Jump to content

Edit filter log

Details for log entry 35842667

13:28, 4 September 2023: 141.5.11.5 (talk) triggered filter 686, performing the action "edit" on Steven M. Reppert. Actions taken: Tag; Filter description: New user adding possibly unreferenced material to BLP (examine | diff)

Changes made in edit

His work demonstrated that the monarch CRY1 protein is functionally analogous to ''Drosophila'' CRY, the blue-light photoreceptor necessary for [[Entrainment (chronobiology)|photoentrainment]] in the fly. He also demonstrated that monarch CRY2 is functionally analogous to vertebrate CRYs and that monarch CRY2 acts as a potent transcriptional [[repressor]] in the [[Circadian clock#Transcriptional and non-transcriptional control|circadian clock transcriptional translation feedback loop]] of the butterfly, as his group previously showed for the two mouse CRYs.<ref name="Kune"/> These data propose the existence of a novel [[circadian clock]] unique to some non-drosophilid insects that possesses mechanisms characteristic of both the ''Drosophila'' and the mammalian clocks.<ref name=Reppert_2008>{{cite journal |doi=10.1371/journal.pbio.0060004 |title=Cryptochromes Define a Novel Circadian Clock Mechanism in Monarch Butterflies That May Underlie Sun Compass Navigation |year=2008 |last1=Zhu |first1=Haisun |last2=Sauman |first2=Ivo |last3=Yuan |first3=Quan |last4=Casselman |first4=Amy |last5=Emery-Le |first5=Myai |last6=Emery |first6=Patrick |last7=Reppert |first7=Steven M. |journal=PLOS Biology |volume=6 |issue=1 |pages=e4 |pmid=18184036 |pmc=2174970}}</ref> Other insects, such as bees and ants, possess only a vertebrate-like CRY, and their circadian clocks are even more vertebrate like.<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1093/molbev/msm011 |title=Insect Cryptochromes: Gene Duplication and Loss Define Diverse Ways to Construct Insect Circadian Clocks |year=2007 |last1=Yuan |first1=Q. |last2=Metterville |first2=D. |last3=Briscoe |first3=A. D. |last4=Reppert |first4=S. M. |journal=Molecular Biology and Evolution |volume=24 |issue=4 |pages=948–55 |pmid=17244599|doi-access=free }}</ref> ''Drosophila'' is the only known insect that does not possess a vertebrate-like CRY.
His work demonstrated that the monarch CRY1 protein is functionally analogous to ''Drosophila'' CRY, the blue-light photoreceptor necessary for [[Entrainment (chronobiology)|photoentrainment]] in the fly. He also demonstrated that monarch CRY2 is functionally analogous to vertebrate CRYs and that monarch CRY2 acts as a potent transcriptional [[repressor]] in the [[Circadian clock#Transcriptional and non-transcriptional control|circadian clock transcriptional translation feedback loop]] of the butterfly, as his group previously showed for the two mouse CRYs.<ref name="Kune"/> These data propose the existence of a novel [[circadian clock]] unique to some non-drosophilid insects that possesses mechanisms characteristic of both the ''Drosophila'' and the mammalian clocks.<ref name=Reppert_2008>{{cite journal |doi=10.1371/journal.pbio.0060004 |title=Cryptochromes Define a Novel Circadian Clock Mechanism in Monarch Butterflies That May Underlie Sun Compass Navigation |year=2008 |last1=Zhu |first1=Haisun |last2=Sauman |first2=Ivo |last3=Yuan |first3=Quan |last4=Casselman |first4=Amy |last5=Emery-Le |first5=Myai |last6=Emery |first6=Patrick |last7=Reppert |first7=Steven M. |journal=PLOS Biology |volume=6 |issue=1 |pages=e4 |pmid=18184036 |pmc=2174970}}</ref> Other insects, such as bees and ants, possess only a vertebrate-like CRY, and their circadian clocks are even more vertebrate like.<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1093/molbev/msm011 |title=Insect Cryptochromes: Gene Duplication and Loss Define Diverse Ways to Construct Insect Circadian Clocks |year=2007 |last1=Yuan |first1=Q. |last2=Metterville |first2=D. |last3=Briscoe |first3=A. D. |last4=Reppert |first4=S. M. |journal=Molecular Biology and Evolution |volume=24 |issue=4 |pages=948–55 |pmid=17244599|doi-access=free }}</ref> ''Drosophila'' is the only known insect that does not possess a vertebrate-like CRY.


In 2008, Reppert discovered the necessity of ''Cry'' for light-dependent [[magnetoreception]] responses in ''Drosophila''. He also showed that magnetoreception requires UVA/blue light, the spectrum corresponding with the [[action spectrum]] of ''Drosophila'' CRY.<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1038/nature07183 |title=Cryptochrome mediates light-dependent magnetosensitivity in Drosophila |year=2008 |last1=Gegear |first1=Robert J. |last2=Casselman |first2=Amy |last3=Waddell |first3=Scott |last4=Reppert |first4=Steven M. |journal=Nature |volume=454 |issue=7207 |pages=1014–8 |pmid=18641630 |pmc=2559964|bibcode=2008Natur.454.1014G }}</ref>
In 2008, Reppert discovered the necessity of ''Cry'' for light-dependent [[magnetoreception]] responses in ''Drosophila''. He also showed that magnetoreception requires UVA/blue light, the spectrum corresponding with the [[action spectrum]] of ''Drosophila'' CRY.<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1038/nature07183 |title=Cryptochrome mediates light-dependent magnetosensitivity in Drosophila |year=2008 |last1=Gegear |first1=Robert J. |last2=Casselman |first2=Amy |last3=Waddell |first3=Scott |last4=Reppert |first4=Steven M. |journal=Nature |volume=454 |issue=7207 |pages=1014–8 |pmid=18641630 |pmc=2559964|bibcode=2008Natur.454.1014G }}</ref>. However, a recent study shows that ''Drosophila'' has no magnetoreception |year=2023 |last1=Bassetto |first1=Marc |last2=Reichl |first2=Thomas |last3=Kobylkov |first3=Dmitry |last4=Kattnig |first4=Daniel R. |last5=Winklhofer |first5=Michael |last6=Hore |first6=P.J. |last7=Mouritsen |first7=Henrik|journal=Nature |volume=620|pages=595-599
These data were the first to genetically implicate CRY as a component of the input pathway or the chemical-based pathway of magnetoreception. Applying these findings to his work with the monarch, Reppert has shown that both monarch CRY1 and CRY2 proteins, when transgenically expressed in CRY-deficient flies, successfully restore magnetoreception function. These results propose the presence of a CRY-mediated magnetosensitivity system in monarchs that may act in concordance with the sun compass to aid navigation. In 2011, Reppert also discovered that human CRY2 can substitute as a functional magnetoreceptor in CRY-deficient flies, a discovery that warrants additional research into magnetosensitivity in humans.<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1038/ncomms1364 |title=Human cryptochrome exhibits light-dependent magnetosensitivity |year=2011 |last1=Foley |first1=Lauren E. |last2=Gegear |first2=Robert J. |last3=Reppert |first3=Steven M. |journal=Nature Communications |volume=2 |pages=356– |pmid=21694704 |pmc=3128388 |issue=6|bibcode=2011NatCo...2..356F }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=Insects that put Google Maps to shame |author=Matt Ridley |url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424127887323375204578269963079963082 |newspaper=Wall Street Journal |date=February 1, 2013 |accessdate=September 28, 2013 }}</ref>
These data were the first to genetically implicate CRY as a component of the input pathway or the chemical-based pathway of magnetoreception. Applying these findings to his work with the monarch, Reppert has shown that both monarch CRY1 and CRY2 proteins, when transgenically expressed in CRY-deficient flies, successfully restore magnetoreception function. These results propose the presence of a CRY-mediated magnetosensitivity system in monarchs that may act in concordance with the sun compass to aid navigation. In 2011, Reppert also discovered that human CRY2 can substitute as a functional magnetoreceptor in CRY-deficient flies, a discovery that warrants additional research into magnetosensitivity in humans.<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1038/ncomms1364 |title=Human cryptochrome exhibits light-dependent magnetosensitivity |year=2011 |last1=Foley |first1=Lauren E. |last2=Gegear |first2=Robert J. |last3=Reppert |first3=Steven M. |journal=Nature Communications |volume=2 |pages=356– |pmid=21694704 |pmc=3128388 |issue=6|bibcode=2011NatCo...2..356F }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=Insects that put Google Maps to shame |author=Matt Ridley |url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424127887323375204578269963079963082 |newspaper=Wall Street Journal |date=February 1, 2013 |accessdate=September 28, 2013 }}</ref>


Action parameters

VariableValue
Edit count of the user (user_editcount)
null
Name of the user account (user_name)
'141.5.11.5'
Age of the user account (user_age)
0
Groups (including implicit) the user is in (user_groups)
[ 0 => '*' ]
Rights that the user has (user_rights)
[ 0 => 'createaccount', 1 => 'read', 2 => 'edit', 3 => 'createtalk', 4 => 'writeapi', 5 => 'viewmyprivateinfo', 6 => 'editmyprivateinfo', 7 => 'editmyoptions', 8 => 'abusefilter-log-detail', 9 => 'urlshortener-create-url', 10 => 'centralauth-merge', 11 => 'abusefilter-view', 12 => 'abusefilter-log', 13 => 'vipsscaler-test' ]
Whether the user is editing from mobile app (user_app)
false
Whether or not a user is editing through the mobile interface (user_mobile)
false
Page ID (page_id)
25120607
Page namespace (page_namespace)
0
Page title without namespace (page_title)
'Steven M. Reppert'
Full page title (page_prefixedtitle)
'Steven M. Reppert'
Edit protection level of the page (page_restrictions_edit)
[]
Last ten users to contribute to the page (page_recent_contributors)
[ 0 => 'Cewbot', 1 => 'Ser Amantio di Nicolao', 2 => 'PrimeBOT', 3 => 'Citation bot', 4 => 'OAbot', 5 => 'SdkbBot', 6 => 'PearBOT II', 7 => 'InternetArchiveBot', 8 => 'Tom.Reding', 9 => 'Dan Plexi' ]
Page age in seconds (page_age)
435295133
Action (action)
'edit'
Edit summary/reason (summary)
'new research shows that the experimental setup of studying magnetosensitivity in Drosophila was not well controlled and led to a bias in a study that can not be reproduced (Bassetto, M., Reichl, T., Kobylkov, D. et al. No evidence for magnetic field effects on the behaviour of Drosophila. Nature 620, 595–599 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06397-7)'
Old content model (old_content_model)
'wikitext'
New content model (new_content_model)
'wikitext'
Old page wikitext, before the edit (old_wikitext)
