User contributions for 82.18.162.80

15 March 2024

• 21:3021:30, 15 March 2024 diff hist +234 User talk:82.18.162.80 No edit summary current
• 21:2621:26, 15 March 2024 diff hist +41 Birmingham Six →Consequences: No sources Tag: Reverted
• 21:2321:23, 15 March 2024 diff hist −113 Birmingham Six →Granada Television productions: IMDB is not a reliable source Tags: Reverted references removed
• 21:2121:21, 15 March 2024 diff hist +108 Birmingham Six →Granada Television productions Tag: Reverted
• 21:1721:17, 15 March 2024 diff hist +29 Birmingham Six That link doesn't work anymore Tag: Reverted
• 20:5120:51, 15 March 2024 diff hist −81 Lucy Letby Undid revision 1213903647 by Sirfurboy (talk) Yes, richard gill says that. Not the conspiracy theories online that the paragraph is about. You need to gain consensus for the inclusion of this content before reinstating Tag: Undo
• 19:1419:14, 15 March 2024 diff hist +6 Birmingham Six →Attempt to force journalist to reveal sources: cn Tag: Reverted
• 19:1119:11, 15 March 2024 diff hist +6 Birmingham Six →Consequences: cn Tag: Reverted
• 19:1019:10, 15 March 2024 diff hist +6 Birmingham Six →Appeals: cn Tag: Reverted
• 19:0919:09, 15 March 2024 diff hist +6 Birmingham Six →Appeals: cn Tag: Reverted
• 19:0819:08, 15 March 2024 diff hist +102 Birmingham Six →Trial: tag Tag: Reverted
• 19:0519:05, 15 March 2024 diff hist +6 Birmingham Six →Trial: tag Tag: Reverted
• 19:0419:04, 15 March 2024 diff hist +6 Birmingham Six →Arrests and questioning: tag Tag: Reverted
• 19:0419:04, 15 March 2024 diff hist +6 Birmingham Six →Birmingham pub bombings: tag Tag: Reverted
• 18:5718:57, 15 March 2024 diff hist −73 Birmingham Six That is not confirmed, the Balcome gang were never found legally responsible for the Guildford bombings Tag: Reverted
• 18:0418:04, 15 March 2024 diff hist −40 Lucy Letby That is already implied by 'conspiracy theorists' and 'doubting the outcome' Tag: Reverted
• 17:5517:55, 15 March 2024 diff hist −41 Lucy Letby →Doubt about conviction: Not exactly what the source says, it says the separate expert involved with de Berk thought there were similarities Tag: Reverted
• 17:0717:07, 15 March 2024 diff hist −229 Roy Meadow →Ian and Angela Gay: Citing a 1993 article for evidence of something that happened in 2005, 12 years in the future, is somewhat laughable Tags: Reverted references removed
• 17:0517:05, 15 March 2024 diff hist −342 Roy Meadow →Aftermath: Not a proper source, tag Tags: Reverted references removed
• 17:0417:04, 15 March 2024 diff hist +58 Roy Meadow →Aftermath Tag: Reverted
• 17:0317:03, 15 March 2024 diff hist +6 Roy Meadow →Aftermath Tag: Reverted
• 17:0217:02, 15 March 2024 diff hist −432 Roy Meadow →Aftermath: Providing a link to an unreliable personal website and saying in prose take a look at this site is clearly unprofessional. Otherwise unreferenced Tags: Reverted references removed
• 16:5816:58, 15 March 2024 diff hist +63 Roy Meadow →Aftermath Tag: Reverted
• 16:5316:53, 15 March 2024 diff hist +6 Roy Meadow →Aftermath: tag Tag: Reverted
• 16:5116:51, 15 March 2024 diff hist −1,892 Roy Meadow This too Tags: Reverted section blanking
• 16:5116:51, 15 March 2024 diff hist −877 Roy Meadow No citations added for weeks now. Removing Tags: Reverted section blanking
• 16:5016:50, 15 March 2024 diff hist −142 Roy Meadow →Death of Sally Clark: What the source actually says Tag: Reverted

14 March 2024

• 22:3922:39, 14 March 2024 diff hist +531 Talk:Roy Meadow →NPOV tag: new section Tags: Reverted New topic
• 22:3622:36, 14 March 2024 diff hist +24 Roy Meadow add tag - see talk Tag: Reverted
• 22:3122:31, 14 March 2024 diff hist +12 Meadow's law tags Tag: Reverted
• 22:2922:29, 14 March 2024 diff hist −30 Meadow's law →The prosecutor's fallacy: uncited section Tag: Reverted
• 22:2822:28, 14 March 2024 diff hist +6 Meadow's law →Statistical independence: tag Tag: Reverted
• 22:2722:27, 14 March 2024 diff hist −612 Meadow's law A see also link that doesn't link at all? Tag: Reverted
• 20:2320:23, 14 March 2024 diff hist +540 Talk:Lucia de Berk case →Statistics table: new section Tag: New topic
• 20:2320:23, 14 March 2024 diff hist −890 Lucia de Berk case →Statistical arguments: remove- see talk Tag: Reverted
• 17:3817:38, 14 March 2024 diff hist −281 Guildford Four and Maguire Seven →Guildford Four and Maguire Seven: The provided source never mentions this. Indeed - it's made five years before the Good Friday Agreement even happened! Tag: Reverted
• 17:3117:31, 14 March 2024 diff hist +6 Guildford Four and Maguire Seven →Appeals: tag Tag: Reverted
• 17:3117:31, 14 March 2024 diff hist +42 Guildford Four and Maguire Seven →Maguire Seven: tags Tag: Reverted
• 17:3017:30, 14 March 2024 diff hist +6 Guildford Four and Maguire Seven →Maguire Seven: tag Tag: Reverted
• 17:2817:28, 14 March 2024 diff hist −94 Guildford Four and Maguire Seven →Guildford Four: Not said in the provided source Tag: Reverted
• 17:2417:24, 14 March 2024 diff hist +84 Guildford Four and Maguire Seven →Guildford Four: tag Tag: Reverted
• 17:1917:19, 14 March 2024 diff hist −121 Guildford Four and Maguire Seven →Background: kept to just what the provided source says Tag: Reverted
• 17:1717:17, 14 March 2024 diff hist −349 Guildford Four and Maguire Seven →Appeals: Very clearly not a reliable or useable source Tag: references removed
• 17:1417:14, 14 March 2024 diff hist −1,411 Guildford Four and Maguire Seven This section has remained uncited for SEVEN years with a tag saying it needs citations Tag: section blanking
• 16:4716:47, 14 March 2024 diff hist +264 User talk:Sirfurboy →You're right: new section Tag: New topic

13 March 2024

• 22:5622:56, 13 March 2024 diff hist −50 Lucia de Berk case →Case reopened: True actually it does mention gauzes but this is what it says about it Tag: Reverted
• 22:4922:49, 13 March 2024 diff hist +29 Lucia de Berk case →Case reopened: questioned specifically for baby amber Tag: Reverted
• 22:4622:46, 13 March 2024 diff hist +88 Lucia de Berk case →Case reopened: specify that this was for Baby Amber Tag: Reverted
• 22:4222:42, 13 March 2024 diff hist −32 Lucia de Berk case →Case reopened: again what it actually says Tag: Reverted
• 22:2822:28, 13 March 2024 diff hist −376 Lucia de Berk case →Case reopened: Again, some of those things are never said by the provided source. Kept to just what the source says