PA23|accessdate=7 March 2013|date=February 2009|publisher=GRIN Verlag|isbn=978-3-640-25671-6|pages=23–24}}</ref> The doctrine urged the need to rebuild good relations among [[East Central Europe|East-Central]] and [[Eastern European|East European]] countries. The doctrine also claimed that the preservation of independence by the new post-Soviet states that lie between Poland and the Russian Federation is a fundamental Polish long-term interest.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Wesley |first1=Michael |last2=Rodkiewicz |first2=Witold |title=Global Allies: Comparing US Alliances in the 21st Century |date=2017 |publisher=ANU Press |page=134 |jstor=j.ctt1sq5twz |isbn=9781760461171 |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1sq5twz |access-date=20 June 2022}}</ref> This called for Poland to reject any imperial ambitions and controversial territorial claims, and to accept the postwar border changes.<ref name="Szczerbiak2012"/><ref name=liberteworld/><ref name="Lorek2009"/> The doctrine supported independence for [[Belarus]] and [[Ukraine]].<ref name="Szczerbiak2012"/> It also advocated treating all East European countries as equal in importance to Russia, and refusing special treatment for Russia.<ref name=lit/><ref name=spw/> The doctrine was not hostile to Russia, but called on both Poland and Russia to abandon their struggle over domination of other East European countries — in this context, mainly the [[Baltic states]], Belarus, and Ukraine (hence another name for the doctrine: the "ULB doctrine", where "ULB" stands for "Ukraine, Lithuania, Belarus").<ref name=lit/><ref name="Szczerbiak2012"/><ref name=spw/><ref name=liberteworld/> Initially it was addressing the attitude of the [[post-World War II]] Polish emigres, especially around the [[Polish government-in-exile]] in London, and basically calling for the recognition of the post-war ''status quo''. <ref>[https://www.tygodnikprzeglad.pl/do-uczniow-giedroycia/ "Do uczniów Giedroycia"], ''[[Przeglad]]'', November 7, 2002</ref> Later it was adapted towards the goal of the moving of Belarus, Ukraine and Lithuania away from the Soviet and later Russian sphere of influence.<ref>[http://wyborcza.pl/7,75968,21216602,bialorus-dobry-sasiad-mowi-po-polsku.html "Białoruś. Dobry sąsiad mówi po polsku"], ''[[Gazeta Wyborcza]]'', January 8, 2017</ref> The doctrine supported the [[European Union]] and aimed at removing East-Central and East European countries from the [[Soviet]] [[sphere of influence]].<ref name="Szczerbiak2012"/> After Poland regained its independence from Soviet influence following the [[fall of communism]] in 1989, the doctrine was implemented in Poland's Eastern foreign policies. Poland itself began integrating into the [[European Union]], eventually [[Poland and the European Union|joining the EU in 2004]].<ref name="Szczerbiak2012"/><ref name=spw/><ref name="Lorek2009"/> Poland has likewise supported Ukrainian membership in the European Union and [[NATO]].<ref name="Szczerbiak2012"/> The doctrine has resulted in some tensions in [[Polish-Russian relations]].<ref name="Szczerbiak2012"/> The doctrine has been questioned by some commentators and politicians, particularly in the 21st century,<ref name=spw/> and it has been suggested that in recent years the doctrine has been abandoned by the [[Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Poland)|Polish Foreign Ministry]].<ref name=liberteworld/> Others, however, argue that the policy remains in force and is endorsed by the Polish Foreign Ministry.<ref name=lit/><ref>[http://www.new.org.pl/files/docs/new110.pdf "''O Giedroycia sporu nie ma. Rozmowa z Radosławem Sikorskim''"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111106055715/http://www.new.org.pl/files/docs/new110.pdf |date=2011-11-06 }}, ''Nowa Europa Wschodnia'' 1/2010, pp. 69–77.