'{{short description|American neuroscientist (born 1946)}} {{Infobox scientist | name = Steven M. Reppert | image = | caption = | birth_date = {{Birth date and age|1946|9|4}} | birth_place = [[Sioux City]], [[Iowa]] | death_date = | death_place = | children = | spouse = | citizenship = United States | ethnicity = | fields = {{Plainlist| * [[Chronobiology]] * [[Neuroethology]] }} | workplaces = {{Plainlist| * Chair of the Department of Neurobiology at [[University of Massachusetts Medical School|UMass Medical School]] (2001–2013) * Higgins Family Professor of Neuroscience UMass Medical School (2001–2017) * Distinguished Professor of Neurobiology at UMass Medical School (2014–2017) * Distinguished Professor Emeritus of Neurobiology at UMass Medical School (2017–)}} | alma_mater = {{Plainlist| * [[University of Nebraska–Lincoln|University of Nebraska, Lincoln]] * [[University of Nebraska Medical Center|University of Nebraska, College of Medicine, Omaha]] * [[Harvard Medical School|Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts]] }} | doctoral_advisor = | academic_advisors = | notable_students = | known_for = {{Plainlist| * Fetal circadian clock * Melatonin receptors * Circadian clock mechanism in mammals * Monarch butterfly sun compass }} | awards = }} '''Steven M. Reppert''' (born September 4, 1946) is an American [[neuroscientist]] known for his contributions to the fields of [[chronobiology]] and [[neuroethology]]. His research has focused primarily on the physiological, cellular, and molecular basis of [[circadian rhythms]] in mammals and more recently on the navigational mechanisms of migratory [[monarch butterflies]]. He was the Higgins Family Professor of Neuroscience at the [[University of Massachusetts Medical School]] from 2001 to 2017, and from 2001 to 2013 was the founding chair of the Department of Neurobiology. Reppert stepped down as chair in 2014. He is currently distinguished professor emeritus of neurobiology. ==Biography== ===Early life=== Steven Reppert grew up in the village of [[Pender, Nebraska]], and graduated from Pender Public High School in 1964. His interest in science began in childhood with the [[cecropia moth]]—an insect made famous by Harvard biologist [[Carroll Williams|Carroll M. Williams]], who used the moth in his pioneering work on the role of [[juvenile hormone]] in molting and metamorphosis.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Pappenheimer|first=A.M. Jr|title=Carroll Milton Williams: December 2, 1916–October 11, 1991|journal=NAS Biographical Memoirs|year=1995|volume=68|pages=413–434|pmid=11616356|url=http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=4990&page=413}}</ref> Reppert continues to rear cecropia from egg to adult each summer. ===Education and career=== Reppert received his BS and MD in 1973 (with distinction) from the [[University of Nebraska Medical Center|University of Nebraska College of Medicine]] and was elected as a medical student to the [[Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Medical Society]]. From 1973 to 1976 he did an internship and residency in pediatrics at the [[Massachusetts General Hospital]]. From 1976 to 1979 Reppert was a postdoctoral fellow in [[neuroendocrinology]] at the [[National Institute of Child Health and Human Development]] in Bethesda, Maryland, in David C. Klein's laboratory, which focuses on the pineal gland and circadian biology.<ref>{{cite web|title=Neuroscience@NIH|url=http://neuroscience.nih.gov/Lab.asp?Org_ID=273|publisher=NIH|accessdate=April 24, 2013}}</ref> Reppert was on the faculty at the Massachusetts General Hospital and [[Harvard Medical School]] beginning in 1979 and was promoted to professor in 1993; he directed the Laboratory of Developmental [[Chronobiology]] at the Massachusetts General Hospital from 1983 to 2001, when he moved to the University of Massachusetts Medical School.<ref>{{Cite web | url=http://www.umassmed.edu/neuroscience/faculty/reppert.cfm |title = Search &#124; Profiles RNS}}</ref> ==Research== Reppert has published more than 180 papers. He is the principal inventor on seven patents derived from his research.<ref>{{Cite web | url=http://www.patentbuddy.com/Inventor/Reppert-Steven-M/1437735 |title = Steven M Reppert, Inventor, Newton, MA}}</ref> ===Fetal circadian clocks=== [[Animal testing on rodents|Rodent studies]] have shown that the master brain clock in the [[suprachiasmatic nucleus]] (SCN) is functional in the fetus before the fetal brain is capable of registering the presence of light. Reppert and colleagues reported that the fetal SCN is entrained to the light-dark cycle before the retinohypothalamic pathway innervates the SCN from the eye.<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1111/j.1749-6632.1985.tb11808.x |title=Maternal Entrainment of the Developing Orcadian Systema |year=1985 |last1=Reppert |first1=Steven M. |journal=Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences |volume=453 |issue=1 |pages=162–9 |pmid=3865580|bibcode=1985NYASA.453..162R |s2cid=45891069 }}</ref> This finding indicates that the mother, and her entrainment to ambient light-dark cycles, provides the necessary information to the fetus for synchronization. As Reppert states, “Mom is functioning as the transducer for the fetal circadian system. She takes in light information to her circadian system, and then that is communicated to the fetal circadian system.”<ref>{{cite news|last=Klinkenborg|first=Verlyn|title=Awakening to Sleep|url=https://www.nytimes.com/1997/01/05/magazine/awakening-to-sleep.html?pagewanted=all&src=pm|newspaper=New York Times|date=5 January 1997}}</ref> This fetal entrainment persists into the postnatal period and ensures that neonatal behavioral patterns are properly tuned with the environment. Dopamine and melatonin can both act as perinatal maternal entraining signals.<ref>{{cite book |doi=10.1007/978-1-4615-1201-1_10 |chapter=Development of Mammalian Circadian Rhythms |title=Handbook of Behavioral Neurobiology |series=Handbook of Behavioral Neurobiology |year=2001 |last1=Davis |first1=Fred C. |last2=Reppert |first2=Steven M. |isbn=978-0-306-46504-8 |volume=12 |pages=[https://archive.org/details/sensoryintegrati0000unse/page/247 247–90] |chapter-url=https://archive.org/details/sensoryintegrati0000unse/page/247 }}</ref> ===Mammalian circadian clocks=== Steven Reppert and colleagues have made seminal contributions that provide insight into the mammalian circadian clock mechanism. ====Cell autonomy in the SCN==== Reppert and colleagues discovered that the [[Suprachiasmatic nucleus|SCN]] contains a large population of autonomous, single-cell circadian oscillators.<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1016/0896-6273(95)90214-7 |title=Individual neurons dissociated from rat suprachiasmatic nucleus express independently phased circadian firing rhythms |year=1995 |last1=Welsh |first1=David K |last2=Logothetis |first2=Diomedes E |last3=Meister |first3=Markus |last4=Reppert |first4=Steven M |journal=Neuron |volume=14 |issue=4 |pages=697–706 |pmid=7718233|doi-access=free }}</ref> They cultured cells from neonatal rat SCN on fixed [[microelectrode array]] that allowed them to monitor individual SCN [[neuron]] activity in culture. Circadian rhythms expressed by neurons in the same culture were not synchronized, indicating that they functioned independently of one another. ====Functions of mouse clock genes: PERIOD2 and PERIOD3==== Reppert and coworkers also discovered the mouse clock genes ''mPer2'' and ''mPer3'' and defined their functions. They found that the [[PER2|mPER2]] and [[PER3|mPER3]] proteins, as well as the previously discovered [[PER1|mPER1]], share several regions of homology with one another and with Drosophila PER.<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80417-1 |title=Two period Homologs: Circadian Expression and Photic Regulation in the Suprachiasmatic Nuclei |year=1997 |last1=Shearman |first1=Lauren P. |last2=Zylka |first2=Mark J. |last3=Weaver |first3=David R. |last4=Kolakowski Jr |first4=Lee F. |last5=Reppert |first5=Steven M. |journal=Neuron |volume=19 |issue=6 |pages=1261–9 |pmid=9427249|doi-access=free }}</ref><ref name=Zylka>{{cite journal |doi=10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80492-4 |title=Three period Homologs in Mammals: Differential Light Responses in the Suprachiasmatic Circadian Clock and Oscillating Transcripts Outside of Brain |year=1998 |last1=Zylka |first1=Mark J |last2=Shearman |first2=Lauren P |last3=Weaver |first3=David R |last4=Reppert |first4=Steven M |journal=Neuron |volume=20 |issue=6 |pages=1103–10 |pmid=9655499|doi-access=free }}</ref> Reppert and coworkers found different light responses among the three ''Per'' genes.<ref name="Zylka"/> Unlike ''mPer1'' and ''mPer2'' mRNA levels, ''mPer3'' mRNA levels are not acutely altered by light exposure during the subjective night. They also found that ''mPer1–3'' are widely expressed in tissues outside the brain, including the liver, skeletal muscles, and testis. To determine the function of mPER1–3, Reppert and colleagues disrupted the three genes encoding them.<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00302-6 |title=Differential Functions of mPer1, mPer2, and mPer3 in the SCN Circadian Clock |year=2001 |last1=Bae |first1=Kiho |last2=Jin |first2=Xiaowei |last3=Maywood |first3=Elizabeth S. |last4=Hastings |first4=Michael H. |last5=Reppert |first5=Steven M. |last6=Weaver |first6=David R. |journal=Neuron |volume=30 |issue=2 |pages=525–36 |pmid=11395012|doi-access=free }}</ref> Using double-mutant mice, they showed that mPER3 functions outside the core circadian clockwork, whereas both mPER1 and mPER2 are necessary for rhythmicity. ====Negative transcriptional feedback loop==== Reppert and colleagues discovered that the two mouse [[cryptochrome]]s, mCRY1 and mCRY2, function as the primary transcriptional repressors of clock gene expression, and the mPER proteins are necessary for CRY nuclear translocation.<ref name=Kune>{{cite journal |doi=10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81014-4 |title=MCRY1 and mCRY2 Are Essential Components of the Negative Limb of the Circadian Clock Feedback Loop |year=1999 |last1=Kume |first1=Kazuhiko |last2=Zylka |first2=Mark J |last3=Sriram |first3=Sathyanarayanan |last4=Shearman |first4=Lauren P |last5=Weaver |first5=David R |last6=Jin |first6=Xiaowei |last7=Maywood |first7=Elizabeth S |last8=Hastings |first8=Michael H |last9=Reppert |first9=Steven M |journal=Cell |volume=98 |issue=2 |pages=193–205 |pmid=10428031 |doi-access=free }}</ref> This work provided the first portrayal of a negative transcriptional feedback loop as the major gear driving the mouse molecular clock.<ref>{{cite web|last=Kreeger|first=Karen Young|title=Collecting Clues to the Mammalian Clock|url=http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/13970/title/Collecting-Clues-to-the-Mammalian-Clock/|publisher=The Scientist}}</ref> ====Interlocking transcriptional feedback loops==== Reppert and colleagues found that the core mechanisms for the SCN in mammals consist of interacting positive and negative [[Transcription (genetics)|transcriptional]] feedback loops.<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1126/science.288.5468.1013 |title=Interacting Molecular Loops in the Mammalian Circadian Clock |year=2000 |last1=Shearman |first1=L. P. |journal=Science |volume=288 |issue=5468 |pages=1013–9 |pmid=10807566 |last2=Sriram |first2=S |last3=Weaver |first3=DR |last4=Maywood |first4=ES |last5=Chaves |first5=I |last6=Zheng |first6=B |last7=Kume |first7=K |last8=Lee |first8=CC |last9=Van Der Horst |first9=GT |last10=Hastings |first10=MH |last11=Reppert |first11=SM |bibcode=2000Sci...288.1013S }}</ref> The first loop is an autoregulatory negative transcriptional feedback loop in which the mCRY proteins negatively regulate ''mCry'' and ''mPer'' gene transcription. The second interlocking feedback loop involves the rhythmic regulation of ''Bmal1''. Rhythmicity of ''Bmal1'' is not necessary for clockwork function, but it helps modulate the robustness of rhythmicity. ====CLOCK and NPAS2==== Reppert and colleagues discovered that the transcription factors CLOCK and [[NPAS2]] have overlapping roles in the SCN, revealing a new and unexpected role for NPAS2.