Edit count of the user (user_editcount ) | 487 |
Name of the user account (user_name ) | 'Tuckertwo' |
Type of the user account (user_type ) | 'named' |
Age of the user account (user_age ) | 370710255 |
Groups (including implicit) the user is in (user_groups ) | [
0 => '*',
1 => 'user',
2 => 'autoconfirmed'
] |
Whether or not a user is editing through the mobile interface (user_mobile ) | false |
Whether the user is editing from mobile app (user_app ) | false |
Page ID (page_id ) | 39401577 |
Page namespace (page_namespace ) | 0 |
Page title without namespace (page_title ) | 'Spring Back Compensation' |
Full page title (page_prefixedtitle ) | 'Spring Back Compensation' |
Edit protection level of the page (page_restrictions_edit ) | [] |
Page age in seconds (page_age ) | 357126704 |
Action (action ) | 'edit' |
Edit summary/reason (summary ) | 'Copyedited lede section. Still needs work.' |
Time since last page edit in seconds (page_last_edit_age ) | 243199 |
Old content model (old_content_model ) | 'wikitext' |
New content model (new_content_model ) | 'wikitext' |
Old page wikitext, before the edit (old_wikitext ) | '{{Short description|Machining technique}}
'''Spring Back Compensation''' occurs due to the plastic-elastic characteristic of a metal, because it is typical that any deformation of [[sheet metal]] at [[room temperature]] will have both elastic and plastic deformation. After the metal workpiece is removed from the tool or deformation implement, the elastic deformation will be released and only the plastic deformation will remain. When a metal forming tool is planned and designed to deform a workpiece, the shape imparted by the tool will be a combination of elastic and plastic deformation. The release of the elastic deformation is the spring back often observed at the end of a metal forming process.
The spring back has to be compensated to achieve an accurate result.
Usually, that is realized by over-bending the material corresponding to the magnitude of the spring back. That means for the practical side of the bending process; the bending former, enters deeper into the bending prism.
For other [[sheet metal]] forming operations like [[Drawing (manufacturing)|drawing]], it entails deforming the sheet metal past the planned net shape of the part, so that when the spring back is released from the part, the plastic deformation in that part delivers the desired shape of the part. In the case of complex tools, the spring back has to be already considered in the engineering and construction phases. Therefore, complex software simulations are used. Frequently this is not enough to deliver the desired results. In such cases practical experiments are done, using the trial-and-error plus experience method to correct the tool. However, the results (work pieces) are only stable, if all influencing factors are the same.<ref>{{Cite book|title = Optimierung der Produkt- und Prozessentwicklung|publisher = ETH Zürich|year = 1999|isbn = 978-3728126962|pages = 67}}</ref>
This mainly includes:
* Yield strength of the sheet
* Chemical composition of the sheet
* Structure of the material (e.g., direction of grain during production process)
* Wear of tools
* Material temperature
* Aging processes of the raw material (significant for aluminum and copper)
* Deformation rate
The list of factors may be continued. Spring back assessment of final formed products is a difficult problem and is affected by the complexity of the formed shape. The NUMISHEET 93 conference benchmark problem involves the draw bending of a U-channel using three measured parameters. Parameter less approaches have been proposed for more complex geometries but need validation.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Raghavan |date=September 2013 |title=Numerical assessment of springback for the deep drawing process by level set interpolation using shape manifolds |journal=International Journal of Material Forming |doi=10.1007/s12289-013-1145-8|volume=7 |issue=4 |pages=487–501|s2cid=255585418 |display-authors=etal}}</ref>
==Practical example: electronic bending tools with spring-back compensation==
{{Multiple issues|section=yes|
{{advert|section|date=November 2017}}
{{unreferenced section|date=November 2017}}
}}
[[File:Bending tool for Standard bending EHRT.jpg|thumb|Electronic bending tool with integrated angle measurement and spring-back compensation]]
Manufactures of electrical assembly's produce components that are flat, using copper and aluminum. The mechanical properties of copper and aluminum are very different and require different programmable inputs in order to achieve the same dimensional characteristics. This variation in inputs is due to spring-back compensation.