</ref> Pietrzak argues that "Although Giedroyć and Mieroszewski were idealistic, and they were very often criticized for the naïve character of their ideas, they were proven right, for they managed to inadvertently shape the future of the region and encourage most of the countries that border Russia to be more proactive in doing their utmost to preventing a domino effect in Eastern Europe – for Russia clearly attempted to implement a Sudetenland-type scenario in Ukraine in 2022"<ref>Piotr Pietrzak (2023, February 3). The Giedroyć-Mieroszewski Doctrine and Poland’s Response to Russia’s Assault on Ukraine. Modern Diplomacy. https://moderndiplomacy.eu/2023/02/03/the-giedroyc-mieroszewski-doctrine-and-polands-response-to-russias-assault-on-ukraine/</ref>. ==See also== *[[Intermarium]] (''Międzymorze'') *[[Polish Government in exile]] *[[Prometheism]] *[[Territorial changes of Poland]] ==References== {{reflist}} ==External links== *[http://pulaski.pl/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=342%3Ajeli-nie-ulb-to-co-doktryna-giedroycia-w-xxi-w-&catid=13%3Aprogram-wschodni&Itemid=53&lang=pl „''Jeśli nie ULB, to co? Doktryna Giedroycia w XXI w.''”] ("If Not ULB, Then What? The Giedroyc Doctrine in the 21st Century", 17 June 2010) *Bartłomiej Sienkiewicz, [http://www.rp.pl/artykul/486685.html "''Pożegnanie z Giedroyciem''"]{{Dead link|date=December 2022 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }} ("Farewell to Giedroyc", ''Rzeczpospolita'', 28-05-2010). *[[Zdzisław Najder]], [https://web.archive.org/web/20161114120556/http://www.new.org.pl/2010-06-10,abdoktryna_ulb_koncepcja_giedroycia_i_mieroszewskiego_w_xxi_wieku.html "'Doktryna ULB – koncepcja Giedroycia i Mieroszewskiego w XXI wieku''"] ("The ULB Doctrine: Giedroyc's and Mieroszewski's Concept in the 21st century"). [https://web.archive.org/web/20160304003017/http://www.new.org.pl/2010-07-02,zndoktryna_ulb_koncepcja_giedroycia_i_mieroszewskiego_w_xxi_wieku.html]. *Marcin Wojciechowski, [https://web.archive.org/web/20111106055715/http://www.new.org.pl/files/docs/new110.pdf "''Co po Giedroyciu? Giedroyc!''"] ("What Comes after Giedroyc? Giedroyc!"), ''Nowa Europa Wschodnia'' (New Eastern Europe), 1/2010, pp.&nbsp;69–77. [[Category:Foreign relations of Poland]] [[Category:Polish People's Republic]] [[Category:History of Poland (1989–present)]] [[Category:Political history of Poland]] [[Category:Foreign policy doctrines]] [[Category:Aftermath of World War II in Poland]]'
Unified diff of changes made by edit (edit_diff)
'@@ -12,4 +12,5 @@ The doctrine has been questioned by some commentators and politicians, particularly in the 21st century,<ref name=spw/> and it has been suggested that in recent years the doctrine has been abandoned by the [[Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Poland)|Polish Foreign Ministry]].<ref name=liberteworld/> Others, however, argue that the policy remains in force and is endorsed by the Polish Foreign Ministry.<ref name=lit/><ref>[http://www.new.org.pl/files/docs/new110.pdf "''O Giedroycia sporu nie ma. Rozmowa z Radosławem Sikorskim''"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111106055715/http://www.new.org.pl/files/docs/new110.pdf |date=2011-11-06 }}, ''Nowa Europa Wschodnia'' 1/2010, pp. 69–77.</ref> +Pietrzak argues that "Although Giedroyć and Mieroszewski were idealistic, and they were very often criticized for the naïve character of their ideas, they were proven right, for they managed to inadvertently shape the future of the region and encourage most of the countries that border Russia to be more proactive in doing their utmost to preventing a domino effect in Eastern Europe – for Russia clearly attempted to implement a Sudetenland-type scenario in Ukraine in 2022"<ref>Piotr Pietrzak (2023, February 3). The Giedroyć-Mieroszewski Doctrine and Poland’s Response to Russia’s Assault on Ukraine. Modern Diplomacy. https://moderndiplomacy.eu/2023/02/03/the-giedroyc-mieroszewski-doctrine-and-polands-response-to-russias-assault-on-ukraine/</ref>. ==See also== '
New page size (new_size)
8782
Old page size (old_size)
8017
Size change in edit (edit_delta)
765
Lines added in edit (added_lines)
[ 0 => 'Pietrzak argues that "Although Giedroyć and Mieroszewski were idealistic, and they were very often criticized for the naïve character of their ideas, they were proven right, for they managed to inadvertently shape the future of the region and encourage most of the countries that border Russia to be more proactive in doing their utmost to preventing a domino effect in Eastern Europe – for Russia clearly attempted to implement a Sudetenland-type scenario in Ukraine in 2022"<ref>Piotr Pietrzak (2023, February 3). The Giedroyć-Mieroszewski Doctrine and Poland’s Response to Russia’s Assault on Ukraine. Modern Diplomacy. https://moderndiplomacy.eu/2023/02/03/the-giedroyc-mieroszewski-doctrine-and-polands-response-to-russias-assault-on-ukraine/</ref>.' ]
Lines removed in edit (removed_lines)
[]
Whether or not the change was made through a Tor exit node (tor_exit_node)
false
Unix timestamp of change (timestamp)
'1679789836'