<ref name=DeBruyne>{{cite journal |doi=10.1038/nn1884 |title=CLOCK and NPAS2 have overlapping roles in the suprachiasmatic circadian clock |year=2007 |last1=Debruyne |first1=Jason P |last2=Weaver |first2=David R |last3=Reppert |first3=Steven M |journal=Nature Neuroscience |volume=10 |issue=5 |pages=543–5 |pmid=17417633 |pmc=2782643}}</ref> His lab observed that CLOCK-deficient mice continue to have behavioral and molecular rhythms, which showed that CLOCK is not essential for circadian rhythm in locomotor activity in mice. They then determined, by investigating CLOCK-deficient mice, that NPAS2 is a [[paralog]] of CLOCK and can functionally substitute CLOCK by dimerizing with BMAL1. Finally, they found—by investigating CLOCK-deficient, NPAS2-deficient, and double-mutant mice—that circadian rhythms in peripheral oscillators require CLOCK.<ref name="DeBruyne"/> Thus, there is a fundamental difference between CLOCK and NPAS2 that is tissue dependent. ===Mammalian melatonin receptors=== In 1994, Reppert [[Cloning|cloned]] human and sheep [[Melatonin receptor 1A|Mel<sub>1a</sub>]] [[melatonin receptor]], the first in a family of [[G protein-coupled receptor|GPCR]]s that bind the pineal hormone [[melatonin]], and localized its expression in the mammalian brain to the [[suprachiasmatic nucleus|SCN]] and the [[Pars tuberalis|hypophyseal pars tuberalis]].<ref name=Reppert_1994>{{cite journal |doi=10.1016/0896-6273(94)90055-8 |title=Cloning and characterization of a mammalian melatonin receptor that mediates reproductive and circadian responses |year=1994 |last1=Reppert |first1=Steven M. |last2=Weaver |first2=David R. |last3=Ebisawa |first3=Takashi |journal=Neuron |volume=13 |issue=5 |pages=1177–85 |pmid=7946354|s2cid=19805481 }}</ref> Mel<sub>1a</sub> is believed to be responsible for the circadian effects of melatonin and the reproductive actions in seasonal breeding mammals.<ref name="Reppert_1994" /> In 1995, Reppert cloned and characterized the [[Melatonin receptor 1B|Mel<sub>1b</sub>]] melatonin receptor. He and colleagues found that the receptor was predominantly expressed in the [[retina]], where it is believed to modify light-dependent retinal functions.<ref name=Reppert_1995>{{cite journal |doi=10.1073/pnas.92.19.8734 |title=Molecular characterization of a second melatonin receptor expressed in human retina and brain: The Mel1b melatonin receptor |year=1995 |last1=Reppert |first1=S. M. |last2=Godson |first2=C. |last3=Mahle |first3=C. D. |last4=Weaver |first4=D. R. |last5=Slaugenhaupt |first5=S. A. |last6=Gusella |first6=J. F. |journal=Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences |volume=92 |issue=19 |pages=8734–8 |pmid=7568007 |pmc=41041|bibcode=1995PNAS...92.8734R |doi-access=free }}</ref> They identified outbred populations of [[Djungarian hamster|Siberian hamsters]] that lacked functional Mel<sub>1b</sub> but maintained circadian and reproductive responses to melatonin;<ref>{{cite journal |pmid=8923472 |year=1996 |last1=Weaver |first1=DR |last2=Liu |first2=C |last3=Reppert |first3=SM |title=Nature's knockout: The Mel1b receptor is not necessary for reproductive and circadian responses to melatonin in Siberian hamsters |volume=10 |issue=11 |pages=1478–87 |journal=Molecular Endocrinology |doi=10.1210/MEND.10.11.8923472|doi-access=free }}</ref> these data indicate that Mel<sub>1b</sub> is not necessary for the circadian and reproductive actions of melatonin, which instead depend on Mel<sub>1a</sub>. Elucidation of the molecular nature of the melatonin receptors has facilitated definition of their ligand-binding characteristics and aided the development of melatonin analogs that are now used to treat sleep disorders and depression.<ref name="Reppert_1994" /> ===Insect cryptochromes=== In 2003, Reppert began investigating the functional and evolutionary properties of the CRY protein in the monarch butterfly. He identified two ''Cry'' genes in the monarch, ''Cry1'' and ''Cry2''.<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1016/j.cub.2005.11.030 |title=The two CRYs of the butterfly |year=2005 |last1=Zhu |first1=Haisun |last2=Yuan |first2=Quan |last3=Briscoe |first3=Oren |last4=Froy |first4=Amy |last5=Casselman |first5=Steven M. |journal=Current Biology |volume=15 |issue=23 |pages=R953–4 |pmid=16332522 |last6=Reppert |first6=SM|doi-access=free }}</ref> His work demonstrated that the monarch CRY1 protein is functionally analogous to ''Drosophila'' CRY, the blue-light photoreceptor necessary for [[Entrainment (chronobiology)|photoentrainment]] in the fly. He also demonstrated that monarch CRY2 is functionally analogous to vertebrate CRYs and that monarch CRY2 acts as a potent transcriptional [[repressor]] in the [[Circadian clock#Transcriptional and non-transcriptional control|circadian clock transcriptional translation feedback loop]] of the butterfly, as his group previously showed for the two mouse CRYs.<ref name="Kune"/> These data propose the existence of a novel [[circadian clock]] unique to some non-drosophilid insects that possesses mechanisms characteristic of both the ''Drosophila'' and the mammalian clocks.<ref name=Reppert_2008>{{cite journal |doi=10.1371/journal.pbio.0060004 |title=Cryptochromes Define a Novel Circadian Clock Mechanism in Monarch Butterflies That May Underlie Sun Compass Navigation |year=2008 |last1=Zhu |first1=Haisun |last2=Sauman |first2=Ivo |last3=Yuan |first3=Quan |last4=Casselman |first4=Amy |last5=Emery-Le |first5=Myai |last6=Emery |first6=Patrick |last7=Reppert |first7=Steven M. |journal=PLOS Biology |volume=6 |issue=1 |pages=e4 |pmid=18184036 |pmc=2174970}}</ref> Other insects, such as bees and ants, possess only a vertebrate-like CRY, and their circadian clocks are even more vertebrate like.<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1093/molbev/msm011 |title=Insect Cryptochromes: Gene Duplication and Loss Define Diverse Ways to Construct Insect Circadian Clocks |year=2007 |last1=Yuan |first1=Q. |last2=Metterville |first2=D. |last3=Briscoe |first3=A. D. |last4=Reppert |first4=S. M. |journal=Molecular Biology and Evolution |volume=24 |issue=4 |pages=948–55 |pmid=17244599|doi-access=free }}</ref> ''Drosophila'' is the only known insect that does not possess a vertebrate-like CRY. In 2008, Reppert discovered the necessity of ''Cry'' for light-dependent [[magnetoreception]] responses in ''Drosophila''. He also showed that magnetoreception requires UVA/blue light, the spectrum corresponding with the [[action spectrum]] of ''Drosophila'' CRY.<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1038/nature07183 |title=Cryptochrome mediates light-dependent magnetosensitivity in Drosophila |year=2008 |last1=Gegear |first1=Robert J. |last2=Casselman |first2=Amy |last3=Waddell |first3=Scott |last4=Reppert |first4=Steven M. |journal=Nature |volume=454 |issue=7207 |pages=1014–8 |pmid=18641630 |pmc=2559964|bibcode=2008Natur.454.1014G }}</ref> These data were the first to genetically implicate CRY as a component of the input pathway or the chemical-based pathway of magnetoreception. Applying these findings to his work with the monarch, Reppert has shown that both monarch CRY1 and CRY2 proteins, when transgenically expressed in CRY-deficient flies, successfully restore magnetoreception function. These results propose the presence of a CRY-mediated magnetosensitivity system in monarchs that may act in concordance with the sun compass to aid navigation. In 2011, Reppert also discovered that human CRY2 can substitute as a functional magnetoreceptor in CRY-deficient flies, a discovery that warrants additional research into magnetosensitivity in humans.<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1038/ncomms1364 |title=Human cryptochrome exhibits light-dependent magnetosensitivity |year=2011 |last1=Foley |first1=Lauren E. |last2=Gegear |first2=Robert J. |last3=Reppert |first3=Steven M. |journal=Nature Communications |volume=2 |pages=356– |pmid=21694704 |pmc=3128388 |issue=6|bibcode=2011NatCo...2..356F }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=Insects that put Google Maps to shame |author=Matt Ridley |url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424127887323375204578269963079963082 |newspaper=Wall Street Journal |date=February 1, 2013 |accessdate=September 28, 2013 }}</ref> ===Monarch butterfly migration=== Since 2002, Reppert and coworkers have pioneered the study of the biological basis of [[monarch butterfly]] migration.<ref name="pmid19591650">{{cite journal |doi=10.1186/jbiol153 |title=Clocks, cryptochromes and Monarch migrations |year=2009 |last1=Kyriacou |first1=Charalambos P |journal=Journal of Biology |volume=8 |issue=6 |pages=55 |pmid=19591650 |pmc=2737371}}</ref><ref name="pmid20627420">{{cite journal |doi=10.1016/j.tins.2010.04.004 |title=Navigational mechanisms of migrating monarch butterflies |year=2010 |last1=Reppert |first1=Steven M. |last2=Gegear |first2=Robert J. |last3=Merlin |first3=Christine |journal=Trends in Neurosciences |volume=33 |issue=9 |pages=399–406 |pmid=20627420 |pmc=2929297}}</ref> Each fall, millions of monarchs from the eastern United States and southeastern Canada migrate as much as 4,000&nbsp;km to overwinter in roosts in Central Mexico.<ref name="pmid20627420"/> Monarch migration is not a learned activity, given that migrants flying south are at least two generations removed from the previous year's migrants.<ref>{{cite journal |pmid=9317405 |year=1996 |last1=Brower |first1=L |author-link=Lincoln Brower|title=Monarch butterfly orientation: Missing pieces of a magnificent puzzle |volume=199 |issue=1 |pages=93–103 |journal=The Journal of Experimental Biology|doi=10.1242/jeb.199.1.93 |doi-access=free }}</ref> Thus, migrating monarchs must have some genetically based navigational mechanism. Reppert and colleagues have focused on a novel [[circadian clock]] mechanism and its role in time-compensated sun compass orientation, a major navigational strategy that butterflies use during their fall migration.<ref name="pmid20627420"/> Using clock-shift experiments, they showed that the circadian clock must interact with the sun compass to enable migrants to maintain a southerly flight direction as the sun moves daily across the sky.<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1126/science.1084874 |title=Illuminating the Circadian Clock in Monarch Butterfly Migration |year=2003 |last1=Froy |first1=O. |journal=Science |volume=300 |issue=5623 |pages=1303–5 |pmid=12764200 |last2=Gotter |first2=AL |last3=Casselman |first3=AL |last4=Reppert |first4=SM|bibcode=2003Sci...300.1303F |s2cid=12011719 }}</ref> Reppert collaborated with Eli Shlizerman at the University of Washington and Daniel Forger at the University of Michigan to propose a working mathematical model of the time-compensated sun compass.