Bending technology for flat material which measures each bend angle and provides spring back compensation is required. This gives the bend angle of flat materials true accuracy. This is attained by using bending prisms with electronic angular measurement technology. While bending two flat bolds supporting the material turn around. The bolds are directly connected to the angular sensors. A computer or rather the machine control then calculates the required final stroke. The spring back of every bend is compensated regardless of material type.
If the measuring accuracy is 0.1º, a high angle accuracy of +/- 0.2º is achieved instantly with the first workpiece without any rework. Because no adjustments are required, material waste amounts and setup times drop considerably. Even inconsistencies within a single piece of material are automatically adjusted.
==See also==
* [[Bending]]
* [[Bending (metalworking)]]
* [[Bending machine (manufacturing)]]
* [[Numerical control]]
==References==
{{Reflist}}
* M. Weck: ''Werkzeugmaschinen Maschinenarten und Anwendungsbereiche (VDI-Buch''Springer Vieweg Verlag, 6. Aufl. 2005 (2. August 2005), {{ISBN|3540225048}}
* ETH Zürich: ''Optimierung der Produkt- und Prozessentwicklung.'' vdf Hochschulvlg, 1999, {{ISBN|3728126969}}.
* EHRT: ''Brochure Bending machines and tools.'', Rheinbreitbach, 2012.
[[Category:Metal forming]]
[[Category:Fabrication (metal)]]
[[Category:Metalworking tools]]' |
New page wikitext, after the edit (new_wikitext ) | '{{Short description|Machining technique}}
''''Spring back compensation''' is used in [[metal forming]] to ensure that the final shape assumed by a piece of metal after being removed from a forming tool is the shape desired. Typically, when metal is being formed at room temperature, it will undergo both [[plastic deformation|plastic]] and [[elastic deformation]]. After the metal workpiece is removed from the tool or deformation implement, the elastic deformation will be released and only the plastic deformation will remain; thus, the workpiece will "spring back" to a position between its original position and the position into which it was formed. Usually, spring back compensation is realized by over-bending the material by an amount corresponding to the magnitude of the spring back.
When bending metal, spring back compensation is done by pushing the workpiece further into the die. For other [[sheet metal]] forming operations like [[Drawing (manufacturing)|drawing]], it entails deforming the sheet metal past the planned shape of the part so that when the part's elastic deformation is released, the plastic deformation in that part delivers the desired shape of the part. In the case of complex tools, spring back must be considered in the engineering and construction phases. Complex software simulations are often used, but frequently this is not enough to deliver the desired results. In such cases practical experiments are done, using trial-and-error and experience to correct the process. However, the results of the process are only stable if all influencing factors are the same.<ref>{{Cite book|title = Optimierung der Produkt- und Prozessentwicklung|publisher = ETH Zürich|year = 1999|isbn = 978-3728126962|pages = 67}}</ref> These include such things as yield strength, chemical composition, aging processes, and structure of the workpiece; tool wear; and temperature and deformation rate during the forming process.
Spring back assessment of final formed products is a difficult problem and is affected by the complexity of the formed shape. The NUMISHEET 93 conference benchmark problem involves the draw bending of a U-channel using three measured parameters. Parameter-less approaches have been proposed for more complex geometries but they need validation.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Raghavan |date=September 2013 |title=Numerical assessment of springback for the deep drawing process by level set interpolation using shape manifolds |journal=International Journal of Material Forming |doi=10.1007/s12289-013-1145-8|volume=7 |issue=4 |pages=487–501|s2cid=255585418 |display-authors=etal}}</ref>
==Practical example: electronic bending tools with spring-back compensation==
{{unreferenced section|date=November 2017}}
[[File:Bending tool for Standard bending EHRT.jpg|thumb|Electronic bending tool with integrated angle measurement and spring-back compensation]]
Manufacturing of electrical assemblies produces components that are flat, using copper and aluminum. The mechanical properties of copper and aluminum are very different and require different programmable inputs in order to achieve the same dimensional characteristics.
Bending technology for flat material which measures each bend angle and provides spring back compensation is required. This gives the bend angle of flat materials true accuracy. This is attained by using bending prisms with electronic angular measurement technology. While bending two flat bolds supporting the material turn around. The bolds are directly connected to the angular sensors. A computer or rather the machine control then calculates the required final stroke. The spring back of every bend is compensated regardless of material type.
