Edit filter log

Details for log entry 4256505

02:35, 16 February 2011: 69.65.229.231 (talk) triggered filter 351, performing the action "edit" on Judicial interpretation. Actions taken: Warn; Filter description: Text added after categories and interwiki (examine)

Changes made in edit

Action parameters

Variable	Value
Name of the user account (`user_name`)	'69.65.229.231'
Page ID (`page_id`)	30870726
Page namespace (`page_namespace`)	0
Page title without namespace (`page_title`)	'Judicial interpretation'
Full page title (`page_prefixedtitle`)	'Judicial interpretation'
Action (`action`)	'edit'
Edit summary/reason (`summary`)	'/* See also */ '
Whether or not the edit is marked as minor (no longer in use) (`minor_edit`)	false
Old page wikitext, before the edit (`old_wikitext`)	'{{noreferences\|date=November 2010}} '''Judicial interpretation''' is a theory or mode of thought that explains how the [[judiciary]] should interpret the [[law]], particularly [[constitution]]al documents and [[legislation]] (see [[statutory interpretation]]). An interpretation which results in or supports some form of law-making role for the judiciary in interpreting the law is sometimes pejoratively characterized as [[judicial activism]], the opposite of which is judicial lethargy, with [[judicial restraint]] somewhere in between. In the [[United States]], theories of judicial interpretation range from [[originalism]] and [[strict constructionism]] to [[functionalism]]. The [[Constitution]] can be viewed as a [[Living Constitution]] or as [[The Moral Constitution]].{{fact\|date=November 2010}} ==See also== {{wikiquote}} * [[Constitutionalism]] * [[Constitutional economics]] * [[Rule according to higher law]] * [[Judicial activism]] * [[Separation of powers]] * [[Statutory interpretation]] <!-- ==References== --> {{reflist}} {{jurisprudence}} [[Category:United States Constitution\|J]] [[bg:Тълкуване на правото]] [[cs:Výklad (právo)]] [[de:Auslegung (Recht)]] [[es:Interpretación judicial]] [[he:פרשנות (משפט)]] [[ja:法解釈]] [[lt:Teisės aiškinimas]] [[pl:Wykładnia prawa]] [[ru:Толкование права]] [[sk:Výklad]] [[zh:司法解釋]]'
New page wikitext, after the edit (`new_wikitext`)	'{{noreferences\|date=November 2010}} '''Judicial interpretation''' is a theory or mode of thought that explains how the [[judiciary]] should interpret the [[law]], particularly [[constitution]]al documents and [[legislation]] (see [[statutory interpretation]]). An interpretation which results in or supports some form of law-making role for the judiciary in interpreting the law is sometimes pejoratively characterized as [[judicial activism]], the opposite of which is judicial lethargy, with [[judicial restraint]] somewhere in between. In the [[United States]], theories of judicial interpretation range from [[originalism]] and [[strict constructionism]] to [[functionalism]]. The [[Constitution]] can be viewed as a [[Living Constitution]] or as [[The Moral Constitution]].{{fact\|date=November 2010}} ==See also== {{wikiquote}} * [[Constitutionalism]] * [[Constitutional economics]] * [[Rule according to higher law]] * [[Judicial activism]] * [[Separation of powers]] * [[Statutory interpretation]] <!-- ==References== --> {{reflist}} {{jurisprudence}} [[Category:United States Constitution\|J]] [[bg:Тълкуване на правото]] [[cs:Výklad (právo)]] [[de:Auslegung (Recht)]] [[es:Interpretación judicial]] [[he:פרשנות (משפט)]] [[ja:法解釈]] [[lt:Teisės aiškinimas]] [[pl:Wykładnia prawa]] [[ru:Толкование права]] [[sk:Výklad]] [[zh:司法解釋]] sdkflsjflkd'
Whether or not the change was made through a Tor exit node (`tor_exit_node`)	0
Unix timestamp of change (`timestamp`)	1297823758