Jump to content

Edit filter log

Details for log entry 4527816

18:26, 4 April 2011: 189.11.102.83 (talk) triggered filter 33, performing the action "edit" on Talk:MXML. Actions taken: Warn; Filter description: Talk page blanking by unregistered/new user (examine)

Changes made in edit

{{WikiProject Computing|class=|importance=}}
Do you have to have a Flex license to use MXML or MXMLC (the command line AS3/MXML compiler)?

:No, you don't. The Flex SDK is free, and includes the MXMLC compiler which can compile an MXML source file into a Flash (.swf) file. [[User:24.5.179.225|24.5.179.225]] 07:08, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

"'drill-down' through an object". Is "drill down" a standard expression ? I haven't seen it before. How about replacing it by "accessing the object properties/fields" ? [[User:Fabricebaro|Fabricebaro]] ([[User talk:Fabricebaro|talk]]) 18:02, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

:Yes, "drill down" is standard terminology, and no, "accessing the object properties/fields" does NOT mean the same thing. Drilling down through an object implies going through many layers of links/pointers/references/subobjects, whatever they're called, eventually accessing the actual properties/fields/data at the end of the chain of dereferencing. [[Special:Contributions/76.243.129.217|76.243.129.217]] ([[User talk:76.243.129.217|talk]]) 18:09, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

== your experiance about working in events by using flex mxml code ==

Hi guys,
just share your experiences about working with events by using flex mxml code. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Mohanmacmilton|Mohanmacmilton]] ([[User talk:Mohanmacmilton|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Mohanmacmilton|contribs]]) 08:55, 12 May 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Code example removed ==

Why has the extended code example been removed? For me, it was always helpful as a quick reference. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/217.24.201.180|217.24.201.180]] ([[User talk:217.24.201.180|talk]]) 15:21, 30 November 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:What are you talking about? The code example is present and intact. [[User:FleetCommand|Fleet Command]] ([[User talk:FleetCommand|talk]]) 16:09, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

Action parameters

VariableValue
Name of the user account (user_name)
'189.11.102.83'
Page ID (page_id)
4300404
Page namespace (page_namespace)
1
Page title without namespace (page_title)
'MXML'
Full page title (page_prefixedtitle)
'Talk:MXML'
Action (action)
'edit'
Edit summary/reason (summary)
''
Whether or not the edit is marked as minor (no longer in use) (minor_edit)
false
Old page wikitext, before the edit (old_wikitext)
'{{WikiProject Computing|class=|importance=}} Do you have to have a Flex license to use MXML or MXMLC (the command line AS3/MXML compiler)? :No, you don't. The Flex SDK is free, and includes the MXMLC compiler which can compile an MXML source file into a Flash (.swf) file. [[User:24.5.179.225|24.5.179.225]] 07:08, 9 December 2006 (UTC) "'drill-down' through an object". Is "drill down" a standard expression ? I haven't seen it before. How about replacing it by "accessing the object properties/fields" ? [[User:Fabricebaro|Fabricebaro]] ([[User talk:Fabricebaro|talk]]) 18:02, 19 December 2007 (UTC) :Yes, "drill down" is standard terminology, and no, "accessing the object properties/fields" does NOT mean the same thing. Drilling down through an object implies going through many layers of links/pointers/references/subobjects, whatever they're called, eventually accessing the actual properties/fields/data at the end of the chain of dereferencing. [[Special:Contributions/76.243.129.217|76.243.129.217]] ([[User talk:76.243.129.217|talk]]) 18:09, 19 January 2010 (UTC) == your experiance about working in events by using flex mxml code == Hi guys, just share your experiences about working with events by using flex mxml code. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Mohanmacmilton|Mohanmacmilton]] ([[User talk:Mohanmacmilton|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Mohanmacmilton|contribs]]) 08:55, 12 May 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> == Code example removed == Why has the extended code example been removed? For me, it was always helpful as a quick reference. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/217.24.201.180|217.24.201.180]] ([[User talk:217.24.201.180|talk]]) 15:21, 30 November 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> :What are you talking about? The code example is present and intact. [[User:FleetCommand|Fleet Command]] ([[User talk:FleetCommand|talk]]) 16:09, 30 November 2010 (UTC)'
New page wikitext, after the edit (new_wikitext)
''
Whether or not the change was made through a Tor exit node (tor_exit_node)
0
Unix timestamp of change (timestamp)
1301941561