If the measuring accuracy is 0.1º, a high angle accuracy of +/- 0.2º is achieved instantly with the first workpiece without any rework. Because no adjustments are required, material waste amounts and setup times drop considerably. Even inconsistencies within a single piece of material are automatically adjusted.
==See also==
* [[Bending]]
* [[Bending (metalworking)]]
* [[Bending machine (manufacturing)]]
* [[Numerical control]]
==References==
{{Reflist}}
* M. Weck: ''Werkzeugmaschinen Maschinenarten und Anwendungsbereiche (VDI-Buch''Springer Vieweg Verlag, 6. Aufl. 2005 (2. August 2005), {{ISBN|3540225048}}
* EHRT: ''Brochure Bending machines and tools.'', Rheinbreitbach, 2012.
[[Category:Metal forming]]
[[Category:Fabrication (metal)]]
[[Category:Metalworking tools]]' |
Unified diff of changes made by edit (edit_diff ) | '@@ -1,29 +1,14 @@
{{Short description|Machining technique}}
-'''Spring Back Compensation''' occurs due to the plastic-elastic characteristic of a metal, because it is typical that any deformation of [[sheet metal]] at [[room temperature]] will have both elastic and plastic deformation. After the metal workpiece is removed from the tool or deformation implement, the elastic deformation will be released and only the plastic deformation will remain. When a metal forming tool is planned and designed to deform a workpiece, the shape imparted by the tool will be a combination of elastic and plastic deformation. The release of the elastic deformation is the spring back often observed at the end of a metal forming process.
-The spring back has to be compensated to achieve an accurate result.
-Usually, that is realized by over-bending the material corresponding to the magnitude of the spring back. That means for the practical side of the bending process; the bending former, enters deeper into the bending prism.
+''''Spring back compensation''' is used in [[metal forming]] to ensure that the final shape assumed by a piece of metal after being removed from a forming tool is the shape desired. Typically, when metal is being formed at room temperature, it will undergo both [[plastic deformation|plastic]] and [[elastic deformation]]. After the metal workpiece is removed from the tool or deformation implement, the elastic deformation will be released and only the plastic deformation will remain; thus, the workpiece will "spring back" to a position between its original position and the position into which it was formed. Usually, spring back compensation is realized by over-bending the material by an amount corresponding to the magnitude of the spring back.
-For other [[sheet metal]] forming operations like [[Drawing (manufacturing)|drawing]], it entails deforming the sheet metal past the planned net shape of the part, so that when the spring back is released from the part, the plastic deformation in that part delivers the desired shape of the part. In the case of complex tools, the spring back has to be already considered in the engineering and construction phases. Therefore, complex software simulations are used. Frequently this is not enough to deliver the desired results. In such cases practical experiments are done, using the trial-and-error plus experience method to correct the tool. However, the results (work pieces) are only stable, if all influencing factors are the same.<ref>{{Cite book|title = Optimierung der Produkt- und Prozessentwicklung|publisher = ETH Zürich|year = 1999|isbn = 978-3728126962|pages = 67}}</ref>
+When bending metal, spring back compensation is done by pushing the workpiece further into the die. For other [[sheet metal]] forming operations like [[Drawing (manufacturing)|drawing]], it entails deforming the sheet metal past the planned shape of the part so that when the part's elastic deformation is released, the plastic deformation in that part delivers the desired shape of the part. In the case of complex tools, spring back must be considered in the engineering and construction phases. Complex software simulations are often used, but frequently this is not enough to deliver the desired results. In such cases practical experiments are done, using trial-and-error and experience to correct the process. However, the results of the process are only stable if all influencing factors are the same.<ref>{{Cite book|title = Optimierung der Produkt- und Prozessentwicklung|publisher = ETH Zürich|year = 1999|isbn = 978-3728126962|pages = 67}}</ref> These include such things as yield strength, chemical composition, aging processes, and structure of the workpiece; tool wear; and temperature and deformation rate during the forming process.