<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1016/j.celrep.2016.03.057 |title=Neural Integration Underlying a Time-Compensated Sun Compass in the Migratory Monarch Butterfly |year=2016 |last1=Shlizerman |first1=E |journal=Cell Reports |volume=15 |issue=4 |pages=683–91 |pmid=27149852 |pmc=5063661 |last2=Phillips-Portillo |first2=J|last3=Forger |first3=DB |last4=Reppert |first4=SM}}</ref> ====Clockwork mechanism==== The monarch clockwork model, which has both ''Drosophila''-like and mammal-like aspects, is unique because it employs two distinct CRY proteins. As presented in a 2010 review paper,<ref name="pmid20627420"/> the clock mechanism, on a gene/protein level, operates as follows: * In an autoregulatory transcriptional feedback loop, heterodimers of CLOCK (CLK) and CYCLE (CYC) form and drive the transcription of the ''Per'', ''Tim'', and ''Cry2'' genes. * TIM, PER, and CRY2 proteins are translated and form complexes in the cytoplasm. * 24 hours later, CRY2 returns to the nucleus and inhibits CLK:CYC transcription. * Meanwhile, PER is progressively phosphorylated, which may aid CRY2 translocation into the nucleus. * CRY1 protein is a circadian photoreceptor that, when exposed to light, causes TIM degradation, allowing light to gain access to the central clock mechanism for photic entrainment. ====Antennal clocks==== Reppert’s lab expanded upon [[Fred Urquhart|Fred Urquhart's]] postulation that antennae play a role in monarch migration. In 2009 Reppert’s lab reported that, despite previous assumptions that the time-compensation clocks are located exclusively in the brain, there are also clocks located in the antennae, which "are necessary for proper time-compensated sun compass orientation in migratory monarch butterflies.”<ref name=Reppert_2009>{{cite journal |doi=10.1126/science.1176221 |title=Antennal Circadian Clocks Coordinate Sun Compass Orientation in Migratory Monarch Butterflies |year=2009 |last1=Merlin |first1=C. |last2=Gegear |first2=R. J. |last3=Reppert |first3=S. M. |journal=Science |volume=325 |issue=5948 |pages=1700–4 |pmid=19779201 |pmc=2754321|bibcode=2009Sci...325.1700M }}</ref> They concluded this by comparing the sun compass orientation of monarch migrants with intact antennae and those whose antennae had been removed.<ref name="Reppert_2009"/> Reppert's lab also studied antennae in vitro and found that antennal clocks can be directly entrained by light and can function independently from the brain.<ref name="Reppert_2009"/> Further research is needed, however, on the interaction between the circadian clocks in monarch butterfly's antennae and the sun compass in the brain. In 2012, Reppert and colleagues determined that only a single antenna is sufficient for sun compass orientation. They did so by painting one antenna black to cause discordant light exposure between the two antennae; the single not-painted antenna was sufficient for orientation. All four clock genes (''per'', ''tim'', ''cry1'', and ''cry2'') were expressed in the various studied areas of the antenna, suggesting that "light entrained circadian clocks are distributed throughout the length of the monarch butterfly antenna."<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1038/ncomms1965 |title=Discordant timing between antennae disrupts sun compass orientation in migratory monarch butterflies |year=2012 |last1=Guerra |first1=Patrick A. |last2=Merlin |first2=Christine |last3=Gegear |first3=Robert J. |last4=Reppert |first4=Steven M. |journal=Nature Communications |volume=3 |pages=958 |pmid=22805565 |issue=7 |pmc=3962218|bibcode=2012NatCo...3..958G }}</ref> In 2013, Reppert and colleagues showed that spring remigrants also use an antenna-dependent time-compensated sun compass to direct their northward flight from Mexico to the southern United States.<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1016/j.cub.2013.01.052 |title=Coldness Triggers Northward Flight in Remigrant Monarch Butterflies |year=2013 |last1=Guerra |first1=Patrick A. |last2=Reppert |first2=Steven M. |journal=Current Biology |volume=23 |issue=5 |pages=419–23 |pmid=23434279|doi-access=free }}</ref> ====Sun compass==== Using anatomical and electrophysiological studies of the monarch butterfly brain, Reppert and colleagues have indicated that the central complex, a midline structure in the central brain, is likely the site of the sun compass.<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1002/cne.23214 |title=Anatomical basis of sun compass navigation II: The neuronal composition of the central complex of the monarch butterfly |year=2013 |last1=Heinze |first1=Stanley |last2=Florman |first2=Jeremy |last3=Asokaraj |first3=Surainder |last4=El Jundi |first4=Basil |last5=Reppert |first5=Steven M. |journal=Journal of Comparative Neurology |volume=521 |issue=2 |pages=267–98 |pmid=22886450|s2cid=205682692 }}</ref> ====Magnetic compass==== Reppert and colleagues showed that migratory monarchs can use a light-dependent, inclination-based, magnetic compass for navigation on overcast days.<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1038/ncomms5164 |title=A magnetic compass aids monarch butterfly migration |year=2014 |last1=Guerra |first1=Patrick A. |last2=Gegear |first2=Robert J. |last3=Reppert |first3=Steven M. |journal=Nature Communications |volume=5 |pages=4164 |pmid=24960099|pmc=4090716 |bibcode=2014NatCo...5.4164G }}</ref> ====Temperature==== Reppert and coworkers showed that fall migrants prematurely exposed to overwintering-like coldness reverse their flight orientation to the north. The temperature microenvironment at the overwintering site is essential for successful completion of the migration cycle: without cold exposure, aged migrants continue to orient to the south. The discovery that coldness triggers the northward flight direction in spring remigrants underscores how vulnerable the migration may be to climate change.<ref>{{cite news |title=Climate change may disrupt monarch butterfly migration |author=Nayantara Narayanan |author2=ClimateWire |url=http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=climate-change-may-disrupt-monarch-butterfly-migration |newspaper=Scientific American |date=February 22, 2013 |accessdate=September 28, 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=Chill turns monarchs north |author=Meghan Rosen |url=http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/348485/description/Chill_turns_monarchs_north |newspaper=ScienceNews |date=March 23, 2013 |accessdate=September 28, 2013 }}</ref> ====Monarch butterfly genome==== In 2011, Reppert and colleagues presented the draft sequence of the monarch butterfly genome and a set 16,866 protein-coding genes. This is the first characterized genome of a butterfly and of a long-distance migratory species.<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1016/j.cell.2011.09.052 |title=The Monarch Butterfly Genome Yields Insights into Long-Distance Migration |year=2011 |last1=Zhan |first1=Shuai |last2=Merlin |first2=Christine |last3=Boore |first3=Jeffrey L. |last4=Reppert |first4=Steven M. |journal=Cell |volume=147 |issue=5 |pages=1171–85 |pmid=22118469 |pmc=3225893}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1016/j.cell.2011.11.009 |title=A Genome Befitting a Monarch |year=2011 |last1=Stensmyr |first1=Marcus C. |last2=Hansson |first2=Bill S. |journal=Cell |volume=147 |issue=5 |pages=970–2 |pmid=22118454|doi-access=free }}</ref><ref> {{Cite news | last = Johnson | first = Carolyn Y. | title = Monarch butterfly genome sequenced | newspaper = The Boston Globe | location = Boston, MA | date = 23 November 2011 | url = http://www.boston.com/Boston/whitecoatnotes/2011/11/monarch-butterfly-genome-sequenced/gF1mFBxXCLUOHigi2FOHPM/index.html | accessdate = 9 January 2012}}</ref> In 2012, Reppert and colleagues established [http://monarchbase.umassmed.edu/ MonarchBase], an integrated database for the genome of ''Danaus plexippus''. The goal of the project was to make genomic and proteomic information about monarch butterflies accessible to biological and lepidopteran communities.<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1093/nar/gks1057 |title=MonarchBase: The monarch butterfly genome database |year=2012 |last1=Zhan |first1=S. |last2=Reppert |first2=S. M. |journal=Nucleic Acids Research |volume=41 |pages=D758–63 |pmid=23143105 |issue=Database issue |pmc=3531138}}</ref> In 2013, Reppert and coworkers developed a novel gene-targeting approach in monarchs that uses a zinc finger nuclease strategy to define the essential nature of CRY2 for clockwork function in lepidopterans.<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1101/gr.145599.112 |title=Efficient targeted mutagenesis in the monarch butterfly using zinc-finger nucleases |year=2012 |last1=Merlin |first1=C. |last2=Beaver |first2=L. E. |last3=Taylor |first3=O. R. |last4=Wolfe |first4=S. A. |last5=Reppert |first5=S. M. |journal=Genome Research |volume=23 |pages=159–68 |pmid=23009861 |issue=1 |pmc=3530676|url=https://kuscholarworks.ku.edu/bitstream/1808/13434/1/Merlin%20et%20al.%20-%202013%20-%20Efficient%20targeted%20mutagenesis%20in%20the%20monarch%20butterfly%20using%20zinc-finger%20nucleases.pdf }}</ref> Targeted mutagenesis of ''Cry2'' indeed resulted in the in vivo disruption of circadian behavior and the molecular clock mechanism. Nuclease strategies are powerful tools for targeting additional clock genes in monarchs and altering gene function. In 2016, Reppert collaborated with Marcus Kronforst at the University of Chicago and others to use population genetic studies to define the evolutionary history of the monarch migration.<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1038/nature13812 |title=The genetics of monarch butterfly migration and warning colouration |year=2014 |last1=Zhan |first1=Shuai |last2=Zhang |first2=Wei |last3=Niitepõld |first3=Kristjan |last4=Hsu |first4=Jeremy |last5=Fernández Haeger |first5=Juan |last6=Zalucki |first6=Myron P. |last7=Altizer |first7=Sonia |last8=de Roode |first8=Jacobus C. |last9=Reppert |first9=Steven M. |last10=Kronforst |first10= Marcus R. |journal=Nature |volume=514 |issue=7522 |pages=317–21 |pmid=25274300|pmc=4331202 |bibcode=2014Natur.514..317Z }}</ref> ==Awards and honors== * Charles King Trust Research Fellowship, 1981–1984 * Basil O'Connor Starter Scholar Research Award, March of Dimes Fund, 1981–1983 * Established Investigator Award of the [[American Heart Association]], 1985–1990 * Fellow, American Society for Clinical Investigation, elected 1987 * [[E. Mead Johnson Award]] for Outstanding Research, 1989<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.aps-spr.org/spr/Awards/EMJ.htm |title=SPR Member Info |access-date=2010-08-30 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100822075701/http://www.aps-spr.org/SPR/Awards/EMJ.htm |archive-date=2010-08-22 }}</ref> * NIH-NICHD MERIT Award, 1992–2002 * Honorary master's degree, [[Harvard University]], 1993 * Higgins Family Professor of Neuroscience, University of Massachusetts Medical School, 2001–2017 * President, Society for Research on Biological Rhythms, 2004 * Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, elected 2011<ref>{{Cite web | url=http://www.aaas.org/aboutaaas/fellows/ |title = AAAS Honorary Fellows}}</ref> * Gregor J. Mendel Honorary Medal for Merit in the Biological Sciences from the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, 2012<ref>{{cite web|last=Czech News Agency (ČTK)|title=Academy of Science awards American researcher Reppert|url=http://praguemonitor.com/2013/03/21/academy-science-awards-american-researcher-reppert|publisher=Prague Daily Monitor}}</ref> * Honorary doctorate, University of South Bohemia, Czech Republic, 2013<ref>{{cite web|title=Neurobiolog Steven M. Reppert převzal čestný doktorát Jihočeské univerzity|url=http://www.jcu.cz/news/neurobiolog-steven-m.-reppert-ziskal-cestny-doktorat-jihoceske-univerzity|publisher=University of South Bohemia}}</ref> * Chancellor’s Medal for Distinguished Scholarship, University of Massachusetts Medical School, 2016<ref> {{Cite news | last = Larson | first = Lisa M. | title = Convocation 2016 recognizes Chancellor's Medal recipients; faculty invested as named chairs | newspaper = UMassMedNOW | location = Worcester, MA | date = 14 September 2016 | url = https://umassmed.edu/news/news-archives/2016/09/convocation-2016-recognizes-chancellors-medal-recipients-faculty-invested-as-named-chairs/ | accessdate = 16 June 2019}}</ref> == References == {{Reflist}} == External links == * [http://reppertlab.org/ Reppert Lab website] * [https://profiles.umassmed.edu/display/133192 UMass Medical School faculty page] * {{PubMedAuthorSearch|Reppert|SM}} * {{Google Scholar id |id=IDUsWwIAAAAJ }} * [http://monarchbase.umassmed.edu/ MonarchBase] * [https://www.ibiology.org/ecology/butterfly-migration/ Steven Reppert Seminar: Neurobiology of Monarch Butterfly Migration] {{Authority control}} {{DEFAULTSORT:Reppert, Steven M.}} [[Category:Living people]] [[Category:American neuroscientists]] [[Category:UMass Chan Medical School faculty]] [[Category:1946 births]] [[Category:Chronobiologists]] [[Category:University of Nebraska Medical Center alumni]] [[Category:People from Sioux City, Iowa]] [[Category:People from Pender, Nebraska]]'
