User contributions for 68.81.226.126

7 March 2019

• 02:3202:32, 7 March 2019 diff hist −2 Kirsten Gillibrand →Appointment: Change word "transgendered" to "transgender" (which is the preferred term, and also happens to match the sources too.) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

27 June 2018

• 14:5814:58, 27 June 2018 diff hist +277 AV1 →History: Add third-party source (phoronix) to help substantiate the v1.0.0 release

26 June 2018

• 22:3622:36, 26 June 2018 diff hist +613 Talk:AV1 →Found an informative (probably not citeable-quality?) source; Seems to clarify the meaning of "reference streams" as mentioned in spec release announcement (28 March): Now that the code and spec are (pretty much) stable, maybe the reference streams will be released soon.
• 22:2822:28, 26 June 2018 diff hist +117 Talk:AV1 →Release is just a PR statement: Signing my edit
• 22:2722:27, 26 June 2018 diff hist +1,483 Talk:AV1 →Release is just a PR statement: Release is real. The repo has a v1.0.0 tag, and the spec PDF is specifically matched to the code in the repo as of the v1.0.0 tag. You can call that a bit-stream freeze of a sort if you want.

27 May 2018

• 04:1304:13, 27 May 2018 diff hist +33 AV1 →Purpose: Add tags to point out the specific flaws with this paragraph. Ideas need to hew closer to cited sources. Avoid improper synthesis. Important assertions in the article should clearly be associated with a specific source or sources, whereas the paragraph, even after improvement for neutral PoV, is unclear where (whoch sources, if any) these ideas came from. I personally think this paragraph is a nice break from too-closely-affiliated primary sources, but needs to be verifiable!

2 April 2018

• 18:3018:30, 2 April 2018 diff hist +526 Talk:AV1 →Release is just a PR statement
• 18:1418:14, 2 April 2018 diff hist +116 AV1 →History: Remove mention of certain details from the announcement for which I couldn't find any third-party/secondary sources.

29 March 2018

• 18:4418:44, 29 March 2018 diff hist +79 AV1 →History: Adding "primary inline" and "third-party inline" tags to the 28 March spec announcement reference. As far as I can tell, the "reference streams" aren't really available yet; Furthermore, I can't find any "bindings" released anywhere, so who knows whether those are released yet, or ever will be. My point being, let's please get some more good-quality, independent sources to back up what the 28 March announcement really entails. Verifiability needs work on the 28 March announcement.
• 06:3206:32, 29 March 2018 diff hist +1,282 Talk:AV1 →Found an informative (probably not citeable-quality?) source; Seems to clarify the meaning of "reference streams" as mentioned in spec release announcement (28 March): new section
• 05:4105:41, 29 March 2018 diff hist +1,926 Talk:AV1 →Ambiguous wording/meaning in cited source: "binding specification," or software "bindings"? (AV1 Spec release, March 28th): new section
• 04:5504:55, 29 March 2018 diff hist +21 AV1 →History: Link to Wikipedia's "Language bindings" page, since I think the use of the word "bindings" here may be cryptic or ambiguous to a general non-computer-programmer audience.