User contributions for 137.25.224.143

24 May 2022

• 03:3303:33, 24 May 2022 diff hist +81 Xi Mingze →Information leak Tags: Reverted Visual edit

30 April 2022

• 06:2506:25, 30 April 2022 diff hist 0 Li Shiji →During Emperor Taizong's reign Tag: Visual edit

17 April 2022

• 04:5404:54, 17 April 2022 diff hist 0 1938 Changsha fire →Damage

3 April 2022

• 02:0902:09, 3 April 2022 diff hist −53 Soong Mei-ling SHE COULD NOT HAVE POSSIBLY LIVED FOR 300 YEARS. COME ON PEOPLE. ESPECIALLY IF THAT VERY ARTICLE SAID SHE DIED AT 106 Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit

12 March 2022

• 03:1003:10, 12 March 2022 diff hist +10 Liaoshen campaign No edit summary Tags: Reverted Visual edit

28 February 2022

• 12:3912:39, 28 February 2022 diff hist +14 List of states with nuclear weapons →China: Corrected the information to be more accurate and truthful Tag: Visual edit

12 December 2021

• 05:3005:30, 12 December 2021 diff hist −210 Chinese Labour Corps Stop reverting truth. Upwards to 500,000 Chinese served in the Labor Corps. Some died in their service and needed to be replaced. Tags: Reverted Visual edit

21 November 2021

• 19:1019:10, 21 November 2021 diff hist +122 Chinese Labour Corps No edit summary Tags: Reverted Visual edit

5 November 2021

• 13:3513:35, 5 November 2021 diff hist −23 History of Ghana →Pan-Africanist dream: The United States does have colonialist ties with Africa. It's called Liberia. Look it up on Wikipedia. Tag: Visual edit

2 October 2021

• 19:5319:53, 2 October 2021 diff hist +244 Talk:Jackie Chan →Semi-protected edit request on 2 October 2021: new section

25 September 2021

• 14:5414:54, 25 September 2021 diff hist +121 U.S. Agency for Global Media Just added a piece of truth that people don' Tag: Reverted

15 September 2021

• 21:3821:38, 15 September 2021 diff hist +23 Battle of Chioggia Corrected incorrect naval term of sea to naval to address the naval aspect and region by specifying Mediterranean and not generally as if galley was used elsewhere or worldwide as the primary naval ship type Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 05:4605:46, 15 September 2021 diff hist +2 Zhang Zhaozhong Not capabilities but U.S. governmental political will
• 05:3505:35, 15 September 2021 diff hist −2 Zhang Zhaozhong Deleted accidental extra period and space

14 September 2021

• 22:4022:40, 14 September 2021 diff hist +126 Wang Zhen (general) →Early career: Did not delete anything. "Questioned" the source of the saying. Explained the source is written from a Han Chinese standpoint and not Uyghur Tags: Reverted Visual edit
• 16:5616:56, 14 September 2021 diff hist +10 Battle of Chioggia It wasn't the first usage generally but only in Europe. Ship based gun powder weaponry were already used in battle elsewhere in the world Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

10 September 2021

• 20:1520:15, 10 September 2021 diff hist −93 Leslie Cheung No sources. No reasoning as to why something happening in the mainland China would affect him in Hong Kong. Hence it is speculative. Unless sources are provided. It's unlikely as the reason as to why he emigrated then Tag: Visual edit

1 September 2021

• 20:0320:03, 1 September 2021 diff hist +5 Lin Biao Someone wrote some nonsense in. I corrected it Tags: Reverted Visual edit

31 August 2021

• 19:4219:42, 31 August 2021 diff hist +546 Liu Yifei →Career Tags: Reverted possible unreferenced addition to BLP Visual edit

30 August 2021

• 18:1218:12, 30 August 2021 diff hist −687 Ghulja incident →Aftermath: Source is solely based on biased propaganda media. It's veracity is questionable and hence lowers the quality of Wikipedia Tag: Reverted
• 18:1018:10, 30 August 2021 diff hist +68 Ghulja incident →Aftermath Tag: Reverted
• 18:0818:08, 30 August 2021 diff hist −89 Ghulja incident →Background: Anachronistic. If left alone - it is a lie and disinformation. If changed, it is more likely to be true Tags: Reverted Visual edit