New page wikitext, after the edit (new_wikitext)
'{{short description|American neuroscientist (born 1946)}} {{Infobox scientist | name = Steven M. Reppert | image = | caption = | birth_date = {{Birth date and age|1946|9|4}} | birth_place = [[Sioux City]], [[Iowa]] | death_date = | death_place = | children = | spouse = | citizenship = United States | ethnicity = | fields = {{Plainlist| * [[Chronobiology]] * [[Neuroethology]] }} | workplaces = {{Plainlist| * Chair of the Department of Neurobiology at [[University of Massachusetts Medical School|UMass Medical School]] (2001–2013) * Higgins Family Professor of Neuroscience UMass Medical School (2001–2017) * Distinguished Professor of Neurobiology at UMass Medical School (2014–2017) * Distinguished Professor Emeritus of Neurobiology at UMass Medical School (2017–)}} | alma_mater = {{Plainlist| * [[University of Nebraska–Lincoln|University of Nebraska, Lincoln]] * [[University of Nebraska Medical Center|University of Nebraska, College of Medicine, Omaha]] * [[Harvard Medical School|Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts]] }} | doctoral_advisor = | academic_advisors = | notable_students = | known_for = {{Plainlist| * Fetal circadian clock * Melatonin receptors * Circadian clock mechanism in mammals * Monarch butterfly sun compass }} | awards = }} '''Steven M. Reppert''' (born September 4, 1946) is an American [[neuroscientist]] known for his contributions to the fields of [[chronobiology]] and [[neuroethology]]. His research has focused primarily on the physiological, cellular, and molecular basis of [[circadian rhythms]] in mammals and more recently on the navigational mechanisms of migratory [[monarch butterflies]]. He was the Higgins Family Professor of Neuroscience at the [[University of Massachusetts Medical School]] from 2001 to 2017, and from 2001 to 2013 was the founding chair of the Department of Neurobiology. Reppert stepped down as chair in 2014. He is currently distinguished professor emeritus of neurobiology. ==Biography== ===Early life=== Steven Reppert grew up in the village of [[Pender, Nebraska]], and graduated from Pender Public High School in 1964. His interest in science began in childhood with the [[cecropia moth]]—an insect made famous by Harvard biologist [[Carroll Williams|Carroll M. Williams]], who used the moth in his pioneering work on the role of [[juvenile hormone]] in molting and metamorphosis.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Pappenheimer|first=A.M. Jr|title=Carroll Milton Williams: December 2, 1916–October 11, 1991|journal=NAS Biographical Memoirs|year=1995|volume=68|pages=413–434|pmid=11616356|url=http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=4990&page=413}}</ref> Reppert continues to rear cecropia from egg to adult each summer. ===Education and career=== Reppert received his BS and MD in 1973 (with distinction) from the [[University of Nebraska Medical Center|University of Nebraska College of Medicine]] and was elected as a medical student to the [[Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Medical Society]]. From 1973 to 1976 he did an internship and residency in pediatrics at the [[Massachusetts General Hospital]]. From 1976 to 1979 Reppert was a postdoctoral fellow in [[neuroendocrinology]] at the [[National Institute of Child Health and Human Development]] in Bethesda, Maryland, in David C. Klein's laboratory, which focuses on the pineal gland and circadian biology.<ref>{{cite web|title=Neuroscience@NIH|url=http://neuroscience.nih.gov/Lab.asp?Org_ID=273|publisher=NIH|accessdate=April 24, 2013}}</ref> Reppert was on the faculty at the Massachusetts General Hospital and [[Harvard Medical School]] beginning in 1979 and was promoted to professor in 1993; he directed the Laboratory of Developmental [[Chronobiology]] at the Massachusetts General Hospital from 1983 to 2001, when he moved to the University of Massachusetts Medical School.<ref>{{Cite web | url=http://www.umassmed.edu/neuroscience/faculty/reppert.cfm |title = Search &#124; Profiles RNS}}</ref> ==Research== Reppert has published more than 180 papers. He is the principal inventor on seven patents derived from his research.<ref>{{Cite web | url=http://www.patentbuddy.com/Inventor/Reppert-Steven-M/1437735 |title = Steven M Reppert, Inventor, Newton, MA}}</ref> ===Fetal circadian clocks=== [[Animal testing on rodents|Rodent studies]] have shown that the master brain clock in the [[suprachiasmatic nucleus]] (SCN) is functional in the fetus before the fetal brain is capable of registering the presence of light. Reppert and colleagues reported that the fetal SCN is entrained to the light-dark cycle before the retinohypothalamic pathway innervates the SCN from the eye.<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1111/j.1749-6632.1985.tb11808.x |title=Maternal Entrainment of the Developing Orcadian Systema |year=1985 |last1=Reppert |first1=Steven M. |journal=Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences |volume=453 |issue=1 |pages=162–9 |pmid=3865580|bibcode=1985NYASA.453..162R |s2cid=45891069 }}</ref> This finding indicates that the mother, and her entrainment to ambient light-dark cycles, provides the necessary information to the fetus for synchronization. As Reppert states, “Mom is functioning as the transducer for the fetal circadian system. She takes in light information to her circadian system, and then that is communicated to the fetal circadian system.”<ref>{{cite news|last=Klinkenborg|first=Verlyn|title=Awakening to Sleep|url=https://www.nytimes.com/1997/01/05/magazine/awakening-to-sleep.html?pagewanted=all&src=pm|newspaper=New York Times|date=5 January 1997}}</ref> This fetal entrainment persists into the postnatal period and ensures that neonatal behavioral patterns are properly tuned with the environment. Dopamine and melatonin can both act as perinatal maternal entraining signals.<ref>{{cite book |doi=10.1007/978-1-4615-1201-1_10 |chapter=Development of Mammalian Circadian Rhythms |title=Handbook of Behavioral Neurobiology |series=Handbook of Behavioral Neurobiology |year=2001 |last1=Davis |first1=Fred C. |last2=Reppert |first2=Steven M. |isbn=978-0-306-46504-8 |volume=12 |pages=[https://archive.org/details/sensoryintegrati0000unse/page/247 247–90] |chapter-url=https://archive.org/details/sensoryintegrati0000unse/page/247 }}</ref> ===Mammalian circadian clocks=== Steven Reppert and colleagues have made seminal contributions that provide insight into the mammalian circadian clock mechanism. ====Cell autonomy in the SCN==== Reppert and colleagues discovered that the [[Suprachiasmatic nucleus|SCN]] contains a large population of autonomous, single-cell circadian oscillators.<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1016/0896-6273(95)90214-7 |title=Individual neurons dissociated from rat suprachiasmatic nucleus express independently phased circadian firing rhythms |year=1995 |last1=Welsh |first1=David K |last2=Logothetis |first2=Diomedes E |last3=Meister |first3=Markus |last4=Reppert |first4=Steven M |journal=Neuron |volume=14 |issue=4 |pages=697–706 |pmid=7718233|doi-access=free }}</ref> They cultured cells from neonatal rat SCN on fixed [[microelectrode array]] that allowed them to monitor individual SCN [[neuron]] activity in culture. Circadian rhythms expressed by neurons in the same culture were not synchronized, indicating that they functioned independently of one another. ====Functions of mouse clock genes: PERIOD2 and PERIOD3==== Reppert and coworkers also discovered the mouse clock genes ''mPer2'' and ''mPer3'' and defined their functions. They found that the [[PER2|mPER2]] and [[PER3|mPER3]] proteins, as well as the previously discovered [[PER1|mPER1]], share several regions of homology with one another and with Drosophila PER.<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80417-1 |title=Two period Homologs: Circadian Expression and Photic Regulation in the Suprachiasmatic Nuclei |year=1997 |last1=Shearman |first1=Lauren P. |last2=Zylka |first2=Mark J. |last3=Weaver |first3=David R. |last4=Kolakowski Jr |first4=Lee F. |last5=Reppert |first5=Steven M. |journal=Neuron |volume=19 |issue=6 |pages=1261–9 |pmid=9427249|doi-access=free }}</ref><ref name=Zylka>{{cite journal |doi=10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80492-4 |title=Three period Homologs in Mammals: Differential Light Responses in the Suprachiasmatic Circadian Clock and Oscillating Transcripts Outside of Brain |year=1998 |last1=Zylka |first1=Mark J |last2=Shearman |first2=Lauren P |last3=Weaver |first3=David R |last4=Reppert |first4=Steven M |journal=Neuron |volume=20 |issue=6 |pages=1103–10 |pmid=9655499|doi-access=free }}</ref> Reppert and coworkers found different light responses among the three ''Per'' genes.<ref name="Zylka"/> Unlike ''mPer1'' and ''mPer2'' mRNA levels, ''mPer3'' mRNA levels are not acutely altered by light exposure during the subjective night. They also found that ''mPer1–3'' are widely expressed in tissues outside the brain, including the liver, skeletal muscles, and testis. To determine the function of mPER1–3, Reppert and colleagues disrupted the three genes encoding them.<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00302-6 |title=Differential Functions of mPer1, mPer2, and mPer3 in the SCN Circadian Clock |year=2001 |last1=Bae |first1=Kiho |last2=Jin |first2=Xiaowei |last3=Maywood |first3=Elizabeth S. |last4=Hastings |first4=Michael H. |last5=Reppert |first5=Steven M. |last6=Weaver |first6=David R. |journal=Neuron |volume=30 |issue=2 |pages=525–36 |pmid=11395012|doi-access=free }}</ref> Using double-mutant mice, they showed that mPER3 functions outside the core circadian clockwork, whereas both mPER1 and mPER2 are necessary for rhythmicity. ====Negative transcriptional feedback loop==== Reppert and colleagues discovered that the two mouse [[cryptochrome]]s, mCRY1 and mCRY2, function as the primary transcriptional repressors of clock gene expression, and the mPER proteins are necessary for CRY nuclear translocation.