-This mainly includes:
-
-* Yield strength of the sheet
-* Chemical composition of the sheet
-* Structure of the material (e.g., direction of grain during production process)
-* Wear of tools
-* Material temperature
-* Aging processes of the raw material (significant for aluminum and copper)
-* Deformation rate
-
-The list of factors may be continued. Spring back assessment of final formed products is a difficult problem and is affected by the complexity of the formed shape. The NUMISHEET 93 conference benchmark problem involves the draw bending of a U-channel using three measured parameters. Parameter less approaches have been proposed for more complex geometries but need validation.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Raghavan |date=September 2013 |title=Numerical assessment of springback for the deep drawing process by level set interpolation using shape manifolds |journal=International Journal of Material Forming |doi=10.1007/s12289-013-1145-8|volume=7 |issue=4 |pages=487–501|s2cid=255585418 |display-authors=etal}}</ref>
+Spring back assessment of final formed products is a difficult problem and is affected by the complexity of the formed shape. The NUMISHEET 93 conference benchmark problem involves the draw bending of a U-channel using three measured parameters. Parameter-less approaches have been proposed for more complex geometries but they need validation.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Raghavan |date=September 2013 |title=Numerical assessment of springback for the deep drawing process by level set interpolation using shape manifolds |journal=International Journal of Material Forming |doi=10.1007/s12289-013-1145-8|volume=7 |issue=4 |pages=487–501|s2cid=255585418 |display-authors=etal}}</ref>
==Practical example: electronic bending tools with spring-back compensation==
-{{Multiple issues|section=yes|
-{{advert|section|date=November 2017}}
{{unreferenced section|date=November 2017}}
-}}
[[File:Bending tool for Standard bending EHRT.jpg|thumb|Electronic bending tool with integrated angle measurement and spring-back compensation]]
-Manufactures of electrical assembly's produce components that are flat, using copper and aluminum. The mechanical properties of copper and aluminum are very different and require different programmable inputs in order to achieve the same dimensional characteristics. This variation in inputs is due to spring-back compensation.
+Manufacturing of electrical assemblies produces components that are flat, using copper and aluminum. The mechanical properties of copper and aluminum are very different and require different programmable inputs in order to achieve the same dimensional characteristics.
Bending technology for flat material which measures each bend angle and provides spring back compensation is required. This gives the bend angle of flat materials true accuracy. This is attained by using bending prisms with electronic angular measurement technology. While bending two flat bolds supporting the material turn around. The bolds are directly connected to the angular sensors. A computer or rather the machine control then calculates the required final stroke. The spring back of every bend is compensated regardless of material type.
@@ -40,5 +25,4 @@
{{Reflist}}
* M. Weck: ''Werkzeugmaschinen Maschinenarten und Anwendungsbereiche (VDI-Buch''Springer Vieweg Verlag, 6. Aufl. 2005 (2. August 2005), {{ISBN|3540225048}}
-* ETH Zürich: ''Optimierung der Produkt- und Prozessentwicklung.'' vdf Hochschulvlg, 1999, {{ISBN|3728126969}}.
* EHRT: ''Brochure Bending machines and tools.'', Rheinbreitbach, 2012.
' |
New page size (new_size ) | 4500 |
Old page size (old_size ) | 5022 |
Size change in edit (edit_delta ) | -522 |
Lines added in edit (added_lines ) | [
0 => '''''Spring back compensation''' is used in [[metal forming]] to ensure that the final shape assumed by a piece of metal after being removed from a forming tool is the shape desired. Typically, when metal is being formed at room temperature, it will undergo both [[plastic deformation|plastic]] and [[elastic deformation]]. After the metal workpiece is removed from the tool or deformation implement, the elastic deformation will be released and only the plastic deformation will remain; thus, the workpiece will "spring back" to a position between its original position and the position into which it was formed. Usually, spring back compensation is realized by over-bending the material by an amount corresponding to the magnitude of the spring back.',
1 => 'When bending metal, spring back compensation is done by pushing the workpiece further into the die. For other [[sheet metal]] forming operations like [[Drawing (manufacturing)|drawing]], it entails deforming the sheet metal past the planned shape of the part so that when the part's elastic deformation is released, the plastic deformation in that part delivers the desired shape of the part. In the case of complex tools, spring back must be considered in the engineering and construction phases. Complex software simulations are often used, but frequently this is not enough to deliver the desired results. In such cases practical experiments are done, using trial-and-error and experience to correct the process. However, the results of the process are only stable if all influencing factors are the same.<ref>{{Cite book|title = Optimierung der Produkt- und Prozessentwicklung|publisher = ETH Zürich|year = 1999|isbn = 978-3728126962|pages = 67}}</ref> These include such things as yield strength, chemical composition, aging processes, and structure of the workpiece; tool wear; and temperature and deformation rate during the forming process.',
2 => 'Spring back assessment of final formed products is a difficult problem and is affected by the complexity of the formed shape. The NUMISHEET 93 conference benchmark problem involves the draw bending of a U-channel using three measured parameters. Parameter-less approaches have been proposed for more complex geometries but they need validation.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Raghavan |date=September 2013 |title=Numerical assessment of springback for the deep drawing process by level set interpolation using shape manifolds |journal=International Journal of Material Forming |doi=10.1007/s12289-013-1145-8|volume=7 |issue=4 |pages=487–501|s2cid=255585418 |display-authors=etal}}</ref>',
3 => 'Manufacturing of electrical assemblies produces components that are flat, using copper and aluminum. The mechanical properties of copper and aluminum are very different and require different programmable inputs in order to achieve the same dimensional characteristics.'