25 August 2021

• 10:0510:05, 25 August 2021 diff hist +1,001 Melissa Chen I added neutral information 'conveniently' not added by Wikipedia in the course of you guys not wanting to expose your complicit propaganda arm collaborating with the US government. Hi from an American Tags: Reverted possible BLP issue or vandalism possible unreferenced addition to BLP Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

24 August 2021

• 15:5015:50, 24 August 2021 diff hist −466 2019 Military World Games Untrustworthy source (compromised veracity). Unverifiable. Attached to U.S. government personnel hence subject to propaganda whitewashing Tags: Reverted references removed Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

11 August 2021

• 17:3117:31, 11 August 2021 diff hist −1,256 Northern Song (960–1127) →Military: Full of fallacy explanations that believes it explains away the woes of the Song dynasty as a whole not just Northern Song. Opinionated ideas is deleted. Misunderstood Song military policy. Most likely Chinese individual miswrote many of what they tried to explain(I'm ethnically Chinese). Syntax is wrong. Diminishes quality of article section. If such fluff pieces are used. It is simply better to concise paragraphs if both are of the same standard Tag: Reverted
• 17:2617:26, 11 August 2021 diff hist −1,172 Northern Song (960–1127) →Military: Summarized in beginning of article section. Claims are not verified. A phrase of opinionated deleted Tag: Reverted
• 17:2417:24, 11 August 2021 diff hist −639 Northern Song (960–1127) →Military: Dead link, unable to verify the opinionated paragraph Tag: Reverted
• 17:2117:21, 11 August 2021 diff hist −88 Northern Song (960–1127) →Military Tag: Reverted
• 17:1817:18, 11 August 2021 diff hist +1,618 Northern Song (960–1127) →Military: To fill in for the nonsense before I deleted and will try to find sources Tag: Reverted
• 17:0117:01, 11 August 2021 diff hist −1,808 Northern Song (960–1127) →Military: Full of fluff opinionated nonsense. Does not use sources to back whoever wrote these opinions. Amateur strategist talking as if he or she knew the geopolitical realities of that time without a more grounded in reality military stratagem written or spoken by the people of then Tag: Reverted
• 16:2416:24, 11 August 2021 diff hist −1,092 Northern Song (960–1127) →Military: Full of fluff. Professed expertise understanding of the situation. Seems to not understand the section is entitled "Military". Goes on a tangent about geography and not the actual military. Tag: Reverted
• 16:2116:21, 11 August 2021 diff hist −1,603 Northern Song (960–1127) →Military: Full of fluff. Bunch of pointless drivel. The nonsense is tantamount to bullshit. Written like an amateur wannabe military strategist. I would know. I am one. I write like this. Relies upon too much supposed firsthand authoritative suggested expertise. Syntax is appallingly amateur. Detracts from the article's quality. Tag: Reverted
• 15:5215:52, 11 August 2021 diff hist −1,094 Northern Song (960–1127) →Military: Highly opinionated using erroneous beliefs to self justify their own ideas without authorative evidence on historical reality. Full of nonsense. Syntax clearly illustrates opinion and lack of evidence to bolster its beliefs. The Song dynasty did not use a system clearly derived from the Han dynasty as it 'suggests' Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 15:4815:48, 11 August 2021 diff hist −1,054 Northern Song (960–1127) →Military: Remove opinionated beliefs with no historical evidence. The citing of a novel and not structure backed by historical military literature. Limited combat effectiveness is applicable to Southern Song and not early Northern Song. Northern Song's military becomes less effective middle on. Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit

1 August 2021

• 04:5104:51, 1 August 2021 diff hist −243 Imperial Chinese Navy No edit summary

15 May 2021

• 04:0504:05, 15 May 2021 diff hist −14 Dragon Springs No edit summary Tag: Reverted
• 03:4003:40, 15 May 2021 diff hist −1,982 Maritime Militia No edit summary Tags: Reverted references removed Visual edit

10 May 2021

• 21:2421:24, 10 May 2021 diff hist −400 China Cables →Description and contents: Bias and untrustworthy insert is deleted Tags: Reverted references removed Mobile edit Mobile web edit

14 March 2021

• 08:4808:48, 14 March 2021 diff hist 0 Battle of Baekgang Imperial China, not Medieval China. Therefore, it was incorrect to use the term. Tag: Visual edit