<ref name=Kune>{{cite journal |doi=10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81014-4 |title=MCRY1 and mCRY2 Are Essential Components of the Negative Limb of the Circadian Clock Feedback Loop |year=1999 |last1=Kume |first1=Kazuhiko |last2=Zylka |first2=Mark J |last3=Sriram |first3=Sathyanarayanan |last4=Shearman |first4=Lauren P |last5=Weaver |first5=David R |last6=Jin |first6=Xiaowei |last7=Maywood |first7=Elizabeth S |last8=Hastings |first8=Michael H |last9=Reppert |first9=Steven M |journal=Cell |volume=98 |issue=2 |pages=193–205 |pmid=10428031 |doi-access=free }}</ref> This work provided the first portrayal of a negative transcriptional feedback loop as the major gear driving the mouse molecular clock.<ref>{{cite web|last=Kreeger|first=Karen Young|title=Collecting Clues to the Mammalian Clock|url=http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/13970/title/Collecting-Clues-to-the-Mammalian-Clock/|publisher=The Scientist}}</ref> ====Interlocking transcriptional feedback loops==== Reppert and colleagues found that the core mechanisms for the SCN in mammals consist of interacting positive and negative [[Transcription (genetics)|transcriptional]] feedback loops.<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1126/science.288.5468.1013 |title=Interacting Molecular Loops in the Mammalian Circadian Clock |year=2000 |last1=Shearman |first1=L. P. |journal=Science |volume=288 |issue=5468 |pages=1013–9 |pmid=10807566 |last2=Sriram |first2=S |last3=Weaver |first3=DR |last4=Maywood |first4=ES |last5=Chaves |first5=I |last6=Zheng |first6=B |last7=Kume |first7=K |last8=Lee |first8=CC |last9=Van Der Horst |first9=GT |last10=Hastings |first10=MH |last11=Reppert |first11=SM |bibcode=2000Sci...288.1013S }}</ref> The first loop is an autoregulatory negative transcriptional feedback loop in which the mCRY proteins negatively regulate ''mCry'' and ''mPer'' gene transcription. The second interlocking feedback loop involves the rhythmic regulation of ''Bmal1''. Rhythmicity of ''Bmal1'' is not necessary for clockwork function, but it helps modulate the robustness of rhythmicity. ====CLOCK and NPAS2==== Reppert and colleagues discovered that the transcription factors CLOCK and [[NPAS2]] have overlapping roles in the SCN, revealing a new and unexpected role for NPAS2.<ref name=DeBruyne>{{cite journal |doi=10.1038/nn1884 |title=CLOCK and NPAS2 have overlapping roles in the suprachiasmatic circadian clock |year=2007 |last1=Debruyne |first1=Jason P |last2=Weaver |first2=David R |last3=Reppert |first3=Steven M |journal=Nature Neuroscience |volume=10 |issue=5 |pages=543–5 |pmid=17417633 |pmc=2782643}}</ref> His lab observed that CLOCK-deficient mice continue to have behavioral and molecular rhythms, which showed that CLOCK is not essential for circadian rhythm in locomotor activity in mice. They then determined, by investigating CLOCK-deficient mice, that NPAS2 is a [[paralog]] of CLOCK and can functionally substitute CLOCK by dimerizing with BMAL1. Finally, they found—by investigating CLOCK-deficient, NPAS2-deficient, and double-mutant mice—that circadian rhythms in peripheral oscillators require CLOCK.<ref name="DeBruyne"/> Thus, there is a fundamental difference between CLOCK and NPAS2 that is tissue dependent. ===Mammalian melatonin receptors=== In 1994, Reppert [[Cloning|cloned]] human and sheep [[Melatonin receptor 1A|Mel<sub>1a</sub>]] [[melatonin receptor]], the first in a family of [[G protein-coupled receptor|GPCR]]s that bind the pineal hormone [[melatonin]], and localized its expression in the mammalian brain to the [[suprachiasmatic nucleus|SCN]] and the [[Pars tuberalis|hypophyseal pars tuberalis]].<ref name=Reppert_1994>{{cite journal |doi=10.1016/0896-6273(94)90055-8 |title=Cloning and characterization of a mammalian melatonin receptor that mediates reproductive and circadian responses |year=1994 |last1=Reppert |first1=Steven M. |last2=Weaver |first2=David R. |last3=Ebisawa |first3=Takashi |journal=Neuron |volume=13 |issue=5 |pages=1177–85 |pmid=7946354|s2cid=19805481 }}</ref> Mel<sub>1a</sub> is believed to be responsible for the circadian effects of melatonin and the reproductive actions in seasonal breeding mammals.<ref name="Reppert_1994" /> In 1995, Reppert cloned and characterized the [[Melatonin receptor 1B|Mel<sub>1b</sub>]] melatonin receptor. He and colleagues found that the receptor was predominantly expressed in the [[retina]], where it is believed to modify light-dependent retinal functions.<ref name=Reppert_1995>{{cite journal |doi=10.1073/pnas.92.19.8734 |title=Molecular characterization of a second melatonin receptor expressed in human retina and brain: The Mel1b melatonin receptor |year=1995 |last1=Reppert |first1=S. M. |last2=Godson |first2=C. |last3=Mahle |first3=C. D. |last4=Weaver |first4=D. R. |last5=Slaugenhaupt |first5=S. A. |last6=Gusella |first6=J. F. |journal=Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences |volume=92 |issue=19 |pages=8734–8 |pmid=7568007 |pmc=41041|bibcode=1995PNAS...92.8734R |doi-access=free }}</ref> They identified outbred populations of [[Djungarian hamster|Siberian hamsters]] that lacked functional Mel<sub>1b</sub> but maintained circadian and reproductive responses to melatonin;<ref>{{cite journal |pmid=8923472 |year=1996 |last1=Weaver |first1=DR |last2=Liu |first2=C |last3=Reppert |first3=SM |title=Nature's knockout: The Mel1b receptor is not necessary for reproductive and circadian responses to melatonin in Siberian hamsters |volume=10 |issue=11 |pages=1478–87 |journal=Molecular Endocrinology |doi=10.1210/MEND.10.11.8923472|doi-access=free }}</ref> these data indicate that Mel<sub>1b</sub> is not necessary for the circadian and reproductive actions of melatonin, which instead depend on Mel<sub>1a</sub>. Elucidation of the molecular nature of the melatonin receptors has facilitated definition of their ligand-binding characteristics and aided the development of melatonin analogs that are now used to treat sleep disorders and depression.<ref name="Reppert_1994" /> ===Insect cryptochromes=== In 2003, Reppert began investigating the functional and evolutionary properties of the CRY protein in the monarch butterfly. He identified two ''Cry'' genes in the monarch, ''Cry1'' and ''Cry2''.<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1016/j.cub.2005.11.030 |title=The two CRYs of the butterfly |year=2005 |last1=Zhu |first1=Haisun |last2=Yuan |first2=Quan |last3=Briscoe |first3=Oren |last4=Froy |first4=Amy |last5=Casselman |first5=Steven M. |journal=Current Biology |volume=15 |issue=23 |pages=R953–4 |pmid=16332522 |last6=Reppert |first6=SM|doi-access=free }}</ref> His work demonstrated that the monarch CRY1 protein is functionally analogous to ''Drosophila'' CRY, the blue-light photoreceptor necessary for [[Entrainment (chronobiology)|photoentrainment]] in the fly. He also demonstrated that monarch CRY2 is functionally analogous to vertebrate CRYs and that monarch CRY2 acts as a potent transcriptional [[repressor]] in the [[Circadian clock#Transcriptional and non-transcriptional control|circadian clock transcriptional translation feedback loop]] of the butterfly, as his group previously showed for the two mouse CRYs.<ref name="Kune"/> These data propose the existence of a novel [[circadian clock]] unique to some non-drosophilid insects that possesses mechanisms characteristic of both the ''Drosophila'' and the mammalian clocks.<ref name=Reppert_2008>{{cite journal |doi=10.1371/journal.pbio.0060004 |title=Cryptochromes Define a Novel Circadian Clock Mechanism in Monarch Butterflies That May Underlie Sun Compass Navigation |year=2008 |last1=Zhu |first1=Haisun |last2=Sauman |first2=Ivo |last3=Yuan |first3=Quan |last4=Casselman |first4=Amy |last5=Emery-Le |first5=Myai |last6=Emery |first6=Patrick |last7=Reppert |first7=Steven M. |journal=PLOS Biology |volume=6 |issue=1 |pages=e4 |pmid=18184036 |pmc=2174970}}</ref> Other insects, such as bees and ants, possess only a vertebrate-like CRY, and their circadian clocks are even more vertebrate like.<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1093/molbev/msm011 |title=Insect Cryptochromes: Gene Duplication and Loss Define Diverse Ways to Construct Insect Circadian Clocks |year=2007 |last1=Yuan |first1=Q. |last2=Metterville |first2=D. |last3=Briscoe |first3=A. D. |last4=Reppert |first4=S. M. |journal=Molecular Biology and Evolution |volume=24 |issue=4 |pages=948–55 |pmid=17244599|doi-access=free }}</ref> ''Drosophila'' is the only known insect that does not possess a vertebrate-like CRY. In 2008, Reppert discovered the necessity of ''Cry'' for light-dependent [[magnetoreception]] responses in ''Drosophila''. He also showed that magnetoreception requires UVA/blue light, the spectrum corresponding with the [[action spectrum]] of ''Drosophila'' CRY.<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1038/nature07183 |title=Cryptochrome mediates light-dependent magnetosensitivity in Drosophila |year=2008 |last1=Gegear |first1=Robert J. |last2=Casselman |first2=Amy |last3=Waddell |first3=Scott |last4=Reppert |first4=Steven M. |journal=Nature |volume=454 |issue=7207 |pages=1014–8 |pmid=18641630 |pmc=2559964|bibcode=2008Natur.454.1014G }}</ref>. However, a recent study shows that ''Drosophila'' has no magnetoreception |year=2023 |last1=Bassetto |first1=Marc |last2=Reichl |first2=Thomas |last3=Kobylkov |first3=Dmitry |last4=Kattnig |first4=Daniel R. |last5=Winklhofer |first5=Michael |last6=Hore |first6=P.J. |last7=Mouritsen |first7=Henrik|journal=Nature |volume=620|pages=595-599 These data were the first to genetically implicate CRY as a component of the input pathway or the chemical-based pathway of magnetoreception. Applying these findings to his work with the monarch, Reppert has shown that both monarch CRY1 and CRY2 proteins, when transgenically expressed in CRY-deficient flies, successfully restore magnetoreception function. These results propose the presence of a CRY-mediated magnetosensitivity system in monarchs that may act in concordance with the sun compass to aid navigation. In 2011, Reppert also discovered that human CRY2 can substitute as a functional magnetoreceptor in CRY-deficient flies, a discovery that warrants additional research into magnetosensitivity in humans.<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1038/ncomms1364 |title=Human cryptochrome exhibits light-dependent magnetosensitivity |year=2011 |last1=Foley |first1=Lauren E. |last2=Gegear |first2=Robert J. |last3=Reppert |first3=Steven M. |journal=Nature Communications |volume=2 |pages=356– |pmid=21694704 |pmc=3128388 |issue=6|bibcode=2011NatCo...2..356F }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=Insects that put Google Maps to shame |author=Matt Ridley |url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424127887323375204578269963079963082 |newspaper=Wall Street Journal |date=February 1, 2013 |accessdate=September 28, 2013 }}</ref> ===Monarch butterfly migration=== Since 2002, Reppert and coworkers have pioneered the study of the biological basis of [[monarch butterfly]] migration.