] |
Lines removed in edit (removed_lines ) | [
0 => ''''Spring Back Compensation''' occurs due to the plastic-elastic characteristic of a metal, because it is typical that any deformation of [[sheet metal]] at [[room temperature]] will have both elastic and plastic deformation. After the metal workpiece is removed from the tool or deformation implement, the elastic deformation will be released and only the plastic deformation will remain. When a metal forming tool is planned and designed to deform a workpiece, the shape imparted by the tool will be a combination of elastic and plastic deformation. The release of the elastic deformation is the spring back often observed at the end of a metal forming process. ',
1 => 'The spring back has to be compensated to achieve an accurate result.',
2 => 'Usually, that is realized by over-bending the material corresponding to the magnitude of the spring back. That means for the practical side of the bending process; the bending former, enters deeper into the bending prism.',
3 => 'For other [[sheet metal]] forming operations like [[Drawing (manufacturing)|drawing]], it entails deforming the sheet metal past the planned net shape of the part, so that when the spring back is released from the part, the plastic deformation in that part delivers the desired shape of the part. In the case of complex tools, the spring back has to be already considered in the engineering and construction phases. Therefore, complex software simulations are used. Frequently this is not enough to deliver the desired results. In such cases practical experiments are done, using the trial-and-error plus experience method to correct the tool. However, the results (work pieces) are only stable, if all influencing factors are the same.<ref>{{Cite book|title = Optimierung der Produkt- und Prozessentwicklung|publisher = ETH Zürich|year = 1999|isbn = 978-3728126962|pages = 67}}</ref>',
4 => 'This mainly includes:',
5 => '',
6 => '* Yield strength of the sheet',
7 => '* Chemical composition of the sheet',
8 => '* Structure of the material (e.g., direction of grain during production process)',
9 => '* Wear of tools',
10 => '* Material temperature',
11 => '* Aging processes of the raw material (significant for aluminum and copper)',
12 => '* Deformation rate',
13 => '',
14 => 'The list of factors may be continued. Spring back assessment of final formed products is a difficult problem and is affected by the complexity of the formed shape. The NUMISHEET 93 conference benchmark problem involves the draw bending of a U-channel using three measured parameters. Parameter less approaches have been proposed for more complex geometries but need validation.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Raghavan |date=September 2013 |title=Numerical assessment of springback for the deep drawing process by level set interpolation using shape manifolds |journal=International Journal of Material Forming |doi=10.1007/s12289-013-1145-8|volume=7 |issue=4 |pages=487–501|s2cid=255585418 |display-authors=etal}}</ref>',
15 => '{{Multiple issues|section=yes|',
16 => '{{advert|section|date=November 2017}}',
17 => '}}',
18 => 'Manufactures of electrical assembly's produce components that are flat, using copper and aluminum. The mechanical properties of copper and aluminum are very different and require different programmable inputs in order to achieve the same dimensional characteristics. This variation in inputs is due to spring-back compensation.',
19 => '* ETH Zürich: ''Optimierung der Produkt- und Prozessentwicklung.'' vdf Hochschulvlg, 1999, {{ISBN|3728126969}}.'
] |
Whether or not the change was made through a Tor exit node (tor_exit_node ) | false |
Unix timestamp of change (timestamp ) | '1725824903' |