<ref name="pmid19591650">{{cite journal |doi=10.1186/jbiol153 |title=Clocks, cryptochromes and Monarch migrations |year=2009 |last1=Kyriacou |first1=Charalambos P |journal=Journal of Biology |volume=8 |issue=6 |pages=55 |pmid=19591650 |pmc=2737371}}</ref><ref name="pmid20627420">{{cite journal |doi=10.1016/j.tins.2010.04.004 |title=Navigational mechanisms of migrating monarch butterflies |year=2010 |last1=Reppert |first1=Steven M. |last2=Gegear |first2=Robert J. |last3=Merlin |first3=Christine |journal=Trends in Neurosciences |volume=33 |issue=9 |pages=399–406 |pmid=20627420 |pmc=2929297}}</ref> Each fall, millions of monarchs from the eastern United States and southeastern Canada migrate as much as 4,000&nbsp;km to overwinter in roosts in Central Mexico.<ref name="pmid20627420"/> Monarch migration is not a learned activity, given that migrants flying south are at least two generations removed from the previous year's migrants.<ref>{{cite journal |pmid=9317405 |year=1996 |last1=Brower |first1=L |author-link=Lincoln Brower|title=Monarch butterfly orientation: Missing pieces of a magnificent puzzle |volume=199 |issue=1 |pages=93–103 |journal=The Journal of Experimental Biology|doi=10.1242/jeb.199.1.93 |doi-access=free }}</ref> Thus, migrating monarchs must have some genetically based navigational mechanism. Reppert and colleagues have focused on a novel [[circadian clock]] mechanism and its role in time-compensated sun compass orientation, a major navigational strategy that butterflies use during their fall migration.<ref name="pmid20627420"/> Using clock-shift experiments, they showed that the circadian clock must interact with the sun compass to enable migrants to maintain a southerly flight direction as the sun moves daily across the sky.<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1126/science.1084874 |title=Illuminating the Circadian Clock in Monarch Butterfly Migration |year=2003 |last1=Froy |first1=O. |journal=Science |volume=300 |issue=5623 |pages=1303–5 |pmid=12764200 |last2=Gotter |first2=AL |last3=Casselman |first3=AL |last4=Reppert |first4=SM|bibcode=2003Sci...300.1303F |s2cid=12011719 }}</ref> Reppert collaborated with Eli Shlizerman at the University of Washington and Daniel Forger at the University of Michigan to propose a working mathematical model of the time-compensated sun compass.<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1016/j.celrep.2016.03.057 |title=Neural Integration Underlying a Time-Compensated Sun Compass in the Migratory Monarch Butterfly |year=2016 |last1=Shlizerman |first1=E |journal=Cell Reports |volume=15 |issue=4 |pages=683–91 |pmid=27149852 |pmc=5063661 |last2=Phillips-Portillo |first2=J|last3=Forger |first3=DB |last4=Reppert |first4=SM}}</ref> ====Clockwork mechanism==== The monarch clockwork model, which has both ''Drosophila''-like and mammal-like aspects, is unique because it employs two distinct CRY proteins. As presented in a 2010 review paper,<ref name="pmid20627420"/> the clock mechanism, on a gene/protein level, operates as follows: * In an autoregulatory transcriptional feedback loop, heterodimers of CLOCK (CLK) and CYCLE (CYC) form and drive the transcription of the ''Per'', ''Tim'', and ''Cry2'' genes. * TIM, PER, and CRY2 proteins are translated and form complexes in the cytoplasm. * 24 hours later, CRY2 returns to the nucleus and inhibits CLK:CYC transcription. * Meanwhile, PER is progressively phosphorylated, which may aid CRY2 translocation into the nucleus. * CRY1 protein is a circadian photoreceptor that, when exposed to light, causes TIM degradation, allowing light to gain access to the central clock mechanism for photic entrainment. ====Antennal clocks==== Reppert’s lab expanded upon [[Fred Urquhart|Fred Urquhart's]] postulation that antennae play a role in monarch migration. In 2009 Reppert’s lab reported that, despite previous assumptions that the time-compensation clocks are located exclusively in the brain, there are also clocks located in the antennae, which "are necessary for proper time-compensated sun compass orientation in migratory monarch butterflies.”<ref name=Reppert_2009>{{cite journal |doi=10.1126/science.1176221 |title=Antennal Circadian Clocks Coordinate Sun Compass Orientation in Migratory Monarch Butterflies |year=2009 |last1=Merlin |first1=C. |last2=Gegear |first2=R. J. |last3=Reppert |first3=S. M. |journal=Science |volume=325 |issue=5948 |pages=1700–4 |pmid=19779201 |pmc=2754321|bibcode=2009Sci...325.1700M }}</ref> They concluded this by comparing the sun compass orientation of monarch migrants with intact antennae and those whose antennae had been removed.<ref name="Reppert_2009"/> Reppert's lab also studied antennae in vitro and found that antennal clocks can be directly entrained by light and can function independently from the brain.<ref name="Reppert_2009"/> Further research is needed, however, on the interaction between the circadian clocks in monarch butterfly's antennae and the sun compass in the brain. In 2012, Reppert and colleagues determined that only a single antenna is sufficient for sun compass orientation. They did so by painting one antenna black to cause discordant light exposure between the two antennae; the single not-painted antenna was sufficient for orientation. All four clock genes (''per'', ''tim'', ''cry1'', and ''cry2'') were expressed in the various studied areas of the antenna, suggesting that "light entrained circadian clocks are distributed throughout the length of the monarch butterfly antenna."<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1038/ncomms1965 |title=Discordant timing between antennae disrupts sun compass orientation in migratory monarch butterflies |year=2012 |last1=Guerra |first1=Patrick A. |last2=Merlin |first2=Christine |last3=Gegear |first3=Robert J. |last4=Reppert |first4=Steven M. |journal=Nature Communications |volume=3 |pages=958 |pmid=22805565 |issue=7 |pmc=3962218|bibcode=2012NatCo...3..958G }}</ref> In 2013, Reppert and colleagues showed that spring remigrants also use an antenna-dependent time-compensated sun compass to direct their northward flight from Mexico to the southern United States.<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1016/j.cub.2013.01.052 |title=Coldness Triggers Northward Flight in Remigrant Monarch Butterflies |year=2013 |last1=Guerra |first1=Patrick A. |last2=Reppert |first2=Steven M. |journal=Current Biology |volume=23 |issue=5 |pages=419–23 |pmid=23434279|doi-access=free }}</ref> ====Sun compass==== Using anatomical and electrophysiological studies of the monarch butterfly brain, Reppert and colleagues have indicated that the central complex, a midline structure in the central brain, is likely the site of the sun compass.<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1002/cne.23214 |title=Anatomical basis of sun compass navigation II: The neuronal composition of the central complex of the monarch butterfly |year=2013 |last1=Heinze |first1=Stanley |last2=Florman |first2=Jeremy |last3=Asokaraj |first3=Surainder |last4=El Jundi |first4=Basil |last5=Reppert |first5=Steven M. |journal=Journal of Comparative Neurology |volume=521 |issue=2 |pages=267–98 |pmid=22886450|s2cid=205682692 }}</ref> ====Magnetic compass==== Reppert and colleagues showed that migratory monarchs can use a light-dependent, inclination-based, magnetic compass for navigation on overcast days.<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1038/ncomms5164 |title=A magnetic compass aids monarch butterfly migration |year=2014 |last1=Guerra |first1=Patrick A. |last2=Gegear |first2=Robert J. |last3=Reppert |first3=Steven M. |journal=Nature Communications |volume=5 |pages=4164 |pmid=24960099|pmc=4090716 |bibcode=2014NatCo...5.4164G }}</ref> ====Temperature==== Reppert and coworkers showed that fall migrants prematurely exposed to overwintering-like coldness reverse their flight orientation to the north. The temperature microenvironment at the overwintering site is essential for successful completion of the migration cycle: without cold exposure, aged migrants continue to orient to the south. The discovery that coldness triggers the northward flight direction in spring remigrants underscores how vulnerable the migration may be to climate change.<ref>{{cite news |title=Climate change may disrupt monarch butterfly migration |author=Nayantara Narayanan |author2=ClimateWire |url=http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=climate-change-may-disrupt-monarch-butterfly-migration |newspaper=Scientific American |date=February 22, 2013 |accessdate=September 28, 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=Chill turns monarchs north |author=Meghan Rosen |url=http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/348485/description/Chill_turns_monarchs_north |newspaper=ScienceNews |date=March 23, 2013 |accessdate=September 28, 2013 }}</ref> ====Monarch butterfly genome==== In 2011, Reppert and colleagues presented the draft sequence of the monarch butterfly genome and a set 16,866 protein-coding genes. This is the first characterized genome of a butterfly and of a long-distance migratory species.<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1016/j.cell.2011.09.052 |title=The Monarch Butterfly Genome Yields Insights into Long-Distance Migration |year=2011 |last1=Zhan |first1=Shuai |last2=Merlin |first2=Christine |last3=Boore |first3=Jeffrey L. |last4=Reppert |first4=Steven M. |journal=Cell |volume=147 |issue=5 |pages=1171–85 |pmid=22118469 |pmc=3225893}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1016/j.cell.2011.11.009 |title=A Genome Befitting a Monarch |year=2011 |last1=Stensmyr |first1=Marcus C. |last2=Hansson |first2=Bill S. |journal=Cell |volume=147 |issue=5 |pages=970–2 |pmid=22118454|doi-access=free }}</ref><ref> {{Cite news | last = Johnson | first = Carolyn Y. | title = Monarch butterfly genome sequenced | newspaper = The Boston Globe | location = Boston, MA | date = 23 November 2011 | url = http://www.boston.com/Boston/whitecoatnotes/2011/11/monarch-butterfly-genome-sequenced/gF1mFBxXCLUOHigi2FOHPM/index.html | accessdate = 9 January 2012}}</ref> In 2012, Reppert and colleagues established [http://monarchbase.umassmed.edu/ MonarchBase], an integrated database for the genome of ''Danaus plexippus''. The goal of the project was to make genomic and proteomic information about monarch butterflies accessible to biological and lepidopteran communities.<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1093/nar/gks1057 |title=MonarchBase: The monarch butterfly genome database |year=2012 |last1=Zhan |first1=S. |last2=Reppert |first2=S. M. |journal=Nucleic Acids Research |volume=41 |pages=D758–63 |pmid=23143105 |issue=Database issue |pmc=3531138}}</ref> In 2013, Reppert and coworkers developed a novel gene-targeting approach in monarchs that uses a zinc finger nuclease strategy to define the essential nature of CRY2 for clockwork function in lepidopterans.<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1101/gr.145599.112 |title=Efficient targeted mutagenesis in the monarch butterfly using zinc-finger nucleases |year=2012 |last1=Merlin |first1=C. |last2=Beaver |first2=L. E. |last3=Taylor |first3=O. R. |last4=Wolfe |first4=S. A. |last5=Reppert |first5=S. M. |journal=Genome Research |volume=23 |pages=159–68 |pmid=23009861 |issue=1 |pmc=3530676|url=https://kuscholarworks.ku.edu/bitstream/1808/13434/1/Merlin%20et%20al.%20-%202013%20-%20Efficient%20targeted%20mutagenesis%20in%20the%20monarch%20butterfly%20using%20zinc-finger%20nucleases.pdf }}</ref> Targeted mutagenesis of ''Cry2'' indeed resulted in the in vivo disruption of circadian behavior and the molecular clock mechanism. Nuclease strategies are powerful tools for targeting additional clock genes in monarchs and altering gene function. In 2016, Reppert collaborated with Marcus Kronforst at the University of Chicago and others to use population genetic studies to define the evolutionary history of the monarch migration.<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1038/nature13812 |title=The genetics of monarch butterfly migration and warning colouration |year=2014 |last1=Zhan |first1=Shuai |last2=Zhang |first2=Wei |last3=Niitepõld |first3=Kristjan |last4=Hsu |first4=Jeremy |last5=Fernández Haeger |first5=Juan |last6=Zalucki |first6=Myron P. |last7=Altizer |first7=Sonia |last8=de Roode |first8=Jacobus C. |last9=Reppert |first9=Steven M. |last10=Kronforst |first10= Marcus R. |journal=Nature |volume=514 |issue=7522 |pages=317–21 |pmid=25274300|pmc=4331202 |bibcode=2014Natur.514..317Z }}</ref> ==Awards and honors== * Charles King Trust Research Fellowship, 1981–1984 * Basil O'Connor Starter Scholar Research Award, March of Dimes Fund, 1981–1983 * Established Investigator Award of the [[American Heart Association]], 1985–1990 * Fellow, American Society for Clinical Investigation, elected 1987 * [[E. Mead Johnson Award]] for Outstanding Research, 1989<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.aps-spr.org/spr/Awards/EMJ.htm |title=SPR Member Info |access-date=2010-08-30 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100822075701/http://www.aps-spr.org/SPR/Awards/EMJ.htm |archive-date=2010-08-22 }}</ref> * NIH-NICHD MERIT Award, 1992–2002 * Honorary master's degree, [[Harvard University]], 1993 * Higgins Family Professor of Neuroscience, University of Massachusetts Medical School, 2001–2017 * President, Society for Research on Biological Rhythms, 2004 * Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, elected 2011<ref>{{Cite web | url=http://www.aaas.org/aboutaaas/fellows/ |title = AAAS Honorary Fellows}}</ref> * Gregor J. Mendel Honorary Medal for Merit in the Biological Sciences from the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, 2012<ref>{{cite web|last=Czech News Agency (ČTK)|title=Academy of Science awards American researcher Reppert|url=http://praguemonitor.com/2013/03/21/academy-science-awards-american-researcher-reppert|publisher=Prague Daily Monitor}}</ref> * Honorary doctorate, University of South Bohemia, Czech Republic, 2013<ref>{{cite web|title=Neurobiolog Steven M. Reppert převzal čestný doktorát Jihočeské univerzity|url=http://www.jcu.cz/news/neurobiolog-steven-m.-reppert-ziskal-cestny-doktorat-jihoceske-univerzity|publisher=University of South Bohemia}}</ref> * Chancellor’s Medal for Distinguished Scholarship, University of Massachusetts Medical School, 2016<ref> {{Cite news | last = Larson | first = Lisa M. | title = Convocation 2016 recognizes Chancellor's Medal recipients; faculty invested as named chairs | newspaper = UMassMedNOW | location = Worcester, MA | date = 14 September 2016 | url = https://umassmed.edu/news/news-archives/2016/09/convocation-2016-recognizes-chancellors-medal-recipients-faculty-invested-as-named-chairs/ | accessdate = 16 June 2019}}</ref> == References == {{Reflist}} == External links == * [http://reppertlab.org/ Reppert Lab website] * [https://profiles.umassmed.edu/display/133192 UMass Medical School faculty page] * {{PubMedAuthorSearch|Reppert|SM}} * {{Google Scholar id |id=IDUsWwIAAAAJ }} * [http://monarchbase.umassmed.edu/ MonarchBase] * [https://www.ibiology.org/ecology/butterfly-migration/ Steven Reppert Seminar: Neurobiology of Monarch Butterfly Migration] {{Authority control}} {{DEFAULTSORT:Reppert, Steven M.}} [[Category:Living people]] [[Category:American neuroscientists]] [[Category:UMass Chan Medical School faculty]] [[Category:1946 births]] [[Category:Chronobiologists]] [[Category:University of Nebraska Medical Center alumni]] [[Category:People from Sioux City, Iowa]] [[Category:People from Pender, Nebraska]]'
Unified diff of changes made by edit (edit_diff)
'@@ -83,5 +83,5 @@ His work demonstrated that the monarch CRY1 protein is functionally analogous to ''Drosophila'' CRY, the blue-light photoreceptor necessary for [[Entrainment (chronobiology)|photoentrainment]] in the fly. He also demonstrated that monarch CRY2 is functionally analogous to vertebrate CRYs and that monarch CRY2 acts as a potent transcriptional [[repressor]] in the [[Circadian clock#Transcriptional and non-transcriptional control|circadian clock transcriptional translation feedback loop]] of the butterfly, as his group previously showed for the two mouse CRYs.<ref name="Kune"/> These data propose the existence of a novel [[circadian clock]] unique to some non-drosophilid insects that possesses mechanisms characteristic of both the ''Drosophila'' and the mammalian clocks.<ref name=Reppert_2008>{{cite journal |doi=10.1371/journal.pbio.0060004 |title=Cryptochromes Define a Novel Circadian Clock Mechanism in Monarch Butterflies That May Underlie Sun Compass Navigation |year=2008 |last1=Zhu |first1=Haisun |last2=Sauman |first2=Ivo |last3=Yuan |first3=Quan |last4=Casselman |first4=Amy |last5=Emery-Le |first5=Myai |last6=Emery |first6=Patrick |last7=Reppert |first7=Steven M. |journal=PLOS Biology |volume=6 |issue=1 |pages=e4 |pmid=18184036 |pmc=2174970}}</ref> Other insects, such as bees and ants, possess only a vertebrate-like CRY, and their circadian clocks are even more vertebrate like.<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1093/molbev/msm011 |title=Insect Cryptochromes: Gene Duplication and Loss Define Diverse Ways to Construct Insect Circadian Clocks |year=2007 |last1=Yuan |first1=Q. |last2=Metterville |first2=D. |last3=Briscoe |first3=A. D. |last4=Reppert |first4=S. M. |journal=Molecular Biology and Evolution |volume=24 |issue=4 |pages=948–55 |pmid=17244599|doi-access=free }}</ref> ''Drosophila'' is the only known insect that does not possess a vertebrate-like CRY. -In 2008, Reppert discovered the necessity of ''Cry'' for light-dependent [[magnetoreception]] responses in ''Drosophila''. He also showed that magnetoreception requires UVA/blue light, the spectrum corresponding with the [[action spectrum]] of ''Drosophila'' CRY.<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1038/nature07183 |title=Cryptochrome mediates light-dependent magnetosensitivity in Drosophila |year=2008 |last1=Gegear |first1=Robert J. |last2=Casselman |first2=Amy |last3=Waddell |first3=Scott |last4=Reppert |first4=Steven M. |journal=Nature |volume=454 |issue=7207 |pages=1014–8 |pmid=18641630 |pmc=2559964|bibcode=2008Natur.454.1014G }}</ref> +In 2008, Reppert discovered the necessity of ''Cry'' for light-dependent [[magnetoreception]] responses in ''Drosophila''. He also showed that magnetoreception requires UVA/blue light, the spectrum corresponding with the [[action spectrum]] of ''Drosophila'' CRY.<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1038/nature07183 |title=Cryptochrome mediates light-dependent magnetosensitivity in Drosophila |year=2008 |last1=Gegear |first1=Robert J. |last2=Casselman |first2=Amy |last3=Waddell |first3=Scott |last4=Reppert |first4=Steven M. |journal=Nature |volume=454 |issue=7207 |pages=1014–8 |pmid=18641630 |pmc=2559964|bibcode=2008Natur.454.1014G }}</ref>. However, a recent study shows that ''Drosophila'' has no magnetoreception |year=2023 |last1=Bassetto |first1=Marc |last2=Reichl |first2=Thomas |last3=Kobylkov |first3=Dmitry |last4=Kattnig |first4=Daniel R. |last5=Winklhofer |first5=Michael |last6=Hore |first6=P.J. |last7=Mouritsen |first7=Henrik|journal=Nature |volume=620|pages=595-599 These data were the first to genetically implicate CRY as a component of the input pathway or the chemical-based pathway of magnetoreception. Applying these findings to his work with the monarch, Reppert has shown that both monarch CRY1 and CRY2 proteins, when transgenically expressed in CRY-deficient flies, successfully restore magnetoreception function. These results propose the presence of a CRY-mediated magnetosensitivity system in monarchs that may act in concordance with the sun compass to aid navigation. In 2011, Reppert also discovered that human CRY2 can substitute as a functional magnetoreceptor in CRY-deficient flies, a discovery that warrants additional research into magnetosensitivity in humans.<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1038/ncomms1364 |title=Human cryptochrome exhibits light-dependent magnetosensitivity |year=2011 |last1=Foley |first1=Lauren E. |last2=Gegear |first2=Robert J. |last3=Reppert |first3=Steven M. |journal=Nature Communications |volume=2 |pages=356– |pmid=21694704 |pmc=3128388 |issue=6|bibcode=2011NatCo...2..356F }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=Insects that put Google Maps to shame |author=Matt Ridley |url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424127887323375204578269963079963082 |newspaper=Wall Street Journal |date=February 1, 2013 |accessdate=September 28, 2013 }}</ref> '
New page size (new_size)
36368
Old page size (old_size)
36028
Size change in edit (edit_delta)
340
Lines added in edit (added_lines)
[ 0 => 'In 2008, Reppert discovered the necessity of ''Cry'' for light-dependent [[magnetoreception]] responses in ''Drosophila''. He also showed that magnetoreception requires UVA/blue light, the spectrum corresponding with the [[action spectrum]] of ''Drosophila'' CRY.<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1038/nature07183 |title=Cryptochrome mediates light-dependent magnetosensitivity in Drosophila |year=2008 |last1=Gegear |first1=Robert J. |last2=Casselman |first2=Amy |last3=Waddell |first3=Scott |last4=Reppert |first4=Steven M. |journal=Nature |volume=454 |issue=7207 |pages=1014–8 |pmid=18641630 |pmc=2559964|bibcode=2008Natur.454.1014G }}</ref>. However, a recent study shows that ''Drosophila'' has no magnetoreception |year=2023 |last1=Bassetto |first1=Marc |last2=Reichl |first2=Thomas |last3=Kobylkov |first3=Dmitry |last4=Kattnig |first4=Daniel R. |last5=Winklhofer |first5=Michael |last6=Hore |first6=P.J. |last7=Mouritsen |first7=Henrik|journal=Nature |volume=620|pages=595-599' ]
Lines removed in edit (removed_lines)
[ 0 => 'In 2008, Reppert discovered the necessity of ''Cry'' for light-dependent [[magnetoreception]] responses in ''Drosophila''. He also showed that magnetoreception requires UVA/blue light, the spectrum corresponding with the [[action spectrum]] of ''Drosophila'' CRY.<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1038/nature07183 |title=Cryptochrome mediates light-dependent magnetosensitivity in Drosophila |year=2008 |last1=Gegear |first1=Robert J. |last2=Casselman |first2=Amy |last3=Waddell |first3=Scott |last4=Reppert |first4=Steven M. |journal=Nature |volume=454 |issue=7207 |pages=1014–8 |pmid=18641630 |pmc=2559964|bibcode=2008Natur.454.1014G }}</ref>' ]
Whether or not the change was made through a Tor exit node (tor_exit_node)
false
Unix timestamp of change (timestamp)
'1693834089'